Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 312, Issue 1–2, pp 1–6 | Cite as

The rhizosphere: complex by design

  • D. L. Jones
  • P. HinsingerEmail author
Editorial

Abstract

The rhizosphere represents one of the most complex ecosystems on earth with almost every root on the planet expected to have a chemically, physically and biologically unique rhizosphere. Despite its intrinsic complexity, understanding the rhizosphere is vital if we are to solve some of the world’s most impending environmental crises such as sustainable food, fibre and energy production, preservation of water resources and biodiversity, and mitigation against climate change. One of the key challenges that faces rhizosphere ecologists is how to translate their fundamental research into practical real-world applications. In addition, they need to convince policy makers that consideration of the rhizosphere is vital in the formulation and implementation of any environmental policy relating to plant growth. This is highlighted by the recent biofuel and carbon debt debate whereby rhizosphere processes such as priming were largely ignored leading to destabilization of national policies. Recent advances in our understanding of the tangled web of rhizosphere interactions have been largely driven by technological innovations in analytical, bioinformatic and imaging tools, and this is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. However, there is also a critical need to incorporate this more reductionist information into mathematical models that are capable of incorporating the rhizosphere to allow simulation of plot- or landscape-level processes that are particularly relevant to policymakers. Consequently, as the multidisciplinary rhizosphere science community grows, there will be increasing need to both integrate scientific information and to subsequently convey this in an effective manner to stakeholders. If we can achieve this we will be in a good position to help prevent ongoing global environmental degeneration. These issues were addressed at the RHIZOSPHERE 2 International Conference which was held at Montpellier, France in August 2007. This special issue gathers some of the research presented during this major event.

Keywords

Biodiversity Carbon cycling Complexity Ecosystem processes Policy Review Spatial scaling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This special issue has been guest-edited by Timothy S. George, Angela Hodge and Petra Marschner, who are gratefully acknowledged for their dedication.

References

  1. Darrah PR, Jones DL, Kirk GJD, Roose T (2006) Modelling the rhizosphere: a review of methods for ‘upscaling’ to the whole-plant scale. Eur J Soil Sci 57:13–25 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00786.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Schamphelaire L, van den Bossche L, Dang HS, Höfte M, Boon N, Rabaey K (2008) Microbial fuel cells generating electricity from rhizodeposits of rice plants. Environ Sci Technol 42:3053–3058 doi: 10.1021/es071938w PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunbabin VM, McDermott S, Bengough AG (2006) Upscaling from rhizosphere to whole root system: Modelling the effects of phospholipid surfactants on water and nutrient uptake. Plant Soil 283:57–72 doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-0866-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EC (2003) Directive on the promotion of the use of biofuels and other renewable fuels for transport, officially 2003/30/EC. Brussels, European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  5. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238 doi: 10.1126/science.1152747 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hartmann A, Rothballer M, Schmid M (2008a) Lorenz Hiltner, a pioneer in rhizosphere microbial ecology and soil bacteriology research. Plant Soil (this issue)Google Scholar
  7. Hartmann A, Lemanceau P, Prosser JI (2008b) Multitrophic interactions in the rhizosphere. Rhizosphere microbiology: at the interface of many disciplines and expertises. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65:179 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00558.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hinsinger P, Marschner P (2006) Rhizosphere—perspectives and challenges—a tribute to Lorenz Hiltner 12–17 September 2004—Munich, Germany. Plant Soil 283:vii–viii doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-0057-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hinsinger P, Gobran GR, Gregory PJ, Wenzel WW (2005) Rhizosphere geometry and heterogeneity arising from root-mediated physical and chemical processes. New Phytol 168:293–303 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01512.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinsinger P, Bengough AG, Vetterlein D, Young IM (2008) Rhizosphere: biophysics, biogeochemistry and ecological relevance. Plant Soil (submitted)Google Scholar
  11. Jones DL, Hodge A, Kuzyakov Y (2004) Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition. New Phytol 163:459–480 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01130.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones DL, Nguyen C, Finlay RD (2008) Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface. Plant Soil (submitted)Google Scholar
  13. Kuyper TW (2008) Rhizosphere studies from the nanoscale to the globe. New Phytol 177:297–299Google Scholar
  14. Kuzyakov Y (2002) Review: Factors affecting rhizosphere priming effects. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:382–396 doi: 10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<382::AID-JPLN382>3.0.CO;2-# CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lambers H, Raven JA, Shaver GR, Smith SE (2008) Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends Ecol Evol 23:95–103 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Dathe L, Wirick S, Jacobsen C (2008) Spatial complexity of soil organic matter forms at nanometre scales. Nat Geosci 1:238–242 doi: 10.1038/ngeo155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loreau M, Oteng-Yeboah A, Arroyo MTK, Babin D, Barbault R, Donoghue M (2006) Diversity without representation. Nature 442:245–246 doi: 10.1038/442245a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lynch JP (2007) Roots of the second green. Aust J Bot 55:493–512 doi: 10.1071/BT06118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nesshöver C, Müssner R, Henle K, Pinto IS (2008) Linking biodiversity research and policy in Europe. Ambio 37:138–141 doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[138:LBRAPI]2.0.CO;2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Donnell AG, Young IM, Rushton SP, Shirley MD, Crawford JW (2007) Visualization, modelling and prediction in soil microbiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:689–699 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1714 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pierret A, Doussan C, Capowiez Y, Bastardie F, Pagès L (2007) Root functional architecture: a framework for modeling the interplay between roots and soil. Vadose Zone J 6:269–281 doi: 10.2136/vzj2006.0067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raaijmakers JM, Paulitz TC, Steinberg C, Alabouvette C, Moënne-Loccoz Y (2008) The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil (in press)Google Scholar
  23. Rees RM, Bingham IJ, Baddeley JA, Watson CA (2005) The role of plants and land management in sequestering soil carbon in temperate arable and grassland ecosystems. Geoderma 128:130–154 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schnepf A, Roose T (2006) Modelling the contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to plant phosphate uptake. New Phytol 171:669–682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong FX, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240 doi: 10.1126/science.1151861 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Standing D, Baggs EM, Wattenbach M, Killham K (2007) Meeting the challenge of scaling up processes in the plant–soil–microbe system. Biol Fertil Soils 44:245–257 doi: 10.1007/s00374-007-0249-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Torsvik V, Ovreas L (2002) Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 5:240–245 doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T (1998) Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396:69–72 doi: 10.1038/23932 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Watt M, Silk WK, Passioura JB (2006a) Rates of root and organism growth, soil conditions, and temporal and spatial development of the rhizosphere. Ann Bot (Lond) 97:839–855 doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Watt M, Kirkegaard JA, Passioura JB (2006b) Rhizosphere biology and crop productivity—a review. Aust J Soil Res 44:299–317 doi: 10.1071/SR05142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wissuwa M, Mazzola M, Picard C (2008) Novel approaches in plant breeding for rhizosphere-related traits. Plant Soil doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9693-2

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of the Environment & Natural ResourcesBangor UniversityGwyneddUK
  2. 2.INRA, UMR Biogéochimie du Sol et de la Rhizosphère (INRA–SupAgro)MontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations