Advertisement

Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 92, Issue 4–5, pp 505–517 | Cite as

Precision breeding for RNAi suppression of a major 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase gene improves cell wall saccharification from field grown sugarcane

  • Je Hyeong Jung
  • Baskaran Kannan
  • Hugo Dermawan
  • Geoffrey W. Moxley
  • Fredy Altpeter
Article

Abstract

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) is a major feedstock for commercial bioethanol production. The recent integration of conversion technologies that utilize lignocellulosic sugarcane residues as well as sucrose from stem internodes has elevated bioethanol yields. RNAi suppression of lignin biosynthetic enzymes is a successful strategy to improve the saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase (4CL) is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoid metabolites, such as lignin and flavonoids. Identifying a major 4CL involved in lignin biosynthesis among multiple isoforms with functional divergence is key to manipulate lignin biosynthesis. In this study, two full length 4CL genes (Sh4CL1 and Sh4CL2) were isolated and characterized in sugarcane. Phylogenetic, expression and RNA interference (RNAi) analysis confirmed that Sh4CL1 is a major lignin biosynthetic gene. An intragenic precision breeding strategy may facilitate the regulatory approval of the genetically improved events and was used for RNAi suppression of Sh4CL1. Both, the RNAi inducing cassette and the expression cassette for the mutated ALS selection marker consisted entirely of DNA sequences from sugarcane or the sexually compatible species Sorghum bicolor. Field grown sugarcane with intragenic RNAi suppression of Sh4CL1 resulted in reduction of the total lignin content by up to 16.5 % along with altered monolignol ratios without reduction in biomass yield. Mature, field grown, intragenic sugarcane events displayed 52–76 % improved saccharification efficiency of lignocellulosic biomass compared to wild type (WT) controls. This demonstrates for the first time that an intragenic approach can add significant value to lignocellulosic feedstocks for biofuel and biochemical production.

Keywords

4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase (4CL) Lignin Intragenic RNAi Sugarcane 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The information, data or work presented herein were funded in part by Syngenta. The authors would like to thank Sun Gro Horticulture, Apopka, FL, for donation of Fafard #2 potting mix.

Author Contributions

FA conceived the experiments. FA, JHJ, BK and GMM designed the experiments. JHJ isolated candidate genes, evaluated their expression profile and constructed the plasmids. JHJ and HD generated transgenic plants and completed molecular analysis of transgenic plants, BK carried out the field trial including phenotypic, sugar and biomass yield evaluation, monitoring of plots and preparing reports for the regulatory agency. JHJ analyzed cell wall composition. GMM carried out the cell wall saccharification analysis, JHJ and FA wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Supplementary material

11103_2016_527_MOESM1_ESM.docx (425 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 424 KB)

References

  1. Altpeter F, Oraby H (2010) Sugarcane. In: Kempken F, Jung C (eds) Genetic Modification of Plants. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 453–472Google Scholar
  2. Altpeter F, Sandhu S (2010) Genetic transformation–biolistics. In: Davey MR, Anthony P (eds) Plant Cell Culture: Essential Methods. Scion Publishing Ltd, Oxfordshire, UK, pp 217–240Google Scholar
  3. Baxter HL, Mazarei M, Labbe N, Kline LM, Cheng Q, Windham MT, Mann DGJ, Chunxiang F, Ziebell A, Sykes RW, Rodriguez M, Davis MF, Mielenz JR, Dixon RA, Wang Z-Y, Stewart CN (2014) Two-year field analysis of reduced recalcitrance transgenic switchgrass. Plant Biotech J 12:914–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonawitz ND, Chapple C (2010) The genetics of lignin biosynthesis: connecting genotype to phenotype. Annu Rev Genet 44:337–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bottcher A, Cesarino I, Santos AB, Vicentini R, Mayer JL, Vanholme R, Morreel K, Goeminne G, Moura JC, Nobile PM, Carmello-Guerreiro SM, Anjos IA, Creste S, Boerjan W, Landell MG, Mazzafera P (2013) Lignification in sugarcane: biochemical characterization, gene discovery, and expression analysis in two genotypes contrasting for lignin content. Plant Physiol 163:1539–1557CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen F, Dixon RA (2007) Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nat Biotech 25:759–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dal-Bianco M, Carneiro MS, Hotta CT, Chapola RG, Hoffmann HP, Garcia AAF, Souza GM (2012) Sugarcane improvement: how far can we go? Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:265–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. de Vetten N, Wolters AM, Raemakers K, van der Meer I, ter Stege R, Heeres E, Heeres P, Visser R (2003) A transformation method for obtaining marker-free plants of a cross-pollinating and vegetatively propagated crop. Nat Biotech 21:439–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dermawan H, Karan R, Jung JH, Zhao Y, Parajuli S, Sanahuja G, Altpeter F (2016) Development of an intragenic gene transfer and selection protocol for sugarcane resulting in resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicide. Plant Cell Tissue Org (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Dias MOS, Ensinas AV, Nebra SA, Filho RM, Rossell CEV, Maciel MRW (2009) Production of bioethanol and other bio-based materials from sugarcane bagasse: Integration to conventional bioethanol production process. Chem Eng Res Des 87:1206–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dias MOS, Cavalett O, Filho RM, Bonomi A (2014) Integrated first and second generation ethanol production from sugarcane. Chem Eng Trans 37:445–450Google Scholar
  12. Ehlting J, Büttner D, Wang Q, Douglas CJ, Somssich IE, Kombrink E (1999) Three 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligases in Arabidopsis thaliana represent two evolutionarily divergent classes in angiosperms. Plant J 19:9–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gadaleta A, Giancaspro A, Blechl AE, Blanco A (2008) A transgenic durum wheat line that is free of marker genes and expresses 1Dy10. J Cereal Sci 48:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray DJ, Li ZT, Grant TNL, Dean DA, Trigiano RN, Dhekney SA (2015) The application of precision breeding (PB) for crop improvement is fully consistent with the plant life cycle: the utility of PB for grapevine. Acta Hortic 1115:49–56Google Scholar
  15. Gui J, Shen J, Li L (2011) Functional characterization of evolutionarily divergent 4-coumarate:coenzyme a ligases in rice. Plant Physiol 157:574–586CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Han KM, Dharmawardhana P, Arias RS, Ma C, Busov V, Strauss SH (2011) Gibberellin-associated cisgenes modify growth, stature and wood properties in Populus. Plant Biotech J 9:162–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison MD, Geijskes RJ, Lloyd R, Miles S, Palupe A, Sainz MB, Dale JL (2014) Recombinant cellulase accumulation in the leaves of mature, vegetatively propagated transgenic sugarcane. Mol Biotechnol 56:795–802CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hatfield RD, Grabber J, Ralph J, Brei K (1999) Using the acetyl bromide assay to determine lignin concentrations in herbaceous plants: some cautionary notes. J Agricult Food Chem 47:628–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holme IB, Dionisio G, Brinch-Pedersen H, Wendt T, Madsen CK, Vincze E, Holm PB (2012) Cisgenic barley with improved phytase activity. Plant Biotech J 10:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holme IB, Wendt T, Holm PB (2013) Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development. Plant Biotech J 11:395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu WJ, Kawaoka A, Tsai CJ, Lung J, Osakabe K, Ebinuma H, Chiang VL (1998) Compartmentalized expression of two structurally and functionally distinct 4-coumarate:CoA ligase genes in aspen (Populus tremuloides). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5407–5412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu Y, Gai Y, Yin L, Wang X, Feng C, Feng L, Li D, Jiang X-N, Wang D-C (2010) Crystal structures of a Populus tomentosa 4-coumarate:CoA ligase shed light on its enzymatic mechanisms. Plant Cell 22:3093–3104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Iskandar H, Simpson R, Casu R, Bonnett G, Maclean D, Manners J (2004) Comparison of reference genes for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of gene expression in sugarcane. Plant Mol Biol Rep 22:325–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jørgensen H, Kristensen JB, Felby C (2007) Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 1:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joshi S, Schaart J, Groenwold R, Jacobsen E, Schouten H, Krens F (2011) Functional analysis and expression profiling of HcrVf1 and HcrVf2 for development of scab resistant cisgenic and intragenic apples. Plant Mol Biol 75:579–591CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Jung JH, Altpeter F (2016) TALEN mediated targeted mutagenesis of the caffeic acid O-methyltransferase in highly polyploid sugarcane improves cell wall composition for production of bioethanol. Plant Mol Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  27. Jung JH, Kim JY, Fouad M, Vermerris W, Gallo M, Altpeter F (2010) Isolation, characterization and RNAi-suppression of COMT and 4CL genes in sugarcane. In 2010 In Vitro Biology Meeting and IAPB 12th World Congress Abstract Issue, P-084. Springer, St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  28. Jung JH, Fouad WM, Vermerris W, Gallo M, Altpeter F (2012) RNAi suppression of lignin biosynthesis in sugarcane reduces recalcitrance for biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass. Plant Biotech J 10:1067–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jung JH, Vermerris W, Gallo M, Fedenko JR, Erickson JE, Altpeter F (2013) RNA interference suppression of lignin biosynthesis increases fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production from field-grown sugarcane. Plant Biotech J 11:709–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim J, Gallo M, Altpeter F (2012) Analysis of transgene integration and expression following biolistic transfer of different quantities of minimal expression cassette into sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids). Plant Cell Tissue Org 108:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lakshmanan P, Geijskes RJ, Aitken K, Grof CP, Bonnett G, Smith G (2005) Sugarcane biotechnology: The challenges and opportunities. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 41:345–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee D, Meyer K, Chapple C, Douglas CJ (1997) Antisense suppression of 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase activity in Arabidopsis leads to altered lignin subunit composition. Plant Cell 9:1985–1998CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Mudge SR, Basnayake SW, Moyle RL, Osabe K, Graham MW, Morgan TE, Birch RG (2013) Mature-stem expression of a silencing-resistant sucrose isomerase gene drives isomaltulose accumulation to high levels in sugarcane. Plant Biotechnol J 11:502–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagaya S, Kawamura K, Shinmyo A, Kato K (2010) The HSP terminator of Arabidopsis thaliana increases gene expression in plant cells. Plant Cell Physiol 51:328–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nielsen KM (2003) Transgenic organisms-time for conceptual diversification? Nat. Biotech 21:227–228Google Scholar
  36. Pichersky E, Gang DR (2000) Genetics and biochemistry of secondary metabolites in plants: an evolutionary perspective. Trends Plant Sci 5:439–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Poovaiah CR, Nageswara-Rao M, Soneji JR, Baxter HL, Stewart CN (2014) Altered lignin biosynthesis using biotechnology to improve lignocellulosic biofuel feedstocks. Plant Biotech J 12:1163–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rommens CM (2004) All-native DNA transformation: a new approach to plant genetic engineering. Trends Plant Sci 9:457–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rommens CM, Haring MA, Swords K, Davies HV, Belknap WR (2007) The intragenic approach as a new extension to traditional plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci 12:397–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Saballos A, Sattler SE, Sanchez E, Foster TP, Xin Z, Kang C, Pedersen JF, Vermerris W (2012) Brown midrib2 (Bmr2) encodes the major 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase involved in lignin biosynthesis in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Plant J 70:818–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schouten HJ, Jacobsen E (2008) Cisgenesis and intragenesis, sisters in innovative plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci 13:260–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schouten HJ, Krens FA, Jacobsen E (2006) Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants. EMBO Rep 7:750–753CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass In Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP), Technical Report NREL⁄TP-510-42618). National Renewable Energy Laboratory, GoldenGoogle Scholar
  44. Somerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, Davis SC, Long SP (2010) Feedstocks for Lignocellulosic Biofuels. Science 329:790–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Stout AT, Davis AA, Domec J-C, Yang C, Shi R, King JS (2014) Growth under field conditions affects lignin content and productivity in transgenic Populus trichocarpa with altered lignin biosynthesis. Biomass Bioenergy 68:228–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Taparia Y, Gallo M, Altpeter F (2012) Comparison of direct and indirect embryogenesis protocols, biolistic gene transfer and selection parameters for efficient genetic transformation of sugarcane. Plant Cell Tiss Org 111:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vanblaere T, Szankowski I, Schaart J, Schouten H, Flachowsky H, Broggini GAL, Gessler C (2011) The development of a cisgenic apple plant. J Biotech 154:304–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vermerris W (2008) Composition and biosynthesis of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Vermerris W (ed) Genetic Improvement of Bioenergy Crops. Springer, New York, pp 89–142Google Scholar
  50. Vermerris W, Abril A (2015) Enhancing cellulose utilization for fuels and chemicals by genetic modification of plant cell wall architecture. Curr Opin Biotechnol 32:104–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Voelker SL, Lachenbruch B, Meinzer FC, Jourdes M, Ki C, Patten AM, Davin LB, Lewis NG, Tuskan GE, Gunter L, Decker SR, Selig MG, Sykes R, Himmel ME, Kitin P, Shevchenko O, Strauss SH (2010) Antisense down-regulation of 4 CL expression alters lignification, tree growth, and saccharification potential of field-grown poplar. Plant Physiol 154:874–886CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Voelker SL, Lachenbruch B, Meinzer FC, Kitin P, Strauss SH (2011) Transgenic poplars with reduced lignin show impaired xylem conductivity, growth efficiency and survival. Plant Cell Environ 34:655–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Vogt T (2010) Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Mol Plant 3:2–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wagner A, Donaldson L, Kim H, Phillips L, Flint H, Steward D, Torr K, Koch G, Schmitt U, Ralph J (2009) Suppression of 4-coumarate-CoA ligase in the coniferous gymnosperm Pinus radiata. Plant Physiol 149:370–383CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang H, Xue Y, Chen Y, Li R, Wei J (2012) Lignin modification improves biofuel production potential in transgenic Populus tomentosa. Ind Crops Prod 37:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weeks J, Ye J, Rommens C (2008) Development of an in planta method for transformation of alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Transgenic Res 17:587–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Xu Z, Zhang D, Hu J, Zhou X, Ye X, Reichel KL, Stewart NR, Syrenne RD, Yang X, Gao P, Shi W, Doeppke C, Sykes RW, Burris JN, Bozell JJ, Cheng MZ, Hayes DG, Labbe N, Davis M, Stewart CN, Yuan JS (2009) Comparative genome analysis of lignin biosynthesis gene families across the plant kingdom. BMC Bioinform 10:S3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu B, Escamilla-Trevino LL, Sathitsuksanoh N, Shen Z, Shen H, Zhang YH, Dixon RA, Zhao B (2011) Silencing of 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase in switchgrass leads to reduced lignin content and improved fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. New Phytol 192:611–625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Zale J, Jung JH, Kim JY, Pathak B, Karan R, Liu H, Chen X, Wu H, Candreva J, Zhai Z, Shanklin J, Altpeter F (2016) Metabolic engineering of sugarcane to accumulate energy-dense triacylglycerols in vegetative biomass. Plant Biotech J 14:661–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agronomy Department, IFASUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, IFASUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.University of Florida Genetics InstituteGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Novozymes North America IncFranklintonUSA
  5. 5.Institute of Life Science and Natural ResourcesKorea UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations