Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 88, Issue 4–5, pp 343–355 | Cite as

Dual functions of GmTOE4a in the regulation of photoperiod-mediated flowering and plant morphology in soybean

Article

Abstract

Flowering time, maturity, and plant morphology have considerable effects on the adaptation and grain yield of soybean (Glycine max). The identification of novel genes and an understanding of their molecular basis are critical to improve soybean productivity. In this study, we cloned a flowering time related APETALA2-like gene GmTOE4a and generated GmTOE4a-overexpressing lines in the cultivar Williams 82. The transgenic lines exhibited late flowering both under long day and short day conditions, and repressed the flowering-related genes, including GmFT2a, GmFT5a, GmAP1, and GmLFY, whereas the flowering repressors GmFT4 and miR156 were upregulated. Interestingly, GmTOE4a was also mediated by photoperiod via maturity genes E3 and E4, which encode photoreceptors in soybean. Further, miR172-mediated GmTOE4a, which regulates flowering in soybean, is different in Arabidopsis in that it is dependent on the CONSTANS-like gene GmCOL1a. In addition to its effect on flowering time, GmTOE4a regulated plant morphology, increased stem thickness, and reduced plant height, internode length and leaf size, which are important agronomic traits that enhance the capacity to resist lodging and increase soybean yield. This is useful information to understand the molecular mechanism of flowering time and plant morphology in soybean and will greatly influence soybean yield improvement.

Keywords

Glycine max Photoperiod flowering miR172 GmTOE4a Plant morphology 

Supplementary material

11103_2015_322_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (111 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 111 kb)
11103_2015_322_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 1598 kb)

References

  1. Aukerman MJ, Sakai H (2003) Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 15:2730–2741PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard RL (1971) Two major genes for time of flowering and maturity in soybeans. Crop Sci 11:242–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonato ER, Vello NA (1999) E6, a dominant gene conditioning early flowering and maturity in soybeans. Genet Mol Biol 22:229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buzzell RI (1971) Inheritance of a soybean flowering response to fluorescent-daylength conditions. Can J Genet Cytol 13:703–707Google Scholar
  5. Buzzell R, Voldeng H (1980) Inheritance of insensitivity to long daylength. Soybean Genet Newsl 7:26–29Google Scholar
  6. Cardon G, Höhmann S, Nettesheim K, Saedler H, Huijser P (1997) Functional analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana SBP-bx gene SPL3: a novel gene involved in the floral transition. Plant J 12:367–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen X (2004) A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science 303:2022–2025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chi Y, Huang F, Liu H, Yang S, Yu D (2011) An APETALA1-like gene of soybean regulates flowering time and specifies floral organs. J Plant Physiol 168:2251–2259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cober ER, Voldeng HD (2001) Low R: FR light quality delays flowering of E7E7 soybean lines. Crop Sci 41:1823–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cober ER, Molnar SJ, Charette M, Voldeng HD (2010) A new locus for early maturity in soybean. Crop Sci 50:524–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunnett CW (1955) A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc 50:1096–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flores T, Karpova O, Su X, Zeng P, Bilyeu K, Sleper DA, Nguyen HT, Zhang ZJ (2008) Silencing of GmFAD3 gene by siRNA leads to low α-linolenic acids (18:3) of fad3-mutant phenotype in soybean [Glycine max (Merr.)]. Transgenic Res 17:839–850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gandikota M, Birkenbihl RP, Hohmann S, Cardon GH, Saedler H, Huijser P (2007) The miRNA156/157 recognition element in the 3′UTR of the Arabidopsis SBP box gene SPL3 prevents early flowering by translational inhibition in seedlings. Plant J 49:683–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jung JH, Seo YH, Seo PJ, Reyes JL, Yun J, Chua NH, Park CM (2007) The GIGANTEA-regulated microRNA172 mediates photoperiodic flowering independent of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:2736–2748PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jung JH, Seo PJ, Kang SK, Park CM (2011) miR172 signals are incorporated into the miR156 signaling pathway at the SPL3/4/5 genes in Arabidopsis developmental transitions. Plant Mol Biol 76:35–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jung JH, Lee S, Yun J, Lee M, Park CM (2014) The miR172 target TOE3 represses AGAMOUS expression during Arabidopsis floral patterning. Plant Sci 215–216:29–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kong F, Liu B, Xia Z, Sato S, Kim BM, Watanabe S, Yamada T, Tabata S, Kanazawa A, Harada K, Abe J (2010) Two coordinately regulated homologs of FLOWERING LOCUS T are involved in the control of photoperiodic flowering in soybean. Plant Physiol 154:1220–1231PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kong F, Nan H, Cao D, Li Y, Wu F, Wang J, Lu S, Yuan X, Cober ER, Abe J, Liu B (2014) A new dominant gene E9 conditions early flowering and maturity in soybean. Crop Sci. doi:10.2135/cropsci2014.03.0228 Google Scholar
  19. Lauter N, Kampani A, Carlson S, Goebel M, Moose SP (2005) microRNA172 down-regulates glossy15 to promote vegetative phase change in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9412–9417PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu B, Kanazawa A, Matsumura H, Takahashi R, Harada K, Abe J (2008) Genetic redundancy in Soybean photoresponses associated with duplication of the Phytochrome A gene. Genetics 180:995–1007PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin A, Adam H, Díaz-Mendoza M, Zurczak M, González-Schain N, Suárez-López P (2009) Graft-transmissible induction of potato tuberization by the microRNA miR172. Development 136:2873–2881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathieu J, Yant LJ, Mürdter F, Küttner F, Schmid M (2009) Repression of flowering by the miR172 target SMZ. PLoS Biol 7(7):e1000148. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000148 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McBlain B, Bernard R (1987) A new gene affecting the time of flowering and maturity in soybeans. J Hered 78:160–162Google Scholar
  24. Na X, Jian B, Yao W, Wu C, Hou W, Jiang B, Bi Y, Han T (2013) Cloning and functional analysis of the flowering gene GmSOC1-like, a putative SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION CO1/AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (SOC1/AGL20) ortholog in soybean. Plant Cell Rep 32:1219–1229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nan H, Cao D, Zhang D, Li Y, Lu S, Tang L, Yuan X, Liu B, Kong F (2014) GmFT2a and GmFT5a redundantly and differentially regulate flowering through interaction with and upregulation of the bZIP transcription factor GmFDL19 in soybean. PLoS ONE 9:e97669PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Preston JC, Hileman LC (2013) Functional evolution in the plant SQUAMOSA-PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) gene family. Front Plant Sci 4:1–13Google Scholar
  27. Ray JD, Hinson K, Mankono J, Malo MF (1995) Genetic-control of a long-juvenile trait in soybean. Crop Sci 35:1001–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, Weigel D (2005) Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev Cell 8:517–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwarz S, Grande AV, Bujdoso N, Saedler H, Huijser P (2008) The microRNA regulated SBP-box genes SPL9 and SPL15 control shoot maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 67:183–195PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun H, Jia Z, Cao D, Jiang B, Wu C, Hou W, Liu Y, Fei Z, Zhao D, Han T (2011) GmFT2a, a soybean homolog of FLOWERING LOCUS T, is involved in flowering transition and maintenance. PLoS ONE 6(12):e29238PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Telfer A, Bollman KM, Poethig RS (1997) Phase change and the regulation of trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 124:645–654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Thakare D, Kumudini S, Dinkins RD (2011) The alleles at the E1 locus impact the expression pattern of two soybean FT-like genes shown to induce flowering in Arabidopsis. Planta 234:933–943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner M, Adhikari S, Subramanian S (2013) Optimizing stem-loop qPCR assays through multiplexed cDNA synthesis of U6 and miRNAs. Plant Signal Behav 8:e24918-1-4Google Scholar
  34. Wang J, Schwab R, Czech B, Mica E, Weigel D (2008) Dual effects of miR156-targeted SPL genes and CYP78A5/KLUH on plastochron length and organ size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 20:1231–1243PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Watanabe S, Hideshima R, Xia Z, Tsubokura Y, Sato S, Nakamoto Y, Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Ishimoto M, Anai T, Tabata S, Harada K (2009) Map-based cloning of the gene associated with the soybean maturity locus E3. Genetics 182:1251–1262PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watanabe S, Xia Z, Hideshima R, Tsubokura Y, Sato S, Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Anai T, Tabata S, Kitamura K, Harada K (2011) A map-based cloning strategy employing a residual heterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene is involved in soybean maturity and flowering. Genetics 188:395–407PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu G, Poethig RS (2006) Temporal regulation of shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana by miR156 and its target SPL3. Development 133:3539–3547PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu G, Park MY, Conway SR, Wang JW, Weigel D, Poethig RS (2009) The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis. Cell 138:750–759PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu F, Price BW, Haider W, Seufferheld G, Nelson R, Hanzawa Y (2014) Functional and evolutionary characterization of the CONSTANS gene family in short-day photoperiodic flowering in soybean. PLoS ONE 9(1):e85754. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085754 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xia Z, Watanabe S, Yamada T, Tsubokura Y, Nakashima H, Zhai H, Anai T, Sato S, Yamazaki T, Lu S, Wu H, Tabata S, Harada K (2012a) Positional cloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis for soybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodic flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:E2155–E2164PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xia Z, Zhai H, Liu B, Kong F, Yuan X, Wu H, Cober ER, Harada K (2012b) Molecular identification of genes controlling flowering time, maturity, and photoperiod response in soybean. Plant Syst Evol 298:1217–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yamashino T, Yamawaki S, Hagui E, Ishida K, Ueoka-Nakanishi H, Nakamichi N, Mizuno T (2013) Clock-controlled and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)-dependent photoperiodic pathway in Lotus japonicus II: characterization of a microRNA implicated in the control of flowering time. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 77:1179–1185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhai H, Lü S, Liang S, Wu H, Zhang X, Liu B, Kong F, Yuan X, Li J, Xia Z (2014) GmFT4, a homolog of FLOWERING LOCUS T, is positively regulated by E1 and Functions as a flowering repressor in Soybean. PLoS ONE 9(2):e89030. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089030 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhong X, Dai X, Xv J, Wu H, Liu B, Li H (2012) Cloning and expression analysis of GmGAL1, SOC1 homolog gene in soybean. Mol Biol Rep 39:6967–6974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhu QH, Upadhyaya NM, Gubler F, Helliwell CA (2009) Over-expression of miR172 causes loss of spikelet determinacy and floral organ abnormalities in rice (Oryza sativa). BMC Plant Biol 9:149PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and AgroecologyChinese Academy of SciencesHarbinChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations