Plant and Soil

, Volume 281, Issue 1–2, pp 55–69 | Cite as

Characterization of Viticultural Terroirs using a Simple Field Model Based on Soil Depth – II. Validation of the Grape Yield and Berry Quality in the Anjou Vineyard (France)

Article

Abstract

Soil and climate are major constituents of the French notion of Terroir. This concept implies that there is a strong relationship between the composition of the grape, the characteristics of the wine and the territory of production. To study this link, a new method of characterization of the Terroir, including geological and pedological factors, was investigated. It uses a field model based on depth and clay content of soil, together with the degree of weathering of the parent rock. Consequently, for every type of parent rock belonging to a given geologic stage, there are a series of soils that show different stages of pedological evolution. According to the model, three kinds of soils are distinguished with regards to the weathering intensity of the parent rock, that are named weakly weathered rock (WWR), moderately weathered rock (MWR) and strongly weathered rock (SWR). By hypothesis, each soil type is considered as a homogeneous unit for vine production from the viewpoint of ecophysiological factors. Each terroir unit defined by this method is called a Basic Terroir Unit (BTU). To validate this hypothesis, experimental plots planted with Chenin and Cabernet Franc vines were studied over three consecutive seasons (2000–2002), in the Anjou vineyard (Loire Valley – France). The major BTUs developed on the two most important geological systems of Anjou (Brioverian and Ordovician–Devonian), were studied. Results showed that the berries of vines cultivated in WWR were significantly smaller, richer in sugars and anthocyanins and had a Total Phenolic Index higher than those of the vines cultivated in SWR. They also had a lower titratable acidity. Cabernet Franc vines cultivated in MWR had berries with sugar and anthocyanin contents but also total phenolics very close to those of WWR. With Chenin vines there was a good relationship between the global pool of free aromas of berries and the BTU type. The study showed significant relationships between the quality of grapes and the measured values of several ecophysiological variables such as the water supply regime or the timing of budburst.

Keywords

field soil model grapevine berry composition water supply regime timing of budburst 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barbeau, G, Asselin, C, Morlat, R 1998Estimation du potentiel viticole des terroirs en Val de Loire selon un indice de précocité du cycle de la vigneBulletin de l’OIV.805–806247262Google Scholar
  2. Baxter, M J, Crew, H M, Dennis, M J, Goodall, I, Anderson, D 1997The determination of the authenticity of wine from its trace element compositionFood Chem.60443450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begnaud F, Viallon C, Denoyer C, Tournayre P, Cuinier C, Picque D and Berdagué J L, 2000 Caractérisation de l’origine des vins par deux méthodes d’analyses rapides-Application aux vins du Beaujolais, de Gaillac et de Touraine. XXVéme congrès Mondial de la Vigne et du Vin, section œnologie, 379Google Scholar
  4. Blouin, J 1992Techniques d’analyses des moûts et des vinsDufardin-SalleronParis332Google Scholar
  5. Bodin F and Morlat R 2006 Characterization of viticultural terroirs using a simple field model I. Validation of the water supply regime, phenology and vine vigour in Anjou vineyard (France). Plant and Soil 281, 37–54Google Scholar
  6. Bohmrich, R 1996Terroir: Competing perspectives on the roles of soil, climate and peopleJ. Wine Res.733Google Scholar
  7. Boselli M, Coletta C, Moio L, Monaco A and Scaglione G 1996 Etude préliminaire des influences pédoclimatiques sur les caractéristiques quali-quantitatives du cépage Aglianico dans une zone de la province de Benevento – Italie. Actes du 1er Colloque International sur les Terroirs Viticoles – Angers – 17 au 18 juillet 1996. 403–407Google Scholar
  8. Bulit, J, Lafon, R 1970Quelques aspects de la biologie de Botrytis cinerea agent de la pourriture grise des raisinsConnaissance de la vigne et du vin4159174Google Scholar
  9. Carbonneau A 1986 Stress modérés sur feuillage induits par le système de conduite et régulation photosynthétique de la vigne. Symp. Physiologie de la vigne, OIV, Bordeaux, pp. 378–385Google Scholar
  10. Carbonneau A 2001 Influence des facteurs climatiques sur la constitution du raisin 12èmes journées GESCO, Montpellier 3–7 July 2001, pp. 5–19Google Scholar
  11. Carbonneau A, Riou C, Guyon D, Riom J and Schneider C 1992 Agrométéorologie de la vigne en France. INRA. Office des publications officielles des communautés européennes, 225pGoogle Scholar
  12. Champagnol F 1984 Eléments de physiologie de la vigne et de viticulture générale. Publié par l’auteur, Montpellier, 351pGoogle Scholar
  13. Conradie, W J, Carey, V A, Bonnardot, V, Saayman, D, Schoot, L H 2002Effect of different environmental factors on the performance of sauvignon blanc grapevines in the Stellenboch/Durbanville districts of south africa. I. geology, soil, climate, phenology and grape compositionSA J. Enol. Viticult.237891Google Scholar
  14. Deloire A, Carbonneau A, Ojeda H, Silva P, Kraeva E, Jacquet O and Andary C 2001 Relations entre l’état hydrique de la vigne et les composés phénoliques de la baie de raisin des cépages Syrah et Grenache Noir. Proposition de principes de gestion de la végétation 12èmes journées GESCO, Montpellier, 3–7 July 2001 Vol 1, pp. 253–258Google Scholar
  15. Dreier, L P, Stoll, G S, Ruffner, H P 2000Berry ripening and evapotranspiration in Vitis vinifera LAm. J. Enol. Viticult.51340346Google Scholar
  16. Escoffier, B, Pages, J 1990Analyses factorielles simples et multiplesDunodParis421Google Scholar
  17. Falissard B 2002 Comprendre et utiliser les statistiques dans les sciences de la vie. (2 édition). Masson, Collection “Evaluation et Statistique” Paris, 328pGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaudillère J P, Van Leeuwen C and Ollat N 2002 Carbon isotope composition of sugars in grapevine, an integrated indicator of vineyard water status J. Exp. Bot. 53–369, 757–763Google Scholar
  19. Greenough, J D, Longerich, H P, Jackson, S E 1997Element fingerprinting of Okanagan Valley wines using ICP-MS: Relationships between wine composition, vineyard and wine colourAust. J. Grape Wine Res.37583Google Scholar
  20. Hoppmann D and Schaller K 1996 Characterization of vineyard sites for quality wine production using meteorological, soil chemical and physical data Actes du 1er Colloque International sur les Terroirs Viticoles – Angers 17–18 July, pp. 264–269Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, D I, Lombard, B 1993Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality – A reviewAm. J. Enol. Viticult.44–4409430Google Scholar
  22. Koundouras, S, Leeuwen, C, Seguin, G, Glories, Y 1999Influence de l’alimentation en eau sur la croissance de la vigne, la maturation des raisins et les caractéristiques des vins en zone méditerranéenne (exemple de Némée, Grèce, cépage Saint-Georges, 1997)Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin33149160Google Scholar
  23. Martin, G J, Mazure, M, Jouitteau, C, Martin, Y -L, Aguile, L, Allain, P 1999Characterization of the geographic origin of Bordeaux wines by a combined use of isotopic and trace element measurementsAm. J. Enol. Viticult.50 409417Google Scholar
  24. Matthews, M A, Anderson, M W 1988Fruit ripening in Vitis vinifera L.: Response to seasonal water deficitsAm. J. Enol. Viticult.39313320Google Scholar
  25. Matthews, M, Ishii, R, Anderson, M, O’Mahony, M 1990Dependence of wine sensory attributes on vine water statusJ. Sci. Food Agric.51321335Google Scholar
  26. Morlat, R, Penavayre, M, Jacquet, A, Asselin, C, Lemaitre, C 1992Influence des terroirs sur le fonctionnement hydrique et la photosynthèse de la vigne en millésime exceptionnellement sec (1990). Conséquences sur la maturation du raisinJournal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin26197220Google Scholar
  27. OIV 1999 Recueil des méthodes internationales d’analyse des vins et des moûts. Publication OIV, 341pGoogle Scholar
  28. Ojeda H, Lebon E, Romieu C, Carbonneau A, Andary C and Deloire A 1999 Relations entre le stress hydrique et la croissance des baies de Vitis vinifera L. cv. Syrah. Evolution des phénols. Compte rendu des 11 journées GESCO, Sicile 1, 185–192.Google Scholar
  29. Ojeda, H, Andary, C, Kraeva, E, Carbonneau, A, Deloire, A 2002Influence of pre- and postveraison water deficit on synthesis and concentration of skin phenolic compounds during berry growth of Vitis vinifera cv. ShirazAm. J. Enol. Viticult.53261267Google Scholar
  30. Peres, C, Viallon, C, Berdagué, J L 2001Solid-phase micro-extraction mass spectrometry : a new approach to the rapid characterization of cheesesAnal. Chem.7310301036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ribereau-Gayon J, Peynaud E, Ribereau-Gayon P and Sudraud P 1976 Sciences et techniques du vin. Dunod, tome 1, Paris, 671pGoogle Scholar
  32. Riou, V, Asselin, C 1996Potentiel polyphénolique disponible du raisin. Estimation rapide par extraction partielle à chaudLe Progrès Agricole et Viticole18382384Google Scholar
  33. Ruhl, E, Alleweldt, G 1985Investigations into the influence of time of irrigation on yield and quality of grapevinesActa Horticult.171457462Google Scholar
  34. Seguin, G 1983Influence des terroirs viticoles sur la constitution et la qualité des vendangesBulletin de l’OIV56318Google Scholar
  35. Smart R E 1982 Vine manipulation to improve wine grape quality. Proc. Int. Symp. Grapes and Wine, Davis, California, pp. 362–375Google Scholar
  36. Smart, R E, Turkington, C R, Evans, G R 1974Grapevine response to furrow and trickle irrigationAm. J. Enol. Viticult.256266Google Scholar
  37. Tesic, D, Wooley, D J, Hewett, E W, Martin, D J 2001Environmental effects on cv Cabernet Sauvignon grown in Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand. 1 – Phenology and characterisation of viticultural environmentsAust. J. Grape Wine Res.81526Google Scholar
  38. Tregoat, O, Leeuwen, C, Choné, X, Gaudillère, J P 2002Etude du régime hydrique et de la nutrition azotée de la vigne par des indicateurs physiologiques. Influence sur le comportement de la vigne et la maturation du raisin (Vitis vinifera L. cv Merlot, 2000, Bordeaux)Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin36133142Google Scholar
  39. Trossais, J, Asselin, C 1985Influence des teneurs en acide malique des moûts sur le dosage de l’acide tartrique par analyse en flux continu par colorimétrie avec le métavanadateConnaissance. Vigne et Vin.4249259Google Scholar
  40. Vercesi, A, Locci, R, Prosser, J I 1997Growth kinetics of Botrytis cinerea on organics acids and sugars in relation to colonisation of grape berriesMycol. Res.101139142CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre INRA d’Angers, Unité Vigne et VinBeaucouzeFrance

Personalised recommendations