Identification of tapetum-specific genes by comparing global gene expression of four different male sterile lines in Brassica oleracea
- 1.7k Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
The tapetum plays an important role in anther development by providing necessary enzymes and nutrients for pollen development. However, it is difficult to identify tapetum-specific genes on a large-scale because of the difficulty of separating tapetum cells from other anther tissues. Here, we reported the identification of tapetum-specific genes by comparing the gene expression patterns of four male sterile (MS) lines of Brassica oleracea. The abortive phenotypes of the four MS lines revealed different defects in tapetum and pollen development but normal anther wall development when observed by transmission electron microscopy. These tapetum displayed continuous defective characteristics throughout the anther developmental stages. The transcriptome from flower buds, covering all anther developmental stages, was analyzed and bioinformatics analyses exploring tapetum development-related genes were performed. We identified 1,005 genes differentially expressed in at least one of the MS lines and 104 were non-pollen expressed genes (NPGs). Most of the identified NPGs were tapetum-specific genes considering that anther walls were normally developed in all four MS lines. Among the 104 NPGs, 22 genes were previously reported as being involved in tapetum development. We further separated the expressed NPGs into different developmental stages based on the MS defects. The data obtained in this study are not only informative for research on tapetum development in B. oleracea, but are also useful for genetic pathway research in other related species.
Keywords
Brassica oleracea Tapetum Gene expression Male sterility (MS) MicroarrayIntroduction
Anther development comprises both gametophyte and anther wall development (Engelke et al. 2002; Ge et al. 2010; Ma and Sundaresan 2010). The connection between these two relatively independent processes occurs in the tapetum, a layer of the anther wall. As the innermost of four somatic layers, the tapetum surrounds developing reproductive cells and plays an important role in the male fertility of pollen grains. Its secretory tissue provides proteins, lipids, and other nutrients for pollen development and exine formation (Mariani et al. 1990; Piffanelli et al. 1998).
Anther development is divided into two main phases: microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis, and these are further subdivided into 14 anther stages (Chang et al. 2011; Ma 2005; Sanders et al. 1999; Smyth et al. 1990). In this research, to simplify these complex developmental processes, we divided these anther stages it into four major stages according to anther developmental events: the sporogenesis cell stage, pollen mother cell stage, pre-tetrad stage, and post-tetrad stage. In the sporogenesis cell stage, the sporogenous cells, which give rise to pollen, are visible within locules of sectioned anthers (Goldberg et al. 1993; Scott et al. 1991, 2004), In the pollen mother cell stage, sporogenous cells develop into pollen mother cells (Owen and Makaroff 1995; Stevens and Murray 1981), In the pre-tetrad stage, microspore mother cells enter meiosis while the middle layer is crushed and degenerates. Tapetum becomes vacuolated and the anther undergoes a general increase in size. Tetrads of microspores are free within each locule when meiosis is completed in the tetrad stage. In the post-tetrad stage, the callose wall surrounding tetrads degenerates and individual microspores are released. Microspores generate an exine wall and become vacuolated (Sanders et al. 1999). After these four stages, tapetum degeneration is initiated. The tapetum undergoes generation, development, and apoptosis, providing enzymes for the release of microspores (Varnier et al. 2005). Eventually, all cell remnants are released into the locules, due to tapetal degeneration, and are integrated into the pollen wall as pollen coat material (Papini et al. 1999). This series of events is completed in a relatively short time, and the progression of stages involves changes in the expression levels of many genes. The identification of genes associated with tapetum-related processes helps build a solid foundation for studying the underlying molecular mechanisms of anther development.
Because of difficulties in separating the tapetum cell layer from other anther wall cell layers, the large-scale identification of tapetum cell-specific genes has not previously been achieved. Tapetum-specific genes have been identified by looking for male sterility (MS) mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Only a limited number of tapetum-specific genes were reported, these included ACOS5, A6, LTP12, LAP5, TSM1, TAP35, TAP44, and A9 (Ariizumi et al. 2002; de Azevedo et al. 2009; Fellenberg et al. 2008; Hird et al. 1993; Kim et al. 2010; Ma et al. 2012; Paul et al. 1992). Unfortunately, it is not possible to reveal the whole picture of tapetum gene expression by identifying specific tapetum gene mutants one by one. A large number of MS mutants have been identified from natural and artificial mutations in Brassica. Hybridization of A. thaliana cDNA arrays against close relatives that have bigger anthers, such as Brassica species, is a good approach for studying the genome-wide expression of anther-specific genes in Arabidopsis (Amagai et al. 2003).
