Plant and Soil

, Volume 271, Issue 1–2, pp 377–389 | Cite as

Orchard floor management practices that maintain vegetative or biomass groundcover stimulate soil microbial activity and alter soil microbial community composition

  • Shengrui Yao
  • Ian A. Merwin
  • George W. Bird
  • George S. Abawi
  • Janice E. Thies


Groundcover management systems (GMS) are important in managing fruit-tree orchards because of their effects on soil conditions, nutrient availability, tree growth and yields. We employed a polyphasic approach, incorporating measures of soil microbial abundance, activity and community composition, to study the long-term effects of different GMS on biotic and abiotic factors in an orchard soil. Four GMS treatments – Pre-emergence residual herbicides (Pre-H), post-emergence herbicide (Post-H), mowed-sod (Grass), and hardwood bark mulch (Mulch) – were established in 2-m-wide strips within tree rows in an apple orchard in 1992, and have been maintained and monitored annually until the present. We have measured soil water and nutrient availability, tree growth, and yields annually from 1993 to 2003. Soil nematode numbers and trophic groups were evaluated in July and Oct. 2001, and Sept. 2003. Numbers of culturable bacteria and fungi, soil respiratory activity, eubacterial and fungal community composition were determined in May and Sept. 2003. The Pre-H treatment soil had the fewest culturable bacteria, while the Grass treatment had the largest population of culturable fungi. Soil nematode population size and diversity were also affected by GMS treatments; the Pre-H treatment had the lowest ratio of (bacteriovores + fungivores) to plant parasitic nematodes. Soil respiration rates were higher in the Mulch than in other treatments during a 40-day incubation period. Hierarchical cluster dendrograms of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) fingerprints for eubacterial community 16S rRNA genes indicated that Post-H and Grass treatments clustered together and separately from the Pre-H and Mulch treatments, which were also grouped together. The influence of GMSs on the fungal community, as assessed by PCR-DGGE of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, was not as pronounced as that observed for bacteria. Soil fungal community composition under the Mulch differed from that under other treatments. The effects of GMS on soil microbial community abundance, activity, and composition were associated with observed differences in soil organic matter inputs and turnover, nutrient availability, and apple tree growth and yields under the different GMS treatments.


apple bacteria fungi groundcover management system microbial community composition 



denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis


groundcover management system


internal transcribed spacer


polymerase chain reaction


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alef, K 1998

    Soil respiration

    Alef, KNanniperi, P eds. Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and BiochemistryAcademic PressNew York224217
    Google Scholar
  2. Amann, R I, Ludwig, W, Schleifer, K H 1995Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial-cells without cultivationMicrobiol. Rev.59143169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferris, H, Bongers, T, Goede, R G M 2001A framework for soil food web diagnostics: Extension of the nematode faunal analysis conceptAppl. Soil Ecol.181329Google Scholar
  4. Forge, T A, Hogue, E, Neilsen, G, Neilsen, D 2003Effects of organic mulches on soil microfauna in the root zone of apple: Implications for nutrient fluxes and functional diversity of the soil food webAppl. Soil Ecol.223954Google Scholar
  5. Garland, J L, Mills, A L 1991Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilizationAppl. Environ. Microbiol.5723512359Google Scholar
  6. Goh, K M, Pearson, D R, Daly, M J 2001Effects of apple orchard production systems on some important soil physical, chemical and biological quality parametersBiol. Agric. Hortic.18269292Google Scholar
  7. Greweling, T, Peech, M 1965Chemical Soil TestsCornell Agricultural Experimental StationIthaca, NYBulletin, no. 960Google Scholar
  8. Heuer, H, Kroppenstedt, R M, Lottmann, J, Berg, G, Smalla, K 2002Effects of T4 lysozyme release from transgenic potato roots on bacterial rhizosphere communities are negligible relative to natural factorsAppl. Environ. Microbiol.6813251335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hogue, E J, Neilsen, G H 1987Orchard floor vegetation managementHortic. Rev.9377430Google Scholar
  10. Hooper, D U, Bignell, D E, Brown, V K, Brussaard, L, Dangerfield, J M, Wall, D H, Wardle, D A, Coleman, D C, Giller, K E, Lavelle, P, Vander Putten, W H, De Ruiter, P C, Rusek, J, Silver, W L, Tiedje, J M, Wolters, V 2000Interactions between aboveground and belowground biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems: Patterns, mechanisms, and feedbacksBioscience5010491061Google Scholar
  11. Jaffee, B A, Abawi, G S, Mai, W F 1982Role of soil microflora and Pratylenchus penetrans in an apple replant diseasePhytopathology72247251Google Scholar
  12. Kable, P F, Mai, W F 1968Influence of soil moisture on Pratylenchus penetransNematologica14101122Google Scholar
  13. Marschner, P, Kandeler, E, Marschner, B 2003Structure and function of the soil microbial community in a long-term fertilizer experimentSoil Biol. Biochem.35453461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marschner, P, Neumann, G, Kania, A, Weiskopf, L, Lieberei, R 2002Spatial and temporal dynamics of the microbial community structure in the rhizosphere of cluster roots of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.)Plant Soil246167174Google Scholar
  15. Marschner, P, Yang, C H, Lieberei, R, Crowley, D E 2001Soil and plant specific effects on bacterial community composition in the rhizosphereSoil Biol. Biochem.3314371445Google Scholar
  16. Melillo, J M, Aber, J D, Muratore, J F 1982Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamicsEcology63621626Google Scholar
  17. Merbach, W, Mirus, E, Knof, G, Remus, R, Ruppel, S, Russow, R, Gransee, A, Schulze, J 1999Release of carbon and nitrogen compounds by plant roots and their possible ecological importanceJ. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.-Z. Pflanzenernahr. Bodenkd.162373383Google Scholar
  18. Merwin, I A 2004Groundcover management effects on orchard production, nutrition, soil, and water qualityNew York Fruit Quarterly122529Google Scholar
  19. Merwin I A 2003 Orchard-floor management systems. In: Apple-Botany, Production and Uses, Ed Ferree D C, Warrington I J. CABI PublishingGoogle Scholar
  20. Merwin, I A, Ray, J A, Steenhuis, T S, Boll, J 1996Groundcover management systems influence fungicide and nitrate-N concentrations in leachate and runoff from a New York apple orchardJ. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.121249257Google Scholar
  21. Merwin, I A, Stiles, W C 1994Orchard groundcover management impacts on apple tree growth and yield, and nutrient availability and uptakeJ. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.119209215Google Scholar
  22. Merwin, I A, Stiles, W C, Vanes, H M 1994Orchard groundcover management impacts on soil physical-propertiesJ. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.119216222Google Scholar
  23. Muyzer, G 1999DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystemsCurr. Opin. Microbiol.2317322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Muyzer, G, Dewaal, E C, Uitterlinden, A G 1993Profiling of complex microbial-populations by denaturing gradient gel-electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes-coding for 16S ribosomal-RNAAppl. Environ. Microbiol.59695700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Muyzer, G, Smalla, K 1998Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecologyAnton. Van Leeuw. Int. J. Gen. Mol. Microbiol.73127141Google Scholar
  26. Neilsen, G H, Hogue, E J, Forge, T, Neilsen, D 2003Mulches and biosolids affect vigor, yield and leaf nutrition of fertigated high density appleHortScience384145Google Scholar
  27. Paul, E A, Clark, M F 1996Soil Microbiology and BiochemistryAcademic PressSan DiegoGoogle Scholar
  28. Psarras, G, Merwin, I A, Lakso, A N, Ray, J A 2000Root growth phenology, root longevity, and rhizosphere respiration of field grown ‘Mutsu’ apple trees on ‘Malling 9’ rootstockJ. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.125596602Google Scholar
  29. Rumberger, A, Yao, S, Merwin, I A, Nelson, E B, Thies, J E 2004Rootstock genotype and orchard replant position rather than soil fumigation or compost amendment determine tree growth and rhizosphere bacterial community composition in an apple replant soilPlant Soil.264247260Google Scholar
  30. Saetre, P, Bääth, E 2000Spatial variation and patterns of soil microbial community structure in a mixed spruce-birch standSoil Biol. Biochem.32909917Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, D L, Bruns, T D 1997Independent, specialized invasions of ectomycorrhizal mutualism by two nonphotosynthetic orchidsProc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA9445104515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tu, C M 1996Effect of selected herbicides on activities of microorganisms in soilsJ. Environ. Sci. Health Part B-Pestic. Contam. Agric. Wastes3112011214Google Scholar
  33. Wintzingerode, F, Gobel, U B, Stackebrandt, E 1997Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: Pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysisFEMS Microbiol. Rev.21213229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Walsh, B D, MacKenzie, A F, Buszard, D J 1996aSoil nitrate levels as influenced by apple orchard floor management systemsCan. J. Soil Sci.76343349Google Scholar
  35. Walsh, B D, Salmins, S, Buszard, D J, MacKenzie, A F 1996bImpact of soil management systems on organic dwarf apple orchards and soil aggregate stability, bulk density, temperature and water contentCan. J. Soil Sci.76203209Google Scholar
  36. Wardle, D A, Yeates, G W, Bonner, K I, Nicholson, K S, Watson, R N 2001Impacts of ground vegetation management strategies in a kiwifruit orchard on the composition and functioning of the soil biotaSoil Biol. Biochem.33893905Google Scholar
  37. Werner, M R 1997Soil quality characteristics during conversion to organic orchard managementAppl. Soil Ecol.5151167Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shengrui Yao
    • 1
  • Ian A. Merwin
    • 1
  • George W. Bird
    • 2
  • George S. Abawi
    • 3
  • Janice E. Thies
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of HorticultureCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant PathologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Department of Plant PathologyCornell UniversityGenevaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations