Plant and Soil

, Volume 307, Issue 1–2, pp 1–19 | Cite as

Meta-analysis of maize yield response to woody and herbaceous legumes in sub-Saharan Africa

  • Gudeta Sileshi
  • Festus K. Akinnifesi
  • Oluyede C. Ajayi
  • Frank Place
Regular Article

Abstract

A number of studies have tested the effect of woody and herbaceous legumes on soil fertility and maize yields in sub-Saharan Africa. However, their effects on maize productivity are much debated because results have been variable. A meta-analysis was conducted with the aim of evaluating the evidence in support of yield benefits from woody and herbaceous green manure legumes. A total of 94 peer-reviewed publications from West, East and southern Africa qualified for inclusion in the analysis. Maize yield from herbaceous green manure legumes (54 publications), non-coppicing legumes (48 publications), coppicing woody legumes (10 publications), natural fallows (29 publications), and fully fertilized monoculture maize (52 publications) were compared. Mixed linear modelling using yield differences (D) and response ratios (RR) indicated that the response to legumes is positive. The mean yield increase (D) over unfertilized maize was highest (2.3 t ha−1) and least variable (CV = 70%) in fully fertilized maize, while it was lowest (0.3 t ha−1) and most variable (CV = 229%) in natural fallows. The increase in yield over unfertilized maize was 1.6 t ha−1 with coppicing woody legumes, 1.3 t ha−1 with non-coppicing woody legumes and 0.8 t ha-1 with herbaceous green manure legumes. Doubling and tripling of yields relative to the control (RR > 2) was recorded in coppicing species (67% of the cases), non-coppicing legumes (45% of the cases), herbaceous green manure legumes (16% of the cases) and natural fallows (19% of the cases). However, doubling or tripling of yields occurred only in low and medium potential sites. Amending post-fallow plots with 50% of the recommended fertilizer dose further increased yields by over 25% indicating that legume rotations may play an important role in reducing fertilizer requirements. Except with the natural fallow, the 95% confidence intervals of D and RR were higher than 1 and 0, respectively indicating significant and positive response to treatments. Therefore, it is concluded that the global maize yield response to legumes is significantly positive and higher than unfertilized maize and natural vegetation fallows.

Keywords

Cover crops Relay intercropping Response ratio Soil fertility 

References

  1. Adu-Gyamfi JJ, Myaka FA, Sakala WD, Odgaard R, Vesterager JM, Høgh-Jensen H (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation and nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in farmer-managed intercrops of maize–pigeonpea in semi-arid southern and eastern Africa. Plant Soil 295:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajayi OC, Akinnifesi FK, Sileshi G, Chakeredza S (2007) Adoption of renewable soil fertility replenishment technologies in southern African region: lessons learnt and way forward. Nat Resour Forum 31:306–317Google Scholar
  3. Akinnifesi FK, Makumba W, Sileshi G, Ajayi O, Mweta D (2007) Synergistic effect of inorganic N and P fertilizers and organic inputs from Gliricidia sepium on productivity of intercropped maize in Southern Malawi. Plant Soil 294:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akobundu IO, Udensi UE, Chikoye D (2000) Velvetbean (Mucuna spp.) suppresses speargrass (Imperata cylindrica) and increases maize yield. Int J Pest Manage 46:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arim OJ, Waceke JW, Waudo SW, Kimenju JW (2006) Effects of Canavalia ensiformis and Mucuna pruriens intercrops on Pratylenchus zeae damage and yield of maize in subsistence agriculture. Plant Soil 284:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnqvist G, Wooter D (1995) Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trend Ecol Evol 10:236–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogale T, Assenga RH, Mbaga TE, Friesen DK, Kikafunda J, Ransom JK (2001) Legume fallows for maize based systems in eastern Africa: Contribution of legumes to enhancd maize productivity and reduced nitrogen requirements. Proceedings of the Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, pp 324–329Google Scholar
  8. Byerlee D, Anandajayasekeram P, Diallo A, Gelaw B, Heisey PW, Lopez-Pereira M, Mwangi W, Smale M, Tripp R, Waddington S (1994) Maize research in Sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of past impacts and future prospects. CIMMYT Economics Working Paper 94–03. Mexico, DF, Mexico.Google Scholar
  9. Cherr CM, Scholberg JM, McSorley R (2006) Green manure approaches to crop production: a synthesis. Agron J 98:302–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chikowo R, Mapfumo P, Nyamugafata P, Giller KE (2004) Maize productivity and mineral N dynamics following different soil fertility management practices on a depleted sandy soil in Zimbabwe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 102:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chintu R, Mafongoya PL, Chirwa TS, Mwale M, Matibini J (2004) Subsoil nitrogen dynamics as affected by planted coppicing tree legume fallows in eastern Zambia. Exp Agric 40:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chirwa PW, Ong CK, Maghembe J, Black CR (2007) Soil water dynamics in intercropping systems containing Gliricidia sepium, pigeon pea and maize in southern Malawi. Agroforest Syst 69:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drechsel P, Steiner KG, Hagedorn F (1996) A review on the potential of improved fallows and green manure in Rwanda. Agroforest Syst 33:109–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gacheru E, Rao MR (2005) The potential of planted shrub fallows to combat Striga infestation on maize. Int J Pest Manage 51:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gates S (2002) Review of methodology of quantitative reviews using meta-analysis in ecology. J Anim Ecol 71:547–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giller KE, Cadish G, Ehaliotis C, Adams A, Sakala D, Mafongoya PL (1997) Building soil nitrogen capital in Africa. In: Buresh RJ, Sanchez PA, Calhoun F (eds) Replenishing soil fertility in Africa. SSSA Special Publication no. 51, Madison, WI, USA, pp 151–192Google Scholar
  17. Gladwin CH (1991) Gendered impacts of fertilizer subsidy removal programs in Malawi and Cameroon. Agric Econ 7:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gurevitch J, Hedges LV (1999) Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80:1142–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hammeed KA (1976) The oil revolution and African development. Afr Aff 75:349–358Google Scholar
  20. Hartemink AE, Buresh RJ, Jama B, Janssen BH (1996) Soil nitrate and water dynamics in Sesbania fallows, weed fallows, and maize. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:568–574Google Scholar
  21. Hauser S, Nolte C, Carsky RJ (2006) What role can planted fallows play in the humid and sub-humid zone of West and Central Africa? Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 76:297–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156Google Scholar
  23. Juo ASR, Dabiri A, Franzluebbers K (1995) Acidification of a kaolinitic Alfisol under continuous cropping and nitrogen fertilization in West Africa. Plant Soil 171:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaizzi CK, Ssali H, Vlek PLG (2004) The potential of velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) and N fertilizers in maize production on contrasting soils and agro-ecological zones of East Uganda. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 68:59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang BT, Balasubramanian V (1990) Long term fertilizer trials on Alfisols in West Africa. In Transactions of XIV International Soil Science Congress, Kyoto, Japan (vol. 4) ISSS, Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan ZR, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ, Hassanali A, Midega CAO (2006) Combined control of Striga and stemborers in maize–Desmodium spp. intercrops. Crop Prot 25:989–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LeMare PH, Pereira J, Goedert WJ (1987) Effects of green manure on isotopically exchangeable phosphate in a dark-red latosol in Brazil. J Soil Sci 38:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lortie CJ, Dyer AR (1999) Over-interpretation: avoiding the stigma of non-significance. Oikos 87:183–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lortie CJ, Callaway RM (2006) Re-analysis of meta-analysis: support for the stress-gradient hypothesis. J Ecol 94:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mafongoya PL, Kuntashula E, Sileshi G (2006) Managing soil fertility and nutrient cycles through fertilizer trees in southern Africa. In: Uphoff N, Ball AS, Fernandes E, Herren H, Husson O, Liang M, Palm C, Pretty J, Sanchez P, Sanginga N, Thies J (eds) Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 273–289Google Scholar
  31. Mekonnen K, Buresh RJ, Jama B (1997) Root and inorganic nitrogen distributions in sesbania fallow, natural fallow and maize fields. Plant Soil 188:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miguez FE, Bollero GA (2005) Review of corn yield response under winter cover cropping systems using meta-analytic methods. Crop Sci 45:2318–2329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mureithi JG, Gachene CKK, Ojiem J (2003) The role of green manure legumes in smallholder farming systems in Kenya: The Legume Research Network Project. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 1:57–70Google Scholar
  34. Mwangi WM (1999) Low use of fertilizers and low productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 47:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nyamadzawo G, Nyamugafata P, Chikowo R., Giller K (2008) Residual effects of fallows on selected soil hydraulic properties in a kaolinitic soil subjected to conventional tillage (CT) and no tillage (NT). Agroforest Syst 72:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ojiem JO, Vanlauwe B, de Ridder N, Giller KE (2007) Niche-based assessment of contributions of legumes to the nitrogen economy of Western Kenya smallholder farms. Plant Soil 292:119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O, Cooper SD, Holt RD (1999) Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models. Ecology 80:1105–1117Google Scholar
  38. Phiri E, Verplancke H, Kwesiga F, Mafongoya P (2003) Water balance and maize yield following improved sesbania fallow in eastern Zambia. Agroforest Syst 59:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Randhawa PS, Condron LM, Di HG, Sinaj S, McLenaghen RD (2005) Effect of green manure addition on soil organic phosphorus mineralization. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 73:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rao MR, Nair PKR, Ong CK (1998) Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systems. Agroforest Syst 38:3–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanchez PA (1999) Improved fallow come of age in the tropics. Agroforest Syst 47:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanchez PA (2002) Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295:2019–2020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sileshi G, Mafongoya PL (2003) Effect of rotational fallows on abundance of soil insects and weeds in maize crops in eastern Zambia. Appl Soil Ecol 23:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sileshi G, Mafongoya PL, Kwesiga F, Nkunika P (2005) Termite damage to maize grown in agroforestry systems, traditional fallows and monoculture on nitrogen-limited soils in eastern Zambia. Agric For Entomol 7:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sileshi G, Kuntashula E, Mafongoya PL (2006) Effect of improved fallows on weed infestation in maize in eastern Zambia. Zambia J Agric Sci 8:6–12Google Scholar
  46. Sileshi G, Schroth G, Rao MR, Girma H (2008) Weeds, diseases, insect pests and tri-trophic interactions in tropical agroforestry. In: Batish DR, Kohli RK, Jose S, Singh HP (eds) Ecological basis of agroforestry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 73–94Google Scholar
  47. Sim J, Reid N (1999) Statistical inference by confidence intervals: Issues of interpretation and utilization. Phys Ther 79:186–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Smale M (1995) “Maize is life”: Malawi’s delayed green revolution. World Dev 23:819–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Snapp SS, Mafongoya PL, Waddington SR (1998) Organic matter technologies to improve nutrient cycling in small holder cropping systems of southern Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 71:187–202Google Scholar
  50. Stocking MA, Murnaghan N (2001) Handbook for the field assessment of land degradation. Earthscan, London, UK, p 176Google Scholar
  51. Styger E, Fernandes ECM (2006) Contribution of managed fallows to soil fertility recovery. In: Uphoff N, Ball AS, Fernandes E, Herren H, Husson O, Liang M, Palm C, Pretty J, Sanchez P, Sanginga N, Thies J (eds) Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 425–437Google Scholar
  52. Szott LT, Palm CA, Buresh RJ (1999) Ecosystem fertility and fallow function in the humid and subhumid tropics. Agrofor Syst 47:163–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tonitto C, David MB, Drinkwater LE (2006) Replacing bare fallows with cover crops in fertilizer-intensive cropping systems: a meta-analysis of crop yield and N dynamics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:58–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vanlauwe B, Aihou K, Aman S, Iwuafor ENO, Tossah BK, Diels J, Sanginga N, Lyasse O, Merckx R, Deckers J (2001) Maize yield as affected by organic inputs and urea in the West African moist savanna. Agron J 93:1191–1199Google Scholar
  55. Wang MC, Bushman BJ (1998) Using the normal quantile plot to explore meta-analytic data sets. Psychol Method 3:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang KH, McSorley R, Gallaher RN (2003) Effect of Crotalaria juncea amendment on nematode communities in soil with different agricultural histories. J Nematol 35:294–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wortmann CS, Kaizzi CK (2000) Tree legumes in medium-term fallows: nitrogen fixation, nitrate recovery and effects on subsequent crops. Afr Crop Sci J 8:263–272Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gudeta Sileshi
    • 1
  • Festus K. Akinnifesi
    • 1
  • Oluyede C. Ajayi
    • 1
  • Frank Place
    • 2
  1. 1.World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), SADC-ICRAF Agroforestry ProgrammeChitedze Agricultural Research StationLilongweMalawi
  2. 2.World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)NairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations