Plant and Soil

, Volume 344, Issue 1–2, pp 187–196 | Cite as

Medium-term fertilization of grassland plant communities masks plant species-linked effects on soil microbial community structure

  • Stavros D. Veresoglou
  • Andreas P. Mamolos
  • Barry Thornton
  • Olga K. Voulgari
  • Robin Sen
  • Demetrios S. Veresoglou
Regular Article


According to the singular hypothesis of plant diversity, different plant species are expected to make unique contributions to ecosystem functioning. Hence, individual species would support distinct microbial communities. It was hypothesized that microbial community dynamics in the respective rhizospheres of, two floristically divergent species, Agrostis capillaris and Prunella vulgaris that were dominant in a temperate, upland grassland in northern Greece, would support distinct microbial communities, in agreement to the singular hypothesis. Phospholipid lipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiles of the rhizosphere soil microbial community were obtained from the grassland which had been subjected to factorial nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilization over five plant growth seasons. The soil cores analyzed were centered on stands of the two co-occurring target plant species, sampled from five blocks in all four factorial N and P fertilization combinations. Distinct PLFA clustering patterns following principle component analysis of PLFA concentrations revealed that, in the absence of P fertilization, soils under the two plant species supported divergent microbial communities. In the P fertilized plots, however, no such distinction could be observed. Results reveal that nutrient fertilization may mask the ability of plant species to shape their own rhizosphere microbial community.


Aboveground-belowground interactions Phospholipid lipid fatty acid Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Singular hypothesis Temperate upland grassland 



The authors acknowledge the contribution of Dr Liz Shaw, Dr George Menexes and three anonymous reviewers for invaluable comments on the manuscript. They would, also, like to thank Mr Kostas Athanasiadis, Mr Panagiotis Skenteridis, Mrs Gillian Martin and Mrs Maureen Procee for technical support. The project was partially funded through a PhD scholarship to S.D. Veresoglou by the Chloros Trust.


