Plant and Soil

, Volume 345, Issue 1–2, pp 211–221 | Cite as

Spatial pattern and variability in soil N and P availability under the influence of two dominant species in a pine forest

  • Alexandra Rodríguez
  • Jorge Durán
  • Felisa Covelo
  • José María Fernández-Palacios
  • Antonio Gallardo
Regular Article


The presence of a legume in a nitrogen (N)-limited forest ecosystem may not only create “islands of N fertility” but also affect the phosphorus (P) availability. The main objective of this study was to compare the effect of a pine (Pinus canariensis) and a leguminous (Adenocarpus viscosus) species on the spatial pattern and variability of different labile organic-N (microbial biomass-N [MB-N] and dissolved organic-N [DON]), as well as inorganic-N (IN) and –P fractions (NH4-N, NO3-N, and PO4-P), in a forest soil of the Canary Islands (Spain). Assuming some litter quantity and quality differences between these two species, we expected to find higher soil labile organic-N concentrations under isolated individuals of P. canariensis than under isolated individuals of A. viscosus. We also expected to find higher concentrations and spatial dependence (percentage of total variance explained by spatial autocorrelation) of NO3-N beneath A. viscosus than beneath P. canariensis canopies, and higher spatial scaling of soil variables under the influence of P. canariensis canopies than under the presence of A. viscosus individuals. Moreover, we tested whether the soil variables measured under isolated individuals of both species showed a different spatial variability than the same soil variables measured under overlapping pine canopies inside a pine forest. To test these hypotheses, soil samples under isolated mature individuals of each species were collected in the winter and summer, whereas under a pine forest canopy, the sampling was performed only in the winter. The winter MB-N and DON concentrations were significantly higher beneath the pine individual, whereas the winter NO3-N, NO3-N-to-IN ratio, and PO4-P were significantly higher under the leguminous individual; these differences were not observed in the summer samples. We found higher spatial ranges under the pine than under the legume canopy in the winter sampling, and the spatial dependence of NO3-N was twice as high beneath the legumes as under the pines at both sampling dates. The soil spatial variability was higher (up to 17 times higher) under isolated individuals than inside the pine forest. The results of this study suggest that both the morphological and physiological characteristics of P. canariensis and A. viscosus, as well as the spatial pattern of P. canariensis, may influence the spatial pattern and variability of soil resources.


Pinus canariensis Adenocarpus viscosus Microbial biomass-N Dissolved organic-N Inorganic-N Extractable-P 



This study was financed by the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología of the Spanish government and by the grants REN2003-08620-C02-01 and CGL2006-13665-C02-01. Alexandra Rodríguez Pereiras was funded by a graduate student fellowship from the Galician (NW Spain) government. We thank Rocío Paramá, Rosana Estévez, Javier Méndez, Gustavo Morales and Feliciano Martínez for their assistance with the soil sampling and chemical analyses. We are grateful to Jesús Rodríguez and Jordan Jessop for their assistance. Local government authorities (Cabildo Insular de La Palma) provided us with lodging, four-wheel drive vehicles, and other facilities to perform the research on the island; we especially thank Félix Medina for his help with the field effort.


  1. Anderson TM, McNaughton SJ, Ritchie ME (2004) Scale-dependent relationships between the spatial distribution of a limiting resource and plant species diversity in an African grassland ecosystem. Oecologia 139:277–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonovics J, Clay K, Schmitt J (1987) The measurement of small-scale environmental heterogeneity using clonal transplants of Anthoxanthum odoratum and Danthonia spicata. Oecologia 71:601–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binkley D, Sollins P, Bell R, Sachs D, Myrold D (1992) Biogeochemistry of adjacent conifer and alder-conifer stands. Ecology 73:2022–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bivand R, Anselin L, Bernat A, Carvalho MM, Chun Y, Dormann C, Dray S, Halbersma R, Lewin-Koh N, Ono H, Tiefelsdorf M, Yu D (2005) Spdep: Spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models. R package version 0.3–17Google Scholar
  5. Boring LR, Swank WT, Waide JB, Henderson GS (1988) Sources, fates and impacts of nitrogen imputs to terrestrial ecosistems: review and synthesis. Biogeochemistry 6:119–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen; a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruckner A, Kandeler E, Kampichler C (1999) Plot-scale spatial patterns of soil water content, pH, substrate-induced respiration and N mineralization in a temperate coniferous forest. Geoderma 93:207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabrera ML, Beare MH (1993) Alkaline persulphate oxidation for determining total nitrogen in microbial biomass extracts. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campo J, Jaramillo VJ, Maass JM (1998) Pulses of soil phosphorus availability in a Mexican tropical forest: effects of seasonality and level of wetting. Oecologia 115:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Climent J, Tapias R, Pardos JA, Gil L (2004) Fire adaptations in the Canary Islands pine (Pinus canariensis). Plant Ecol 171:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole DW, Compton J, Van Miegroet H, Homann P (1991) Changes in soil properties and site productivity caused by alder. Water Air Soil Pollut 54:231–246Google Scholar
  12. Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Elia CF, Steudler PA, Corwin N (1977) Determination of total nitrogen in aqueous samples using persulfate digestion. Limnol Oceanogr 22:760–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doyle A, Weintraub MN, Schimel JP (2004) Persulfate digestion and simultaneous colorimetric analysis of carbon and nitrogen in soil extracts. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:669–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Durán J, Rodríguez A, Fernández-Palacios JM, Gallardo A (2008) Changes in soil N and P availability in a Pinus canariensis fire chronosequence. For Ecol Manage 256:384–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durán J, Rodríguez A, Fernández-Palacios JM, Gallardo A (2009) Changes in leaf nutrient traits in a wildfire chronosequence. Plant Soil 331:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Ngai JT, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Smith JE (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ettema CH, Wardle DA (2002) Spatial soil ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 17:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO (1996) Digital soil map of the world and derived soil properties. Derived from the FAO/UNESCO soil map of the world, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  20. Font I (2007) Climatología de España y Portugal, 2nd edn. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, SalamancaGoogle Scholar
  21. Frank DA, Groffman PM (2009) Plant rhizospheric N processes: what we don’t know and why we should care. Ecology 90:1512–1519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fraterrigo JM, Rusak JA (2008) Disturbance-driven changes in the variability of ecological patterns and processes. Ecol Lett 11:756–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallardo A, Covelo F (2005) Spatial pattern and scale of leaf N and P concentration in a Quercus robur population. Plant Soil 273:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton MA (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320:889–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giardina CP, Huffman S, Binkley D, Caldwell BA (1995) Alders increase soil phosphorus availability in a Douglas-fir plantation. Can J For Res 25:1652–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo D, Mou P, Jones RH, Mitchel RJ (2002) Temporal changes in spatial patterns of soil moisture following disturbance: an experimental approach. J Ecol 90:338–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hothorn T, Hornik K (2006) ExactRankTests: exact distributions for rank and permutation tests. R package version 0.8-15Google Scholar
  28. Hutchings MJ, John EA, Wijesinghea DK (2003) Toward understanding the consequences of soil heterogeneity for plant populations and communities. Ecology 84:2322–2334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. James SE, Pärtel M, Wilson SD, Peltzer DA (2003) Temporal heterogeneity of soil moisture in grassland and forest. J Ecol 91:234–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones DL, Healey JR, Willett VB, Farrar JF, Hodge A (2005) Dissolved organic nitrogen uptake by plants–an important N uptake pathway? Soil Biol Biochem 37:413–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koutika L-S, Nolte C, Yemefack M, Ndango R, Folefoc D, Weise S (2005) Leguminous fallows improve soil quality in south-central Cameroon as evidenced by the particulate organic matter status. Geoderma 125:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Legendre P, Dale MRT, Fortin MJ, Casgrain P, Gurevitch J (2004) Effects of spatial structures on the results of field experiments. Ecology 85:3202–3214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE (2002) Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol Monogr 72:445–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKey D (1994) Legumes and nitrogen: the evolutionary ecology of a nitrogen-demanding lifestyle. In: Sprent JI, McKey D (eds) Advances in legume systematics 5: the nitrogen factor. R Bot Gard, Kew, pp 211–228Google Scholar
  35. Méndez J (2010) Análisis del impacto del fuego en la regeneración sexual del pino canario a lo largo de una cronosecuencia de incendios en la isla de La Palma (Canarias). Dissertation. Universidad de la Laguna, SpainGoogle Scholar
  36. Morales G (2010) Análisis del impacto del fuego en la composición específica, estructura y función del pinar canario a lo largo de una cronosecuencia de incendios en la isla de La Palma (Canarias). Dissertation. Universidad de la Laguna, SpainGoogle Scholar
  37. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Soil Science Society of America and America Society of Agronomy (eds), Methods of soils analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. SSAA Books Series nº 5, Madison, pp. 961–1009Google Scholar
  38. Pebesma EJ, Wesseling CG (1998) Gstat: a program for geostatistical modelling, prediction and simulation. Comput Geosci 24:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peoples MB, Craswell ET (1992) Biological nitrogen fixation: investments, expectations and actual contributions to agriculture. Plant Soil 141:13–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prescott CE (2002) The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling. Tree Physiol 22:1193–1200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Quilchano C, Marañón T, Pérez-Ramos IM, Noejovich L, Valladares F, Zavala MA (2008) Patterns and ecological consequences of abiotic heterogeneity in managed cork oak forests of Southern Spain. Ecol Res 23:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A Language and Environment For Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  43. Ribeiro PJ Jr, Diggle PJ (2001) GeoR: a package for geostatistical analysis. R-NEWS 1:15–18Google Scholar
  44. Robertson GP (1982) Nitrification in forested ecosystems. Phil Trans R Soc Lon B 296:445–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robertson GP (1987) Geostatistics in ecology: interpolating with known variance. Ecology 68:744–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robertson GP, Klingensmith KM, Klug MJ, Paul EA, Crum JR, Ellis BG (1997) Soil resources, microbial activity, and primary production across an agricultural ecosystem. Ecol Appl 7:158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodríguez A, Durán J, Gallardo A (2007) Influence of legumes on N cycling in a heathland in northwest Spain. Web Ecol 7:87–93Google Scholar
  48. Rodríguez A, Durán J, Fernández-Palacios JM, Gallardo A (2009a) Spatial variability of soil properties under Pinus canariensis canopy in two contrasting soil textures. Plan soil 322:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rodríguez A, Durán J, Fernández-Palacios JM, Gallardo A (2009b) Spatial pattern and scale of soil N and P fractions under the influence of a leguminous shrub in a Pinus canariensis forest. Geoderma 151:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Röhmel J (1996) Precision intervals for estimates of the difference in success rates for binary random variables based on the permutation principle. Biometrical J 38:977–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rossi RE, Mulla DJ, Journel AG, Franz EH (1992) Geostatistical tools for modelling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol Monogr 62:277–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ryel RJ, Caldwell MM, Manwaring JH (1996) Temporal dynamics of soil spatial heterogeneity in sagebrush-wheatgrass steppe during a growing season. Plant Soil 184:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schimel JP, Bennett J (2004) Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85:591–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schlesinger WH, Reynolds JF, Cunningham GL, Huenneke LF, Jarrell WM, Virginia RA, Whitford WG (1990) Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247:1043–1048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schlesinger WH, Raikes JA, Hartley AE, Cross AF (1996) On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology 77:364–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sims GK, Ellsworth TR, Mulvaney RL (1995) Microscale determination of inorganic nitrogen in water and soil extracts. Commun Soil Sci Plan 26:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sprent J (1988) The ecology of nitrogen cycle. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Sprent J, Sprent P (1990) Nitrogen fixing organisms. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Tausz M, Trummer W, Wonisch A, Goessler W, Grill D, Jimenez MS, Morales D (2004) A survey of foliar mineral nutrient concentrations of Pinus canariensis at field plots in Tenerife. For Ecol Manage 189:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tilman D (1989) Ecological experimentation: strengths and conceptual problems. In: Likens GE (ed) Long-term studies in ecology: approaches and alternatives. Springer, New York, pp 136–157Google Scholar
  61. Vitousek PM, Matson PA (1985) Disturbance, nitrogen availability, and nitrogen losses in an intensively managed loblolly pine plantation. Ecology 66:1360–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vitousek PM, Cassman K, Cleveland C, Crews T, Field CB, Grimm NB, Howarth RW, Marino R, Martinelli L, Rastetter EB, Sprent JI (2002) Towards an ecological understanding of biological nitrogen fixation. Biogeochemistry 57(58):1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wardle DA (1992) A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomasa carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biol Rev 67:321–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Webster R, Oliver MA (2001) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Zinke PJ (1962) The patterns of influence of individual forest trees on soil properties. Ecology 43:130–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zou X, Binkle D, Caldwell BA (1995) Effects of dinitrogen-fixing trees on phosphorus biogeochemical cycling in contrasting forests. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:1452–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Jorge Durán
    • 1
  • Felisa Covelo
    • 1
  • José María Fernández-Palacios
    • 2
  • Antonio Gallardo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Chemical and Natural SystemsPablo de Olavide UniversitySevilleSpain
  2. 2.Department of Parasitology, Ecology and GeneticsLa Laguna UniversityLa LagunaSpain

Personalised recommendations