Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 280, Issue 1–2, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Spatial Variation of Soil Properties Relating to Vegetation Changes

  • Thomas J. Sauer
  • Cindy A. Cambardella
  • David W. Meek
Commentary

Abstract

Bekele and Hudnall provide an interesting perspective on the spatial variation of soil chemical properties in a natural area undergoing transition from prairie to forest. Their focus is on the unique calcareous prairie ecosystem of Louisiana where prairie remnants are being encroached upon by the forest, primarily eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana L.). Bekele and Hudnall were especially interested in investigating any differences in spatial variability among similar sites and in documenting the scale at which the variability occurs. Geostatistical methods have been used to describe and model spatial patterns in soil data for more than 20 years. The accessibility of user-friendly geostatistical software packages has increased the use of spatial analysis of soil’s data but carries the risk that these tools are used without due consideration of the underlying theory, especially in the field of semivariogram modeling or recommended good practices. The feedback between plant community composition and species distribution and soil properties in natural systems has promise to provide enhanced insight into the short- and long-term relationships between plants and soil properties. This is an intriguing area of research that couples plant ecology and soil science and should provide valuable information on the interaction of soils with the processes of plant succession and competition. Researchers in this area are urged to be cautious in verifying the assumptions behind popular geostatistical methods and explicit in describing the important steps such as trend analysis, which can reveal critical interpretive information.

Keywords

forest prairie eastern red cedar geostatistics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aerts, R 1999Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: Mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacksJ. Exp. Bot.502937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, R M, Jawson, M D, Grahammer, K, Polymenopoulos, A D 1991Positional, spatially correlated and random components of carbon dioxide fluxJ. Environ. Qual.20301308Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D W 1987Pedogenesis in the grassland and adjacent forests of the Great PlainsStewart, B A eds. Adv. Soil SciVol. 7Springer-VerlagNew York5393Google Scholar
  4. Axmann, B D, Knapp, A K 1993Water relations of Juniperus virginiana and Andropogon gerardi in an unburned tallgrass prairie watershedSouthw. Nat.38325330Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, L W, Odell, R T, Boggess, W R 1964Properties of selected soils developed near the forest-prairie border in east-central IllinoisSoil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.28257263Google Scholar
  6. Bekele, A, Hudnall, W H 2003Stable carbon isotope study of the prairie-forest transition soil in.LouisianaSoil Sci.168783792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonmati, M, Cecanti, B, Nanniperi, P 1991Spatial variability of phosphatase, urease, protease, organic carbon and total nitrogen in soilSoil Biol. Biochem.23391396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briggs, J M, Gibson, D J 1992Effect of fire on tree spatial patterns in a tallgrass prairie landscapeBull. Torrey Bot. Club119300307Google Scholar
  9. Burgess, T M, Webster, R 1980aOptimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. I. The variogram and punctual krigingJ. Soil Sci.31315331Google Scholar
  10. Burgess, T M, Webster, R 1980bOptimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. II. Block krigingJ. Soil Sci.31333341Google Scholar
  11. Cambardella, C A, Moorman, T B, Novak, J M, Parkin, T B, Karlen, D L, Turco, R F, Konopka, A E 1994Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soilsSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.5815011511Google Scholar
  12. Cressie, N A C 1993Statistics for Spatial DataAcademic PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Curtis, J T, McIntosh, R P 1951An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of WisconsinEcology32476496Google Scholar
  14. Gehring, J L, Bragg, T B 1992Changes in prairie vegetation under eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) in an eastern Nebraska bluestem prairieAm. Midl. Nat.128209217Google Scholar
  15. Goovaerts, P 1998Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil propertiesBiol. Fertil. Soils27315334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holthuijzen, A M A, Sharik, T L 1984Seed longevity and mechanisms of regeneration of eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana L.)Bull. Torrey Bot. Club111153158Google Scholar
  17. Holthuijzen, A M A, Sharik, T L 1985The avian seed dispersal system of eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana L.)Can. J. Bot.6315081515Google Scholar
  18. Journel, A G, Huijbregts, C J 1978Mining GeostatisticsAcademic PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Matlack, G R 1994Vegetation dynamics of the forest edge – trends in space and successional timeJ. Ecol.82113123Google Scholar
  20. Meek D W and Sauer T J 2004 Suggestions for presenting kriging results. In G Milliken Ed. Proc. 15th Appl. Stat. Agric. Conf., Manhattan, KS, Apr. 29–May 1, 2003. Stat. Dept., K S. St. Univ., Manhattan, KS, pp. 258–276Google Scholar
  21. Meek D W, Dinnes D, Jaynes D, Cambardella C, Colvin T, Hatfield J and Karlen D 2001 An autoregression model for a paired watershed comparison. In G. Milliken Ed. Proc.12th Appl. Stat. Agric. Conf., Manhattan, K S, May 1–2, 2000. pp. 223–231. State. Dept., KS. St. Univ., Manhattan, KSGoogle Scholar
  22. Mills, K E, Bever, J D 1998Maintenance of diversity within plant communities: soil pathogens as agents of negative feedbackEcology7915951601Google Scholar
  23. Norris, M D, Blair, J M, Johnson, L C 2001Land cover change in eastern Kansas: litter dynamics of closed-canopy eastern red cedar forests in tallgrass prairieCan. J. Bot.79214222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ormsbee, P, Bazzaa, F A, Boggess, W R 1976Physiological ecology of Juniperus virginiana in oldfieldsOecologia237582Google Scholar
  25. Parkin, T B 1993Spatial variability of microbial processes in soil – a reviewJ. Environ. Qual.22409417Google Scholar
  26. Peltzer, D A 2001Plant responses to competition and soil origin across a prairie-forest boundaryJ. Ecol.89176185Google Scholar
  27. Pettapiece, W W 1969The forest-grassland transitionPawluk, S eds. Pedology and Quaternary ResearchUniv. of AlbertaEdmonton, AB103113Google Scholar
  28. Rochette, P, Desjardins, R L, Pattey, E 1991Spatial and temporal variability of soil respiration in agricultural fieldsCan. J. Soil Sci.71189196Google Scholar
  29. Ruhe, R V, Scholtes, W H 1956Ages and development of soil landscapes in relation to climatic and vegetational changes in IowaSoil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.21264273Google Scholar
  30. Sauer, T J, Meek, D W 2003Spatial variation of plant-available phosphorus in pastures with contrasting managementSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.67826836Google Scholar
  31. Transeau, E N 1935The prairie peninsulaEcology16423437Google Scholar
  32. Viera, S R, Nielson, D R, Biggar, J W 1981Spatial variability of field-measured infiltration rateSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.4510401048Google Scholar
  33. Voltz, M, Goulard, M 1994Spatial interpolation of soil moisture retention curvesGeoderma62109123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. West, C P, Mallarino, A P, Wedin, W F, Marx, D B 1989Spatial variability of soil chemical properties in grazed pasturesSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.53784789Google Scholar
  35. White, E M, Johnson, J R, Nichols, J T 1969Prairie-forest transition soils of the South Dakota Black HillsSoil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.33932936Google Scholar
  36. White, J G, Welch, R M, Norvell, W A 1997Soil zinc map of the USA using geostatistics and geographic information systemsSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.61185194Google Scholar
  37. Wilson, S D, Tilman, D 1993Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilizationEcology74599611Google Scholar
  38. Yost, R S, Uehara, G, Fox, R L 1982Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areasI. Semi-variograms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.4610281032Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. Sauer
    • 1
  • Cindy A. Cambardella
    • 1
  • David W. Meek
    • 1
  1. 1.USDA-ARSNational Soil Tilth LaboratoryAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations