Plant and Soil

, Volume 341, Issue 1–2, pp 437–445 | Cite as

Fire effects on the mobilization and uptake of nitrogen by cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.)

  • Brittany G. Johnson
  • Dale W. Johnson
  • Jeanne C. Chambers
  • Robert R. Blank
Regular Article

Abstract

Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.), an invasive annual grass, is displacing native species and causing increased fire frequency in the Great Basin of the southwestern United States. Growth and nitrogen uptake patterns by cheatgrass were examined in a greenhouse study using soils from sites with the same soil type but different fire histories: 1) an area that burned in 1999 that is now completely invaded with cheatgrass (CG); 2) an area that has not burned recently and is now dominated by Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentatassp.wyomingensis Beetle and Young) and Sandberg’s bluegrass (Poa secunda J. Presl) (WBS); and 3) a Wyoming big sagebrush area that burned in August of 2008 just prior to soil collection (NB). Cheatgrass seedlings had higher leaf numbers, height and mass in the NB soil. Ammonium-N mobilized by fire in the NB soil had significantly enriched 15N than soils from CG or WBS sites and this pattern was reflected in the isotopic signatures of the plants. Fire-mobilized mineral N accounted for only 58% of N taken up by cheatgrass in the NB soil, suggesting fire enhanced the ability of cheatgrass to assimilate more recalcitrant soil organic N.

Keywords

Bromus tectorum Fire Nitrogen Ammonium nitrate 15N 

References

  1. Blank RR (2008) Biogeochemistry of plant invasion: a case study with downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:226–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blank RR, Young JA (2004) Influence of three weed species on soil nutrient dynamics. Soil Sci 169(5):385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boxell J, Drohan PJ (2009) Surface soil physical and hydrological characteristics in Bromus tectorum L. (Cheatgrass) versus Artemesia tridentata Nutt. (Big Sagebrush) habitat. Geoderma 149:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks PD, Stark JM, MacInteer BB, Preston T (1989) Diffusion method to prepare soil extracts for automated nitrogen-15 analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:1707–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Certini G (2005) Effects of fire on properties of forest soils. Oecologica 143:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambers JC, Roundy BA, Blank RR, Meyer SE, Whittaker A (2007) What makes great basin sagebrush ecosystems invasible by Bromus tectorum? Ecol Monogr 77(1):117–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denny DW (2002) Soil survey of humboldt county, Nevada, East Part, Part 1. Reno, NV, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 521 pGoogle Scholar
  8. Grogan P, Bruns TD, Chapin FS III (2000) Fire effects on ecosystem nitrogen cycling in a California Bishop Pine Forest. Oecologia 122:537–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Högberg P (1997) 15N natural abundance in soil–plant systems. New Phytol 137:179–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hooker TD, Stark JM, Norton U, Leffler AJ, Peek M, Ryel R (2008) Distribution of ecosystem C and N within contrasting vegetation types in a semiarid rangeland in the Great Basin, USA. Biogeochemistry 90:291–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson DW, Murphy JD, Susfalk RB, Caldwell TG, Miller WW, Walker RF, Powers RF (2005) The effects of wildfire, salvage logging, and post-fire N fixation on the nutrient budgets of a Sierran forest. For Ecol Manag 220:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson DW, Murphy JD, Walker RF, Glass DW, Miller WW (2007) Wildfire effects on forest carbon and nutrient budgets. Ecol Eng 31:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knapp PA (1996) Cheatgrass (Bromus Tectorum L) Dominance in the Great Basin Desert. Glob Environ Change 6(1):37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Korb JE, Johnson NC, Covington WW (2004) Slash pile burning effects on soil biotic and chemical properties and plant establishment: recommendations for amelioration. Restor Ecol 12(1):52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacKown CT, Jones TA, Johnson DA, Monaco TA, Redinbaugh MG (2009) Nutrient uptake by perennial and invasive annual grass seedlings: nitrogen form effect. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73(6):1864–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller WW, Johnson DW, Loupe TM, Sedinger JS, Carroll EM, Murphy JD, Walker RF, Glass DS (2006) Nutrients flow from runoff at burned forest site in Lake Tahoe Basin. Calif Agric 60(2):65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monaco TA, Johnson DA, Norton JM, Jones TA, Connors KJ, Norton JB, Redinbaugh MB (2003) Contrasting responses of intermountain west grasses to soil nitrogen. J Range Manag 56:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Norton JB, Monaco TA, Norton JM, Johnson DA, Jones TA (2004) Soil morphology and organic matter dynamics under cheatgrass and sagebrush-steppe plant communities. J Arid Environ 57:445–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Norton U, Mosier AR, Morgan JA, Derner JD, Ingram LJ, Stahl PD (2008) Moisture pulses, trace gas emissions and soil C and N in cheatgrass and native grass-dominated sagebrush—steppe in Wyoming, USA. Soil Biol. Biochem 40:1421–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rimer RL, Evans RD (2006) Invasion of Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum L.) causes rapid changes in the nitrogen cycle. Amer Midl Nat 156(2):252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roundy BA, Hardegree SP, Chambers JC, Whittaker A (2007) Prediction of cheatgrass field germination potential using wet thermal accumulation. Rangeland Ecol Manag 60(6):613–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saito L, Miller WW, Johnson DW, Qualls RG, Provencher L, Carroll E, Szameitat P (2007) Fire effects on stable isotopes in a Sierran Forested Watershed. J Environ Qual 36:91–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sperry LJ, Belnap J, Evans RD (2006) Bromus tectorum invasion alters nitrogen dynamics in an undisturbed arid grassland ecosystem. Ecology 87(3):603–615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brittany G. Johnson
    • 1
  • Dale W. Johnson
    • 1
  • Jeanne C. Chambers
    • 2
    • 3
  • Robert R. Blank
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Nevada, RenoRenoUSA
  2. 2.USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research StationRenoUSA
  3. 3.USDA Agricultural Research ServiceRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations