Spatial root distribution of apricot trees in different soil tillage practices
- 248 Downloads
- 31 Citations
Abstract
Root and soil water distribution was studied in a mature drip-irrigated apricot (Prunus armeniaca L. cv. Búlida) orchard with different soil tillage practices, in a loamy textured soil with a 7% slope, located in Murcia (SE Spain). Three treatments were applied between tree rows:control (no-tillage), whereby, following the common practice in the area, weeds were cut back to ground level by a blade attached to a tractor; perforated treatment, where the soil surface was mechanically perforated with an adapted-plough; and mini-catchment treatment, consisting of mini-catchments with low banks manually raised perpendicular to the line of emitters. Almost all of the apricot root system was located in the first 0.75 m of soil depth, with 91% in the first 0.50 m. More than 75% of the roots corresponded to thin roots, with a diameter less than 0.2 mm. Both tillage treatments decreased runoff compared with the control treatment, while the mini-catchment treatment showed the highest change in soil water content after rainfall events. The mini-catchment treatment was performed in an attempt to reduce the rainwater running down the slope, leaving the accumulated water near plant roots, an effect which was responsible for the higher root length density (RLD) values found in this treatment. In addition, roots were distributed over a wider area, providing higher RLD values up to 1 m from the emitter, meaning that a higher soil volume was explored. For these reasons, the mini-catchment treatment was seen to be the most beneficial soil tillage treatment for optimising water use in semiarid conditions.
Keywords
kriging Prunus armeniaca root distribution soil water content tillagePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Abrisqueta J M, Plana V, Franco J A and Ruiz-Sánchez M C 2004 Effect of soil tillage on hydraulic properties of a loam soil. Soil Till. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
- Albaladejo, J, Castillo, V, Díaz, E 2000Soil runoff on semiarid land as amended with urban solid refuseLand Degrad. Develop.11363373Google Scholar
- Atkinson, D 1980The distribution and effectiveness of root of tree cropsHortic. Rev.2424490Google Scholar
- Baker, J M, Wraith, J M, Dalton, F N 1992Root function in water transportHartfield, J LStewart, B A eds. Limitations to Plant Root Growth. Advances in Soil ScienceSpriger-VerlagNew York5372Vol. 19Google Scholar
- Bevington, K B, Castle, W S 1985Annual root growth pattern of young citrus trees in relation to shoot growth, soil temperature, and soil water contentJ. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.110840854Google Scholar
- Bielorai, H 1982The effect of partial wetting of the root zone on yield and water use efficiency in a drip and sprinkler-irrigated mature grapefruit groveIrrig. Sci.389100Google Scholar
- Castillo, V M, Martínez-Mena, M, Albaladejo, J 1997Runoff and soil loss response to vegetation removal in a semiarid environmentSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.6111161121Google Scholar
- Dexter, A R 1986Model experiments on the behaviour of roots at the interface between a tilled seedbed and a compacted sub-soilPlant Soil95149161Google Scholar
- Fernández, J E, Moreno, F, Martín-Aranda, J, Fereres, E 1992Olive-tree root dynamics under different soil water regimesAgric. Mediterranean122225235Google Scholar
- Fowkes N D and Landsberg J J 1981. Optimal roots systems in terms of water uptake and movement. In Mathematics and Plant Physiology. pp. 109–125. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Franco, J A, Abrisqueta, J M 1997A comparison between minirhizotron and soil coring methods of estimating root distribution in young almond trees under trickle irrigationJ. Hortic. Sci.72797805Google Scholar
- Frasier, G W 1980Harvesting water for agricultural, wildlife, and domestic usesJ. Soil Water Conserv.35125128Google Scholar
- Graveel, J G, Tyler, D D, Jones, J R, McFee, W W 2002Crop yield and rooting as affected by fragipan depth in loess soils in the southeast USASoil Tillage Res.68153161Google Scholar
- Hanada, S, Saitoh, H, Aoyama, M 1985Effective root zone and its root density in apple orchard from different soil regions. I. Orchard characteristicsBull. Fac. Agric. Hirosaki Univ.44816Google Scholar
- Hudson, N W 1997Medición sobre el terreno de la erosión del suelo y de la escorrentíaBoletín FAO683556Google Scholar
- Li, X Y, Xie, Z K, Yan, X K 2004Runoff characteristics of artificial catchment materials for rainwater harvesting in the semiarid regions of ChinaAgric. Water Manage.65211224Google Scholar
- López-Bermudez, F, Albaladejo, J 1990Factores ambientales de la degradación del suelo en el área mediterráneaAlbaladejo, J.Stocking, M ADíaz, E. eds. Degradación y Regeneración del Suelo en Condiciones Ambientales MediterráneasCSICMurcia1546Google Scholar
- Marler, T E, Davies, F S 1990Microsprinkler irrigation and growth of young ‘Hamlin’ orange treesJ. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.1154551Google Scholar
- Méndez J, Domingo R, Abrisqueta J M, Plana V and Ruiz-Sánchez C 2002 Effect of soil tillage practices on runoff and soil loss in an apricot plantation. In VII Congress European Society of Agronomy (Córdoba, Spain). pp. 521–522.Google Scholar
- Pages, L, Pellerin, S 1996Study of differences between vertical root maps obtained using a model for the three-dimensional architecture of the root systemPlant Soil182329337Google Scholar
- Pérez-Pastor, A, Ruiz-Sánchez, M C, Domingo, R, Torrecillas, A 2004Growth and phenological stages of ‘Búlida’ apricot trees in south-east SpainAgronomie2418Google Scholar
- Phene, C J, Davis, K R, Hutmacher, R B, Bar-Yosef, B, Meek, D W, Misaki, J 1991Effect of high frequency surface and subsurface drip irrigation on root distribution of sweet cornIrrig. Sci.12135140Google Scholar
- Plana V 2003 Optimización del uso del agua en albaricoquero mediante riego deficitario controlado y manejo del suelo. MS Thesis (ISBN: 0-493-36699–7), Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Murcia, Spain, 253 pp.Google Scholar
- Plana, V, Ruiz, A, Ruiz-Sánchez, M C, Franco, J A, Abrisqueta, J M 2002Spatial representativity of the possible sites for measuring the water balance of apricot treesAgric. Water Manage.57145153Google Scholar
- Prinz D 1996. Water harvesting: past and future. In Proceeding of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop. pp. 135–144.Google Scholar
- Ruiz-Sánchez, M C, Domingo, R, Torrecillas, A, Pérez-Pastor, A 2000Water stress preconditioning to improve drought resistance in young apricot plantsPlant Sci.156245251PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shwarz, D, Grosch, R 2003Influence of nutrient solution concentration and a root pathogen (Pythium aphanidermatum) on tomato root growth and morphologySci. Hortic.97109120Google Scholar
- Smucker, A J M, Aiken, R M 1992Dynamic root responses to water deficitsSoil Sci.154281289Google Scholar
- Topp, G C, Davis, J L 1985Time domain reflectometry (TDR) and its application to irrigation schedulingAdv. Irrig.3107127Google Scholar
- Torrecillas, A, Domingo, R, Galego, R, Ruiz-Sánchez, M C 1999Apricot tree response to withholding irrigation at different phenological periodsSci. Hortic.85201215Google Scholar
- Unger, P W, Howell, T A 1999Agricultural water conservation a global perspectiveKirkham, M B eds. Water Use in Crop ProductionFood Products PressNew York136Google Scholar