Water-extractable humic substances alter root development and epidermal cell pattern in Arabidopsis
- 324 Downloads
The effect of a low-molecular weight, water-extractable fraction of humic substances (WEHS) derived from sphagnum peat on post-embryonic plant development has been studied using Arabidopsis roots. Application of humic substances caused an array of changes in root morphology, such as an increase in root hair length and density, formation of ectopic root hairs, and an increase in cell proliferation in the root ground tissue. Application of WEHS affected genes involved in epidermal cell fate specification, suggesting that humic substances can alter developmental programs at an early stage of root cell differentiation. The WEREWOLF and GLABRA2 genes, encoding negative regulators of the root hair cell fate, were significantly down-regulated in the presence of WEHS. Thus, the presence of humic substances caused an ordered remodeling of the root morphology, leading to an increased absorptive surface of the root. Growth in the presence of WEHS did not rescue the phenotype of the root hair defective rhd6 mutant. Analyzing BA3:uidA and DR5:uidA transgenic plants, carrying auxin response elements, and monitoring the expression of the auxin-responsive GH3 gene by real-time RT-PCR did not provide evidence for a WEHS-induced expression of auxin-related genes. It is concluded that WEHS do not exert their effects in an auxin-like manner.
KeywordsArabidopsis thaliana Auxin Cell specification Humic substances Root hairs Root development
We thank Dr. Paula Perry for professional help in minor (plant) surgery.
- Chen Y, Magen H, Riov J (1994) Humic substances originating from rapidly decomposing organic matter: properties and effects on plant growth. In: Senesi N, Miano TM (eds) Humic substances in the global environment and implication on human health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 427–443Google Scholar
- Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp 365–386Google Scholar
- Varanini Z, Pinton R (2000) Direct versus indirect effects of soil humic substances on plant growth and nutrition. In: Pinton R, Varanini Z, Nannipieri P (eds) The Rhizosphere. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 141–157Google Scholar
- Vaughan D, Malcolm RE (1985) Influence of humic substances on growth and physiological process. In: Vaughan D, Malcolm RE (eds) Soil organic matter and biological activity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 37–75Google Scholar