Plant and Soil

, Volume 268, Issue 1, pp 195–208 | Cite as

Crop row spacing and its influence on the partitioning of evapotranspiration by winter-grown wheat in Northern Syria

  • Philip Eberbach
  • Mustafa Pala


A study was conducted during the 1996–97 crop growth season at ICARDA in northern Syria, to investigate the influence of wheat canopy architecture on the partitioning of moisture between soil evaporation and crop transpiration, on a soil with high hydraulic conductivity. The study was conducted on the long-term two course wheat-lentil rotation trial, established on a swelling clay soil (Calcixerollic xerochrept). The wheat canopy architecture was manipulated by sowing the crop at either of two row-spacings, 0.17 or 0.30 m, both at a constant sowing rate equivalent to 120 kg ha−1. In this study, evapotranspiration from the crop was inferred from changes in soil moisture content over time, evaporation and rainfall interception were measured daily using microlysimetry, drainage was estimated as being the difference between potential daily evapotranspiration, and the evapotranspiration estimated from the soil water deficit. Between sowing and day 80 (tillering stage), evapotranspiration was calculated to consist mainly of soil evaporation. However, after day 80, transpiration became an increasingly dominant component of evapotranspiration. For both row-spacings, cumulative evapotranspiration over the season was approximately 373 mm. In the narrow-row crop, transpiration and soil evaporation were approximately 185 mm and 183 mm of water respectively. Conversely for the wide row-spaced crop, 172 mm of water was transpired while about 205 mm of water evaporated from the soil surface. While green leaf area index did not differ between row-spacings, the architecture of the crops as a result of sowing affected solar radiation penetration such that more incident radiation was intercepted at the soil surface of the wide row-spaced crop. This is likely to have made some contribution to the elevated levels of evaporation from the soil beneath the canopy of the wide-sown crop.


canopy light interception crop canopy architecture effective rainfall soil evaporation transpiration wheat 



potential evaporation measured using a Class A pan evaporation basin






soil evaporation


precipitation measured at a height of 1.2 m above the ground surface


precipitation intercepted by the crop canopy


precipitation at the soil surface


soil volumetric moisture


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, S J 1990Measurement and estimation of evaporation from soil under sparse barley crops in Northern SyriaAgric. For. Meterol49291309Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, W K 1992Increasing grain yield and water use of wheat in a rainfed mediterranean type environmentAust. J. Agric. Res43117Google Scholar
  3. Boast, C W, Robertson, T M 1982A ‘microlysimeter’ method for determining evaporation form fallow tilled soil under spring conditions in a temperate climateSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J46689695Google Scholar
  4. Boesten, J J T I, Stroosnijder, L 1986Simple model for daily evaporation from fallowed tilled soil under spring conditions in a temperate climateNeth. J. Agric. Sci347590Google Scholar
  5. Bolger, T P, Turner, N C 1999Water use efficiency and water use of Mediterranean annual pastures in southern AustraliaAust. J. Agric. Res5010351046Google Scholar
  6. Butler G J, Cawthray S, Castor M, Yeates S and Christian T 2001 Improving the Reliability of Sorghum Production in the Farming System. Proc. 10th Aust. Agron. Conf. Scholar
  7. Cooper, P J M, Gregory, P J 1987Soil water management in the rain-fed farming systems of the Mediterranean regionSoil Use Man3572Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, P J M, Gregory, P J, Tully, D, Harris, H C 1987Improving water use efficiency of annual crops in the rainfed farming systems of West Asia and North AfricaExp. Agric23113158Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, P J M, Keatinge, J D H, Hughes, G 1983Crop evapotranspiration – A technique for calculation of its components by field measurementsField Crops Res7299313Google Scholar
  10. Denmead O T 1973 Relative significance of soil and plant evaporation in estimating evapotranspiration. In Plant Response to Climatic Factors. Proceedings Uppsala Symp. pp. 505–511. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  11. Eastham, J, Gregory, P J 2000Deriving empirical models of evaporation from soil beneath crops in a Mediterranean climate using microlysimetryAust. J. Agric. Res5110171022Google Scholar
  12. Eastham, J, Gregory, P J, Williamson, D R, Watson, G D 1999The influence of early sowing of wheat and lupin crops on evapotranspiration and evaporation from the soil surface in a Mediterranean climateAgric. Water Man42205218Google Scholar
  13. Farm Resource Management Program 1994 Annual Report. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria 6 pp.Google Scholar
  14. French, R J, Schultz, J E 1984aWater use efficiency of wheat in a mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climateAust J. Agric. Res35743764Google Scholar
  15. French, R J, Schultz, J E 1984bWater use efficiency of wheat in a mediterranean-type environment. II. Some limitations to efficiencyAust. J. Agric. Res35765775Google Scholar
  16. Hamblin, A, Tennant, D, Perry, M W 1987Management of soil water for wheat production in Western AustraliaSoil Use Manage36369Google Scholar
  17. Howell, D 1982Statistical Methods in PsychologyDuxbury PressBostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Isbell, R J 1996The Australian Soil ClassificationCSIRO PublishingCollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  19. Johns, G G 1982Measurement and simulation of evaporation from a red earth. I Measurements in a glasshouse using a neutron moisture meterAust. J. Soil Res20165178Google Scholar
  20. Lascano, R J, Bavel, C H M, Hatfield, J L, Upchurch, D R 1987Energy and water balance of a sparse crop: Simulated and measured soil and crop evaporationSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J5111131121Google Scholar
  21. Leuning, R, Condon, A G, Dunin, F X, Zegelin, S, Denmead, O T 1994Rainfall interception and evaporation from soil below wheat canopyAgric. For. Meterol67221238Google Scholar
  22. Passioura, J 1976Physiology of grain yield of wheat growing on stored waterAust. J. Plant Physiol3559565Google Scholar
  23. Philip, J R 1957Evaporation, and moisture and heat fields in the soil JMeteor14354366Google Scholar
  24. Ritchie, J T 1972Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete coverWater Resour. Res812041213Google Scholar
  25. Ritchie, J T 1983Efficient water use in crop production: discussion on the generality of relations between biomass production and evapotranspirationTaylor, H MJordan, W RSinclair, T R eds. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop ProductionAm. Soc. Agron. MadisonWisconsin2943Google Scholar
  26. Ritchie, J T, Burnett, E 1971Dryland evaporative flux in a subhumid climate: II Plant influencesAgron. J635662Google Scholar
  27. Routley R, Broad I, McLean G, Whish J and Hammer G 2003 The Effect of Row Configuration on Yield Reliability in Grain Sorghum: 1, Yield, Water Use Efficiency and Soil Water Extraction. Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference Scholar
  28. Ryan, J, Masri, S, Garabet, S, Diekmann, J, Habib, H 1997Soil of ICARDA’S Agricultural Experimental Stations and Sites: Climate, Classification, Physical and Chemical Properties, and Land UseInternational Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry AreasAleppo, SyriaGoogle Scholar
  29. Shawcroft, R W, Gardner, H R 1983Direct evaporation from soil under a row crop canopyAgric. Meterol28229238Google Scholar
  30. Siddique, K H M, Tennant, D, Perry, M W, Belford, R H 1990Water use and water use efficiency of old and modern wheat cul-tivars in a Mediterranean-type environment AustJ. Agric. Res41431447Google Scholar
  31. Soil Taxonomy1975Soil Conservation Service USDA , Agriculture Handbook, No 436US Government Printing OfficeWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. Sokal, R R, Rohlf, F J 1981Biometry2Freeman and CompanyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Suwardji, P, Eberbach, P L 1998Seasonal changes of physical properties of an Oxic Paleustalf (Red Kandasol) after 16 years of direct drilling or conventional cultivationSoil Till. Res496577Google Scholar
  34. Tanner, C B, Jury, W A 1976Estimating evaporation and transpiration from a row crop during incomplete coverAgron. J68239243Google Scholar
  35. Villalobos, F J, Fereres,  1990Evaporation measurements beneath corn, cotton, and sunflower canopiesAgron. J8211531159Google Scholar
  36. Wallace, J S, Lloyd, C R, Sivakumar, M V K 1993Measurements of soil, plant and total evaporation from millet in NigerAgric. For. Meteorol63149169Google Scholar
  37. Yunusa, I A M, Sedgley, R H, Tennant, D, Belford, R K 1993aDynamics of water use in a dry mediterranean environment. I. A test of four evaporation models using microlysimetry under spring wheatAgric. Water Manage24225238Google Scholar
  38. Yunusa, I A M, Sedgley, R H, Belford, R K, Tennant, D 1993bDynamics of water use in a dry mediterranean environment. I. Soil evaporation little affected by presence of plant canopyAgric. Water Manage24205224Google Scholar
  39. Yunusa, I A M, Sedgley, R H, Siddique, K M H 1994Influence of mulching on the pattern of growth and water use by spring wheat and moisture storage on a fine textured soilPlant Soil160119130Google Scholar
  40. Zhang, H, Oweis, T Y, Garabet, S, Pala, M 1998water-use efficiency and transpiration efficiency of wheat under rain-fed conditions and supplemental irrigation in a mediterranean-type environmentPlant Soil201295305Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Eberbach
    • 1
  • Mustafa Pala
    • 2
  1. 1.CRC Plant Based Management of Dryland Salinity, Farrer CentreCharles Sturt UniversityWagga WaggaAustralia
  2. 2.Natural Resource Management ProgramInternational Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)AleppoSyrian Arab Republic

Personalised recommendations