Plant and Soil

, Volume 303, Issue 1–2, pp 115–129 | Cite as

Genotypic variation in seedling root architectural traits and implications for drought adaptation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

  • Ahmad M. Manschadi
  • Graeme L. Hammer
  • John T. Christopher
  • Peter deVoil
Regular Article


Root system characteristics are of fundamental importance to soil exploration and below-ground resource acquisition. Root architectural traits determine the in situ space-filling properties of a root system or root architecture. The growth angle of root axes is a principal component of root system architecture that has been strongly associated with acquisition efficiency in many crop species. The aims of this study were to examine the extent of genotypic variability for the growth angle and number of seminal roots in 27 current Australian and 3 CIMMYT wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes, and to quantify using fractal analysis the root system architecture of a subset of wheat genotypes contrasting in drought tolerance and seminal root characteristics. The growth angle and number of seminal roots showed significant genotypic variation among the wheat genotypes with values ranging from 36 to 56 (degrees) and 3 to 5 (plant−1), respectively. Cluster analysis of wheat genotypes based on similarity in their seminal root characteristics resulted in four groups. The group composition reflected to some extent the genetic background and environmental adaptation of genotypes. Wheat cultivars grown widely in the Mediterranean environments of southern and western Australia generally had wider growth angle and lower number of seminal axes. In contrast, cultivars with superior performance on deep clay soils in the northern cropping region, such as SeriM82, Baxter, Babax, and Dharwar Dry exhibited a narrower angle of seminal axes. The wheat genotypes also showed significant variation in fractal dimension (D). The D values calculated for the individual segments of each root system suggested that, compared to the standard cultivar Hartog, the drought-tolerant genotypes adapted to the northern region tended to distribute relatively more roots in the soil volume directly underneath the plant. These findings suggest that wheat root system architecture is closely linked to the angle of seminal root axes at the seedling stage. The implications of genotypic variation in the seminal root characteristics and fractal dimension for specific adaptation to drought environment types are discussed with emphasis on the possible exploitation of root architectural traits in breeding for improved wheat cultivars for water-limited environments.


Cluster analysis Digital imaging Fractal dimension Root architecture Seminal roots Drought environments 



We wish to thank Mrs Janette Wood for her excellent assistance in conducting the root chamber experiments. We also thank Andries Potgieter and Scott Chapman for their valuable contributions to cluster analysis of data. Financial support from the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) of Australia is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Araki H, Iijima M (2001) Deep rooting in winter wheat: rooting nodes of deep roots in two cultivars with deep and shallow root systems. Plant Prod Sci 4:215–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengough AG, Gordon DC, Al-Menaie H, Ellis RP, Allan D, Keith R, Thomas WTB, Forster BP (2004) Gel observation chamber for rapid screening of root traits in cereal seedlings. Plant Soil 262:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berntson GM (1994) Root systems and fractals: how reliable are calculations of fractal dimensions? Ann Bot 73:281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berntson GM (1997) Topological scaling and plant root system architecture: developmental and functional hierarchies. New Phytol 135:621–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouma TJ, Nielsen KL, Van Hal J, Koutstaal B (2001) Root system topology and diameter distribution of species from habitats differing in inundation frequency. Funct Ecol 15:360–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper M, Jensen NM, Carroll BJ, Godwin ID, Podlich DW (1999) QTL mapping activities and marker assisted selection for yield in the Germplasm Enhancement Program of the Australian Northern Wheat Improvement Program. In: Ribaut J-M, Poland D (eds) Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico, pp 120–127Google Scholar
  7. DAFWA (Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia) (2007) Wheat variety guide 2007 Western Australia. Bulletin 4704, ISSN 1833–7236Google Scholar
  8. Eastwood R (2001) Wheat varieties 2001. Victorian Department of Primary Industry, Horsham, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  9. Eghball B, Settimi JR, Maranville JW, Parkhurst AM (1993) Fractal analysis for morphological description of corn roots under nitrogen stress. Agron J 85:287–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eshel A (1998) On the fractal dimensions of a root system. Plant Cell Environ 21:247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitter AH (1987) An architectural approach to the comparative ecology of plant root systems. New Phytol 106:61–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitter AH (2002) Characteristics and functions of root systems. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, pp 249–259Google Scholar
  13. Fitter AH, Stickland TR (1991) Architectural analysis of plant root systems 2. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species. New Phytol 118:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitter AH, Stickland TR (1992) Fractal characterization of root system architecture. Funct Ecol 6:632–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fritsch R (1977) Über morphologische Wurzelmerkmale bei Triticum L. und Aegilops L. (Gramimeae). Kulturpflanze 25:45–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregory PJ (1989) The role of root characteristics in moderating the effects of drought. In: Drought resistance in cereals. Proceedings of a symposium held in Cairo, Egypt, 28–30 November 1988, pp 141–150Google Scholar
  17. Gregory PJ (1994) Root growth and activity. In: Boote KJ, Bennett JM, Sinclair TR, Paulsen GM (eds) Physiology and determination of crop yield. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 65–93Google Scholar
  18. Gregory PJ, McGowan M, Biscoe PV, Hunter B (1978) Water relations of winter wheat. 1. Growth of the root system. J Agric Sci Camb 91:91–102Google Scholar
  19. Gregory PJ, Tennant D, Belford RK (1992) Root and shoot growth, and water and light use efficiency of barley and wheat crops grown on a shallow duplex soil in a Mediterranean-type environment. Aust J Agric Res 43:555–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hammer GL (2006) Pathways to prosperity: breaking the yield barrier in sorghum. Agricultural Science 19(2):16–22Google Scholar
  21. Hartigan JA (1975) Clustering algorithms. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoad SP, Russell G, Lucas ME, Bingham IJ (2001) The management of wheat, barley, and oat root systems. Adv Agron 74:193–246Google Scholar
  23. Hurd EA (1968) Growth of roots of seven varieties of spring wheat at high and low moisture levels. Agron J 60:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kato Y, Abe J, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J (2006) Genotypic variation in root growth angle in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and its association with deep root development in upland fields with different water regimes. Plant Soil 287:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirkegaard JA, Lilley JM, Howe GN, Graham JM (2007) Impact of subsoil water use on wheat yield. Aust J Agric Res 58:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klepper B (1992) Development and growth of crop root systems. In: Hatfield JL, Stewart BA (eds) Limitations to plant root growth. Adv Soil Sci 19, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  27. Klepper B, Belford RK, Rickman RW (1984) Root and shoot development in winter wheat. Agron J 76:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kutschera L (1960) Wurzelatlas mitteleuropaeischer Ackerunkraeuter und Kulturpflanzen. DLG Verlag, Frankfurt am main, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  29. Liao H, Rubio G, Yan X, Cao A, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2001) Effect of phosphorus availability on basal root shallowness in common bean. Plant Soil 232:69–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liao M, Fillery IRP, Palta JA (2004) Early vigorous growth is a major factor influencing nitrogen uptake in wheat. Funct Plant Biol 31:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liao M, Palta JA, Fillery IRP (2006) Root characteristics of vigorous wheat improve early nitrogen uptake. Aust J Agric Res 57:1097–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. López-Castañeda C, Richards RA (1994) Variation in temperate cereals in rainfed environments. I. Grain yield, biomass and agronomic characteristics. Field Crops Res 37:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ludlow MM, Muchow RC (1990) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv Agron 43:107–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lush D (2007) Wheat varieties for Queensland 2007. Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, PRO7-2651, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  35. Lynch J (1995) Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol 109:7–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lynch JP, Brown KM (2001) Topsoil foraging – an architectural adaptation of plants to low phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 237:225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lynch J, van Beem JJ (1993) Growth and architecture of seedling roots of common bean genotypes. Crop Sci 33:1253–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mac Key J (1979) Wheat domestication as a shoot: root interrelation process. In: Ramanujam S (ed) Proceedings of the fifth international wheat genetics symposium. Volume 2, Session IX. Genetics of adaptation, production and stress physiology. Indian Society of Plant Breeding and Genetics, New Delhi, India, pp 875–890Google Scholar
  39. Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Manschadi AM, Christopher J, deVoil P, Hammer GL (2006) The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments. Funct Plant Biol 33:823–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Manske GGB, Vlek PLG (2002) Root architecture – wheat as a model plant. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, pp 249–259Google Scholar
  42. Manske GGB, Ortiz-Monasterio JI, Ginkel MV, González RM, Rajaram S, Molina E, Vlek PLG (2000) Traits associated with improved P-uptake efficiency in CIMMYT’s semidwarf spring bread wheat grown on an acid Andisol in Mexico. Plant Soil 221:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Masi CEA, Maranville JW (1998) Evaluation of sorghum root branching using fractals. J Agric Sci Camb 131:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McPhee K (2005) Variation for seedling root architecture in the core collection of pea germplasm. Crop Sci 45:1758–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McRae FJ, McCaffery DW, Matthews PW (2007) Winter crop variety guide. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, ISSN 1328-9535Google Scholar
  46. Nakamoto T, Oyanagi A (1994) The direction of growth of seminal roots of Triticum aestivum L. and experimental modification thereof. Ann Bot 73:363–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nielsen K, Lynch J, Weiss H (1997) Fractal geometry of bean root systems: correlations between spatial and fractal dimension. Am J Bot 84:26–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nielsen KL, Miller CR, Beck D, Lynch JP (1999) Fractal geometry of root systems: field observations of contrasting genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown under different phosphorus regimes. Plant Soil 206:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nix HA (1975) The Australian climate and its effect on grain yield and quality. In: Lazenby A, Matheson EM (eds) Australian field crops, wheat and other temperate cereals. Angus and Robertson, Sydney, pp 183–226Google Scholar
  50. O’Brien L (1979) Genetic variability of root growth in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Aust J Agric Res 30:587–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Olivares-Villegas JJ, Reynolds MP, McDonald GK (2007) Drought-adaptive attributes in the Seri/Babax hexaploid wheat population. Funct Plant Biol 34:189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Toole JC, Bland WL (1987) Genotypic variation in crop plant root systems. Adv Agron 41:91–145Google Scholar
  53. Oyanagi A (1994) Gravitropic response growth angle and vertical distribution of roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Soil 165:323–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Passioura JB (1972) The effect of root geometry on the yield of wheat growing on stored water. Aust J Agric Res 23:745–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Passioura JB (1983) Roots and drought resistance. Agric Water Manag 7:265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peake AS, Cooper M, Fabrizius MA (1996) The relationship between the 1BL/1RS translocation and grain yield in three wheat populations in Queensland environments. In: Richards R, Wrigley C, Rawson H, Robetzke G, Davidson J, Brettell R (eds) Proceedings of the 8th Assembly of the Wheat Breeding Society of Australia, Canberra ACT Australia, pp 20–23Google Scholar
  57. Poorter H, Nagel O (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:595–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Price AH, Steele KA, Gorham J, Bridges JM, Moore BJ, Evans JL, Richardson P, Jones RGW (2002) Upland rice grown in soil-filled chambers and exposed to contrasting water-deficit regimes: I. Root distribution, water use and plant water status. Field Crops Res 76:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rebetzke GJ, Richards RA (1999) Genetic improvement of early vigour in wheat. Aust J Agric Res 50:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Richards RA (2006) Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agric Water Manag 80:197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Richards RA, Passioura JB (1989) A breeding program to reduce the diameter of the major xylem vessel in the seminal roots of wheat and its effect on grain yield in rain-fed environments. Aust J Agric Res 40:943–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Condon AG, van Herwaarden AF (2002) Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Sci 42:111–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. SAS Institute Inc (1991) SAS system for linear models. Cary, NC, USA, p 329Google Scholar
  64. Siddique KHM, Belford RK, Tennant D (1990) Root:shoot ratios of old and modern, tall and semi-dwarf wheats in a Mediterranean environment. Plant Soil 121:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sinclair TR, Purcell LC, Sneller CH (2004) Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential. Trends Plant Sci 9:70–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sivapalan S, O’Brien L, Ortiz-Ferrara G, Hollamby GJ, Barclay I, Martin PJ (2001) Yield performance and adaptation of some Australian and CIMMYT/ICARDA developed wheat genotypes in the West Asia North Africa (WANA) region. Aust J Agric Res 52:661–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sivapalan S, O’Brien L, Ortiz-Ferrara G, Hollamby GJ, Barclay I, Martin PJ (2003) A comparative study for yield performance and adaptation of some Australian and CIMMYT/ICARDA wheat genotypes grown at selected locations in Australia and the WANA region. Aust J Agric Res 54:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tatsumi J, Yamauchi A, Kono Y (1989) Fractal analysis of plant root systems. Ann Bot 64:499–503Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmad M. Manschadi
    • 1
  • Graeme L. Hammer
    • 2
  • John T. Christopher
    • 3
  • Peter deVoil
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Development Research (ZEF)University of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.APSRU, School of Land, Crop and Food SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Queensland Department of Primary Industries & FisheriesLeslie Research CentreToowoombaAustralia
  4. 4.APSRUQueensland Department of Primary Industries & FisheriesToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations