Plant and Soil

, 314:143 | Cite as

Assessment of nutrient deficiencies in maize in nutrient omission trials and long-term field experiments in the West African Savanna

  • G. Nziguheba
  • B. K. Tossah
  • J. Diels
  • A. C. Franke
  • K. Aihou
  • E. N. O. Iwuafor
  • C. Nwoke
  • R. Merckx
Regular Article

Abstract

Low soil fertility is one of the main constraints to crop production in the West African savanna. However, the response of major cereals to fertilizer applications is often far below the potential yields. Low fertilizer efficiency, inadequacy of current fertilizer recommendations, and the ignorance of nutrients other than N, P, and K may limit crop production. Nutrient limitations to maize production were identified in on-farm trials in Togo and in several long-term experiments in Nigeria and Benin. Maize ear leaf samples were analyzed for macro and micro-nutrients, and the Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated Systems (DRIS) was applied to rank nutrients according to their degree of limitation to maize. In the on-farm trials, both yield and DRIS results indicated that, when N is supplied, P limited maize production in all fields, reducing yields by 31% on average. Sulfur was limiting in 81% of the fields and was responsible for an average yield reduction of 20%. In the long-term experiments where N, P, and K had been annually applied, Ca and Mg indices were strongly negative, indicative of deficiency. Zn indices were negative in all trials. Despite N-fertilizer additions, N indices remained negative in some of the long-term experiments, pointing to low efficiency of applied fertilizers. There was a direct link between DRIS indices and the management imposed in the different experiments, indicating that DRIS is a useful approach to reveal nutrient deficiencies or imbalances in maize in the region.

Keywords

DRIS Ear leaves Fertilizers Nutrient indices Organic inputs 

References

  1. Agbenin JO (2003) Soil saturation extract composition and sulfate solubility in a tropical semiarid soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1133–1139Google Scholar
  2. Bationo A, Lompo F, Koala S (1998) Research on nutrient flows and balances in West Africa: state-of-the-art. Agric Ecosyst Environ 71:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bationo A, Mokwunye U, Vlek PLG, Koala S, Shapiro BI (2003) Soil fertility management for sustainable land use in the West Africa Sudano-Sahelian zone. In: Gichuru MP, Bationo A et al (eds) Soil fertility management in Africa: a regional perspective. ASP AAS, Nairobi, pp 253–292Google Scholar
  4. Beaufils ER (1973) Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS). A general scheme for experimentation and calibration based on principles developed from research in plant nutrition. Soil Sci Bull. No 1, University of Natal, pp 1–132Google Scholar
  5. Carsky RJ, Oyewole B, Tian G (1999) Integrated soil fertility management for the savanna zone of W.Africa: legume rotation and fertilizer N. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 55:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carsky RJ, Becker M, Hauser S (2001) Mucuna cover crop fallow systems: potential and limitations. In: Tian G, Ishida F, Keatinge JDH (eds) Sustaining soil fertility in West Africa. SSSA Special Publication 58, pp 111–135Google Scholar
  7. Escano CR, Jones CA, Uehara G (1981) Nutrient diagnosis in corn grown on Hydric Dystrandepts: II. Comparison of two systems of tissue diagnosis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1140–1144Google Scholar
  8. FAO (1988) FAO/Unesco Soil Map of the World, Revised Legend. World Resources Report 60, FAO, Rome. Reprinted as Technical Paper 20, ISRIC, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1989, pp 138Google Scholar
  9. FAO (1998) World reference base for soil resources. FAO, ISRIC, ISSS, Rome, Italy, p 91Google Scholar
  10. Franke AC, Laberge G., Oyewole BD, Schulz S (2008) A comparison between legume technologies and fallow, and their effects on maize and soil traits, in two distinct environments of the West African savannah. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyt. doi:10.1007/s10705-008-9174-2
  11. Friesen DK (1991) Fate and efficiency of sulfur fertilizer applied to food crops in West Africa. Fertil Res 29:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris FMA (1998) Farm-level assessment of nutrient balance in north Nigeria. Agric Ecosyst Environ 71:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kang BT, Osiname OA (1976) Sulfur response of maize in Western Nigeria. Agron J 68:333–336Google Scholar
  14. Novozamsky I, Houba VJG, van Eck R, van Vark W (1983) A novel digestion technique for multi-element plant analysis. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 14:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ojeniyi SO, Kayode GO (1993) Response of maize to copper and sulfur in tropical regions. J Agric Sci Camb 120:295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reuter DJ, Edwards DG, Wilhelm NS (1997) Temperate and tropical crops. In: Reuter DJ, Robinson JB (eds) Plant analysis: an interpretation manual. CSIRO, Australia, pp 83–284Google Scholar
  17. de Ridder N, Breman H, van Keulen H (2004) Revisiting a ‘cure against land hunger’: soil fertility management and farming systems dynamics in the West African Sahel. Agric Syst 80:109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. SAS (1992) The mixed procedure. SAS Technical report p 229: SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Schulz S, Carsky RJ, Tarawali S (2001) Herbaceous legumes: the panacea for West African soil fertility problems? In: Tian G, Ishida F, Keatinge JDH (eds) Sustaining soil fertility in West Africa. SSSA Special Publication 58:179–196Google Scholar
  20. Schulz S, Diels J, Lyasse O (2002) Rehabilitation of severely degraded soil through the application of limiting nutrients: an example from Shika farm. In: Improving and intensifying cereal–legume systems in the moist and dry savanna of West and Central Africa. Annual Report 2002, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp 4–5.Google Scholar
  21. Searle PL (1984) The Berthelot or indophenol reaction and its use in analytical chemistry of nitrogen. A review. Analyst (Lond) 109:549–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Snedeker SM, Greger JL (1983) Metabolism of zinc, copper, and iron as affected by dietary protein, cysteine and histidine. J Nutr 113:644–652PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stoorvogel JJ, Smaling EMA, Janssen BH (1993) Calculation of soil nutrient balances in Africa at different scale. I. Supra-national scale. Fertil research 35:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sumner ME (1981) Diagnosing the sulphur requirements of corn and wheat using foliar analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:87–90Google Scholar
  25. Vanlauwe B, Aihou K, Aman S, Iwuafor ENO, Tossah BK, Diels J et al (2001) Maize yield as affected by organic inputs and urea in the West African moist savanna. Agron J 92:1191–1199Google Scholar
  26. Vanlauwe B, Diels J, Lyasse O, Aihou K, Iwuafor ENO, Sanginga N et al (2002) Fertility status of soils of the derived savanna and northern guinea savanna and response to major plant nutrients, as influenced by soil type and land use management. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 62:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vanlauwe B, Aihou K, Tossah BK, Diels J, Sanginga N, Merckx R (2005) Senna siamea trees recycle Ca from a Ca-rich subsoil and increase the topsoil pH in agroforestry systems in the West African derived savanna zone. Plant Soil 269:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Walworth J, Sumner ME (1988) Foliar diagnosis: a review. In: Tinker B, Lauchli AV (eds) Advances plant nutrition. Praeger Publishers, NY, pp 193–241Google Scholar
  29. Weil RR, Mughogho SK (2000) Sulfur nutrition of maize in four regions of Malawi. Agron J 92:649–656Google Scholar
  30. Zhao FJ, Hawkesfordt MJ, McGrath SP (1999) Sulphur assimilation and effects on yield and quality of wheat. J Cereal Sci 30:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Nziguheba
    • 1
  • B. K. Tossah
    • 2
  • J. Diels
    • 3
  • A. C. Franke
    • 4
  • K. Aihou
    • 5
  • E. N. O. Iwuafor
    • 6
  • C. Nwoke
    • 1
  • R. Merckx
    • 3
    • 7
  1. 1.IITA-Ibadan, Nigeria. c/o Lambourn, Carolyn HouseCroydonUK
  2. 2.ITRALomeTogo
  3. 3.Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.University of WageningenWageningenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.INRABCotonouBenin
  6. 6.IARZariaNigeria
  7. 7.HeverleeBelgium

Personalised recommendations