Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 271, Issue 1–2, pp 15–26 | Cite as

Effects of various salt-alkaline mixed stresses on Aneurolepidium chinense (Trin.) Kitag.

  • Decheng Shi
  • Deli Wang
Article

Abstract

The stress conditions of salt-alkalinized soil were simulated to investigate the features and acting factors of salt-alkaline mixed stress, using a natural salt-alkaline tolerant grass Aneurolepidium chinense (Trin.) Kitag. According to the features of salt-alkalinized soil in the northeast of China, various salt-alkali conditions with different salinities and pHs were established by mixing NaCl, NaHCO3, Na2SO4, and Na2CO3, in various proportions. The treatments included a salt concentration range of 50 to 350 mM and pH values from 7.14 to 10.81. Seedlings of A. chinense were stressed under these salt-alkali conditions. Several physiological indices of seedling stress were determined, including survival rate, tillering rate, number of rhizomes, relative growth rate (RGR), proline content, electrolyte leakage rate, and Na+ and K+ content, in order to analyze the characteristics of the stresses due to the salt-alkali mixes and their main stress factors.

The results showed that the survival rate, tillering rate, number of rhizomes, RGR, and K+ content of A. chinense decreased with increasing salinity and pH (or alkalinity). Proline and Na+ content and electrolyte leakage rate increased with increasing salinity and pH (or alkalinity). The deleterious effects of a high pH value or salinity alone were significantly less than those of high pH in combination with salinity. This result suggested that for a salt-alkaline mixed stress, a reciprocal enhancement between salt stress and alkali stress was a characteristic feature, and it was most evidently reflected in the survival rate. When salinity was below 125 mM or pH was below 8.8, survival rates were all 100%. However, when salinity was above 125 mM and pH was above 8.8, survival rates sharply declined with the increasing of either salinity or pH.

The buffer capacity of the treatment solution was taken as a stress factor in order to simplify the stress factor analysis. The results of the statistical analysis showed that for the stress factors of the salt-alkaline mixed stress, [CO 3 2− ] and [HCO 3 ] could be fully represented by the buffer capacity, and [Na+] could be fully represented by salinity, whereas [SO 4 2− ] was negligible. Therefore, four factors, salinity, buffer capacity, pH and [Cl], could reflect all of the stress factors. Perfect linear correlations were observed between all physiological indices and four or three stress factors by a stepwise regression analysis. However, the effects of the four stress factors on the physiological indices were significantly different in magnitude. Buffer capacity and salinity were dominant factors for all physiological indices. Thus, it is reasonable to consider the sum of salinity plus buffer capacity as the strength value of salt-alkaline mixed stress. Furthermore, the relationships between different physiological indices and various stress factors were shown to be different.

Keywords

alkali stress buffer capacity pH salinity salt stress stress factor 

Abbreviations

RGR

relative growth rate

DW

dry weight

FW

fresh weight

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brand, JD, Tang, C., Rathjen, AJ. 2002Screening rough-seeded lupins (Lupinus pilosus Murr. and Lupinus atlanticus Glads.) for tolerance to calcareous soilsPlant Soil245261275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, SA., Nishio, JN. 2000Iron deficiency studies of sugar beet using an improved sodium bicarbonate-buffered hydroponics growth systemJ. Plant Nutr23741757Google Scholar
  3. Cheeseman, JM. 1988Mechanisms of salinity tolerance in plantsPlant Physiol87547550Google Scholar
  4. Cramer, GR, Lauchli, A., Epstein, E. 1986Effects of NaCl and CaCl2 on ion activities in complex nutrient solutions and root growth of cottonPlant Physiol81792797Google Scholar
  5. Degenhardt, B, Gimmler, H, Hose, E., Hartung, W. 2000Effect of alkaline and saline substrates on ABA contents, distribution and transport in plant rootsPlant Soil2258394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lacerda, CF, Cambraia, J, Oliva, MA, Ruiz, HA., Prisco, JT. 2003Solute accumulation and distribution during shoot and leaf development in two sorghum genotypes under salt stressEnviron. Exp. Bot49107120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ElSamad, HMA., Shaddad, MAK. 1996Comparative effect of sodium carbonate, sodium sulphate, and sodium chloride on the growth and related metabolic activities of pea plantsJ. Plant Nutr19717728Google Scholar
  8. Ge, Y., Li, JD. 1990A preliminary study on the effects of halophytes on salt accumulation and desalination in the soil of Songnen Plain, Northeast ChinaActa Prataculturae Sin17076Google Scholar
  9. Ghoulam, C, Foursy, A., Fares, K 2002Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivarsEnviron. Exp. Bot473950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartung, W, Leport, L, Ratcliffe, RG, Sauter, A, Duda, R., Turner, NC. 2002Abscisic acid concentration, root pH and anatomy do not explain growth differences of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) on acid and alkaline soilsPlant Soil240191199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hong, L., Lin, W. 1996Effects of salt stress on root plasma membrane characteristics of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive buffalograss clonesEnviron. Exp. Bot36239247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. James, SA, Bell, DT., Robson, AD. 2002Growth response of highly tolerant Eucalyptus species to alkaline pH, bicarbonate and low iron supplyAust. J. Exp. Agric426570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kawanabe, S., Zhu, TC. 1991Degeneration and conservation of Aneurolepidium chinense grassland in Northern ChinaJ. Japan. Grassl. Sci379199Google Scholar
  14. Kingsbury, RW, Epstein, E., Peary, RW. 1984Physiological responses to salinity in selected lines of wheatPlant Physiol74417423Google Scholar
  15. Liu, J., Zhu, JK. 1997Proline accumulation and salt-stress-induced gene expression in a salt-hypersensitive mutant of ArabidopsisPlant Physiol114591596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lutts, S, Kiner, JM., Bouharmont, J. 1996NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistanceAnn. Bot78389398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marcum, KB. 1999Salinity tolerance mechanisms of grasses in the subfamily chloridoideaeCrop Sci3911531160Google Scholar
  18. Nuttall, G, Armstrong, RD., Connor, DJ. 2003Evaluating physicochemical constraints of Calcarosols on wheat yield in the Victorian southern MalleeAust. J. Agric. Res54487497Google Scholar
  19. Sharma, PC, Mishra, B, Singh, RK, Singh, YP., Tyagi, NK. 2001Adaptability of onion (Allium cepa) genotypes to alkali and salinity stressesIndian J. Agric. Sci70674678Google Scholar
  20. Shi, DC., Yin, LJ. 1993Difference between salt (NaCl) and alkaline (Na2CO3) stresses on Puccinellia tenuiflora (Griseb.) Scribn. et Merr. plantsActa Bot. Sin35144149Google Scholar
  21. Shi, DC, Sheng, YM., Zhao, KF. 1998Stress effects of mixed salts with various salinities on the seedlings of Aneurolepidium chinenseActa Bot. Sin4011361142Google Scholar
  22. Shi, DC, Yin, SJ, Yang, GH., Zhao, KF. 2002Citric acid accumulation in an alkali-tolerant plant Puccinellia tenuiflora under alkaline stressActa Bot. Sin44537540Google Scholar
  23. Soussi, M, Ocana, A., Lluch, C. 1998Effects of salt stress on growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation in chick-pea (Cicer arietinum L.). JExp. Bot4913291337Google Scholar
  24. Surjus, A., Durand, M. 1996Lipid changes in soybean root membranes in response to salt treatmentJ. Exp. Bot471723Google Scholar
  25. Tang, C., Turner, NC. 1999The influence of alkalinity and water stress on the stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate and growth of Lupinus angustifolius L. and Lupinus pilosus MurrAust. J. Exp. Agric39457464Google Scholar
  26. Tanji KK. (1990). Agricultural salinity assessment and management. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York pp. 1–112Google Scholar
  27. Wang, BS., Zhao, KF. 1995Comparison of extractive methods of Na+ and K+ in wheat leavesPlant Physiol. Commun35052Google Scholar
  28. Yan, H, Shi, DC, Yin, SJ., Zhao, W. 2000Effects of Ca2+, ABA and H3PO4 on relaxing stress of Na2CO3 and NaClChinese J. Appl. Ecol11889892Google Scholar
  29. Zhu, GL, Deng, XW., Zuo, WN. 1983Determination of free proline in plantsPlant Physiol. Commun13537Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Life Science CollegeNortheast Normal UniversityChangchunChina
  2. 2.Institute of Grassland ScienceNortheast Normal UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations