Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 286, Issue 1–2, pp 1–6 | Cite as

The mysterious root length

  • Peter RyserEmail author
Commentary

Root length has a touch of mystery to it, reflecting the difficulty in extracting fine roots from the soil, and the enormous length these roots can attain. For example, Dittmer (1937) excavated the entire root system of a single rye plant, which consisted of 13,815,672 branches and had a total length of 622 km with a surface area of 237 m2, and a total root hair length of 11,000 km. Since then, progress has been made in the methodology of assessing root length and in understanding the variation in it, but there still remains an air of mystery around root length as even the newest findings are often contradictory. Investigations have often focused on Specific Root Length (SRL), a trait which characterizes the economical aspects of a root system, stating the costs––mass––per potential return––root length. SRL has been shown to increase, decrease, or stay constant in response to nutrient limitation (Ryser 1998). Furthermore, root length does not always respond to specific ions, such as...

Keywords

Root Length Root Fineness Root Diameter Root Trait Specific Root Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bauhus J, Messier C (1999) Soil exploitation strategies of fine roots in different tree species of the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada. Can J For Res 29:260–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boot RGA, den Dubbelden KC (1990) Effects of nitrogen supply on growth, allocation and gas exchange characteristics of two perennial grasses from inland dunes. Oecologia 85:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouma TJ, Hengst K, Koutstaal BP, van Soelen J (2002) Estimating root lifespan of two grasses at contrasting elevation in a salt marsh by applying vitality staining on roots from in-growth cores. Plant Ecol 165:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouma TJ, Nielsen KL, Koutstaal B (2000) Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerised analysis of root length and diameter. Plant Soil 218:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chassot A, Richner W (2002) Root characteristics and phosphorus uptake of maize seedlings in a bilayered soil. Agron J 94:118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comas LH, Bouma TJ, Eissenstat DM (2002) Linking root traits to potential growth rate in six temperate tree species. Oecologia 132:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Comas LH, Eissenstat DM (2004) Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species. Funct Ecol 18:388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa C, Dwyer LM, Hamel C, Muamba D, Wang XL, Nantais L, Smith DL (2001) Root contrast enhancement for measurement with optical scanner-based image analysis. Can J Bot 79:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craine JM, Froehle J, Tilman DG, Wedin DA, Chapin FS III (2001) The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients. Oikos 93:274–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dittmer HJ (1937) A quantitative study of the roots and root hairs of a winter rye plant (Secale cereale). Am J Bot 24:417–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drew MC, He CJ, Morgan PW (1989) Decreased ethylene biosynthesis, and induction of aerenchyma, by nitrogen or phosphate-starvation in adventitious roots of Zea mays L. Plant Physiol 91:266–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eissenstat DM (1991) On the relationship between specific root length and the rate of root proliferation: a field study using citrus rootstocks. New Phytol 118:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eissenstat DM, Wells CE, Yanai RD, Whitbeck JL (2000) Building roots in a changing environment: implications for root longevity. New Phytol. 147:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elberse WTh, Berendse F (1993) A comparative study of the growth and morphology of eight grass species from habitats with different nutrient availabilities. Funct Ecol 7:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan M, Zhu J, Richards C, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2003) Physiological roles for aerenchyma in phosphorus-stressed roots. Funct Plant Biol 30:493–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitter AH (1985) Functional significance of root morphology and root system architecture. In: Fitter A, Atkinson D, Read DJ, Usher MB (eds) Ecological interactions in soil. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 87–106Google Scholar
  17. Heinemeyer A, Fitter AH (2004) Impact of temperature on the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis: growth responses of the host plant and its AM fungal partner. J Exp Bot 55:525–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill JO, Simpson RJ, Moore AD, Chapman DF (2006) Morphology and response of roots of pasture species to phosphorus and nitrogen nutrition. Plant Soil Google Scholar
  19. Himmelbauer ML, Loiskandl W, Kastanek F (2004) Estimating length, average diameter and surface area of roots using two different Image analyses systems. Plant Soil 260:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho MD, Zhu J, Rosas JC, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2005) Root architectural tradeoffs for water and phosphorus acquisition. Funct Plant Biol 32:737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Konings H, Verschuren G (1980) Formation of aerenchyma in roots of Zea mays in aerated solutions, and its relation to nutrient supply. Physiol Plant 49:265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leyser O, Fitter A (1998) Roots are branching out in patches. Trends Plant Sci 3:203–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luquet D, Zhang BG, Dingkuhn M, Dexet A, Clément-Vidal A (2005) Phenotypic plasticity of rice seedlings: case of phosphorus deficiency. Plant Prod Sci 8:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lux A, Luxova M, Hattori T, Inanaga S, Sugimoto Y (2002) Silification in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) cultivars with different drought tolerance. Physiol Plant 115:87–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lynch JP, Ho MD (2005) Rhizoeconomics: carbon costs of phosphorus acquisition. Plant Soil 269:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mendoza R, Escudero V, Garcia I (2005) Plant growth, nutrient acquisition and mycorrhixal symbioses of a waterlogging tolerant legume (Lotus glaber Mill.) in a saline-sodic soil. Plant Soil 275:305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicotra AB, Babicka N, Westoby M (2002) Seedling root anatomy and morphology:an examination of ecological differentiation with rainfall using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Oecologia 130:136–145Google Scholar
  28. North GB, Nobel PS (1991) Changes in hydraulic conductivity and anatomy caused by drying and rewetting roots of Agave deserti (Agavaceae). Am J Bot 78:906–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peat HJ, Fitter AH (1994) The distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizas in the British flora. New Phytol 125:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Poorter H, de Jong R (1999) A comparison of specific leaf area, chemical composition and leaf construction costs of field plants from 15 habitats differing in productivity. New Phytol 143:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Poot P, Lambers H (2003) Are trade-offs in allocation pattern and root morphology related to species abundance? A congeneric comparison between rare and common species in the south-western Australian flora. J Ecol 91:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robinson D (1996) Resource capture by localized root proliferation: why do plants bother? Ann Bot 77:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roumet C, Urcelay C, Diaz S (2006) Suites of root traits differ between annual and perennial species growing in the field. New Phytol 170:357–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryser P (1998) Intra- and interspecific variation in root length, root turnover and the underlying parameters. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, Van Vuuren MMI (eds) Variation in plant growth. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 441–465Google Scholar
  35. Ryser P, Eek L (2000) Consequences of phenotypic plasticity vs. interspecific differences in leaf and root traits for acquisition of aboveground and belowground resources. Am J Bot 87:402–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryser P, Lambers H (1995) Root and leaf attributes accounting for the performance of fast- and slow-growing grasses at different nutrient supply. Plant Soil 170:251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Salih AA, Ali IA, Lux A, Luxova M, Cohen Y, Sugimoto Y, Inanaga S (1999) Rooting, water uptake, and xylem structure adaptation to drought of two sorghum cultivars. Crop Sci 39:168–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schippers P, Olff H (2000) Biomass partitioning, architecture and turnover of six herbaceous species from habitats with different nutrient supply. Plant Ecol 149:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith DE, Read DJ (2003) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  40. Tan LP, He J, Lee SK (2002) Effects of root-zone temperature on the root development and nutrient uptake of Lactuca sativa L. “Panama” grown in an aeroponic system in the tropics. J Plant Nutr 25:297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tjoelker MG, Craine JM, Wedin D, Reich PB, Tilman D (2005) Linking leaf and root trait syndromes among 39 grassland and savannah species. New Phytol 167:493–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trubat R, Cortina J, Vilagrosa A (2006) Plant morphology and root hydraulics are altered by nutrient deficiency in Pistacia lentiscus (L.). Trees 20:334–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van der Weele CM, Canny MJ, McCully ME (1996) Water in aerenchyma spaces in roots. A fast diffusion path for solutes. Plant Soil 184:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vasellati V, Oesterheld M, Medan D, Loreti J (2001) Effects of flooding and drought on the anatomy of Paspalum dilatatum. Ann Bot 88:355–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wahl S, Ryser P (2000) Root tissue structure is linked to ecological strategies of grasses. New Phytol 148:459–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wahl S, Ryser P, Edwards PJ (2001) Phenotypic plasticity of grass root anatomy in response to light intensity and nutrient supply. Ann Bot 88:1071–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Watt M, van der Weele CM, McCully ME, Canny MJ (1996) Effects of local variations in soil moisture on hydrophobic deposits and dye diffusion in corn roots. Bot Acta 109:492–501Google Scholar
  48. Yano K, Kume T (2005) Root morphological plasticity for heterogeneous phosphorus supply in Zea mays. L Plant Prod Sci 8:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyLaurentian UniversitySudburyCanada

Personalised recommendations