Soil water content, maize yield and its stability as affected by tillage and crop residue management in rainfed semi-arid highlands
- 886 Downloads
Rainfed crop management systems need to be optimized to provide more resilient options to cope with projected climatic scenarios forecasting a decrease in mean precipitation and more frequent extreme drought periods in Mexico. Soil water content (0–60 cm) was measured during three crop cycles in maize plots with different agronomic management practices in a long-term rainfed experiment (established in 1991) in the highlands of Mexico. Maize yields of 1997–2009 were reported. Crop management practices varied in (1) tillage (conventional [CT] vs. zero tillage [ZT]) and (2) residue management (full or partial retention and removal). ZT with residue retention had higher soil water content than management practices involving CT and ZT with residue removal which provided a buffer for drought periods during the growing seasons. In 2009, a cycle with a prolonged drought during vegetative growth, this resulted in yield differences of up to 4.7 Mg ha−1 between ZT with (partial) residue retention and the other practices. Averaged over 1997–2009, these practices had a yield advantage of approximately 1.5 Mg ha−1 over practices involving CT and ZT with residue removal. ZT with (partial) residue retention used rainfall more efficiently and resulted in a more resilient agronomic system than practices involving either CT or ZT with residue removal.
KeywordsConservation agriculture Crop residues No-tillage Yield stability
N.V. received a PhD fellowship of the Research Foundation—Flanders. N.J., V.N. and H.H. received a grant from the IRO-K.U.Leuven. We thank Humberto Gonzalez Juarez, Gerardo Morales Méndez, Jose Cándido Guillermo García Ramírez and Zita Gallardo for technical assistance. The research was funded by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT, Int.) and its strategic partners and donors.
- Aguilar E, Peterson TC, Ramírez Obando P, Frutos R, Retana JA, Solera M, Soley J, González García I et al (2005) Changes in precipitation and temperature extremes in Central America and Northern South America, 1961–2003. J Geophys Res Atmos 110:D23107. doi: 10.1029/2005JD006119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I et al (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Doorenbos J, Kassam AK (1979) Yield response to water. Irrigation and drainage paper 33. FAO, Rome, p 176Google Scholar
- SAS Institute (1994) SAS user’s guide. SAS Inst, CaryGoogle Scholar
- IUSS Working Group WRB (2007) World Reference base for soil resources 2006, first update 2007. World soil resources reports No. 103. FAO, Rome, p 128Google Scholar
- Magrin G, Gay García C, Cruz Choque D, Giménez JC, Moreno AR, Nagy GJ, Nobre C, Villamizar A (2007) Latin America. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 581–615Google Scholar
- Mupangwa W, Tomlow S, Walker S, Hove L (2007) Effect of minimum tillage and mulching on maize (Zea mays L.) yield and water content of clayey and sandy soils. Phys Chem Earth 32:1127–1134Google Scholar
- Sayre K, Govaerts B, Martinez A, Mezzalama M, Martineza M (2006) Comparison of alternative conservation agriculture technologies for rainfed production in the highlands of Central Mexico. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organization, Kiel, Germany, August 28th-September 3rd 2006Google Scholar
- Soil Survey Staff (2003) Keys to soil taxonomy. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington DC, p 332Google Scholar
- Verhulst N, Govaerts B, Verachtert E, Castellanos-Navarrete A, Mezzalama M, Wall P, Deckers J, Sayre KD (2010) Conservation agriculture, improving soil quality for sustainable production systems? In: Lal R, Stewart BA (eds) Advances in soil science: food security and soil quality. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 137–208Google Scholar
- White RE (2006) Principles and practice of soil science: the soil as a natural resource, 4th edn. Blackwell Science Ltd., Cornwall, p 363Google Scholar