Plant and Soil

, Volume 340, Issue 1–2, pp 227–238 | Cite as

Tradeoffs between nitrogen- and water-use efficiency in dominant species of the semiarid steppe of Inner Mongolia

  • Xiao Ying Gong
  • Qing Chen
  • Shan Lin
  • Holger Brueck
  • Klaus Dittert
  • Friedhelm Taube
  • Hans Schnyder
Regular Article


In water-limited environments, photosynthetic carbon gain and loss of water by transpiration are in a permanent tradeoff as both are contrarily regulated by stomata conductance. In semiarid steppe grasslands water limitation may covary with nitrogen limitation. Steppe grassland species are capable of optimizing their use of limiting resources, water and nitrogen, but regulation is still poorly understood. In a two-year experiment with addition of water (irrigation simulating a wet year) and nitrogen (0, 25, and 50 kg urea-N ha−1) we assessed intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi), nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and related plant functional traits (PFTs) of four dominant C3 species (Leymus chinensis, Agropyron cristatum, Stipa grandis, and Artemisia frigida). Water and N fertilizer supplementation significantly increased plant primary production, and N effect was more pronounced under irrigated conditions. Parallel with the responses of plant production, a strong tradeoff between WUEi and NUE was detected: water supply increased NUE but decreased WUEi, whereas N addition slightly increased WUEi at the expense of NUE. This tradeoff occurred at the leaf level, and involved the responses of leaf N concentration and specific leaf area. WUEi of species changed among treatments in a predictable manner by the parameter of leaf N content per area. Dominant plant species commonly achieved a higher utilization efficiency of the more limiting resource via altering PFTs, which was an important mechanism of adaptation to variable resource limitation in semiarid grasslands.


Carbon isotope discrimination C-13 Resource utilization Specific leaf area Leaf nitrogen concentration 



This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We thank Prof. Karl Auerswald for helping with data analysis, and Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station of Botany Institute, Chinese Academy of Science for providing working facility and meteorological data. Special thank goes to German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for providing a doctoral fellowship.


  1. Bai Y, Han X, Wu J, Chen Z, Li L (2004) Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Nature 431:181–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai Y, Wu J, Xing Q, Pan Q, Huang J, Yang D, Han X (2008) Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia plateau. Ecology 89:2140–2153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brueck H (2008) Effects of nitrogen supply on water-use efficiency of higher plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brueck H, Erdle K, Gao Y, Zhao Y, Giese M, Peth S, Lin S (2009) Effects of N and water supply on water use-efficiency of a semiarid grassland in Inner Mongolia. Plant Soil. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0128-5 Google Scholar
  5. Burke IC, Lauenroth WK, Parton WJ (1997) Regional and temporal variation in net primary production and nitrogen mineralization in grasslands. Ecology 78:1330–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabrera-Bosquet L, Molero G, Nogues S, Araus JL (2009) Water and nitrogen conditions affect the relationships of Δ13C and Δ18O to gas exchange and growth in durum wheat. J Exp Bot 60:1633–1644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandra A, Dubey A (2008) Evaluation of genus Cenchrus based on malondialdehyde, proline content, specific leaf area and carbon isotope discrimination for drought tolerance and divergence of species at DNA level. Acta Physiol Plant 30:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen S, Bai Y, Zhang L, Han X (2005) Comparing physiological responses of two dominant grass species to nitrogen addition in Xilin River Basin of China. Environ Exp Bot 53:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen S, Bai Y, Lin G, Huang J, Han X (2007) Isotopic carbon composition and related characters of dominant species along an environmental gradient in Inner Mongolia, China. J Arid Environ 71:12–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong SK, Jiang Y, Wei MJ, Long RJ, Hu ZZ, Muyi K (2004) Effects of nitrogen application rate on soil and plant characteristics in pastures of perennial grass mixtures in the alpine region of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Aust J Soil Res 42:727–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehleringer JR, Cooper TA (1988) Correlations between carbon isotope ratio and microhabitat in desert plants. Oecologia 76:562–566Google Scholar
  12. Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD (1993) Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans JR (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans JR, Kaldenhoff R, Genty B, Terashima I (2009) Resistances along the CO2 diffusion pathway inside leaves. J Exp Bot 60:2235–2248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eviner VT, Chapin FS III (2003) Functional matrix: a conceptual framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem processes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Systemat 34:455–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1984) Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust J Plant Physiol 11:539–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farquhar GD, O’Leary MH, Berry JB (1982) On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol 9:121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Field C, Merino J, Mooney HA (1983) Compromises between water-use efficiency and nitrogen-use efficiency in five species of California evergreens. Oecologia 60:384–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fowler N (1986) The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Annu Rev Ecol Systemat 17:89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox J (1997) Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related methods. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  22. Hooper DU, Johnson L (1999) Nitrogen limitation in dryland ecosystems: responses to geographical and temporal variation in precipitation. Biogeochemistry 46:247–293Google Scholar
  23. Kogami H, Hanba YT, Kibe T, Terashima I, Masuzawa T (2001) CO2 transfer conductance, leaf structure and carbon isotope composition of Polygonum cuspidatum leaves from low and high altitudes. Plant Cell Environ 24:529–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCulley R, Burke I, Lauenroth W (2009) Conservation of nitrogen increases with precipitation across a major grassland gradient in the Central Great Plains of North America. Oecologia 159:571–581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nageswara Rao RC, Wright GC (1994) Stability of the relationship between specific leaf area and carbon isotope discrimination across environments in Peanut. Crop Sci 34:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oesterheld M, Loreti J, Semmartin M, Sala OE (2001) Inter-annual variation in primary production of a semi-arid grassland related to previous-year production. J Veg Sci 12:137–142Google Scholar
  27. Patterson TB, Guy RD, Dang QL (1997) Whole-plant nitrogen- and water-relations traits, and their associated trade-offs, in adjacent muskeg and upland boreal spruce species. Oecologia 110:160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Picotte J, Rosenthal D, Rhode J, Cruzan M (2007) Plastic responses to temporal variation in moisture availability: consequences for water use efficiency and plant performance. Oecologia 153:821–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schulze ED, Turner NC, Nicolle D, Schumacher J (2006) Species differences in carbon isotope ratios, specific leaf area and nitrogen concentrations in leaves of Eucalyptus growing in a common garden compared with along an aridity gradient. Physiol Plant 127:434–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sparks JP, Ehleringer JR (1997) Leaf carbon isotope discrimination and nitrogen content for riparian trees along elevational transects. Oecologia 109:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Suits DB (1957) Use of dummy variables in regression equations. J Am Stat Assoc:548–551Google Scholar
  32. Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsialtas JT, Handley LL, Kassioumi MT, Veresoglou DS, Gagianas AA (2001) Interspecific variation in potential water-use efficiency and its relation to plant species abundance in a water-limited grassland. Funct Ecol 15:605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turner NC, Schulze ED, Nicolle D, Schumacher J, Kuhlmann I (2008) Annual rainfall does not directly determine the carbon isotope ratio of leaves of Eucalyptus species. Physiol Plant 132:440–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Van den Boogaard R, Kostadinova S, Veneklaas E, Lambers H (1995) Association of water use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency with photosynthetic characteristics of two wheat cultivars. J Exp Bot 46:1429–1438Google Scholar
  36. Vaquez De Aldana BR, Berendse F (1997) Nitrogen-use efficiency in six perennial grasses from contrasting habitats. Funct Ecol 11:619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vitousek PM, Aplet G, Turner D, Lockwood JJ (1992) The Mauna Loa environmental matrix: foliar and soil nutrients. Oecologia 89:372–382Google Scholar
  39. Wang GH (2006) Can the restoration of natural vegetation be accelerated on the Chinese Loess Plateau? A study of the response of the leaf carbon isotope ratio of dominant species to changing soil carbon and nitrogen levels. Ecol Res 21:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wittmer M, Auerswald K, Tungalag R, Bai YF, Schaufele R, Bai CH, Schnyder H (2008) Carbon isotope discrimination of C3 vegetation in Central Asian Grassland as related to long-term and short-term precipitation patterns. Biogeosciences 5:903–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wright GC, Nageswara Rao RC, Farquhar GD (1994) Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in Peanut under water deficit conditions. Crop Sci 34:92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M (2001) Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Funct Ecol 15:423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yahdjian L, Sala OE (2006) Vegetation structure constrains primary production response to water availability in the Patagonian steppe. Ecology 87:952–962CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yuan ZY, Li LH (2007) Soil water status influences plant nitrogen use: a case study. Plant Soil 301:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao Ying Gong
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Qing Chen
    • 1
  • Shan Lin
    • 1
  • Holger Brueck
    • 2
  • Klaus Dittert
    • 2
  • Friedhelm Taube
    • 3
  • Hans Schnyder
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Plant NutritionChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil ScienceChristian-Albrechts-UniversityKielGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding—Grass and Forage Science/Organic AgricultureChristian-Albrechts-UniversityKielGermany
  4. 4.Institute of GrasslandTechnical University MunichFreising- WeihenstephanGermany

Personalised recommendations