Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 278, Issue 1–2, pp 315–325 | Cite as

Modelling the Long-Term Stabilization of Carbon from Maize in a Silty Soil

  • B. Ludwig
  • M. Helfrich
  • H. Flessa
Article

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) models have been widely used to predict SOC change with changing environmental and management conditions, but the accuracy of the prediction is often open to question. Objectives were (i) to quantify the amounts of C derived from maize in soil particle size fractions and at various depths in a long-term field experiment using 13C/12C analysis, (ii) to model changes in the organic C, and (iii) to compare measured and modelled pools of C. Maize was cultivated for 24 years on a silty Luvisol which resulted in a stock of 1.9 kg maize-derived C m−2 (36% of the total organic C) in the Ap horizon. The storage of maize-derived C in particle size fractions of the Ap horizon decreased in the order clay (0.65 kg C m−2) > fine and medium silt (0.43) > coarse silt (0.33) > fine sand (0.13) > medium sand (0.12) > coarse sand (0.06) and the turnover times of C3-derived C ranged from 26 (fine sand) to 77 years (clay). The turnover times increased with increasing soil depth. We used the Rothamsted Carbon Model to model the C dynamics and tested two model approaches: model A did not have any adjustable parameters, but included the Falloon equation for the estimation of the amount of inert organic matter (IOM) and independent estimations of C inputs into the soil. The model predicted well the changes in C3-derived C with time but overestimated the changes in maize-derived C 1.6-fold. In model B, the amounts of IOM and C inputs were optimized to match the measured C3- and C4-derived SOC stocks after 24 years of continuous maize. This model described the experimental data well, but the modelled annual maize C inputs (0.41 kg C m−2 a−1) were less than the independently estimated total input of maize litter C (0.63 kg C m−2 a−1) and even less than the annual straw C incorporated into the soil (0.46 kg C m−2 a−1). These results indicated that the prediction of the Rothamsted Carbon Model with independent parameterization served only as an approximation for this site. The total amount of organic C associated with the fraction 0–63 μm agreed well with the sum of the pools ‘microbial biomass’, ‘humified-organic matter’ and IOM of the model B. However, the amount of maize-derived C in this fraction (3.4 g kg−1) agreed only satisfactorily with the sum of maize-derived C in the pools ‘microbial biomass’ and ‘humified organic matter’ (2.6 g kg−1).

