Plant and Soil

, Volume 280, Issue 1–2, pp 101–114 | Cite as

Aggregative Root Placement: A Feature During Interspecific Competition in Inland Sand-Dune Habitats

  • Maik Bartelheimer
  • Tom Steinlein
  • Wolfram Beyschlag


Segregation of roots is frequently observed in competing root systems. However, recently, intensified root growth in response to a neighbouring plant has been described in pot experiments [Gersani M, Brown J S, O'Brien E E, Maina G M and Abramsky Z 2001. J. Ecol. 89, 660–669]. This paper examines whether intense root growth towards a neighbour (aggregation) plays a role in competitive interactions between plant species from open nutrient-poor mid-European sand ecosystems. In a controlled field-competition experiment, root distribution patterns of intra- and interspecific pairs as well as single control plants of Corynephorus canescens, Festuca psammophila, Hieracium pilosella, Hypochoeris radicata and Conyza canadensis were investigated after one growing season. Under intraspecific competition plants tended to segregate their root systems, while under interspecific competition most species tended to aggregate roots towards their neighbours even at the expense of root development at the opposite competition-free side of the target. Preference of a root aggregation strategy over the occupation of competition-free soil in interspecific competition emphasizes the importance of contesting between individuals in relation to mere resource acquisition. It is suggested that in the presence of a competitor the plants might use root aggregation as a defensive reaction to maintain a strong competitive response and exclusive access to the resources of already occupied soil volumes.


aggregation competition Conyza canadensis root distribution sand ecosystems segregation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aerts, R 1999Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: Mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacksJ. Exp. Bot.502937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A 2003Underground processes in plant communitiesEcology8422562257Google Scholar
  3. Bais, H P, Park, S-W, Weir, T L, Callaway, R M, Vivanco, J M 2004How plants communicate using the underground information superhighwayTrends Plant Sci.92632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berendse, F 1982Competition between plant populations with different rooting depths III. Field experimentsOecologia535055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bunce, J A, Miller, L N, Chabot, B F 1977Competitive exploitation of soil water by five eastern North American tree speciesBot. Gaz.138168173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bliss, K M, Jones, R H, Mitchell, R J, Mou, P P 2001Are competitive interactions influenced by spatial nutrient heterogeneity and root foraging behavior?New Phytol.154409417Google Scholar
  7. Böhm, W 1979Methods of Studying Root SystemsSpringer Verlag, HeidelbergBerlin, New York183Google Scholar
  8. Boorman, L A 1982Some plant growth patterns in relation to the sand dune habitatJ. Ecol.70607614Google Scholar
  9. Bouma, T J, Nielsen, K L, Koutstaal, B 2000Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerized analysis of root length diameterPlant Soil218185196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cahill, J F,Jr 2003aLack of relationship between below-ground competition and allocation to roots in 10 grassland speciesJ. Ecol.91532540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cahill, J F,Jr 2003bNeighbourhood-scale diversity, composition and root crowding do not alter competition during drought in a native grasslandEcol. Lett.6599603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cahill, J F,Jr, Casper, B B 2000Investigating the relationship between neighbor root biomass and belowground competition: Field evidence for symmetric competition belowgroundOIKOS90311320Google Scholar
  13. Caldwell, M M, Dawson, T E, Richards, J H 1998Hydraulic lift: Consequences of water efflux from the roots of plantsOecologia113151161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caldwell, M M, Eissenstat, D M, Richards, J H, Allen, F M 1985Competition for Phosphorus: Differential uptake from dual-isotope-labeled soil interspaces between shrub and grassScience229384386Google Scholar
  15. Caldwell, M M, Manwaring, J H, Durham, S L 1996Species interactions at the level of fine roots in the field: Influence of soil nutrient heterogeneity and plant sizeOecologia106440447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caldwell, M M, Richards, J H 1986Competing root systems: Morphology and models of absorptionGivnish, T J eds. On the Economy of Plant Form and FunctionCambridge University PressCambridge251273Google Scholar
  17. Callaway, R M 2002The detection of neighbors by plantsTrends Ecol. Evol.17104105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Casper, B B, Jackson, R B 1997Plant competition undergroundAnnu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.28545570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Casper, B B, Schenk, H J, Jackson, R B 2003Defining a plant’s belowground zone of influenceEcology8423132321Google Scholar
  20. Falik, O, Reides, P, Gersani, M, Novoplansky, A 2003Self/non-self discrimination in rootsJ. Ecol.91525531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Falik, O, Reides, P, Gersani, M, Novoplansky, A 2005Root navigation by self inhibitionPlant Cell Environ.28562569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fitter, A H, Williamson, L, Linkohr, B, Leyser, O 2002Root system achitecture determines fitness in an Arabidopsis mutant in competition for immobile phosphat ions but not for nitrate ionsProc. R. Soc. Lond.26920172022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fu, X D, Harberd, N P 2003Auxin promotes Arabidopsis root growth by modulating giberillin responseNature421740743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gersani, M, Brown, J S, O’Brien, E E, Maina, G M, Abramsky, Z 2001Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competitionJ. Ecol.89660669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldberg, D E 1990Components of resource competition in plant communitiesGrace, J BTilman, D eds. Perspectives on Plant CompetitionAcademic PressSan Diego, London2749Google Scholar
  26. Goldberg, D E, Fleetwood, L 1987Competitive effect and response in four annual plantsJ. Ecol.7511311143Google Scholar
  27. Gruntman, M, Novoplansky, A 2004Physiologically mediated self/non-self discrimination in rootsProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA10138633667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gur, A, Cohen, Y 1989The peach replant problem – some causal agentsSoil Biol. Biochem.21829834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hegi, G 1979Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-europaVerlag Paul PareyBerlin, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  30. Holzapfel, C, Alpert, P 2003Root cooperation in a clonal plant: Connected strawberries segregate rootsOecologia1347277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Huber-Sannwald, E, Pyke, D, Caldwell, M M 1996Morphological plasticity following species-specific recognition and competition in two perennial grassesAm. J. Bot.83919931Google Scholar
  32. Hutchings, M J, John, A J, Wijesinghe, D K 2003Toward understanding the consequences of soil heterogeneity for plant populations and communitiesEcology8423222334Google Scholar
  33. Inderjit Weston, L A 2003Root Exudates: An overviewKroon, HVisser, E J W eds. Root EcologySpringer-VerlagBerlin, Heidelberg235251Google Scholar
  34. Keddy, P A, Twolan-Strutt, L, Wisheu, I C 1994Competitive effect and response rankings in 20 wetland plants: Are they consistent across three environments?J. Ecol.82635643Google Scholar
  35. Kücke, M, Schmid, H, Spiess, A 1995A comparison of four methods for measuring roots of field crops in three contrasting soilsPlant Soil1726371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kutschera, L, Lichtenegger, E 1992Wurzelatlas mitteleuropäischer GrünlandpflanzenFischerStuttgartGoogle Scholar
  37. Lamont, B B 2003Structure, ecology and physiology of root clusters – a reviewPlant Soil248119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Law, R, Watkinson, A R 1987Response-surface analysis of two-species competition: An experiment on Phleum arenarium and Vulpia fasciculataJ. Ecol.75871886Google Scholar
  39. Lundell, Y, Johannisson, C, Högberg, P 2001Ion leakage after liming or acidifying fertilization of Swedish forests – a study of lysimeters with and without active tree rootsForest Ecol. Manag.147151170Google Scholar
  40. Mahall, B E, Callaway, R M 1991Root communication among desert shrubsProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA88874876PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mahall, B E, Callaway, R M 1992Root communication mechanisms and intracommunity distribution of two Mojave shrubsEcology7321452151Google Scholar
  42. Maina, G M, Brown, J S, Gersani, M 2002Intra-plant versus inter-plant root competition in beans: Avoidance, resource matching or tragedy of the commonsPlant Ecol.160235247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Markham, J H, Chanway, C P 1996Measuring plant neighbour effectsFunct. Ecol.10548549Google Scholar
  44. McConnaughay, K D M, Bazzaz, F A 1991Is physical space a soil resource?Ecology7294103Google Scholar
  45. McKane, R B, Johnson, L C, Shaver, G R, Nadelhoffer, K J, Rastetter, E B, Fry, B, Biblin, A E, Kielland, K, Kwiatkowske, B L, Laundre, J A, Murray, G 2002Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundraNature4156871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Novoplansky, A, Cohen, D 1997The mutual distribution of competing root systemsAltman, AWaisel, Y eds. Biology of Root Formation and Development: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Biology of Root Formation and Development, held June 23Plenum PressNew York353364Google Scholar
  47. Oleszek, W A, Hoagland, R E, Zablotowicz, R M 1999Ecological significance of plant saponinsInderjit, Dakshini, K M MChester, F eds. Priciples and Practices in Plant Ecology: Allelochemical InteractionsCRC Press LLCBoca Raton451465Google Scholar
  48. Pless, H 1995Pflanzensoziologische Untersuchungen der Trockenrasen an den Hängen des Odertales zwischen Seelow und Frankfurt (Oder)Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in Brandenburg32731Google Scholar
  49. Purves, D W, Law, R 2003Experimental derivation of functions relating growth of Arabidopsis thaliana neighbour size and distanceJ. Ecol.90882894Google Scholar
  50. Richner, W, Liedgens, M, Bürgi, H, Soldati, A, Stamp, P 2000Root image analysis and interpretationSmit, A LBengough, A GEngels, CNoordwijk, MPellegrin, SGeijn, S C eds. Root Methods: A HandbookSpringer VerlagBerlin, Heidelberg305341Google Scholar
  51. Robinson, D, Hodge, A, Griffiths, B, Fitter, A H 1999Plant root proliferation in nitrogen-rich patches confers competitive advantageProc R. Soc. Lond.266431435Google Scholar
  52. Sachs, T, Novoplansky, A, Cohen, D 1993Plants as competing populations of redundant organsPlant Cell Environ.16765770Google Scholar
  53. Schenk, H J 2004Vertical vegetation structure below ground: Scaling from root to globeEsser, KLüttge, UBeyschlag, WMurata, J eds. Progress in BotanySpringer-VerlagBerlin Heidelberg341373Google Scholar
  54. Schenk, H J, Callaway, R M, Mahall, B E 1999Spatial root segregation: Are plants territorial?Adv. Ecol. Res.28145180Google Scholar
  55. Smith, S E, Read, D J 1997Mycorrhizal SymbiosisAcademic PressSan Diego, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Webb, L J, Tracey, J G, Haydock, K P 1967A factor toxic to seedlings of the same species associated with living roots of the non-gregarious subtropical rain forest tree Grevillea robustaJ Appl Ecol41325Google Scholar
  57. Weigelt A 2001 Plant competition on inland dunes: Influence of water availability, nitrogen supply and the role of belowground processes. Ph.D. thesis. University of BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  58. Weigelt, A, Steinlein, T, Beyschlag, W 2005Competition in inland dunes: The impact of water availability on below-ground processesPlant Ecol.1765768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weiner, J 1986How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populationsEcology6714251427Google Scholar
  60. Wilson, S D, Keddy, P A 1986Measuring diffuse competition along an environmental gradient: Results from a shoreline plant communityAm. Nat.127862869Google Scholar
  61. Zobel, M, Moora, M 1997Plant coexistence in the interactive environment: Arbuscular mycorrhiza should not be out of mindOIKOS78202208Google Scholar
  62. Zobel, R 2003Fine roots – discarding flawed assumptionsNew Phytol.160276279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maik Bartelheimer
    • 1
  • Tom Steinlein
    • 1
  • Wolfram Beyschlag
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Experimental and Systems EcologyUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations