Plant and Soil

, Volume 332, Issue 1–2, pp 163–176 | Cite as

Dynamics of soil water content in the rhizosphere

  • Andrea CarminatiEmail author
  • Ahmad B. Moradi
  • Doris Vetterlein
  • Peter Vontobel
  • Eberhard Lehmann
  • Ulrich Weller
  • Hans-Jörg Vogel
  • Sascha E. Oswald
Regular Article


Water flow from soil to plants depends on the properties of the soil next to roots, the rhizosphere. Although several studies showed that the rhizosphere has different properties than the bulk soil, effects of the rhizosphere on root water uptake are commonly neglected. To investigate the rhizosphere’s properties we used neutron radiography to image water content distributions in soil samples planted with lupins during drying and subsequent rewetting. During drying, the water content in the rhizosphere was 0.05 larger than in the bulk soil. Immediately after rewetting, the picture reversed and the rhizosphere remained markedly dry. During the following days the water content of the rhizosphere increased and after 60 h it exceeded that of the bulk soil. The rhizosphere’s thickness was approximately 1.5 mm. Based on the observed dynamics, we derived the distinct, hysteretic and time-dependent water retention curve of the rhizosphere. Our hypothesis is that the rhizosphere’s water retention curve was determined by mucilage exuded by roots. The rhizosphere properties reduce water depletion around roots and weaken the drop of water potential towards roots, therefore favoring water uptake under dry conditions, as demonstrated by means of analytical calculation of water flow to a single root.


Root water uptake Water retention curve Rhizosphere Neutron radiography Mucilage Hysteresis 



The authors acknowledge Dani Or for suggesting the role of mucilage. We thank A. Badorreck and W. Schaaf for providing the soil. The positions of A. Carminati and A. Moradi were funded by the EU-Marie Curie Project “Water Watch”, contract MTKKD-2006-042724.


  1. Carminati A, Vetterlein D, Weller U, Vogel HJ, Oswald SE (2009) When roots lose contact. Vadose Zone J 8:805–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chenu C (1993) Clay- or sand-polysaccharide associations as models for the interface between micro-organisms and soil–water related properties and microstructure. Geoderma 56:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Willigen P, van Noordwijk M (1987) Roots, plant production, and nutrient use efficiency. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Agric. Univ., The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  4. Doussan C, Pierret A, Garrigues E, Pages L (2006) Water uptake by plant roots: II—modelling of water transfer in the soil root-system with explicit account of flow within the root system—comparison with experiments. Plant Soil 283:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foehse D, Claassen N, Jungk A (1991) Phosphorus efficiency of plants. II. Significance of root radius, root hairs and cation–anion balance for phosphorus influx in seven plant species. Plant Soil 132:261–272Google Scholar
  6. Gardner WR (1960) Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants. Soil Sci 89:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garrigues E, Doussan C, Pierret A (2006) Water uptake by plant roots: I—formation and propagation of a water extraction front in mature root systems as evidenced by 2D light transmission imaging. Plant Soil 283:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregory PJ (2006) Roots, rhizosphere and soil: the route to a better understanding of soil science? Eur J Soil Sci 57:2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hainsworth JM, Aylmore LAG (1989) Non-uniform soil water extaction by plant roots. Plant Soil 113:121–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hallett PD, Gordon DC, Bengough AG (2003) Plant influence on rhizosphere hydraulic properties: direct measurements using a miniaturized infiltrometer. New Phytol 157:597–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassanein R, Lehmann E, Vontobel P (2005) Methods of scattering corrections for quantitative neutron radiography. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 542:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinsinger P, Bengough AG, Vetterlein D, Young IM (2009) Rhizosphere: biophysics, biogeochemistry and ecological relevance. Plant Soil 321:117–152. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9885-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Javaux M, Schroeder T, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2008) Use of a three-dimensional detailed modeling approach for predicting root water uptake. Vadose Zone J 7:1079–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lavelle P (2002) Functional domains in soils. Ecol Res 17:441–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCully ME, Boyer JS (1997) The expansion of maize root-cap mucilage during hydration. 3: changes in water potential and water content. Phisiol Plantarum 99:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Menon M, Robinson B, Oswald SE, Kaestner A, Abbaspour KC, Lehmann E, Schulin R (2007) Visualization of root growth in heterogeneously contaminated soil using neutron radiography. Eur J Soil Sci 58:802–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moradi AB, Conesa HM, Robinson B, Lehmann E, Kuehne G, Kaestner A, Oswald S, Schulin R (2009) Neutron radiography as a tool for revealing root development in soil: capabilities and limitations. Plant Soil 318:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mualem YA (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakanishi TM, Okuni Y, Hayashi Y, Nishiyama H (2005) Water gradient profiles at bean plant roots determined by neutron beam analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 264:313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Or D, Phutane S, Dechesne A (2007) Extracellular polymeric substances affecting pore-scale hydrologic conditions for bacterial activity in unsaturated soils. Vadose Zone J 6:298–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Oswald SE, Menon M, Carminati A, Vontobel P, Lehmann E, Schulin R (2008) Quantitative imaging of infiltration, root growth, and root water uptake via neutron radiography. Vadose Zone J 7:1035–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pierret A, Kirby M, Moran C (2003) Simultaneous X-ray imaging of plant root growth and water uptake in thin-slab systems. Plant Soil 255:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pleinert H, Lehmann E (1997) Determination of hydrogenous distributions by neutron trasmission analysis. Phys B 234:1030–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Read DB, Gregory PJ (1997) Surface tension and viscosity of axenic maize and lupin root mucilages. New Phytol 137:623–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Read DB, Gregory PJ, Bell AE (1999) Physical properties of axenic maize root mucilage. Plant Soil 211:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Read DB, Bengough AG, Gregory PJ, Crawford JW, Robinson D, Scrimgeour CM, Young IM, Zhang K, Zhang X (2003) Plant roots release phospholipid surfactants that modify the physical and chemical properties of soil. New Phytol 157:315–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richards LA (1928) The usefulness of capillary potential to soil-moisture and plant investigators. J Agric Res 37:719–742Google Scholar
  28. Richards LA, Wadleigh CH (1952) Soil water and plant growth. In: Soil physical conditions and plant growth. Academic, New York, pp 73–251Google Scholar
  29. Roberson EB, Firestone MK (1992) Relationship between dessication and exopolysaccharide production in a soil Pseudomonas. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1284–1291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Roose T, Fowler AC (2004) A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by plant root systems. J Theor Biol 228:173–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schneider CL, Attinger S, Delfs JO, Hildebrandt A (2009) Implementing small scale processes at the soil–plant interface—the role of root architectures for calculating root water uptake profiles. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 6(3):4233–4264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Segal E, Kushnir T, Mualem Y, Shani U (2008) Microsensing of water dynamics and root distributions in sandy soils. Vadose Zone J 7:1018–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Serra J (1982) Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Siqueira M, Katul G, Porporato A (2008) Onset of water stress, hysteresis in plant conductance, and hydraulic lift: scaling soil water dynamics from millimeters to meters. Water Resour Res 44:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Strayer DL, Power ME, Fagan WF, Pickett STA, Belnap J (2003) A classification of ecological boundaries. Bioscience 53:723–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tumlinson LG, Liu H, Silk WK, Hopmans JW (2008) Thermal neutron computed tomography of soil water and plant roots. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1234–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van Dam JC, Stricker JNM, Droogers P (1992) Inverse method for determining soil hydraulic functions from one-step outflow experiments. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1042–1050Google Scholar
  38. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Watt M, McCully ME, Canny MJ (1994) Formation and stabilization of rhizosheaths of Zea mays l. effect of soil water content. Plant Physiol 106:179–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Watt M, Silk WK, Passioura JB (2006) Rates of root and organism growth, soil conditions, and temporal and spatial development of the rhizosphere. Ann Bot 97:839–855CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Whalley WR, Leeds-Harrison PB, Leech PK, Riseley B, Bird NRA (2004) The hydraulic properties of the root–soil interface. Soil Sci 169:90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Young IM (1995) Variation in moisture contents between bulk soil and the rhizosheath of wheat Triticum-Aestivum l. cv. wembley. New Phytol 130:135–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Carminati
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ahmad B. Moradi
    • 1
  • Doris Vetterlein
    • 1
  • Peter Vontobel
    • 2
  • Eberhard Lehmann
    • 2
  • Ulrich Weller
    • 1
  • Hans-Jörg Vogel
    • 1
  • Sascha E. Oswald
    • 1
  1. 1.Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Paul Scherrer Institute—PSIVilligenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations