Plant and Soil

, Volume 268, Issue 1, pp 61–74 | Cite as

Nitrogen use efficiency of monoculture and hedgerow intercropping in the humid tropics

  • Edwin C. Rowe
  • Meine Van Noordwijk
  • Didik Suprayogo
  • Georg Cadisch


The design of productive and efficient intercropping systems depends on achieving complementarity between component species’ resource capture niches. Spatiotemporal patterns of capture and use of pruning and urea nitrogen (N) by trees and intercrops were elucidated by isotopic tracing, and consequences for nitrogen use efficiency were examined. During the first cropping season after applying urea−15N, maize accounted for most of the plant 15N recovery in Peltophorum dasyrrachis (33.5%) and Gliricidia sepium (22.3%) hedgerow intercropping systems. Maize yield was greatest in monoculture, and maize in monoculture also recovered a greater proportion of urea 15N (42%) than intercropped maize. Nitrogen recovery during active crop growth will not be increased by hedgerow intercropping if hedgerows adversely affect crop growth through competition for other resources. However, hedgerows recovered substantial amounts of 15N during both cropping cycles (e.g. a total of 13–22%), showing evidence of spatio-temporal complementarity with crops in the spatial distribution of roots and the temporal distribution of Nuptake. The degree of complementarity was species-specific, showing the importance of selecting appropriate trees for simultaneous agroforestry. After the first cropping season 17–34% of 15N applied was unaccounted for in the plant-soil system. Urea and prunings N were recovered by hedgerows in similar amounts. By the end of the second (groundnut) cropping cycle, total plant 15N recovery was similar in all cropping systems. Less N was taken up by the maize crop from applications of labelled prunings (5–7%) than from labelled urea (22–34%), but the second crop recovered similar amounts from these two sources, implying that prunings N is more persistent than urea N. More 15N was recovered by the downslope hedgerow than the upslope hedgerow, demonstrating the interception of laterally flowing N by hedgerows.


agroforestry competition complementarity isotope subsoil uptake 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akinnifesi, F K, Kang, B T, Sanginga, N, Tijani-Eniola, H 1997Nitrogen use efficiency and Ncompetition between Leucaena hedgerows and maize in an alley cropping systemNutr. Cycl. Agroecosys477180Google Scholar
  2. Alves, J R, Boddey, R M, Urquiaga, S S 1993A rapid and sensitive flow injection technique for the analysis of ammonium in soil extractsCommun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal24277284Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J M, Ingram, J S I 1993Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of MethodsCAB InternationalWallingford UK221Google Scholar
  4. Cadisch, G, Handayanto, E, Malama, C, Seyni, F, Giller, K E 1998Nrecovery from legume prunings and priming effects are governed by the residue qualityPlant Soil205125134Google Scholar
  5. Cadisch, G, Willigen, P, Suprayogo, D, Noordwijk, M, Rowe, E C 2004

    Catching and competing for mobile nutrients in soils

    Noordwijk, MCadisch, GOng, C eds. Belowground Interactions in Tropical Agroecosystems with Multiple Plant Components.CAB InternationalWallingford UK171191
    Google Scholar
  6. Cannell, M G R, Noordwijk, M, Ong, C K 1996The central agroforestry hypothesis: The trees must acquire resources that the crop would not otherwise acquireAgrofor. Syst3315Google Scholar
  7. Constantinides, M, Fownes, J H 1994Nitrogen mineralization from leaves and litter of tropical plants: Relationship to nitrogen, lignin and soluble polyphenol concentrationsSoil Biol. Biochem264955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gartner, T, Cardon, Z 2004Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litterOikos104230246Google Scholar
  9. Giller, K E, Cadisch, G 1995Future benefits from biological nitrogen fixation: An ecological approach to agriculturePlant Soil174255277Google Scholar
  10. Gine, M F, Bergamin-Filho, H, Zagatto, E A G, Reis, B F 1980Simultaneous determination of nitrate and nitrite by flow injection analysisAnal. Chim. Acta114191197Google Scholar
  11. Hamblin, A P 1985The influence of soil structure on water movement, crop root growth, and water uptakeAdv. Agron3895155Google Scholar
  12. Handayanto, E, Cadisch, G, Giller, K E 1994Nitrogen release from prunings of legume hedgerow trees in relation to quality of the prunings and incubation methodPlant Soil160237248Google Scholar
  13. Handayanto, E, Giller, K E, Cadisch, G 1997Regulating Nrelease from legume tree prunings by mixing residues of different qualitySoil Biol. Biochem2914171426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huxley, PA 1999Tropical AgroforestryBlackwell ScienceOxford371Google Scholar
  15. Jenkinson, D S, Fox, R H, Rayner, J H 1985Interactions between fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen – The so-called ‘priming’ effectJ. Soil Sci36425444Google Scholar
  16. Lehmann, J 2003Subsoil root activity in tree-based cropping systemsPlant Soil255319331Google Scholar
  17. Lehmann, J, Muraoka, T, Zech, W 2001Root activity patterns in an Amazonian agroforest with fruit trees determined by 32P, 33P and 15N applicationsAgrofor. Syst52185197Google Scholar
  18. Lehmann, J, Gebauer, G, Zech, W 2002Nitrogen cycling assessment in a hedgerow intercropping system using 15N enrichmentNutrient Cycl. Agroecos6219Google Scholar
  19. Oorts K, Merckx R, VanLauwe B, Sanginga N and Diels J 2002. Dynamics of Charge Bearing Soil Organic Matter Fractions in Highly Weathered Soils. Proceedings of the 17th World Congress of Soil Science, CD-ROM. International Soil Science Society, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  20. Payne, R W, Lane, P W, Ainsley, A E, Bicknell, K E, Digby, P G N, Harding, S A, Leech, P K, Simpson, H R, Todd, A D, Verrier, P J, White, R P 1987Genstat5 Reference ManualClarendon PressOxford749Google Scholar
  21. Rao KV and Shinde JE 1990. Uptake and balance of 15N labelled green manures and urea in tropical wetland rice culture. In Stable Isotopes in Plant Nutrition, Soil Fertility and Environmental Studies. Ed. International Atomic Energy Agency. pp.317–362. IAEA, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  22. Rowe, E C, Cadisch, G 2002Implications of heterogeneity on procedures for estimating plant 15N recovery in hedgerow intercrop systemsAgrofor. Syst546170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rowe, E C, Hairiah, K, Giller, K E, Noordwijk, M, Cadisch, G 1999Testing the safety-net role of hedgerow tree roots by 15N placement at different soil depthsAgrofor. Syst438193Google Scholar
  24. Rowe, E C, Noordwijk, M, Suprayogo, D, Hairiah, K, Giller, K E, Cadisch, G 2001Root distributions partially explain 15N uptake patterns in Gliricidia and Peltophorum hedgerow intercropping systemsPlant Soil235167179Google Scholar
  25. Sanchez, P A 1976Properties and Management of Soils in the TropicsWileyNew York618Google Scholar
  26. Suprayogo, D, Noordwijk, M, Hairiah, K, Cadisch, G 2002The inherent ‘safety-net’ of Ultisols: measuring and modelling retarded leaching of mineral nitrogenEur. J. Soil Sci53185194Google Scholar
  27. Tennant, D 1975A test of modified line intersect method for determining root lengthJ. Ecol639951001Google Scholar
  28. Heide, J, Setijono, S, Syekhfani, M S, Flach, E N, Hairiah, K, Ismunandar, S, Sitompul, S M, Noordwijk, M 1992Can low external input cropping systems on acid upland soils in the humid tropics be sustainable? Backgrounds of the UniBraw/IB Nitrogen management project in Bunga Mayang (Sunkai Selatan, Kotabumi, S Sumatera, Indonesia)Agrivita15110Google Scholar
  29. Noordwijk, M, Cadisch, G 2002Access and excess problems in plant nutritionPlant Soil2472539Google Scholar
  30. Noordwijk, M, Lawson, G, Soumare, A, Groot, J J R, Hairiah, K 1996

    Root distribution of trees and crops: Competition and/or complementarity

    Ong, C KHuxley, P A eds. Tree-crop Interactions – A Physiological ApproachCABIWallingford, Oxon, UK319364
    Google Scholar
  31. van Noordwijk M, Sitompul SM, Hairiah K, Listyarini E and Syekhfani MS 1995 Nitrogen supply from rotationally or spatially zoned inclusion of Leguminosae for sustainable maize production on an acid soil in Indonesia. In Plant-soil Interactions at Low pH. Ed. RA Date. pp.779–784. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. VanLauwe, B, Sanginga, N, Merckx, R 1998Recovery of Leucaena and Dactyladenia residue nitrogen-15 in alley cropping systemsSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J62454460Google Scholar
  33. Wahid, P A, Suresh, P R, George, S S 2004Absorption and partitioning of applied 15N in a black pepper + erythrina system in Kerala, IndiaAgrofor. Syst60143147Google Scholar
  34. Young, A 1986

    The effects of trees on soils

    Prinsley, R TSwift, M J eds. Amelioration of Soil by TreesCommonwealth Science CouncilLondon1019
    Google Scholar
  35. Xu, Z H, Myers, R J K, Saffigna, P G, Chapman, A L 1993Nitrogen fertilizer in Leucaena alley cropping: II. Residual value of nitrogen fertilizer and Leucaena residuesFert. Res3418Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edwin C. Rowe
    • 1
    • 2
  • Meine Van Noordwijk
    • 3
  • Didik Suprayogo
    • 4
  • Georg Cadisch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Sciences, Imperial College at WyeUniversity of LondonWyeUK
  2. 2.Plant Production SystemsWageningen UniversityAK WageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.ICRAF – SE ASIABogorIndonesia
  4. 4.Fakultas Pertanian, Jurusan Tanah, Universitas BrawijayaJalan VeteranIndonesia

Personalised recommendations