  1. Bardgett RD, Shine A (1999) Linkages between plant litter diversity, soil microbial biomass and ecosystem function in temperate grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 31:317–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardgett RD, Mawdsley JL, Edwards S, Hobbs PJ, Rodwell JS, Davies WJ (1999) Plant species and nitrogen effects on soil biological properties of temperate upland grasslands. Funct Ecol 13:650–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardgett RD, Bowman D, Kaufmann R, Schmidt SK (2005) A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20:634–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beauregard MS, Hamel C, Atul-Nayyar, St-Arnaud M (2009) Long-term phosphorus fertilization impacts soil fungal and bacterial diversity but not AM fungal community in alfalfa. Microb Ecol 59:379–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billings SA, Ziegler SE (2008) Altered patterns of soil carbon substrate usage and heterotrophic respiration in a pine forest with elevated CO2 and N fertilization. Global Change Biol 14:1025–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Nobili M, Contin M, Montini C, Brookes PC (2001) Soil microbial biomass is triggered into activity by trace amounts of substrate. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1163–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demoling F, Figueroa D, Bååth E (2007) Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2485–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisenhauer N, Beßler H, Gleixner G, Habekost M, Milcu A, Parstch A, Sabais ACW, Scherber C, Steinbeiss S, Weigelt A, Weisser WW, Scheu S (2010) Plant diversity effects on soil microorganisms support the singular hypothesis. Ecology 91:485–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Everitt BS (2002) The Cambridge dictionary of statistics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Filion M, St-Arnaud M, Fortin JA (1999) Direct interaction between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices and different rhizosphere micro-organisms. New Phytol 141:525–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frey SD, Knorr M, Parrent JL, Simpson RT (2004) Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests. Forest Ecol Manag 196:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frostegård A, Bååth E (1996) The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil. Biol Fert Soils 22:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frostegård A, Tunlid A, Bååth E (1993) Shifts in the structure of soil microbial communities in limed forests as revealed by phospholipid fatty acid analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 25:723–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gange AC, Brown VK (2002) Soil food web components affect plant community structure during early succession. Ecol Res 17:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garbeva P, van Elsas JD, van Veen JA (2008) Rhizosphere microbial community and its response to plant species and soil history. Plant Soil 302:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green H, Larsen J, Olsson PA, Jensen DF, Jakobsen I (1999) Suppression of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum by mycelium of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices in root-free soil. Appl Environ Microb 65:1428–1434Google Scholar
  17. Güsewell S, Verhoeven JTA (2006) Litter N: P ratios indicate whether N or P limits decomposability of graminoid leaf litter. Plant Soil 287:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamer U, Potthast K, Makeschin F (2009) Urea fertilisation affected soil organic matter dynamics and microbial community structure in pasture soils of Southern Ecuador. Appl Soil Ecol 43:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heggenstaller AH, Moore KJ, Liebman M, Anex RP (2009) Nitrogen influences biomass and nutrient partitioning by perennial, warm-season grasses. Agron J 101:1363–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holt RD (2008) Theoritical perspectives on resource pulses. Ecology 89:671–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Innes L, Hobb PJ, Bardgett RD (2004) The impacts of individual plant species on rhizosphere microbial communities in soils of different fertility. Biol Fert Soils 40:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joergensen RG, Wichern F (2008) Quantitative assessment of the fungal contribution to microbial tissue in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2977–2991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA (1997) Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytol 135:575–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones DL, Nguyen C, Finlay RD (2009) Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil-root interface. Plant Soil 321:5–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karanika ED, Mamolos AP, Alifragis DA, Kalburtji KL, Veresoglou DS (2008a) Arbuscular mycorrhizas contribution to nutrition, productivity, structure and diversity of plant community in mountainous herbaceous grassland of northern Greece. Plant Ecol 199:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karanika ED, Voulgari OK, Mamolos AP, Alifragis DA, Veresoglou DS (2008b) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in northern Greece and influence of soil resources on their colonization. Pedobiologia 51:409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaur A, Chaudhary A, Kaur A, Choudhary R, Kaushik R (2005) Phospholipid fatty acid—a bioindicator of environment monitoring and assessment in soil ecosystem. Curr Sci India 89:1103–1112Google Scholar
  28. Kielak A, Pijl AS, van Veen JA, Kowalchuk GA (2008) Differences in vegetation composition and plant species identity lead to only minor changes in soil-borne microbial communities in a former arable field. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63:372–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kroppenstedt RM (1992) The genus Nocardiopsis. In: Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer KH (eds) The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria: ecophysiology, isolation, identification, applications, vol II, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 1139–1156Google Scholar
  30. Lechevalier MP (1989) Lipids in bacterial taxonomy. In: O’Leary WM (ed) Practical handbook of microbiology. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 455–561Google Scholar
  31. Ma BL, Dwyer LM, Gregorich EG (1999) Soil nitrogen amendment effects on seasonal nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen cycling in maize production. Agron J 91:1003–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mamolos AP, Elisseou CV, Veresoglou DS (1995) Depth of root activity of coexisting grassland species in relation to N and P additions, measured using nonradioactive tracers. J Ecol 83:643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mamolos AP, Vasilikos CV, Veresoglou DS (2005) Vegetation in contrasting soil water sites of upland herbaceous grasslands and N:P ratios as indicators of nutrient limitation. Plant Soil 270:335–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marschner P, Timonen S (2005) Interactions between plant species and mycorhrhizal colonization on the bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere. Appl Soil Ecol 28:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marschner P, Yang CY, Lieberei R, Crowley D (2001) Soil and plant specific effects on bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1437–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marschner P, Crowley D, Yang CY (2004) Development of specific rhizosphere bacterial communities in relation to plant species, nutrition and soil type. Plant Soil 261:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McKenzie RH, Middleton AB, Pfiffner PG, Bremer E (2010) Evaluation of polymer-coated urea and urease inhibitor for winter wheat in Southern Alberta. Agron J 102:1210–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Naeem SM, Li S (1997) Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390:507–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Naeem SM, Loreau M, Inchausti P (2002) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the emergence of a synthetic ecological framework. In: Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–11Google Scholar
  40. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54:655–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Olsson PA, Bååth E, Jakobsen I, Söderström B (1995) The use of phospholipids and neutral fatty acids to estimate biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil. Mycol Res 99:623–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palojärvi A (2006) Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analyses. In: Bloem J, Hopkins DW, Benedetti A (eds) Microbiological methods for assessing soil quality. CABI, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  43. Paterson E, Osler G, Dawson LA, Gebbing T, Sim A, Ord B (2008) Labile and recalcitrant plant fractions are utilised by distinct microbial communities in soil: Independent of the presence of roots and mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1103–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rani K, Zwanenburg B, Sugimoto Y, Yoneyama K, Bouwmeester HJ (2008) Biosynthetic considerations could assist the structure elucidation of host plant produced rhizosphere signaling compounds (strigolactones) for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and parasitic plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 46:616–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rillig MC, Mummey DL, Ramsey PW, Klironomos JN, Gannon JE (2006) Phylogeny of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi predicts community composition of symbiosis-associated bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 57:389–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rodwell JS, Pigott CD, Ratcliffe DA, Maloch AJC, Birks HLB, Proctor MCF, Shimwell DW, Huntley JP, Rafdord E, Wigginton MJ, Wilkins P (2000) British plant communities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rooney DC, Clipson NJW (2009) Phosphate addition and plant species alters microbial community structure in acidic upland grassland soil. Microb Ecol 57:4–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strickland MS, Rousk J (2010) Considering fungal:bacterial dominance in soils—methods, controls and ecosystem implications. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1385–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tilman D (1983) Plant succession and gopher disturbance along an experimental gradient. Oecologia 60:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Treseder KK, Vitousek PM (2001) Effects of soil nutrient availability on investment in acquisition of N and P in Hawaiian rain forests. Ecology 82:946–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ushio M, Wagai R, Balser TC, Kitayama K (2008) Variations in the soil microbial community composition of a tropical montane forest ecosystem: Does tree species matter? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40: 2699-2702Google Scholar
  52. Vandenkoornhuyse P, Mahe S, Ineson P, Staddon PL, Ostle N, Cliquet JB, Francez AJ, Fitter AH, Young JPW (2007) Active root-inhabiting microbes identified by rapid incorporation of plant-derived carbon into RNA. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16970–16975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Verhoeven JTA, Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996) Nitrogen- or phosphorus-limited growth in herbaceous, wet vegetation: Relations with atmospheric inputs and management regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:494–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vitousek PM (2004) Nutrient cycling and limitation: Hawai as a model ecosystem. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  55. Walker BH (1992) Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Concerv Biol 6:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wallenstein MD, McNulty S, Fernandez IJ, Boggs J, Schlesinger WH (2006) Nitrogen fertilization decreases forest soil fungal and bacterial biomass in three long-term experiments. Forest Ecol Manag 222:459–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watkins NK, Fitter AH, Graves JD, Robinson D (1996) Quantification using stable carbon isotopes of carbon transfer between C3 and C4 plants linked by a common mycorrhizal network. Soil Biol Biochem 28:471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. White DC, Davis WM, Nickels JS, King JD, Bobbie RJ (1979) Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractable lipid phosphate. Oecologia 40:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilkinson SC, Anderson JM, Sgardelis SP, Tsiafouli M, Taylor A, Wolters V (2002) PLFA profiles of microbial communities in decomposing conifer litters subject to moisture stress. Soil Biol Biochem 34:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zeglin LH, Stursova M, Sinsabaugh RP, Collins SL (2007) Microbial responses to nitrogen addition in three contrasting grassland ecosystems. Oecologia 154:349–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zelles L (1999) Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterization of microbial communities in soil: a review. Biol Fert Soils 29:111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stavros D. Veresoglou
    • 1
  • Andreas P. Mamolos
    • 2
  • Barry Thornton
    • 3
  • Olga K. Voulgari
    • 2
  • Robin Sen
    • 1
  • Demetrios S. Veresoglou
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Geographical SciencesManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Agriculture, Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental ProtectionAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.Analytical GroupThe Macaulay Land Use Research InstituteAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations