Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 305, Issue 1–2, pp 49–59 | Cite as

Variations in the radial gradient of sap velocity in trunks of forest and fruit trees

  • Yehezkel CohenEmail author
  • Shabtai Cohen
  • Tatiana Cantuarias-Aviles
  • Gabriel Schiller
Regular Article

Abstract

We studied the radial pattern of sap velocity (v) in trunks of six forest species: Cupressus sempervirens L; Eucalyptus camaldulensis F. Muell; Pinus halepensis Mill. (Alleppo pine); Quercus aegilops L. ssp. ithaburensis [Decne] Boiss; Quercus calliprinos Webb; Quercus rotundifolia Lam. (Syn. Quercus ilex spp. Rotundifolia) and three fruit species: Citrus sinensis L. Osback; Malus domestica cv. Golden Delicious; Persea americana Mill. Data was selected from measurements made over a period of 15 years. For each species, at least data of 1–2 weeks measured on days with clear sky and after a rain event or irrigation were analyzed. Measurements were made with the T max heat pulse method, and six points were measured along the radius of the trunk. Two types of radial pattern were found; in one type the highest v value was recorded near the cambium, decreasing toward the heartwood; and the other type had low v near the cambium increasing toward a depth of 12 to 20 mm below the cambium and decreasing with depth to the heartwood. There was large interspecies variability of v in both the pattern of radial gradient with depth and the distance between the cambium and the border of conducting sapwood. Variations in radial pattern of v between trees within species were generally small with a coefficient of variation of 4–20%. The mean fractions of volumetric flow in the 0–16 and 0–24 mm layers below the cambium were 59% and 79% of the total flow, respectively. The distance between the cambium and the border between conducting and non-conducting sapwood varied from 31 to 66 mm in the various species. The radial distribution of sap velocity with azimuth around the trunk had a coefficient of variation similar to that found between trees of the same species. The amplitude of the azimuthal variation changed during the day; it was high in the mornings and evenings and low at noon. The variation of sap velocity in three azimuths was more affected by the structure of each individual trunk than by the position with respect to the sun.

Keywords

Azimuthal variations Conductive sapwood Radial distribution of volumetric flow Tmax heat pulse method 

References

  1. Burgess SSO, Adams MA, Tuner NC, Ong CK (1998) The redistribution of soil water by tree root systems. Oecologia 115:306–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen Y, Fuchs M, Green GC (1981) Improvement of the heat pulse method for determining sap flow in trees. Plant Cell Environ 4:391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen Y, Adar E, Dody A, Schiller G (1997) Underground water use by Eucalyptus trees in an arid climate. Trees 11:356–362Google Scholar
  4. Cermak J, Kucera J (1990) Scaling up transpiration data between trees, stands and watersheds. Silva Carelica 15:101–120Google Scholar
  5. Cermak J, Cienciala E, Kucera J, Hallgren JE (1992) Radial velocity profiles of water flow in trunks of Norway spruce and oak and the response of spruce to severing. Tree Physiol 10:367–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clearwater MJ, Meinzer FC, Andrade JL, Goldstein G, Holbrook NM (1999) Potential errors in measurement of non-uniform sap flow using heat dissipation probes. Tree Physiol 19:681–687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clearwater MJ, Goldstein AH (2005) Embolism repair and long distance water transport. In: Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA (eds) Vascular transport in plants. Elsevier/Academic, Oxford, UK, pp 307–318Google Scholar
  8. David TS, Ferreira MI, Cohen S, Pereira JS, David JS (2004) Constraints on transpiration from an evergreen oak tree in southern Portugal. Agric For Meteorol 122:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delzon S, Sartore M, Granier A, Loustau D (2004) Radial profiles of sap flow with increasing tree size in maritime pine. Tree Physiol 24:1285–1293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiora A, Cescatti A (2006) Diurnal and seasonal variability in radial distribution of sap flux density: implications for estimating stand transpiration. Tree Physiol 26:1217–1225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ford CR, Goranson CE, Mitchell RJ, Will RE, Teskey RO (2004a) Diurnal and seasonal variability in the radial distribution of sap flow: predicting total stem flow in Pinus taeda trees. Tree Physiol 24:951–960Google Scholar
  12. Ford CR, McGuire MA, Mitchell RJ, Teskey RO (2004b) Assessing variation in the radial profile of sap flux density in Pinus species and its effect on daily water use. Tree Physiol 24:241–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gartner BL, Meinzer FC (2005) Structure–function relationships in sapwood water transport and storage. In: Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA (ed) Vascular transport in plants. Elsevier/Academic, Oxford, UK, pp 307–318Google Scholar
  14. Granier A (1987) Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol 3:309–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Granier A, Anfodillo T, Sabatti M, Cochard H, Dreyer E, Tomasi M, Valentini R, Breda N (1994) Axial and radial water flow in the trunk of oak trees: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Tree Physiol 14:1383–1396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Green SR, Clothier BE (1988) Water use of kiwifruit vines and apple trees by the heat-pulse technique. J Exp Bot 39:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hatton TJ, Catchpole EA, Vertessy RA (1990) Integration of sap flow velocity to estimate plant water use. Tree Physiol 6:201–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. James SA, Clearwater MJ, Meinzer FC, Goldstein G (2002) Heat dissipation sensors of variable length for the measurement of sap flow in trees with deep sapwood. Tree Physiol 22:277–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. James SA, Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Woodruff D, Jones T, Restom T, Mejia M, Clearwater MJ, Campanello P (2003) Axial and radial water transport and internal water storage in tropical forest canopy trees. Oecologia 134:37–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jimenez MS, Nadezhdina N, Cermak J, Morales D (2000) Radial variation in sap flow in five laurel forest tree species in Tenrife, Canary Islands. Tree Physiol 20:1149–1156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kostner B, Biron P, Siegwolf R, Granier A (1996) Estimates of water-vapor flux and canopy conductance of Scots pine at the tree level utilizing different xylem sap flow methods. Theor Appl Climatol 53:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kostner B, Granier A, Cermak J (1998) Sap flow measurements in forest stands: methods and uncertainties. Ann Sci For 55:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kubota M, Tenhunen J, Zimmermann R, Schmidt M, Adiku S, Kakubari Y (2005) Influences of environmental factors on the radial profile of sap flux density in Fagus crenata growing at different elevations in the Naeba Mountains, Japan. Tree Physiol 25:545–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Loustau D, Domec JC, Bosc A (1998) Interpreting the variations in xylem sap flux density within the trunk of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Alt. ): application of a model for calculating water flows at tree and stand levels. Ann Sci For 55:29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu P, Muller WJ, Chacko EK (2000) Spatial variations in xylem sap flux density in the trunk of orchard-grown mature mango trees under changing soil water conditions. Tree Physiol 20:683–692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nadezhdina N, Cermak J, Ceulemans R (2002) Radial patterns of sap flow in woody stems of dominant and understory species: scaling errors associated with positioning of sensors. Tree Physiol 22:907–918PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nadezhdina N, Nadezhdin V, Ferreira MI, Pitacco A (2007) Variability with xylem depth in sap flow in trunks and branches of mature olive trees. Tree Physiol 27:105–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips N, Oren R, Zimmermann R (1996) Radial patterns of xylem sap flow in non-diffuse and ring-porous tree species. Plant Cell Environ 19:983–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Poyatos R, Cermak J, LLorens P (2007) Variation in the radial patterns of sap flux density in pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens) and its implications for tree and stand transpiration measurements. Tree Physiol 2:537–548Google Scholar
  30. Schiller G, Cohen Y (1995) Water regime of a pine forest under a Mediterranean climate. Agric For Meteorol 74:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spicer R, Gartner BL (2001) The effects of cambial age and position within the stem on specific conductivity in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) sapwood. Trees 15:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tyree MT, Zimmermann MH (2002) Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Springer, New York, p 283Google Scholar
  33. Wullschleger SD, King AW (2000) Radial variation in sap velocity as a function of stem diameter and sapwood thickness in yellow-poplar trees. Tree Physiol 20:511–518PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yehezkel Cohen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shabtai Cohen
    • 1
  • Tatiana Cantuarias-Aviles
    • 3
  • Gabriel Schiller
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Physics and IrrigationInstitute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research OrganizationBet-DaganIsrael
  2. 2.Institute of Plant Science, Agricultural Research OrganizationBet-DaganIsrael
  3. 3.Departamento de Produção VegetalUSP/ESALQPiracicabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations