Plant and Soil

, Volume 327, Issue 1–2, pp 465–479 | Cite as

Effects of open-top chambers and substrate type on biogeochemical processes at disturbed boreal forest sites in northwestern Quebec

  • Anna DabrosEmail author
  • James W. Fyles
Regular Article


Open-top chamber (OTC) climate change simulation was used to predict the potential effects of climate change on biogeochemistry, including: 1) soil decomposition of three litter types (trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), black spruce (Picea mariana (Miller) BSP), and Sphagnum); 2) soil nutrient supply rates, and; 3) soil acidity. We assessed the effects of OTCs on these biogeochemical factors in the presence or absence of Sphagnum moss substrate at post-fire and logging sites, in the transitional mixedwood-boreal zone of northwestern Quebec. Higher air temperatures and cooler, drier soils created by the OTC treatment resulted in lower decomposition rates and a higher C:N ratio of aspen litter, and lower Ca concentrations of the Sphagnum litter after 14 months of incubation, as well as lower K concentrations of spruce litter after 24 month incubation. There were no effects of the OTC treatment on decomposition rates for Sphagnum and spruce litter. The nutrient supply rates of Ca and Mg were consistently lower in the OTCs. The supply rates of N were significantly higher in the control plots at the logging site than at any other combination of the OTC treatment and disturbance site. Soil pH was lower in the OTCs by the end of the growing seasons in 2006 and 2007. The results suggest that the impact of climatic changes, as simulated by the OTC treatment, on the soil system of mixedwood-boreal post-disturbance sites is likely to affect biogeochemical processes such as nutrient supply rates and the soil pH, but the effects on decomposition may be minimal.


Open-top chambers Climate change Soil pH Soil nutrient supply rates Decomposition rates Post-disturbance boreal forest sites 



We would like to thank L. Bissonnette, K. Bona, D. Dabros, L. Dabros, B. Gélinas, H. Lalande and A. Murphy for field and laboratory assistance; and E. and H. Coriveau, J.-G. and C. Harvey and M.-P. Bluteau for logistic support while staying in James Bay. Financial support for this project was provided by Sustainable Forest Management Network and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.


  1. ACIA (2004) Impacts of a warming arctic: arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: A triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aerts R (2006) The freezer defrosting: global warming and litter decomposition rates in cold biomes. J Ecol 94:713–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ågren GI, McMurtrie RE, Parton WJ, Shugart HH (1991) State-of-the-art of models of production-decomposition linkages in conifer and grassland ecosystems. Ecol Appl 1:118–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alban DH, Perala DA, Schlaegel BE (1978) Biomass and nutrient distribution in aspen, pine, and spruce stands on same soil type in Minnesota. Can J For Res 8:290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belyea LR (1996) Separating the effects of litter quality and microenvironment on decomposition rates in a patterned peatland. Oikos 77:529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergeron Y, Gauthier S, Flannigan M, Kafka V (2004) Fire regimes at the transition between mixedwood and coniferous boreal forest in Northwestern Quebec. Ecology 85:1916–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dabros A (2008) Effects of simulated climate change on post-disturbance Populus tremuloides—Picea mariana ecosystems in northwestern Quebec. PhD thesis, McGill UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahlgren RA, Driscoll CT (1994) The effects of whole-tree clear-cutting on soil processes at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New-Hampshire, USA. Plant Soil 158:239–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Decker KLM, Wang D, Waite C, Scherbatskoy T (2003) Snow removal and ambient air temperature effects on forest soil temperatures in Northern Vermont. Soil Sci Soc of Am J 67:1234–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorrepaal E, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC, Van Logtestijn RSP, Callaghan TV (2006) Sphagnum modifies climate-change impacts on subarctic vascular bog plants. Funct Ecol 20:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Groffman PM, Driscoll CT, Fahey TJ, Hardy JP, Fitzhugh RD, Tierney GL (2001) Colder soils in a warmer world: a snow manipulation study in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Biogeochemistry 56:135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardy JP, Groffman PM, Fitzhugh RD, Henry KS, Welman AT, Demers JD, Fahey TJ, Driscoll CT, Tierney GL, Nolan S (2001) Snow depth manipulation and its influence on soil frost and water dynamics in a northern hardwood forest. Biogeochemistry 56:151–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobbie SE (1996) Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol Monogr 66:503–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbie SE, Gough L (2004) Litter decomposition in moist acidic and non-acidic tundra with different glacial histories. Oecologia 140:113–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hollister RD (1998) Response of wet meadow tundra to interannual and manipulated temperature variation: implications for climate change research. MSc thesis, Michigan State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, p 996Google Scholar
  18. Kirschbaum MU (2000) Will changes in soil organic matter act as a positive or negative feedback on global warming? Biogeochemistry 48:21–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lefort P (2003) Ecology and management of Claybelt forests: a knowledge synthesis. Lake Abitibi Model Forest Network, Cochrane, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  20. Marion GM, Pidgeon DE (1992) Passive techniques for manipulating field soil temperatures. Special Report 92-14. U.S. Army Crops of Engineers, Cold Regions Research & Engineering LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  21. McClaugherty CA, Pastor J, Aber JD, Melillo JM (1985) Forest litter decomposition in relation to soil nitrogen dynamics and litter quality. Ecology 66:266–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore TR, Bubier JL, Bledzki L (2007) Litter decomposition in temperate peatland ecosystems: The effect of substrate and site. Ecosystems 10:949–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parkinson JA, Allen SE (1975) Wet oxidation procedure suitable for determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 6:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Plant Root Simulator (PRS™) Operations Manual (2004) Applying Research Solutions to Agriculture & the Environment. Western Ag Innovations Inc., Saskatoon, SaskatchewanGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenberg NJ, Blad BL, Verma SB (1983) Microclimate; the biological environment. Wiley, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Rustad LE, Campbell JL, Marion GM, Norby RJ, Mitchell MJ, Hartley AE, Cornelissen JHC, Gurevitch J (2001) A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SAS Institute Inc. (2007) SAS Language and Procedures: Usage. Version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. StatSoft, Inc. (2001) STATISTICA (data analysis software system). Version 6. Tulsa, OK, USAGoogle Scholar
  29. Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Trofymow JA, and the CIDET Working Group (1998) The Canadian Intersite Decomposition Experiment. Canadian Forest Service Information Report BC-X-378, Natural Resources Canada, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, B.C., CanadaGoogle Scholar
  31. Turetsky MR (2003) The role of bryophytes in carbon and nitrogen cycling. Bryologist 106:395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Cleve K, Oliver L, Schlentner R, Viereck LA, Dyrness CT (1983) Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems. Can J For Res 13:747–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Cleve K, Oechel WC, Hom JL (1990) Response of black spruce (Picea mariana) ecosystems to soil temperature modification in Interior Alaska. Can J For Res 20:1530–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang TJ (2005) Influence of the seasonal snow cover on the ground thermal regime: An overview. Rev of Geophysics 43: Art. No. RG4002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Macdonald CampusMcGill UniversitySainte Anne de BellevueCanada

Personalised recommendations