Keywords

natural abundance particle size fractionation Rothamsted Carbon Model soil organic matter stable isotopes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldock, J A, Oades, J M, Waters, A G, Peng, X, Vassallo, A M, Wilson, M A 1992Aspects of the chemical structure of soil organic materials as revealed by solid-state 13C NMR spectrometryBiogeochemistry16142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balesdent, J 1996The significance of organic separates to carbon dynamics and its modelling in some cultivated soilsEur. J. Soil Sci.47485493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balesdent, J, Balabane, M 1992Maize root-derived soil organic carbon estimated by natural 13C abundanceSoil Biol. Biochem.2497101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balesdent, J, Mariotti, A 1996Measurement of soil organic matter turnover using 13C natural abundanceButton, T WYamasaki, S I eds. Mass Spectrometry of SoilsMarcel DekkerNew York83111Google Scholar
  5. Balesdent, J, Mariotti, A, Boisgontier, D 1990Effect of tillage on soil organic carbon mineralization estimated from 13C abundance in maize fieldsJ. Soil Sci.41587596Google Scholar
  6. Brodowski, S, Amelung, W, Zech, W 2001Mechanismen und Regulation von langfristig stabilem Humus aus pyrogenem KohlenstoffMitteilungen Dtsch. Bodenkdl. Ges.96161162Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, B T 1996Carbon in primary and secondary organomineral complexesCarter, M RStewart, B A eds. Structure and Organic Matter Storage in Agricultural SoilsCRC – Lewis PublishersBoca Raton97165Google Scholar
  8. Coleman K and Jenkinson D S 1999 ROTHC)26.3. Lawes Agricultural Trust.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, H P, Blevins, R L, Bundy, L G, Christenson, D R, Dick, W A, Huggins, D R, Paul, E A 1999Soil carbon dynamics in corn-based agroecosystems: Results from carbon−13 natural abundanceSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.63584591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falloon, P, Smith, P 2000Modelling refractory soil organic matterBiol. Fertil. Soils30388398Google Scholar
  11. Falloon, P, Smith, P, Coleman, K, Marshall, S 1998Estimating the size of the inert organic matter pool from total soil organic carbon content for use in the Rothamsted carbon modelSoil Biol. Biochem.3012071211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregorich, E G, Ellert, B H, Drury, C F, Liang, B C 1996Fertilization effects on soil organic matter turnover and corn residue C storageSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.60472476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenkinson, D S, Rayner, J H 1977The turnover of soil organic matter in some of the Rothamsted classical experimentsSoil Sci.123298305Google Scholar
  14. John B, Yamashita T, Ludwig B and Flessa H 2005 Storage of organic carbon in aggregate and density fractions of silty soils under different types of land use. Geoderma 128, 63–79Google Scholar
  15. Körschens, M, Weigel, A, Schulz, E 1998Turnover of soil organic matter (SOM) and long-term balances – tools for evaluating sustainable productivity of soilsZ. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk.161409424Google Scholar
  16. Kristiansen, S M, Brandt, M, Hansen, E M, Magid, J, Christensen, B T 200413C signature of CO2 evolved from incubated maize residues and maize-derived sheep faecesSoil Biol. Biochem.3699105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lobe I, Bol R, Ludwig B, Du Preeze C C and Amelung W 2005 Savanna-derived organic matter remaining in long-term mixed cropping arable soils of the South African Highveld – evidence from 13C and 15N natural abundance. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 1898–1909Google Scholar
  18. Ludwig, B, John, B, Ellerbrock, R, Kaiser, M, Flessa, H 2003Stabilization of carbon from maize in a sandy soil in a long-term experimentEur. J. Soil Sci.54117126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mueller, T, Jensen, L S, Nielsen, N E, Magid, J 1998Turnover of carbon and nitrogen in a sandy loam soil following incorporation of chopped maize plants, barley straw and blue grass in the fieldSoil Biol. Biochem.30561571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parton, W J, Schimel, D S, Cole, C V, Ojima, D S 1987Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslandsSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.5111731179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Paustian, K, Parton, W J, Persson, J 1992Modeling soil organic matter in organic-amended and nitrogen-fertilized long-term plotsSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.56476488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Post, W M, Kwon, K C 2000Soil carbon sequestration and land use change: Processes and potentialGlobal Change Biol.6317327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Puget, P, Chenu, C, Balesdent, J 1995Total young organic matter distribution in aggregates of silty cultivated soilsEur. J. Soil Sci.46449459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rethemeyer J 2004 Organic carbon transformation in agricultural soils: Radiocarbon analysis of organic matter fractions and biomarker compounds. Ph D thesis. Kiel University, pp. 149Google Scholar
  25. Rühlmann, J 1999A new approach to estimating the pool of stable organic matter in soil using data from long-term field experimentsPlant Soil213149160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schnellhammer, R, Sirch, J 2001Höhere Landbauschule Rotthalmünster – Versuchsbericht 2000Staatliche Höhere LandbauschuleRotthalmünster114Google Scholar
  27. Six, J, Conant, R T, Paul, E A, Paustian, K 2002Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soilsPlant Soil241155176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skjemstad, J O, Spouncer, L R, Cowie, B, Swift, R S 2004Calibration of the Rothamsted organic carbon turnover model (RothC ver. 26.3) using measurable soil organic carbon poolsAust. J. Soil Res.427988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, P, Smith, J U, Powlson, D S, McGill, W B, Arah, J R M, Chertov, O G, Coleman, K, Franko, U, Frolking, S, Jenkinson, D S, Jensen, L S, Kelly, R H, Klein-Gunnewiek, H, Komarov, A S, Li , C, Molina, J A E, Mueller, T, Parton, W J, Thornley, J H M, Whitmore, A P 1997A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experimentsGeoderma81153225Google Scholar
  30. Smith, J U, Smith, P, Monaghan, R, MacDonald, A J 2002When is a measured soil organic matter fraction equivalent to a model pool?Eur. J. Soil Sci.53405416CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental ChemistryUniversity of KasselWitzenhausenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Soil Science and Forest NutritionUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations