Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 277, Issue 1–2, pp 221–232 | Cite as

Wheat Responses to Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in a Highly Calcareous Soil Differ from those of Clover, and Change with Plant Development and P supply

  • H. Y. LiEmail author
  • Y. G. Zhu
  • P. Marschner
  • F. A. Smith
  • S. E. Smith
Article

Abstract

We evaluated the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in growth and phosphorus (P) nutrition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a highly calcareous soil and compared the responses of wheat with those of clover (Trifolium subterraneum L). In the first experiment wheat (cv. Brookton) was harvested at 6 wk. Colonisation by four AM fungi was low (<20%). Clover was harvested at 8 wk. Colonisation varied with different fungi, with the highest value (52%) obtained with Glomus intraradices. Although suffering from P deficiency, non-mycorrhizal (NM) wheat grew relatively well with no added P (P0) and application of P at 100 mg kg−1 (P100) increased the dry weight (DW). Shoot P concentrations increased with P application and there were positive effects of all AM fungi at P100. In contrast, NM clover grew very poorly at P0 and did not respond to P application. Clover responded positively to all AM fungi at both P levels, associated with increases in P uptake. In the second experiment colonisation by a single AM fungus (G. intraradices) of two wheat cultivars (Brookton and Krichauff) was well established at 6 wk (~50% in P0 plants) and continued to increase up to maturity (~70%), but decreased greatly at both harvests as P supply was increased (up to 150 mg P kg−1: P150). Addition of P significantly increased plant growth, grain yield and P uptake irrespective of cultivar and harvest time, and the optimum soil P for grain yield was P100. In both cultivars, a growth depression in AM plants occurred at 6 wk at all P levels, but disappeared at 19 wk with added P. At P0, AM plants also produced lower grain yield (weight) per plant, but with higher P, AM plants produced higher grain yields than NM plants. There was a significant positive effect of AM on grain P concentration at P0, but not at other P levels. Brookton was somewhat more P efficient than Krichauff, and the latter responded more to AM fungi. This study showed that responses of wheat to AM inoculation and P supply were quite different from those of clover, and changed during development. Results are discussed in relation to the underlying soil properties.

Keywords

arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi grain yield growth response phosphorus uptake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Karaki, G N, Al-Omoush, M 2002Wheat response to phosphogypsum and mycorrhizal fungi in alkaline soilJ. Plant Nutr.25873883Google Scholar
  2. Al-Karaki, G N, Clark, R B 1999Mycorrhizal influence on protein and lipid of durum wheat grown at different soil phosphorus levelsMycorrhiza.997101Google Scholar
  3. Baath, E, Hayman, D S 1984Effect of soil volume and plant density on mycorrhizal infection and growth responsePlant Soil77373376Google Scholar
  4. Baon, J B, Smith, S E, Alston, A M, Wheeler, R D 1992Phosphorus efficiency of three cereals as related to indigenous mycorrhizal infectionAust. J. Agric. Res.43479491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand, I, Holloway, R E, Armstrong, R D, McLaughlin, M J 2003Chemical characteristics of phosphorus in alkaline soils from southern AustraliaAust. J. Agric. Res.416176Google Scholar
  6. Bolland, M D A 1994Critical phosphorus concentrations for burr medic, yellow serradella, subterranean clover, and wheatCommun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.25385394Google Scholar
  7. Bryla, D R, Koide, R T 1990Regulation of reproduction in wild and cultivated Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infectionOecologia847481Google Scholar
  8. Colwell, J D 1963The estimation of the phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South WalesAust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husbandry3190197Google Scholar
  9. Dodd, J C, Jeffries, P 1989Effect of fungicides on three vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Biol. Fertil. Soils7120128Google Scholar
  10. Dodd, J C, Krikun, J, Haas, J 1983Relative effectiveness of indigenous populations of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from four sites in the NegevIsr. J. Bot.321021Google Scholar
  11. Elliott, D E, Reuter, D J, Reddy, G D, Abbott, L K 1997Phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) 2*. Distribution of phosphorus in glasshouse-grown wheat and the diagnosis of phosphorus deficiency by plant analysisAust. J. Agric. Res.48869881Google Scholar
  12. Facelli, E, Facelli, J M, Smith, S E, McLaughlin, M J 1999Interactive effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, intraspecific competition and resource availability on Trifolium subterraneum cv. MtBarker. New Phytol.141535547Google Scholar
  13. Giovannetti, M, Mosse, B 1980An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in rootsNew Phytol.84489500Google Scholar
  14. Graham, J H, Abbott, L K 2000Wheat responses to aggressive and non-aggressive arbuscular mycorrhizal fungiPlant Soil220207218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, I R 1975Endomycorrhizas of Metrosideros umbellata and Weinmannia racemosa N.Z. J. Bot.13463472Google Scholar
  16. Hanson, W C 1950The photometric determination of phosphorus in fertilizers using the phosphovanado-molybdate complexJ. Sci. Food Agric.1172173Google Scholar
  17. Hetrick, B A D, Wilson, G W T, Cox, T S 1993Mycorrhizal dependence of modern wheat varieties, landraces, and ancestorsCan. J. Bot.7020322040Google Scholar
  18. Holloway, R E, Bertrand, I, Frischke, A J, Brace, D M, McLaughlin, M J, Shepperd, W 2001Improving fertiliser efficiency on calcareous and alkaline soils with fluid sources of P, N and ZnPlant Soil236209219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holloway R E, Frischke B M, Frischke A J, Brace D M, McLaughlin M J, Lombi E and Armstrong R D 2004 Field evidence for efficiency of fluid fertilisers. In First Australian Fluid Fertiliser Workshop, Adelaide, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, N C, Graham, J H, Smith, F A 1997Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuumNew Phytol.135575586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan, A G 1975The effect of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal associations on growth of cereals. II. Effects on wheat growthAnn. Appl. Biol.802736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koide, R T 1991Density-dependent response to mycorrhizal infection in Abutilon theophrasti MedicOecologia85389395Google Scholar
  23. Koide, R, Li, M 1989Appropriate controls for vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza researchNew Phytol.1113544Google Scholar
  24. Koide, R T, Li, M G, Lewis, J D, Irby, C 1988Role of mycorrhizal infection in the growth and reproduction of wild. Vs. cultivated plants 1. Wild vs cultivated oatsOecologia77537542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koide, R T, Lu, X H 1992Mycorrhizal infection of wild oats maternal effects on offspring growth and reproductionOecologia90218226Google Scholar
  26. Li, X L, George, E, Marschner, H 1991Extension of the phosphorus depletion zone in VA-mycorrhizal white clover in a calcareous soilPlant Soil1364148Google Scholar
  27. McLaughlin, M J, Lancaster, P A, Sale, P G, Uren, N C, Peverill, K I 1994Comparison of cation/anion exchange resin methods for multi-element testing of acidic soilsAust. J. Soil Res.32229240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohammad, A, Mitra, B, Khan, A G 2004Effects of sheared-root inoculum of Glomus intraradices on wheat grown at different phosphorus levels in the fieldAgric. Ecosys. Envrion103245249Google Scholar
  29. Mohammad, M J, Pan, W L, Kennedy, A C 1998Seasonal mycorrhizal colonization of winter wheat and its effect on wheat growth under dryland field conditionsMycorrhiza8139144Google Scholar
  30. Mosse, B, Powell, C L, Hayman, D S 1976Plant growth responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. IX. Interactions between VA mycorrhiza, rock phosphate and symbiotic nitrogen fixationNew Phytol76331342Google Scholar
  31. Oliver, A J, Smith, S E, Nicholas, D J D, Wallace, W, Smith, F A 1983Activity of nitrate reductase in Trifolium subterraneum: effects of mycorrhizal infection and phosphate nutritionNew Phytol946379Google Scholar
  32. Parke, J L, Kaeppler, S W 2000Effects of genetic differences among crop species and cultivars upon the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosisDouds, D D J eds. Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and FunctionKluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht, The Netherlands131146Google Scholar
  33. Phillips, J M, Hayman, D S 1970Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infectionTrans. Br. Mycol. Soc.55158161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ravnskov, S, Jakobsen, I 1995Functional compatibility in arbuscular mycorrhizas measured as hyphal P transport to the plantNew Phytol.129611618Google Scholar
  35. Reuter, D J, Dyson, C B, Elliott, D E, Lewis, D C, Rudd, C L 1995An appraisal of soil phosphorous testing data for crops and pastures in South AustraliaAust. J. of Exp. Agric.35979995Google Scholar
  36. Ryan, M H, Graham, J H 2002Is there a role for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in production agriculture?Plant Soil244263271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schweiger, P F, Jakobsen, I 1999Direct measurement of arbuscular mycorrhizal phosphorus uptake into field-grown winter wheatAgron. J.919981002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, S E, Nicholas, D J D, Smith, F A 1979Effect of early mycorrhizal infection on nodulation and nitrogen fixation in Trifolium subterraneum L. AustJ. Plant Physiol.6305316Google Scholar
  39. Smith, S E, Read, D J 1997Mycorrhizal SymbiosisAcademic Press LtdSan Diego and London605Google Scholar
  40. Smith, F A, Smith, S E 1981Mycorrhizal infection and growth of Trifolium subterraneum: use of sterilized soil as a control treatmentNew Phytol.88299309Google Scholar
  41. Smith, S E, Smith, F A, Jakobsen, I 2004Functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses: the contribution of the mycorrhizal P uptake pathway is not correlated with mycorrhizal responses in growth or total P uptakeNew Phytol.162511524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, S E, Smith, F A, Jakobsen, I 2003Mycorrhizal fungi can dominate phosphate supply to plants irrespective of growth responsesPlant Physiol1331620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Soil Survey Staff1994Keys to soil taxonomyUnited States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation ServiceWashington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilhelm N and Growden B, 1999 Phosphorus fertilisation for field crops in difficult soils. In 91st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Agronomy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USAGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson, G W T, Daniels Hetrick, B A, Gerschefske Kitt, D 1988Suppression of mycorrhizal growth response of big bluestem by non-sterile soilMycologia80338343Google Scholar
  46. Yao, Q, Li, X L, Feng, G, Christie, P 2001Influence of extramatrical hyphae on mycorrhizal dependency of wheat genotypesCommun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.3233073317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhu, Y G, Smith, S E 2001Seed phosphorus (P) content affects growth, and P uptake of wheat plants and their association with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungiPlant Soil231105112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhu, Y G, Smith, S E, Barritt, A R, Smith, F A 2001aPhosphorus (P) efficiencies and mycorrhizal responsiveness of old and modern wheat cultivarsPlant Soil237249255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhu, Y G, Smith, S E, Smith, F A 2001bPlant growth and cation composition of two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in P uptake efficiencyJ. Exp. Bot.5212771282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Y. Li
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Y. G. Zhu
    • 1
    • 3
  • P. Marschner
    • 1
  • F. A. Smith
    • 1
  • S. E. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Soil-Plant Interactions, Soil and Land Systems, School of Earth and Environmental SciencesThe University of AdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.The Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Research Centre for Agricultural Resources Chinese Academy of SciencesShijiazhuangChina
  3. 3.Research enter for Eco-environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations