Nutrient uptake estimates for woody species as described by the NST 3.0, SSAND, and PCATS mechanistic nutrient uptake models
Minimalist mechanistic nutrient uptake models based on the fundamentals of nutrient movement in the soil, nutrient uptake kinetics, and root growth and morphology, have become important tools for research. Because different approaches to solution may lead to different simulation results, it would be useful to evaluate the SSAND, and PCATS mechanistic models along with the very successful crop model NST 3.0 using common data sets and by conducting both one dimensional and multiple dimensional sensitivity analyses. The predictions of nutrient uptake by the three models using the same data set were diverse, indicating a need to reexamine model structure. Both types of sensitivity analyses suggested that the effect of soil moisture on simulation can be influential when nutrient concentration in the soil solution is low. One dimensional sensitivity analysis also revealed that Imax negatively influenced estimates of nutrient uptake in the SSAND and PCATS models. Further analysis indicated that this phenomenon was also related to the low nutrient supplying ability typically found in forest soils. The predictions of SSAND under low-nutrient-supply scenarios are generally lower than these of NST 3.0. We suspect that both results are artifacts of the steady state models.
KeywordsImax Model comparison Multiple dimensional sensitivity analysis Soil moisture
Support for this study was provided by the Forest Nutrition Cooperative and the Virginia Tech Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation. The authors express their appreciation to Drs. Ruth Yanai and Tom Fox for their critical reviews of the manuscript.
- Barber SA (1995) Soil nutrient bioavailability: a mechanistic approach, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Claassen N, Steingrobe B (1999) Mechanistic simulation models for a better understanding of nutrient uptake from soil. In: Rengel Z (ed) Mineral nutrition of crops: fundamental mechanisms and implications. Food Products, New York, pp 327–367Google Scholar
- Comerford NB, Cropper WP Jr, Hua L, Smethurst PJ, Van Rees KCJ, Jokela EJ, Adams F (2006) Soil Supply and Nutrient Demand (SSAND): a general nutrient uptake model and an example of its application to forest management. Can J Soil Sci 86:665–673Google Scholar
- Kelly JM, Chappelka AH, Lockaby BG (1995) Measured and estimated parameters for a model of nutrient uptake by trees. N Z J For Sci 24:213–225Google Scholar
- Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Nye PH, Spiers JA (1964) Simultaneous diffusion and mass flow to plant roots. In: Transactions : 8th International Congress of Soil Science, 31 Aug. -9 Sep. 1964. Bucharest, Romania. Publishing House of the Academy of the Socialist Republic of Romania, Rompresfilatelia, Bucharest, pp 535–541Google Scholar
- Nye PH, Tinker PB (1977) Solute movement in the soil-root system. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Oates K, Barber SA (1987) NUTRIENT UPTAKE: a microcomputer program to predict nutrient absorption from soil by roots. J Agron Edu 16:65–68Google Scholar
- Parsons R (1959) Handbook of electro-chemical constants. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Singh B (2008) Nutrient uptake by hybrid poplar in competition with weed species under growth chamber and field conditions using the soil supply and nutrient demand (SSAND) model. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Smethurst PJ, Mendham DS, Battaglia M, Misra R (2004) Simultaneous prediction of nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in a Eucalyptus nitens plantation using linked CABALA and PCATS models. In: Borralho NMG (ed) Eucalyptus in a changing world. Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference, 11–15 October 2004. Aveiro, Portugal, pp 565–569Google Scholar
- Tinker PB, Nye PH (2000) Solute movement in the rhizosphere. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar