Plant and Soil

, Volume 297, Issue 1–2, pp 83–92

The effects of heavy metal pollution on genetic diversity in zinc/cadmium hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii populations

  • Jinchuan Deng
  • Bin Liao
  • Mai Ye
  • Dongmei Deng
  • Chongyu Lan
  • Wensheng Shu
Regular Article


The genetic diversity and population structure of seven populations of Sedum alfredii growing in lead/zinc (Pb/Zn) mine spoils or in uncontaminated soils from eastern and southern China were investigated using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technology. Four of the sampled sites were heavily contaminated with heavy metals (Zn, Cd, Pb), and extremely high concentrations of Zn, Cd, and Pb were found among these corresponding populations. A significant reduction of genetic diversity was detected in the mining populations. The reduction of genetic diversity could be derived from a bottleneck effect and might also be attributed to the prevalence of vegetative reproduction of the mining populations. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) tree derived from genetic distances further corroborated that the genetic differentiation between mine populations and uncontaminated populations was significant. Polymorphism with the heavy metal accumulation capability of S. alfredii probably due to the genetic variation among populations and heavy metal contamination could have more impact on the genetic diversity and population structure of S. alfredii populations than geographic distance.


Sedum alfredii Heavy metal RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) Genetic diversity 


  1. Allen SE (1989) Chemical analysis of ecological materials, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson S, Sadinski W, Shugart I (1994) Genetic and molecular ecotoxicology: a research framework. Environ Health Perspect 102:3–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Assunção AGL, Bookum WM, Nelissen HJM, Vooijs R, Schat H, Ernst WHO (2003) Differential metal-specific tolerance and accumulation patterns among Thlaspi caerulescens populations originating from different soil types. New Phytol 159:411–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker AJM, Reeves RD, Hajar ASM (1994) Heavy metal accumulation and tolerance in British populations of the metallophyte Thlaspi caerulescens J. and C. Presl (Brassicaceae). New Phytol 127:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bert V, Bonnin I, Saumitou Laprade P, de Laguérie P, Petit D (2002) Do Arabidopsis halleri from nonmetalliferous populations accumulate zinc and cadmium more effectively than those from metalliferous populations? New Phytol 146:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickham JW, Smolen SL (1994) Somatic and heritable effect of environmental genotoxins and the emergence of evolutionary toxicology. Environ Health Perspect 102:25–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bickham JW, Sandhu S, Hebert PDN, Chikhi L, Athwal R (2000) Effects of chemical contaminants on genetic diversity in natural populations: implications for biomonitoring and ecotoxicology. Mutat Res 463:33–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradshaw AD (1984) The importance of evolutionary ideas in ecology and vice versa. In: B Shorrocks (ed) Evolutionary ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  9. Bradshaw AD, Chadwick J (1980) The restoration of land. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks RR (1998) Geobotany and hyperaccumulators. In: Brooks RR (ed) Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 55–94Google Scholar
  11. Bush EJ, Barrett SCH (1993) Genetics of mine invasions by Deschampsia cespitosa, Poaceae. Can J Bot 71:1336–1348Google Scholar
  12. Conte C, Muti I, Puglisi P, Ferrarini A, Regina G, Maestri E, Marmiroli N (1998) DNA fingerprinting analysis by a PCR based method for monitoring the genotoxic effects of heavy metals pollution. Chemosphere 37:2739–2749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deng DM, Shu WS, Zhang J, Zou HL, Ye ZH, Wong MH (2007) Zinc and cadmium accumulation and tolerance in populations of Sedum alfredii. Environ Pollut 147:381–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dubois S, Cheptou PO, Petit C, Meerts P, Poncelet M, Vekemans X, Lefèbvre C, Escarré J (2003) Genetic structure and mating systems of metalliferous and nonmetalliferous populations of Thlaspi caerulescens. New Phytol 157:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ducousso A, Petit D, Valero M, Vernet P (1990) Genetic variations between and within populations of perennial grass: Arrhenatherum elatius. Hereditas 65:179–188Google Scholar
  16. Escarré J, Lefèbvre C, Gruber W, Leblanc M, Lepart J, Rivière Y, Delay B (2000) Zinc and cadmium hyperaccumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens from metalliferous and nonmetalliferous sites in the Mediterranean area: implications for phytoextraction. New Phytol 145:429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro M (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox GA (1995) Tinkering with the tinkerer: pollution versus evolution. Environ Health Perspect 103:93–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fu SX, Fu SJ (1984) Flora of China (in Chinese). Science Public, Beijing, China, pp 34–148Google Scholar
  20. He B, Yang XE, Ni WZ, Wei YZ, Ye HB (2002) Sedum alfredii: a new lead-accumulating ecotype. Acta Bot Sin 44:1365–1370Google Scholar
  21. Jiménez-Ambriz G, Petit C, Bourrié I, Dubois S, Olivieri I, Ronce O (2007) Life history variation in the heavy metal tolerant plant Thlaspi caerulescens growing in a network of contaminated and noncontaminated sites in southern France: role of gene flow, selection and phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol 173:199–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleijn D, van Groenendael JM (1999) The exploitation of heterogeneity by a clonal plant in habitats with contrasting productivity levels. J Ecol 87:873–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lefèbvre C, Vernet P (1990) Microevolutionary processes on contaminated deposits. In: Shaw J (ed) Heavy metal tolerance in plants: evolutionary aspects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 285–300Google Scholar
  24. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lodhi MA, Ye GN, Weeden NF, Daly MJ, Reisch BI (1994) A simple and efficient method for DNA extraction from grapevine cultivars and Vitis species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 12:6–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Long XX (2002) Mechanisms of zinc tolerance and hyperaccumulation by Sedum alfredii Hance. Ph.D. thesis, Zhejiang University, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  27. Macnair MR (1987) Heavy metal tolerance in plants: a model evolutionary system. Trends Ecol Evol 2:354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Macnair MR (2002) Within and between population genetic variation for zinc accumulation in Arabidopsis halleri. New Phytol 155:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGrath SP, Cunliffe CH (1985) A simplified method for the extraction of the metals Fe, Zn, Cu, Ni, Cd, Pb, Cr, Co and Mn from soils and sewage sludges. J Sci Food Agric 36:794–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mengoni A, Gonnelli C, Galardi F, Bazzicalupo M (2000) Genetic diversity and heavy metal tolerance in populations of Silene paradoxa L. (Caryophyllaceae): a random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Mol Ecol 9:1319–1324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mengoni A, Barabesi C, Gonnelli C, Galardi F, Gabbrielli R, Bazzicalupo M (2001) Genetic diversity of heavy metal-tolerant populations in Silene paradoxa L. (Caryophyllaceae): a chloroplast microsatellite analysis. Mol Ecol 10:1909–1916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nadig SG, Lee KL, Adams SM (1998) Evaluating alterations of genetic diversity in sunfish populations exposed to contaminants using RAPD assay. Aquat Toxicol 43:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pauwels M, Saumitou-Laprade P, Holl AC, Petit D, Bonnin I (2005) Multiple origin of metallicolous populations of the seudometallophyte Arabidopsis halleri (Brassicaceae) in Central Europe: the cpDNA testimony. Mol Ecol 14:4403–4414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, Version 2.10e. Exeter Software, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Ross K, Cooper N, Bidwell JR, Elder J (2002) Genetic diversity and metal tolerance of two marine species: a comparison between populations from contaminated and reference sites. Mar Pollut Bull 44:671–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rossens N, Verbruggen N, Meerts P, Ximėnez-Embún P, Smith JAC (2003) Natural variation in cadmium tolerance and its relationship to metal hyperaccumulation for seven populations of Thlaspi caerulescens from Western Europe. Plant Cell Environ 26:1657–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN ver. 2.000: a software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  40. Shu WS, Ye ZH, Zhang ZQ, Lan CY, Wong MH (2005) Natural colonization of plants on five lead/zinc mine tailings in southern China. Restor Ecol 13:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Staton JL, Schizas NV, Chandler GT, Coull BC, Quattro JM (2001) Ecotoxicology and population genetics, the emergence of phylogeographic and evolutionary ecotoxicology. Ecotoxicology 10:217–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor SI, Macnair MR (2006) Within and between population variation for zinc and nickel accumulation in two species of Thlaspi (Brassicaceae). New Phytol 169:505–514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Theodorakis CW, Lee KL, Adams SM, Law CB (2006) Evidence of altered gene flow, mutation rate, and genetic diversity in redbreast sunfish from a pulp-mill-contaminated river. Environ Sci Technol 40:377–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vekemans X, Lefèbvre C (1997) On the evolution of heavy-metal tolerant populations in Armeria maritime: evidence from allozyme variation and reproduction barriers. J Evol Biol 10:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu L (1990) Colonization and establishment of plants in contaminated environments. In: Shaw AJ (ed) Heavy metal tolerance in plants: evolutionary aspects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 269–284Google Scholar
  47. Wu L, Bradshaw AD, Thurman DA (1975) The potential for evolution of heavy metal tolerance in plants. III. The rapid evolution of copper tolerance in Agrostic stolonifera. Hereditas 34:165–187Google Scholar
  48. Yang XE, Long XX, Ni WZ, Fu CX (2002) Sedum alfredii Hance: a new Zn hyperaccumulating plant first found in China. Chin Sci Bull 47:1634–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang XE, Long XX, Ye HB, He ZL, Calvert DV, Stoffella PJ (2004) Cadmium tolerance and hyperaccumulation in a new Zn-hyperaccumulating plant species (Sedum alfredii Hance). Plant Soil 259:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ye ZH (1995) Heavy metal tolerance, uptake and accumulation in populations of Typha latifolia L. and Phragmites australis (Car.) Trin. ex. Strudel. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinchuan Deng
    • 1
  • Bin Liao
    • 1
  • Mai Ye
    • 1
  • Dongmei Deng
    • 1
  • Chongyu Lan
    • 1
  • Wensheng Shu
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Bio-Control, School of Life SciencesSun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations