Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 265, Issue 1–2, pp 31–46 | Cite as

Estimating fine-root biomass and production of boreal and cool temperate forests using aboveground measurements: A new approach

  • Wenjun Chen
  • Quanfa Zhang
  • Josef Cihlar
  • Jürgen Bauhus
  • David T. Price
Article

Abstract

Information of fine-root biomass and production is critical for quantifying the productivity and carbon cycle of forest ecosystems, and yet our ability to obtain this information especially at a large spatial scale (e.g., regional to global) is extremely limited. Several studies attempted to relate fine-root biomass and production with various aboveground variables that can be measured more easily so that fine-root biomass and production could be estimated at a large spatial scale, but found the correlations were generally weak or non-existed at the stand level. In this study, we tested a new approach: instead of using the conventional way of analysing fine-root biomass at the stand level, we analysed fine-root data at the tree level. Fine-root biomass of overstory trees in stand was first separated from that of understory and standardized to a common fine-root definition of < 2 mm or < 5 mm diameter. Afterwards, we calculated fine-root biomass per tree for a ‘representative’ tree size of mean basal area for each stand. Statistically significant correlations between the fine-root biomass per tree and the diameter at the ground surface were found for all four boreal and cool temperate spruce, pine, fir and broadleaf forest types, and so allometric equations were developed for each group using a total of n = 212 measurements. The stand-level fine-root biomass of trees estimated using the allometric equations agrees well with the measurements, with r2 values of 0.64 and 0.57 (n = 171), respectively, for fine-roots < 2 mmand < 5 mm diameter. This study further estimated fine-root production as the product of fine-root turnover rate and fine-root biomass, and determined the turnover rate as a function of fine-root biomass, stand age, and mean annual temperature. The estimates of tree fine-root production agree well with reported values, with r2 value of 0.53 for < 2 mm and 0.54 for < 5 mm diameter (n = 162) at the stand level.

Key words

boreal cool temperature fine-root biomass fine-root production forest new approach regional estimation turnover rate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aber J D, Melillo J M, Nadelhoffer K J, McClaugherty C A and Pastor J 1985 Fine-root turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to quantity and form of nitrogen availability: A comparison of two methods. Oecologia 66, 317–321.Google Scholar
  2. Aerts R, Bakker C and De Caluwe H 1992 Root turnover as determinant of the cycling of the C, N, P in a dry heathland ecosystem. Biogeochemistry 15, 175–190.Google Scholar
  3. Alaback P A 1982 Dynamics of understory biomass in Sitka spruce-western hemlock forests of southeast Alaska. Ecology 63, 1932–1948.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander I J and Fairley R I 1983 effects of N fertilization on populations of fine-roots and mycorrhizas in spruce humus. Plant Soil 71, 49–53.Google Scholar
  5. Arneth A, Kelliher F M, McSeveny T M and Byers J N 1998 Net ecosystem productivity, net primary productivity and ecosystem carbon sequestration in a Pinus radiata plantation subject to soil water deficit. Tree Physiol. 18, 785–793.Google Scholar
  6. Arthur M A and Fahey T J 1992 Biomass and Nutrients in an Englemann spruce-subalpine fir forest in north central Colorado: pools, annual production, and internal cycling. Can. J. For. Res. 22, 315–325.Google Scholar
  7. Axelsson B and Brakenhielm S 1980 Investigation sites of the Swedish Coniferous Forest project-biological and physiological features. In Structure and Function of Northern Coniferous Forests - An Ecosystem Study. Ed. T Persson. Ecol Bull. 32, 25–64.Google Scholar
  8. Baskerville G L 1965 Estimation of dry weight of tree components and total standing crop in conifer stands. Ecology 46, 867–869.Google Scholar
  9. Burke M K and Raynal D J 1995 Fine-root growth phenology, production, and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Plant Soil 162, 135–146.Google Scholar
  10. Bauhus J and Messier C 1999 Soil exploitation strategies of fine-roots in different tree species of the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 29, 260–273.Google Scholar
  11. Cairns M A, Brown S, Helmer E H and Baumgardner G A 1997 Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia 111, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen J M, Chen W J, Liu J, Cihlar J and Gray S 2000a Annual carbon balance of Canada’s forest during 1895–1996. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 839–850.Google Scholar
  13. Chen W 2002 Tree size distribution functions of shade-tolerant and shade-intolerant boreal forests for biomass mapping. For. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Chen W, Chen J M and Cihlar J 2000c An integrated terrestrial carbon-budget model based on changes in disturbance, climate, and atmospheric chemistry. Ecol. Modell. 135: 55–79.Google Scholar
  15. Chen W, Chen J M, Liu J and Cihlar J 2000b Approaches for reducing uncertainties in regional forest carbon balance. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 827–838.Google Scholar
  16. Chen W, Chen J M, Price D T and Cihlar J 2002 Effects of stand age on net primary productivity of boreal black spruce forests in Ontario, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 32, 833–842.Google Scholar
  17. Cole D W and Gessel S P 1968 Cedar River Research. A program for studying the pathways, rates, and processes of elemental cycling in a forest ecosystem. Forest resources monograph. Institute of Forest Products, University of Washington College of Forest Resources Contribution No 4. 54p.Google Scholar
  18. Cole D W and Rapp M 1981 Elemental cycling in forests. In Dynamic Properties of Forest Ecosystems, International Biological Programme 23. Ed. D E Reichle. pp. 341–409. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Coleman M D, Dickson R E and Isebrands J G 2000 Contrasting fine-root production, survival and soil CO2 efflux in pine and poplar plantations. Plant Soil 225, 129–139.Google Scholar
  20. Comeau P G and Kimmins J P 1989 Above- and below-ground biomass and production of lodgepole pine on sites with suffering soil moisture regimes. Can. J. For. Res. 19, 447–454.Google Scholar
  21. Curt T, Lucot E and Bouchaud M 2001 Douglas-fir root biomass and rooting profile in relation to soils in a mid-elevation area (Beaujolais Mounts, France). Plant Soil, 233, 109–125.Google Scholar
  22. DeAngelis D L, Gardner R H and Shugart H H 1981 Productivity of forest ecosystems studied during the IBP: The woodlands data sets. In Dynamic Properties of Forest Ecosystems. International Biological Programme 23. Ed. D E Reichle. pp. 567–675. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Dixon R K, Brown S, Houghton R A, Solomon A M, Trexler M C and Wisniewski J 1994 Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263, 185–190.Google Scholar
  24. Fahey T J and Hughes J W 1994 Fine-root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH. J Ecol. 82, 533–548.Google Scholar
  25. Finer L and Laine J 1998 Root dynamics at drained peatland sites of different fertility in southern Finland. Plant Soil 201, 27–36.Google Scholar
  26. Finer L, Messier C and Grandpré L D 1997 Fine-root dynamics in mixed boreal conifer-broad leafed forest stands at different successional stages after fire. Can. J. For. Res. 27, 304–314.Google Scholar
  27. Ford E D 1982 High productivity in a pole-stage Sitka spruce stand and its relation to canopy structure. Forestry 55, 1–17.Google Scholar
  28. Foster J R 1985 Coarse root biomass in subalpine balsam fir forests. For. Sci. 31, 952–956.Google Scholar
  29. Fredericksen T S and Zedaker S M 1995 Fine-root biomass, distribution, and production in young pine-hardwood stands. New Forests 10, 99–110.Google Scholar
  30. Garkoti S C and Sigh S P 1995 Variation in net primary productivity and biomass of forests in the high mountains of Central Himalayas. J. Veget. Sci. 6, 23–28.Google Scholar
  31. Gholz H L, Hendry L C and Cropper W P 1986 Organic matter dynamics of fine-roots in plantations of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) in north Florida. Can. J. For. Res. 16, 529–538.Google Scholar
  32. Gill R A and Jackson R B 2000 Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol. 147, 13–31.Google Scholar
  33. Gomez M M and Day F P Jr 1982 Litter nutrient content and production in the Great Dismal Swamp. Am. J. Bot. 69, 1314–1321.Google Scholar
  34. Gower S T, Kucharik C J and Norman J M 1999 Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, FAPAR, and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 70, 29–51.Google Scholar
  35. Gower S T, Vogel J G, Norman J M, Kucharik C J, Steele S J and Stow T K 1997 Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary production in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 29029–29041.Google Scholar
  36. Gower S T, Vogt K A and Grier C C 1992 Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecol. Monogr. 62, 43–65.Google Scholar
  37. Grier C C, Vogt K A, Keyes M R and Edmonds R L 1981 Biomass distribution and above- and below ground-ground production in young and mature Abies amabilis zone ecosystem of the Washington Cascades. Can. J. For. Res. 11, 155–167.Google Scholar
  38. Haland B and Brekke F H 1989 Distribution of boot biomass in a low-shrub pine bog. Scand. J. For. Res. 4, 307–316.Google Scholar
  39. Hall J P 2001 Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management, Environ. Monit. Asses. 67, 109–119.Google Scholar
  40. Halpern C B and Franklin J F 1990 Physiognomic development of Pseudotsuga forests in relation to initial structure and disturbance intensity. J. Veg. Sci. 1, 475–482.Google Scholar
  41. Harris W F, Sollins P, Edwards N T, Dinger B E and Shugart H H 1975 Analysis of carbon flow and production in a temperate deciduous forest ecosystem. In Production of World Ecosystems. Eds. D E Reichle, J F Franklin and D W Goodall. pp. 116–122. National Academy of Science, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Haynes B E and Gower S T 1995 Belowground carbon allocation in unfertilized and fertilized red pine plantations in northern Wisconsin. Tree Physiol. 15, 317–325.Google Scholar
  43. Helmisaari H S and Hallbachen L 1999 Fine-root biomass and necromass in limed and fertilized Norway spruce (Picea abis (L.) Karst.) stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 119, 99–110.Google Scholar
  44. Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1993 The dynamics of fine-root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 2507–2520.Google Scholar
  45. Houghton J T, Ding Y, Griggs D J, Noguer M, van der Linden P J and Xiaosu D (Eds.) 2001 Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  46. Houghton J T, Meira Filho L G, Callander B A, Harries N, Kattenberg A and Maskell K (Eds.) 1996 Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  47. Jiangping S, Dali T, Sidong Z and Miao W 1993 Fine-root dynamics of broadleaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 4, 241–245.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson M G, Tingey D T, Phillips D L and Storm M J 2001 Advancing fine-root research with minirhizotrons. Environ. Exp. Bot. 45, 263–289.Google Scholar
  49. Joslin J D and Henderson G S 1987 Organic matter and nutrients associated with fine-root turnover in a white oak stand. For. Sci. 33, 330–346.Google Scholar
  50. Joslin J D, Wolfe M H and Hanson P J 2000 Effects of altered water regimes on forest root systems. New Phytol. 147, 117–129.Google Scholar
  51. Kelting D L, Burger J A and Edwards G S 1995 The effects of ozone on the root dynamics of seedlings and mature red oak (Quercus rubra L.), For. Ecol. Manage. 79, 197–206.Google Scholar
  52. Keyes M R and Grier C C 1981 Above- and below-ground production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can. J. For. Res. 11, 599–605.Google Scholar
  53. Kimmins J P and Hawkes B C 1978 Distribution and chemistry of fine-roots in a white spruce-subalpine fir stand in British Columbia: Implications for management. Can. J. For. Res. 8, 265–279.Google Scholar
  54. Kinerson P S, Ralston C W and Wells C G 1977 Carbon cycling in a loblolly pine plantation. Oecologia 29, 1–10.Google Scholar
  55. Klinka K, Chen H Y H, Wang Q and de Montigny L 1996 Forest canopies and their influence on understory vegetation in early-seral stands on west Vancouver Island. Northwest Sci. 70, 193–200.Google Scholar
  56. Kurz W A and Kimmins J P 1987 Analysis of some sources of error in methods used to determine fine-root production in forest ecosystems: a simulation approach. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 909–912.Google Scholar
  57. Kurz W A, Beukema S J and Apps M J 1996 Estimation of root biomass and dynamics for the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector. Can. J. For. Res. 26, 1973–1979.Google Scholar
  58. Li Z, Kurz W A, Apps M J and Beukema S J 2003 Belowground biomass dynamics in the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector: recent improvements and implications for the estimation of NPP and NEP, Can. J. For. Res. 33, 126–136.Google Scholar
  59. Liu J, Chen J M, Cihlar J and Chen W 1999 Net primary productivity distribution in the BOREAS study region, J. Geophy. Res. 104, 27735–27754.Google Scholar
  60. Liu X and Tyree M T 1997 Root carbohydrate reserves, mineral nutrient concentrations and biomass in a healthy and a declining sugar maple (Acer saccharum) stand. Tree Physiol. 17, 179–185.Google Scholar
  61. Liu X, Ellsworth D S and Tyree M T 1997 Leaf nutrition and photosynthetic performance of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) in stands with contrasting health conditions. Tree Physiol. 17, 169–178.Google Scholar
  62. Lytle D E and Cronan C S 1998 Comparative soil CO2 evolution, litter decay, and root dynamics in clearcut and uncut spruce-fir forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 103, 121–128.Google Scholar
  63. Makkonen K and Helmisaari H S 1998 Seasonal and yearly variations of fine-root biomass and necromass in a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand. For. Ecol. Manage. 102, 283–290.Google Scholar
  64. Makkonen K and Helmisaari H S 1999 Assessing fine-root biomass and production in a Scots pine stand: comparison of soil core and root ingrowth core methods. Plant Soil 210, 43–50.Google Scholar
  65. McClaugherty C A, Aber J D and Melillo J M 1982 The role of fine-roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology 63, 1481–1490.Google Scholar
  66. McClaugherty C A, Aber J D and Melillo J M 1984 Decomposition dynamics of fine-roots in forested ecosystems. Oikos 42, 378–386.Google Scholar
  67. McDowell N G, Balster N J and Marshall J D 2001 Belowground carbon allocation of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir, Can. J. For. Res. 31, 1425–1436.Google Scholar
  68. Merier C 1981 The role of fine-roots in N and P budgets in young and mature Abies amabilis ecosystems. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.Google Scholar
  69. Nadelhoffer K J 2000 The potential effects of nitrogen deposition on fine root production in forest ecosystems. New Phytol. 147, 131–139.Google Scholar
  70. Nadelhoffer K J and Raich J W 1992 Fine-root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology 73, 1139–1147.Google Scholar
  71. Nadelhoffer K J, Aber J D and Mellilo J M 1985 Fine-root, net primary production and nitrogen availability: a new hypothesis. Ecology 66, 1377–1390.Google Scholar
  72. Nisbet T R and Mullins C E 1986 A comparison of live and dead fine-root weights in stands of Sitka spruce in contrasting soil water regimes. Can. J. For. Res. 16, 394–397.Google Scholar
  73. Pastor J P, Aber J D, McClaugherty C A and Mellilo J M 1984 Aboveground production and N and P cycling along a nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin. Ecology 65, 256–268.Google Scholar
  74. Pearson J A, Fahey T J and Knight D H 1983 Biomass and leaf area in contrasting lodgepole pine forests. Can. J. For. Res. 14, 259–265.Google Scholar
  75. Persson H 1978 Root dynamics in a young Scots pine stand in central Sweden. Oikos 30, 508–519.Google Scholar
  76. Persson H 1992 Factors affecting fine-root dynamics of trees. Suo 43, 165–172.Google Scholar
  77. Powell S W and Day F P Jr 1991 Root production in four communities in the Great Dismal Swamp. Am. J. Bot. 78, 288–297.Google Scholar
  78. Price D T, Halliwell D H, Apps M J, Kurz W A and Curry S R 1997 Comprehensive assessment of carbon stocks and fluxes in a boreal forest management unit. Can. J. For. Res. 27, 2005–2016.Google Scholar
  79. Price, D T, Peng C H, Apps M J and Halliwell D H 1999. Simulating effects of climate change on boreal ecosystem carbon pools in central Canada. J. Biogeogr. 26, 1237–1248.Google Scholar
  80. Pregitzer K S, Zak D R, Curtis P S, Kubiske M E, Teeri J A and Vogel C S 1995 Atmospheric CO2, soil nitrogen and turnover of fine-roots. New Phytol. 129, 579–585.Google Scholar
  81. Publicover D and Vogt K A 1993 A comparison of methods for estimating forest fine-root production with respect to sources of error. Can. J For. Res. 23, 1179–1186.Google Scholar
  82. Rencz A N and Auclair A D 1980 Biomass distribution in a subarctic Picea mariana - Cladonia alpestris woodland. Can. J. For. Res. 8, 168–176.Google Scholar
  83. Retzlaff W A, Handest J A, O’Malley D M, Mckeand S E and Topa M A 2001 Whole-tree biomass and carbon allocation of juvenile trees of loblolly pine (Pinus Taeda): Influence of genetics and fertilization. Can. J. For. Res. 31, 960–970.Google Scholar
  84. Ruark G A and Bockheim J G 1988 Biomass, net primary production, and nutrient distribution for an age sequence of Populus tremuloides ecosystem. Can. J. For. Res. 18, 435–443.Google Scholar
  85. Ruess R W, Van Cleve K, Yarie J and Viereck L A 1996 Contributions of fine-root production and turnover to carbon and nitrogen cycling in taiga forests of the Alaskan interior. Can. J. For. Res. 26, 1326–1336.Google Scholar
  86. Ryan M G, Lavigne M B and Gower S T 1997 Annual carbon cost of autotrophic respiration in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species and climate. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 28871–28883.Google Scholar
  87. Sala O E, Biondini M E and Lauenroth W K 1988 Bias in estimates of primary production: an analytical solution. Ecol. Modell. 44, 43–55.Google Scholar
  88. Santantonio D 1989 Dry-matter partitioning and fine-root production in forests-new approaches to a difficult problem. In Biomass Production by Fast Growing Trees. Eds. J S Pereira and J J Landsberg. pp. 57–72. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  89. Santantonio D and Grace J C 1987 Estimating fine-root production and turnover from biomass and decomposition data: a compartment-flow model. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 900–908.Google Scholar
  90. Santantonio D and Hermann R K 1985 Standing crop, production, and turnover of fine-roots on dry, moderate, and wet sites of mature Douglas-fir in western Oregon. Ann. Sci. For. 42, 113–142.Google Scholar
  91. Santantonio D and Santantonio E 1987 Effect of thinning on production and mortality of fine-roots in a Pinus radiata plantation on a fertile site in New Zealand. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 919–928.Google Scholar
  92. Santantonio D, Hermann R K and Overton W S 1977 Root biomass studies in forest ecosystems. Pedobiologia 17, 1–31.Google Scholar
  93. Smith C K, Coyea M R and Munson A D 2000 Soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stocks and dynamics under disturbed black spruce forests. Ecol. Appl. 10, 775–788.Google Scholar
  94. Sprugel D G 1983 Correcting for bias in log-transformed allometric equations. Ecology 64, 209–210.Google Scholar
  95. Steele S J, Gower S T, Vogel J G and Norman J M 1997 Root mass, net primary production and turnover in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. Tree Physiol. 17, 577–587.Google Scholar
  96. Symbula M and Day F P 1988 Evaluation of two methods for estimating belowground production in a freshwater swamp forest. Am. Midl. Natural. 120, 405–415.Google Scholar
  97. Ter-Mikaelian M T and Korzukhin M D 1997 Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. For. Ecol. Manage. 97, 1–24.Google Scholar
  98. Van Cleve K, Chapin F S III, Dyrness C T and Viereck L A 1991 Element cycling in taiga forests: state factor control. BioSci. 41, 78–88.Google Scholar
  99. Vanninen P and Mäkela A 1999 Fine-root biomass of Scots pine stands differing in age and soil fertility in southern Finland. Tree Physiol. 19, 823–830.Google Scholar
  100. Vanninen P, Ylitalo H, Sievanen R and Mäkela A 1996 Effects of age and site quality on distribution of biomass in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Trees 10, 231–238.Google Scholar
  101. Vogt K A 1991 Carbon cycling in forest ecosystems. Tree Physiol. 9, 69–86.Google Scholar
  102. Vogt K A and Persson H 1991 Root methods. In Techniques and Approaches in Forest Tree Ecophysiology. Eds. J P Lassoie and T M Hinckley. pp. 477–502. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  103. Vogt K A, Grier C C and Vogt D J 1986 Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above and belowground detritus of world forests. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15, 303–377.Google Scholar
  104. Vogt K A, Grier C C, Meier M E and Edmonds R L 1982 Mycorrhizal role in net primary production and nutrient cycling in Abies amabilis ecosystem in western Washington, Ecology 63, 370–380.Google Scholar
  105. Vogt K A, Vogt D J and Bloomfield J 1998 Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level. Plant Soil 200, 71–89.Google Scholar
  106. Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Gower S T and Grier C C 1990 Carbon and nitrogen interactions for forest ecosystems. In Above and belowground interactions in forest trees in acidified soils. Air Pollution Report 32. Ed. H Persson, pp. 203–235. Commission of the European Community, Directorate-General for Science, Research and Development, Environmental Programme, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  107. Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Moore E E, Fatuga B A, Redlin M R and Edmonds R L 1987 Conifer and angiosperm fine-root biomass in relation to stand age and site productivity in Douglas-fir forests. J. Ecol. 75, 857–870.Google Scholar
  108. Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Palmiotto P A, Boon P, O’Hara J and Asbjornsen H 1996 Review of root dynamics grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil 187, 159–219.Google Scholar
  109. Widén B and Majdi H 2001 Soil CO2 efflux and root respiration at three sites in a mixed pine and spruce forest: seasonal and diurnal variation. Can. J. For. Res. 31, 786–796.Google Scholar
  110. Wilmot T R, Ellsworth D S and Tyree M T 1995 Relationships among crown conditions, growth and plant and soil nutrition in seven northern Vermont sugar bushes. Can. J. For. Res. 25, 386–397.Google Scholar
  111. Xu Y J, Rohrig E and Folster H 1997 Reaction of root systems of grand fir (Abies grandis Lindl.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) to seasonal waterlogging. For. Ecol. Manage. 93, 9–19.Google Scholar
  112. Yin X, Perry J A and Dixon R K 1989 Fine-root dynamics and biomass distribution in a Quercus ecosystem following harvesting. For. Ecol. Manage. 27, 159–177.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenjun Chen
    • 1
  • Quanfa Zhang
    • 1
  • Josef Cihlar
    • 1
  • Jürgen Bauhus
    • 2
  • David T. Price
    • 3
  1. 1.Applications DivisionCanada Centre for Remote SensingOttawaCanada
  2. 2.School of Resources, Environment and SocietyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.Northern Forestry Centre, Canadian Forestry ServiceEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations