Plant and Soil

, Volume 266, Issue 1–2, pp 23–39 | Cite as

Effects of transgenic potatoes with an altered starch composition on the diversity of soil and rhizosphere bacteria and fungi

  • Annett Milling
  • Kornelia Smalla
  • Franz Xaver Maidl
  • Michael Schloter
  • Jean Charles Munch


The aim of this study was to investigate potential effects on the composition of the bacterial and fungal diversity in rhizosphere and soil of a transgenic potato line (SIBU S1) which was modified in its starch composition by RNA anisensing, compared to the non-transgenic parental cultivar (SIBU) at the flowering stage in 2000. Furthermore a second non-transgenic cultivar (SOLANA) was included in the study. To avoid artefacts derived from cultivation depending approaches, molecular techniques based on 16S-(bacteria) and 18S-(fungi) rDNA respectively were used to describe the microbial community structure. Comparing 16S- and 18S-rDNA DGGE fingerprints from the different bulk soil samples, it could be shown that no significant differences between the two cultivars and the transgenic line were found. Similar results were obtained for the rhizosphere samples using the eubacterial, α-and β-proteobacterial and fungal specific primers with the exception of, the eubacterial DGGE patterns obtained for the rhizosphere of SOLANA. These patterns revealed that the relative abundance of one band was enhanced compared with the patterns of SIBU and SIBU S1 and the sequence of the differentiating band showed the highest similarity with Enterobacter amnigenus. When Pseudomonas specific primers were used, relevant differences were found between the rhizosphere patterns of the transgenic potato line (SIBU S1) and the parental cultivar (SIBU). However, clear effects of the cultivar SOLANA on the structure of the Pseudomonas community compared to SIBU were also detected.

Key words

bacteria fungi microbial community structure rhizosphere transgenic potatoes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bashan Y and Holguin G 1998 Proposal for the division of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria into two classifications: biocontrol-PGPB (plant growth-promoting bacteria) and PGPB. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30, 1225–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brimecombe M J, De Leij F A and Lynch J M 2001 The effect of root exudates on rhizosphere microbial populations. In The rhizosphere. Eds. R Pinton, Z Varanini and P Nanipieri. pp. 95–140. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  3. Brosius J, Dull T J, Sleeter D D and Noller H F 1981 Gene organisation and primary structure of ribosomal RNA operon from Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 148, 107–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Deroin P 1998 Transgenic cotton, potato and corn on trial. Biofuture 176, 6–24.Google Scholar
  5. Di Giovanni G D, Watrud L S, Seidler R J and Widmer F 1999 Comparison of parental and transgenic alfalfa rhizosphere bacterial communities using Biolog GN metabolic fingerprinting and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence-PCR (ERIC-PCR). Microb. Ecol. 37, 129–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Donegan K K, Palm C J, Fieland V J, Porteous L A, Ganio L M, Schaller D L, Bucao L Q and Seidler R J 1995 Changes in levels, species and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganisms associated with cotton expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki endotoxin, Appl. Soil Ecol. 2, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donegan K K, Schaller D L, Stone J K, Ganio L M, Reed G, Hamm P B and Seidler R J 1996 Microbial populations, fungal species diversity and plant pathogen levels in field plots of potato plants expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenebrionis endotoxin. Transgenic Research 5, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunefield K E and Germida J J 2001 Diversity of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere and root interior of field grown genetically modified Brassica napus. FEMS Microb. Ecol. 82, 1–9.Google Scholar
  9. Düring K, Porsch P, Fladung M and Lörz H 1993 Transgenic potato plants resistant to the phytopathogenic bacterium Erwinia carotovora. Plant 3, 587–598.Google Scholar
  10. Düring K, Porsch P, Mahn A, Brinkmann O and Gieffers W 1999 The non-enzymatic microbicidal activity of lysozymes. FEBS Lett. 449, 93–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomes N C M, Heuer H, Schönfeld J, Costa R, Mendonça-Hagler L and Smalla K 2001 Bacterial diversity of the rhizosphere of maize (Zea mays) grown in tropical soil studied by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Plant and Soil 232, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gomes N C M, Fagbola O, Costa R, Rumjanek N G, Buchner A, Mendonça-Hagler L and Smalla K 2003 Dymamics of fungal communities in bulk and maize rhizosphere soil in the tropics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 3758–3766.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gyamfi S, Pfeifer U, Stierschneider M and Sessitsch A 2002 Effects of transgenic glufosinate-tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and the associated herbicide application on eubacterial and Pseudomonas communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 41, 181–190.Google Scholar
  14. Hagn A, Pritsch K, Ludwig W and Schloter M 2003a Theoretical and practical approaches to evaluate suitable primer sets for fungal community analysis. Acta Biotechnologica, in press.Google Scholar
  15. Hagn A, Pritsch K, Schloter M and Munch J C 2003b Fungal diversity in agricultural soil under different farming management systems with special reference on biocontrol strains of Trichoderma spp. Biology and Fertility of Soils, in press.Google Scholar
  16. Heuer H and Smalla K 1997 Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis for studying soil microbial communities. In Modern Soil Microbiology. Eds. J D van Elsas, E M H Wellington and J T Trevors. pp. 353–373. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  17. Heuer H, Krsek M, Baker P, Smalla K and Wellington E M H 1997 Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of 16S rDNA and gel electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 3233–3241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Heuer H, Wieland G, Schönfeld J, Schönwälder A, Gomes N C M and Smalla K 2001 Bacterial community profiling using DGGE or TGGE analysis. In Environmental Molecular Microbiology: Protocols and Application. Ed. J D van Elsas. pp. 85–99. Horizon Scientific Press, Wymondham.Google Scholar
  19. Heuer H, Kroppenstedt R M, Lottmann J, Berg G and Smalla K 2002 Effects of T4 lysozyme release from transgenic potato roots on bacterial rhizosphere communities are negligible relative to natural factors. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(3), 1325–1335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoover R 2001 Composition, molecular structure and physicochemical properties of tuber and root starches: a review. Carbohydrate Polymers 81, 253–267.Google Scholar
  21. Hopkins D W, Webster E A, Chudek J A and Halpin C 2003 Decomposition in soil of tobacco plants with genetic modifications to lignin biosynthesis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1455–1462.Google Scholar
  22. Kloepper J W, Wie G and Sham T. 1992 Rhizosphere populations dynamics and internal colonization of cucumber by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria which induce systemic resistance to Colletotrichum orbiculare. In Biological control of plant diseases. Progress and challenges for the Future. E C Tjamos, G C Papavizas and J. Cook. pp. 185–192. Nato ASI Series a, Vol. 230, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Kowalchuk G A 1999 New perspectives towards analysing fungal communities in terrestrial environments. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 10, 247–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Larkin R P, Hopkins D L and Martin F N 1993 Ecology of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum in soil suppressive and conducive to Fusarium wilt of watermelon. Phytopathology 83, 1105–1116.Google Scholar
  25. Li Q B and Guy C L 1996 Prolonged final extension time increases cloning efficiency of PCR products. BioTech. 21, 192–196.Google Scholar
  26. Liu W.-T, Marsh T L, Cheng H and Forney L J 1997 Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 63, 4516–4522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lottmann J, Heuer H, Smalla K and Berg G 1999 Influence of transgenic T4-lysozyme-producing potato plants on potentially beneficial plant-associated bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 29, 365–377.Google Scholar
  28. Lottmann J, Heuer H, de Vries J, Mahn, A, Düring K, Wackernagel W, Smalla K and Berg G 2000 Establishment of introduced antagonistic bacteria in the rhizosphere of transgenic potatoes and their effect on the bacterial community. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 33, 41–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lukow T, Dunfield P F and Liesack W 2000 Use of the T-RFLP technique to assess spatial and temporal changes in the bacterial community structure within an agricultural soil planted with transgenic and non-transgenic potato plants. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 32, 241–247.Google Scholar
  30. Lynch J M 1990 The rhizosphere. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  31. Lynch J M and Whipps J M 1991 Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. In The Rhizosphere and Plant Growth. Eds. D L Keister and P. B. Cregan. pp 15–25. Kluwer Publ, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Marchesi J R, Sato T, Weightman A J, Martin T A, Fry J C, Hiom S J, Dymock D and Wade W G 1998 Design and evaluation of useful bacterium specific PCR primers that amplify genes coding for bacterial 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 795–799.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller H J, Liljeroth E, Willemsen-De Klein M J E I M and Van Veen J A 1990 The dynamics of actinomycetes and fluorescent pseudomonads in wheat rhizoplane and rhizosphere. Symbiosis 9, 389–391.Google Scholar
  34. Muyzer G and Smalla K 1998. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. A. van Leeuwenhoek 73, 127–141.Google Scholar
  35. Neumann G and Römheld V 2001 The release of root exudates as affected by the plant’s physiological status. In The rhizosphere. Eds. R Pinton, Z Varanini and P Nanipieri. pp. 41–93. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  36. Nübel U, Engelen B, Felske A, Snaidr J, Wieshuber A, Amann R I, Ludwig W and Backhaus H 1996 Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. J. Bacteriol. 178, 5636–5643.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Donnell K and Gray L E 1995 Phylogenetic relationships of the soybean sudden death syndrome pathogen Fusarium solani f. sp. inferred from rDNA sequence data and PCR primers for its identification. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 8, 709–716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Oger P, Petit A and Dessaux Y 1997 Genetically engineered plants producing opines alter their biological environment. Nature Biotechnol. 15, 369–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oger P, Mansouri H and Dessaux Y 2000 Effect of crop rotation and soil cover on alteration of the soil microflora generated by the culture of transgenic plants producing opines. Mol. Ecol. 9, 881–890.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Safford R, Jobling S A, Sidebottom C M, Westcott R J, Cooke D, Tober K J, Strongitharm B H, Alison L, Russell M and Gidley M J 1998 Consequences of antisense RNA inhibition of starch branching enzyme activity on properties of potato starch. Carbohydrate Polymers 35, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sambrook J, Fritsch E F and Maniatis T 1889 Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual.2nd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Schmalenberger A and Tebbe C C 2002 Bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere of a transgenic, herbicide-resistant maize (Zea mays) and comparison to its non-transgenic cultivar Bosphore. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 40, 29–37.Google Scholar
  43. Schwieger F and Tebbe C C 1998 A new approach to utilize PCR-single strand-conformation polymorphism for 16S rRNA gene-based microbial community analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 4870–4876.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwieger F and Tebbe C C 2000 Effect of field inoculation with Sinorhizobium meliloti L33 on the composition of bacterial communities in rhizospheres of a target plant (Medicago sativa) and a non-target plant (Chenopodium album)-linking of 16S rRNA gene-based single-strand conformation polymorphism community profiles to the diversity of cultivated bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 66, 3556–3565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sessitsch A, Kan F-Y and Pfeifer U 2003 Diversity and community structure of culturable Bacillus spp. populations in the rhizosphere of transgenic potatoes expressing the lytic peptide cecropin B. Appl. Soil Ecol. 22, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siciliano S D and Germida J J 1999 Taxonomic diversity of bacteria associated with roots of field-grown transgenic Brassica napus cv. Quest, compared to the non-transgenic B. napus cv. Exel and B. rapa cv. Parkland. FEMS Microb. Ecol. 29, 263–272.Google Scholar
  47. Simpson J M, McCracken V J, White B A, Gaskins H R and Mackie R I 1999 Application of denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis for the analysis of the porcine gastrointestinal microbiota. J. Microbiol. Meth. 36, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smalla K, Wieland G, Buchner A, Zock A, Parzy J, Kaiser S, Roskot N, Heuer H and Berg G 2001 Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 4742–4751.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Smit E, Leeflang P, Gommans S, van den Broek J, van Mil S and Wernars K 2001 Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 2284–2291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Soerensen J 1997 The rhizosphere as a habitat for soil microorganisms. In Manual of Environmental Microbiology. Eds. J D Van Elsas, E M H Wellington and J T Trevors. pp. 387–401. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  51. Van’t Slot K A E and Knogge W 2002 A Dual Role for Microbial Pathogen-Derived Effector Proteins in Plant Disease and Resistance. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 21, 229–271.Google Scholar
  52. Weller D M 1988 Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 26, 379–407.Google Scholar
  53. Widmer F, Seidler R S, Gillivet P M, Watrud L S and Di Giovanni G D 1998 A highly selective PCR protocol for detecting 16S rRNA genes of the genus Pseudomonas (Sensu Stricto) in environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 2545–2553.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annett Milling
    • 1
  • Kornelia Smalla
    • 1
  • Franz Xaver Maidl
    • 2
  • Michael Schloter
    • 3
  • Jean Charles Munch
    • 3
  1. 1.BBA - Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and ForestryInstitute for Plant Virology, Microbiology and BiosafetyBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.Chair for Crop Production and Plant BreedingTechnical University of MunichWeihenstephanGermany
  3. 3.GSF - National Research Center for Environment and HealthInstitute of Soil EcologyNeuherbergGermany

Personalised recommendations