Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 305, Issue 1–2, pp 15–24 | Cite as

A simple field validation of daily transpiration derived from sapflow using a porometer and minimal meteorological data

  • Isa A. M. Yunusa
  • Ian K. Nuberg
  • Sigfredo Fuentes
  • Ping Lu
  • Derek Eamus
Regular Article

Abstract

Heat-pulse techniques are routinely used to estimate transpiration from canopies of woody plants typically without any local calibration, mainly because of the difficulty of doing so in the field and, frequently, lack of detailed weather data. This is despite concerns that the techniques may produce erroneous values under certain conditions, such as when evaporative demand is high. In this study, we used a micrometeorological approach to validate transpiration from irrigated olives deduced from heat-pulse technique by ascertaining precise values for the parameters that are critical for converting heat-pulse velocity to sapflow. The micrometeorological approach involved limited data on stomatal conductance (gs), obtained hourly with a porometer on four contrasting days, and was used to calibrate a simple model for predicting conductance. Predicted stomatal conductance (gsm) agreed well with that measured, and when both were used to calculate hourly transpiration, they produced values that were within 10% of each other. This was despite brief underestimations of transpiration based on gsm (Tm) in the early hours of the day that arose from poor determination of incident radiation at this time. We then used Tm to iteratively set the values for the various parameters, including the time-out value that accounts for zero-flow conditions, needed to convert heat-pulse velocity to sapflow, for the four days. The best fit between Tm and transpiration from sapflow (Ts) was obtained with time-out value set to 120 s. All heat-pulse velocity data were therefore analysed with this time-out value to obtain sapflow and, hence, transpiration (Ts). Comparison of Tm and Ts for the whole season showed that the former tended to produce higher values on certain days when vapour pressure deficit (D) was high in summer (December–February). While Ts occasionally produced larger values than Tm under the mild conditions of autumn (March–April). Totals of the daily transpiration during the 190-day period were within 10% of each other.

Keywords

Heat-pulse technique Irrigation Olives Sapflow Stomatal conductance Transpiration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr Stephen Mylius for his technical support in the field, and Mr Con Kratopolous for the use of his grove in this project. The project was funded by the Rural Industries Research and Development Cooperation (RIRDC), Australia.

References

  1. Bleby TM, Burgess SSO, Adams MA (2004) A validation, comparison and error analysi of two heat-pulse methods for measuring sap flow in Eucalyptus marginate saplings. Funct Plant Biol 31:645–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen Y, Fuchs M, Green GC (1981) Improvements of the heat-pulse method for determining sap flow in trees. Plant Cell Environ 4:391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edwards WRN, Warrick NWN (1984) Transpiration from kiwifruit vine as estimated by the heat pulse technique and Penman-Monteith equation. NZ J Exp Agr 27:537–543Google Scholar
  4. Fuentes S, Kelley G, Collins J, Rogers G, Conroy J (2004) Use of infrared thermography to assess spatial and temporal variability of stomatal conductance of grapevines under partial root-zone drying. An irrigation scheduling application. Acta Hort 689:309–316Google Scholar
  5. Granier A, Loustau D (1994) Measuring and modelling the transpiration of a maritime pine canopy from sap-flow data. Agr Forest Meteorol 71:61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Green S, Clothier B, Jardine B (2003) Theory and practical application of heat pulse to measure sap flow. Agron J 95:1371–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenspan Technology (1993) Sapflow measurement with the Greenspan sensor: theory and techniques. Greenspan Technology, Warwick, Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall RL, Harding RJ (1993) The water use of the Balquhidder catchments: a processes approach. J Hydrol 145:285 –314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hatton TJ, Vertessey RA (1990) Transpiration of plantation Pinus radiata estimated by the heat pulse method and the Bowen Ratio. Hydrol Proc 4:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hatton TJ, Catchpole EA, Vertessey RA (1990) Integration of sapflow velocity to estimate plant water use. Tree Physiol 6:201–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Inoue Y, Kimball BA, Jackson RD, Pinter PJ Jr, Reginato RJ (1990) Remote estimation of leaf transpiration rate and stomatal resistance based on infrared thermometry. Agr Forest Meteorol 51:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kluitenberg GJ, Ham JM (2004) Improved theory for calculating sap flow with the heat pulse method. Agr Forest Meteorol 126:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu P, Yunusa IAM, Walker RR, Műller WJ (2003) Stomatal control of whole-vine transpiration and modelling canopy conductance for irrigated grapevines. Funct Plant Biol 30:689–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McNaughton KG, Jarvis PG (1983) Predicting effects of vegetation changes on transpiration and evaporation. In: Kozlowski TT (ed) Water deficits and plant growth. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–47Google Scholar
  15. Maier-Maerker U (1999) New light on the importance of prestomatal transpiration. Aust J Plant Physiol 26:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marshall DC (1958) Measurements of sap flow in conifers by heat transport. Plant Physiol 33:385–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moreno F, Fernández E, Clothier BE, Green SR (1996) Transpiration and root water uptake by olive trees. Plant Soil 184:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moriana A, Villalobos FJ, Fereres E (2002) Stomatal and photosynthetic responses of olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves to water deficits. Plant Cell Environ 25:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nuberg I, Yunusa I (2003) Olive water use and yield––monitoring the relationship. RIRDC Publication No 03/048. RIRDC Project No UA-47A. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia. http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/NPP/03–048.pdf (Accessed: 5 January 2007)
  20. Ortega-Farias S, Olioso A, Fuentes S, Valdes H (2006) Latent heat flux over a tomato crop by using Penman-Monteith equation with a variable canopy resistance. Agr Water Manage 82:421–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith RGC, Barrs HD, Meyer WS (1989) Evaporation from irrigated wheat using radiative temperature: an operational approach. Agr Forest Meteorol 48:331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Ninth ed., 2003. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/tax_keys/keysweb.pdf (Accessed: 19 January 2007)Google Scholar
  24. Tarara JM, Fergusson JC (2001) Device for simulating high rates of sapflow in grapevives. Am J Enol Vitic 52:260–265Google Scholar
  25. Thorpe MR, Warrit B, LandsbergG JJ (1980) Responses of apple leaf stomata: a model for single leaves and a whole tree. Plant Cell Environ 3:23–27Google Scholar
  26. Villalobos FJ, Mateos L, Orgaz F (1995) Non-destructive measurement of leaf area in olive (Olea europaea L.) trees using a gap inversion method. Agr Forest Meteorol 91:89–111Google Scholar
  27. Warrit B, Landsberg JJ, Thorpe MR (1980) Responses of apple leaf stomata to environmental factors. Plant Cell Environ 3:13 –22Google Scholar
  28. Yunusa IAM, Walker RR, Guy JR (1997) Partitioning of seasonal evapotranspiration from a commercial furrow-irrigated vineyard. Irrigation Sci 18:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yunusa IAM, Walker RR, Lovey BR, Blackmore DH (2000) Determination of transpiration in irrigated grapevines: comparison of heat-pulse technique with gravimetric and micrometeorological methods. Irrigation Sci 20:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yunusa IAM, Walker RR, Lu P (2004) Evapotranspiration components from energy balance, sap-flow and microlysimetry techniques for an irrigated vineyard in inland Australia. Agr Forest Meteorol 127:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isa A. M. Yunusa
    • 1
  • Ian K. Nuberg
    • 2
  • Sigfredo Fuentes
    • 1
  • Ping Lu
    • 3
  • Derek Eamus
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Water and Environmental Resource ManagementUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Agriculture, Food and WineUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.EWL SciencesWinnellieAustralia

Personalised recommendations