Plant and Soil

, Volume 331, Issue 1–2, pp 377–389 | Cite as

Fertilization and litter effects on the functional group biomass, species diversity of plants, microbial biomass, and enzyme activity of two alpine meadow communities

  • Changting Wang
  • Ruijun Long
  • Qilan Wang
  • Wei Liu
  • Zengchun Jing
  • Li Zhang
Regular Article


We conducted a field experiment in two alpine meadows to investigate the short-term effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter biomass on plant species richness, the percent cover of functional groups, soil microbial biomass, and enzyme activity in two alpine meadow communities. The addition of nitrogen fertilizer to experimental plots over two growing seasons increased plant production, as indicated by increases in both the living plant biomass and litter biomass in the Kobresia humilis meadow community. In contrast, fertilization had no significant effect on the amounts of living biomass and litter biomass in the K. tibetica meadow. The litter treatment results indicate that litter removal significantly increased the living biomass and decreased the litter biomass in the K. humilis meadow; however, litter-removal and litter-intact treatments had no impact on the amounts of living biomass and litter biomass in the K. tibetica meadow. Litter production depended on the degree of grass cover and was also influenced by nitrogen enrichment. The increase in plant biomass reflects a strong positive effect of nitrogen enrichment and litter removal on grasses in the K. humilis meadow. Neither fertilization nor litter removal had any impact on the grass biomass in the K. tibetica meadow. Sedge biomass was not significantly affected by either nutrient enrichment or litter removal in either alpine meadow community. The plant species richness decreased in the K. humilis meadow following nitrogen addition. In the K. humilis meadow, microbial biomass C increased significantly in response to the nitrogen enrichment and litter removal treatments. Enzyme activities differed depending on the enzyme and the different alpine meadow communities; in general, enzyme activities were higher in the upper soil layers (0–10 cm and 10–20 cm) than in the lower soil layers (20–40 cm). The amounts of living plant biomass and plant litter biomass in response to the different treatments of the two alpine meadow communities affected the soil microbial biomass C, soil organic C, and soil fertility. These results suggest that the original soil conditions, plant community composition, and community productivity are very important in regulating plant community productivity and microbial biomass and activity.


Functional group biomass Species diversity Microbial biomass Enzyme activity Fertilization Alpine meadow 


  1. Abrams PA (1995) Monotonic or unimodal diversity-productivity gradients: what does competition theory predict? Ecology 76:2019–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acosta-Martinez V, Acosta-Mercado D, Sotomayor-Ramrez D, Cruz-Rodrguez L (2008) Microbial communities and activities under different management in semiarid soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38:249–260Google Scholar
  3. Aerts R, Berendse F (1988) The effect of increased nutrient availability on vegetation dynamics in heathlands. Vegetation 63:63–69Google Scholar
  4. Baldrian P, Trögl J, Valàšková V, Merhautvá V, Cajthaml T, Herinková J (2008) Enzyme activities and microbial biomass in topsoil layer during spontaneous succesion in spoil heaps after brown coal mining. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2107–2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbhuiya AR, Arunachalam A, Pandey HN, Arunachalam K, Khan ML, Nath PC (2004) Dynamics of soil microbial biomass C, N and P in disturbed and undisturbed stands of a tropical wet-evergreen forest. Eur J Soil Biol 40:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardgett RD, Mawdsley JL, Edwards S, Hobbs PJ, Rodwell JS, Davies WJ (1999) Plant species effects on soil biological properties of temperate upland grasslands. Funct Ecol 13:650–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bever JD (2002) Host-specificity of AM fungal population growth rates can generate feed-back on plant growth. Plant Soil 244:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowman WD, Conant RT (1994) Shoot growth dynamics and photosynthetic response to increased nitrogen availability in the alpine willow Salix glauca. Oecologia 97:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman WD, Theodose TA, Schardt JC, Conant RT (1993) Constraints of nutrient availability on primary production in two alpine communities. Ecology 74:2085–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. China vegetation edit commission (1980) China vegetations. Science, Beijing, pp 10–68Google Scholar
  11. Descheemaeker D, Muys B, Nyssen J, Poesen J, Raes D, Haile M, Deckers J (2006) Litter production and organic matter accumulation in exclosures of the Tigray highlands, Ethiopia. Forest Ecol Manag 233:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991) Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot Rev 57:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster BL, Gross KL (1998) Species richness in successional grassland: effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter. Ecology 79:2593–2602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox JE (1992) Responses of diversity and growth form dominance to fertility in Alaskan tundra ellfield communities. Arct Ant Arct Alp Res 24:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guan SY (1986) Research methods on soil enzymes. China Agricultural, Beijing, pp 182–266Google Scholar
  16. Hobbie SE (1992) Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 7:336–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huston MA, DeAngelis DL (1994) Competition and coexistence: the effects of resource transport and supply rates. Am Nat 144:954–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jonasson S (1992) Plant responses to fertilization and species removal in tundra related to community structure and clonality. Oikos 63:420–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jonasson S, Bryant JP, Chapin FS, Anderson M (1986) Plant phenols and nutrients in relation to variations in climate and rodent grazing. Am Nat 128:394–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jutila HM, Grace JB (2002) Effects of disturbance on germination and seedling establishment in a coastal prairie grassland: a test of the competitive release hypothesis. J Ecol 90:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Korner C (1991) Some often overlooked plant characteristics as determinants of plant growth: a reconsideration. Funct Ecol 5:162–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kourtev PS, Ehrenfeld JG, Haggblom M (2002) Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure and function in the soil. Ecology 83:3152–3166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li YS, Wu LH, Lu XH, Zhao LM, Fan QL, Zhang FS (2006) Soil microbial biomass as affected by non-flooded plastic mulching cultivation in rice. Biol Fertil Soils 1:107–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li YS, Li FM, Rengel Z, Zhan ZY, Singh B (2007) Soil physical properties and their relations to organic carbon pools as affected by land use in an alpine pastureland. Geoderma 139:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. May DE, Webber PJ (1982) Spatial and temporal variation of vegetation and its productivity on Niwot Ridge, Colorado. In: Hakfpenny J (ed) Ecological studies in the Colorado alpine, a Festschrift for John W. Marr. Occasional Paper Number 37. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, pp 35–62Google Scholar
  26. Pielou EC (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Pysek P, Leps J (1991) Response of a weed community to nitrogen fertilization: a multivariate analysis. J Veg Sci 2:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sugden A, Stone R, Ash C (2004) Ecology in the underworld. Science 304:1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Theodose TA (1995) Interspecific plant competition in alpine tundra. Dissertation. University of Colorado, Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  30. Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Tilman D (1984) Plant dominance along an experimental nutrient gradient. Ecology 56:1445–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tilman D (1987) Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol Monogr 57:189–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tilman D (1993) Species richness of experimental productivity gradients: how important is colonization limitation? Ecology 74:2179–2191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vance ED, Brooks PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measure soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vinton MA, Burke IC (1997) Contingent effects of plant species on soils along a regional moisture gradient in the Great Plains. Oecologia 110:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang QJ, Zhou XM, Zhang YQ, Shen ZX (1995) Community structure and biomass dynamic of the Kobresia pygmaea steppe meadow. Acta Phytoecol Sini 19:225–235Google Scholar
  37. Wang CT, Cao GM, Wang QL, Jing ZC, Ding LM, Long RJ (2008a) Effects of altitude on plant-species diversity and productivity in an alpine meadow, Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Sci China Ser C 51:86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang CT, Long RJ, Wang QL, Jing ZC, Du YG DLM, Cao GM (2008b) Effects of soil resources on species composition, plant diversity, and plant biomass in an alpine meadow, Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Isr J Ecol Evol 53:205–222Google Scholar
  39. Wedin DA, Tilman D (1990) Species effects on nitrogen cycling: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84:433–441Google Scholar
  40. Wilson SD, Tilman D (1991) Interactive effects of fertilization and disturbance on community structure and resource availability in an old-field community. Oecologia 88:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xiong S, Nilsson C, Johansson ME, Jansson R (2001) Responses of riparian plants to accumulations of silt and plant litter: the importance of plant litter. J Veg Sci 12:481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhou XM (2001) Kobresia meadow in China. Science Press, Beijing, pp 131–162Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Changting Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ruijun Long
    • 3
  • Qilan Wang
    • 2
  • Wei Liu
    • 2
  • Zengchun Jing
    • 2
  • Li Zhang
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.College of Life Science and TechnologySouthwest University for NationalitiesChengduChina
  2. 2.Northwest Plateau Institute of Biologythe Chinese Academy of ScienceXiningChina
  3. 3.College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and TechnologyLanzhou UniversityLanzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations