Plant and Soil

, Volume 346, Issue 1–2, pp 63–78

Effectiveness of wood ash containing charcoal as a fertilizer for a forest plantation in a temperate region

  • Martín Santalla
  • Beatriz Omil
  • Roque Rodríguez-Soalleiro
  • Agustín Merino
Regular Article


Amendment of forest soils with mixed wood ash (MWA) generated in biomass power plants can prevent the depletion of soil nutrients that results from the intensive harvesting of forest plantations. Unlike fly wood ash, MWA contains charcoal and is characterized by a lower release of nutrients, so that it might be useful as a long term source of nutrients and soil organic matter. However, in order to use MWA as a fertilizer in forest systems, its effectiveness as regards supplying P and N must be improved. These aspects were studied in a 4 year-trial carried out in a Pinus radiata plantation. MWA was added alone or with mineral P, and the results were compared with those obtained with a combination of Ca(OH)2 and mineral P. The application of MWA together with mineral P fertilizer increased the nutrient supply to the trees, as revealed by the changes in nutrient concentrations, lower values of resorption efficiencies and improved tree growth. The results showed that the amounts of Ca, Mg and K supplied by the MWA were suitable for maintenance of soil reserves. However, the presence of charcoal may have decreased the availability of P. The application of the MWA led to lower soil N mineralization rates and mineral N concentrations, which may affect N-limited systems. The use of density-dependent single tree increment models enabled the positive effects on tree growth of fertilization and thinning to be distinguished. For the treatments supplemented with mineral P, multiplicative factors of 1.13 to 1.15 can be applied to obtain post-thinning predictions of 4-year single-tree basal area increments. Although MWA can be used as a long term source of nutrients, charcoal temporarily reduces the availability of P and N.


Wood ash Charcoal Fertilization Phosphorus Nitrogen Decomposition Litterfall Nutrient cycling Pinus radiata Tree growth 


  1. Albaugh TJ, Alleen L, Fox TR (2008) Nutrient use and uptake in Pinus taeda. Tree Physiol 28:1083–1098PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Augusto L, Bakker MR, Meredieu C (2008) Wood ash applications to temperate forest ecosystems—potential benefits and drawbacks. Plant Soil 306:181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball PN, MacKenzie MD, DeLuca TH, Holben WE (2010) Wildfire and charcoal enhance nitrification and ammonium-oxidizing bacterial abundance in dry montane forest soils. J Environ Qual 39:1243–1253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco JA, Imbert JB, Castillo FJ (2009) Thinning affects nutrient resorption and nutrient-use efficiency in two Pinus sylvestris stands in the Pyrenees. Ecol Appl 19:682–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campo J, Solis E, Valencia MG (2007) Litter N and P dynamics in two secondary tropical dry forests after relaxation of nutrient availability constraints. For Ecol Manage 252:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clough TJ, Condron LM (2010) Biochar and the nitrogen cycle: introduction. J Environ Qual 39:1218–1223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corre MD, Beese FO, Brumme R (2003) Soil nitrogen cycle in high nitrogen deposition forest: changes under nitrogen saturation and liming. Ecol Appl 13:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crecente F (2008) Modelo de crecimiento de árbol individual para Pinus radiata D. Don en Galicia. PhD report. Escuela Politécnica Superior, University of Santiago de Compostela, SpainGoogle Scholar
  10. Dail BD, Davidson EA, Chorover J (2001) Rapid abiotic transformation of nitrate in acid forest soil. Biogeochemistry 54:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diéguez-Aranga U, Burkhart H, Rodríguez SR (2005) Modelling dominant height growth of radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) plantations in north-western Spain. For Ecol Manage 215:271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European Communities (1986) Council directive on the protection of the environment and in particular on the soil when sewage sludge is used in agriculture (86/278 EEC). Off J Eur Communities 181:6–12Google Scholar
  13. Fernández C, Vega JA, Bara S, Beloso C, Alonso M, Fonturbel T (2009) Nitrogen mineralization after clearcutting and residue management in a second rotation Eucalyptus globulus Labill. stand in Galicia (NW Spain). Ann For Sci 66:807. doi:10.1051/forest/2009076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferreiro A, Merino A, Díaz N, Piñeiro J (2011) Improving the effectiveness of wood ash fertilization in mountain mixed pastures. Grass Forage Sci ID: 835840-715177Google Scholar
  15. Helmisaari HS, Saarsalmi A, Kukkola M (2009) Effects of wood ash and nitrogen fertilization on fine root biomass and soil and foliage nutrients in a Norway spruce stand in Finland. Plant Soil 314:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hynynen J, Burkhart HE, Allen HL (1998) Modelling tree growth in fertilized mid rotation loblolly pine plantations. For Ecol Manage 1107:213–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference Base for Soil Resources. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobson S (2003) Addition of stabilized wood ashes to Swedish coniferous stands on mineral soils-effects on stem growth and needle nutrient concentrations. Silva Fenn 37:437–450Google Scholar
  19. Jokinen HK, Kiikkila O, Fritze H (2006) Exploring the mechanisms behind elevated microbial activity after wood ash application. Soil Biom Biochem 38:2285–2291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaspari M, Garcia MN, Harms KE, Santana M, Wright SJ, Yavitt JB (2008) Multiple nutrients limits litterfall and decomposition in a tropical forest. Ecol Lett 11:35–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Krull ES, Swanston CW, Skjemstad JO, McGowan JA (2006) Importance of charcoal in determining the age and chemistry of organic carbon in surface soils. J Geophis Res-Biogescic 111 (G4): Art. No. G04001Google Scholar
  22. Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang BQ, Karlen DL (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liang BQ, Lehmann J, Sohi SP, Thies JE, O’Neill B, Trujillo L, Gaunt J, Solomon D, Grossman J, Neves EG, Luizao FJ (2010) Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in soil. Org Geochem 41:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Majdi H, Truus L, Johansson U, Nylund JE, Wallander H (2008) Effects of slash retention and wood ash addition on fine root biomass and production and fungal mycelium in a Norway spruce stand in SW Sweden. For Ecol Manage 255:2109–2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Makoto K, Tamai Y, Kim YS, Koike T (2010) Buried charcoal layer and ectomycorrhizae cooperatively promote the growth of Larix gmelinii seedlings. Plant Soil 327:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merino A, Balboa MA, Soalleiro RR, Alvarez Gonzalez JGA (2005) Nutrient exports under different harvesting regimes in fast-growing forest plantations in Southern Europe. For Ecol Manage 207:325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Merino A, Otero V, Omil B, Lastra B, Pineiro V, Gallego PP (2006) Application of wood ash compared with fertigation for improving the nutritional status and fruit production of kiwi vines. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 169:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nyakuengama JG, Downes GM, Ng J (2002) Growth and wood density responses to later-age fertilizer application in Pinus radiata. IAWA J 23:431–448Google Scholar
  29. Oleksyn J, Reich PB, Zytkowiak R, Karolewski P, Tjoelker MG (2003) Nutrient conservation increases with latitude of origin in European Pinus sylvestris populations. Oecologia 136:220–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Omil B, Pineiro V, Merino A (2007) Trace elements in soils and plants in temperate forest plantations subjected to single and multiple applications of mixed wood ash. Sci Total Environ 381:157–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ouro G, Pérez-Batallón P, Merino A (2001) Effects of silvicultural practices on nutrient status in a Pinus radiata plantation: nutrient export by tree removal and nutrient dynamics in decomposing logging residues. Ann For Sci 58:411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perez-Batallón P, Ouro G, Macias F, Merino A (2001) Initial mineralization of organic matter in a forest plantation soil following different logging residue management techniques. Ann For Sci 58:807–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pérez-Cruzado C, Solla F, Merino A, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R (2010) Analysis of growth and nutrition of a young Castanea x coudercii plantation alter application of wood bark ash. Eur J For Res 132:209–217Google Scholar
  34. Perkiömäki J, Levula T, Fritze H (2004) A reciprocal decomposition experiment of Scots pine needles 19 yr after wood ash fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 36:731–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raison RK, Connel MJ, Khanna PK (1987) Methodology for studying fluxes of soil mineral-N in situ. Soil Biol Biochem 19:521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reimann C, Ottesen RT, Andersson M, Arnoldussen A, Koller F, Englmaier P (2008) Element levels in birch and spruce wood ashes—green energy? Sci Total Environ 393:191–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saarsalmi A, Mälkönen E, Kukkola M (2004) Effects of wood ash fertilization on soil chemical properties and stand nutrient status and growth of some coniferous stands in Finland. Scand J For Res 4:217–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saarsalmi A, Smolander A, Kukkola M, Arola M (2010) Effect of wood ash and nitrogen fertilization on soil chemical properties, soil microbial processes, and stand growth in two coniferous stands in Finland. Plant Soil 331:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sánchez-Rodríguez F, López C, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R, Español E, Merino A (2002) Influence of edaphic factors on the productivity of Pinus radiata D. Don plantations in NW Spain. For Ecol Manage 171:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sardans J, Penuelas J, Roda F (2005) Changes in nutrient use efficiency, status and retranslocation in young post-fire regeneration Pinus halepensis in response to sudden N and P input, irrigation and removal of competing vegetation. Trees 19:233–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. SAS Institute Inc (2004) SAS STAT ®User’s guide. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  42. Schiemenz K, Eichler-Lobermann B (2010) Biomass ashes and their phosphorus fertilizing effect on different crops. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 87:471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shröder J, Gadow K (1999) Testing a new competition index for Maritime pine in northwestern Spain. Can J For Res 29:280–283Google Scholar
  44. Snowdon P (2002) Modelling Type 1 and Type 2 growth response in plantacions after application of fertilizer or other silvicultural treatments. For Ecol Manage 163:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Snowdon P, Waring HD (1990) Growth responses by Pinus radiata to combinations of superphosphate, urea and thinning type. For Ecol Manage 30:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Solla-Gullón F, Santalla M, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R, Merino A (2006) Nutritional status and growth of a young Pseudotsuga menziesii plantation in a temperate region after application of wood bark ash. For Ecol Manage 237:312–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Solla-Gullón F, Santalla M, Pérez-Cruzado C, Merino A, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R (2008) Response of Pinus radiata seedlings to application of mixed wood-bark ash at planting in a temperate region: nutrition and growth. For Ecol Manage 255:3873–3884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Blum WEH, Zech W (2008) Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central Amazonian Ferralsol amended with compost and charcoal. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:893–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner J, Lambert MJ, Bowman V, Knott J (1992) Two post thinning fertilizer trials in Pinus radiata in New South Wales, Australia. Fertil Res 32:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wardle DA, Nilsson M-C, Olle Zackrisson O (2008) Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus. Science 320:629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, Rillig MC (2007) Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil—concepts and mechanisms. Plant Soil 300:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martín Santalla
    • 1
  • Beatriz Omil
    • 1
  • Roque Rodríguez-Soalleiro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Agustín Merino
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Sustainable Forest Management UnitEscuela Politécnica Superior, University of Santiago de CompostelaLugoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Crop ProductionEscuela Politécnica Superior, University of Santiago de CompostelaLugoSpain
  3. 3.Department of Soil Science and Agricultural ChemistryEscuela Politécnica Superior, University of Santiago de CompostelaLugoSpain

Personalised recommendations