Pollen grains can be easily isolated, which allows genes expressed in pollen grains to be easily profiled. A number of Arabidopsis pollen grain transcriptomes have been reported by Becker et al. (2003), Pina et al. (2005). Furthermore, a previous pollen transcriptome study by (Honys and Twell 2003) identified 992 pollen-expressed mRNAs, nearly 40 % of which were detected specifically in pollen. They also (Honys and Twell 2004) developed specific spore isolation procedures for Arabidopsis at the pollen developmental stage, and used Affymetrix ATH1 genomic arrays to identify 13,977 male gametophyte-expressed mRNAs in all stages of microsporogenesis, 9.7 % (1,355) of which were male gametophyte specific. However, comparative studies using the tapetum to identify anther wall-specific genes have not been reported in multiple MS lines in which MS mutants occur at different stages of tapetum development. Non-pollen expressed genes (NPGs), are the genes remaining after the exclusion of pollen-specific expressed genes from the genes expressed specifically in the anther. This provides a narrow range for the identification of potential tapetum-specific expressed genes.
This study employs four types of B. oleracea MS lines: Nigra cytoplasm male sterility (NiCMS), Ogura cytoplasm male sterility (OguCMS), recessive male sterility (RGMS) and dominant male sterility (DGMS) (Kang et al. 2008; Fang et al. 2001). Each MS line has a distinct tapetum abortion phenotype and their abnormal characteristics appear successively during anther development. For the large-scale identification of tapetum-specific genes and to gain further insight into downstream cellular reactions of tapetum development, we compared the anther transcriptomes of the four types of B. oleracea MS lines through the heterologous hybridization of B. oleracea mRNA onto an Arabidopsis whole genome oligonucleotide microarray.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
The description of four male sterile lines in this study
| MS materials | Types | Origins | Transfer methods | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NiCMS | Cytoplasmic male sterile | Brassica nigra | Protoplast fusion | Pearson 1972 |
| RGMS | Recessive male sterile | Brassica oleracea | Natural mutant | Fang et al. 1984 |
| OguCMS | Cytoplasmic male sterile | Raphanus sativus | Protoplast fusion | Kao et al. 1992 |
| DGMS | Dominant male sterile | Brassica oleracea | Natural mutant | Fang et al. 1995 |
Cytological analysis using microscopes
Light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to investigate the cytological differences between the mutants and wild-type. Different sized buds were fixed overnight in 4 % glutaraldehyde with 200 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and then rinsed overnight in 200 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Next, buds were post-fixed in a solution containing 1 % osmium tetroxide for 2 h and washed in a dehydrated ethanol series for 30 min at each step (2 × 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 2 × 100 %). Dehydrated tissues were embedded in Spurr’s epoxy resin (Spurr 1969; Ted Pella, Redding, CA) for 3 days at 60 °C, and sectioned at 60–90 nm using a microtome (Leica Ultratome V, LKB, Bromma, Sweden). Anther transverse sections were stained in 4 % uranyl acetate for 20 min and in lead citrate for 3 min. All specimens were analyzed using TEM (H-8100, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). For the light microscopy analysis, buds were fixed overnight in FAA (50 % ethanol, 5.0 % glacial acetic acid, 3.7 % formaldehyde), dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (2 × 50, 60, 70, 85, 95, and 3 × 100 %), embedded in Spurr’s epoxy resin, and sectioned in 1 µm thick slices using a microtome. Anther transverse sections were stained in 1 % toluidine blue at 42 °C for 1–2 h and observed under a compound microscope (Olympus Model BH2, Tokyo, Japan).
RNA preparation, probe labeling, and microarray hybridization
For total RNA isolation, all flower buds above the last opened flowers of three flowering branches from three MS and three MF plants were collected in duplicate and combined to reduce plant-to-plant variation. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol following the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, Beijing, China). RNA was further purified using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and the quality was checked using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and RNA 6000 Nano kit (Agilent Technologies China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) before labeled cRNA was synthesized. Cy3- and Cy5-labeled cRNA was synthesized from 400 ng total RNA using a Low RNA Input Linear Amplification and Labeling kit Plus (Agilent Technologies China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) following manufacturer’s protocol. Swap labeling of the other MS and MF (three plant pools) RNAs was conducted for the replications. Labeled cRNA was hybridized onto a 22 K Arabidopsis oligo microarray (Agilent Technologies China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) using the In situ Hybridization kit Plus (Agilent Technologies China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).
Data acquisition, normalization, and gene annotation analysis
Hybridized microarrays were scanned sequentially for Cy3- and Cy5-labeled probes with a laser scanner (G2655AA, Agilent Technologies China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at a resolution of 10 µm and a PMT of 100. The intensities were normalized by linear LOWESS (Yang et al. 2002). The signal was considered positive when the signal/noise value was >5. To determine pollen stage specificity and co-expression information, our data were compared with array data from two other studies. The pollen transcriptome refers to the dataset from (Honys and Twell 2004), and the stamen transcriptome refers to the dataset from (Wellmer et al. 2004). Microsoft Office Excel (Excel 2010, Microsoft China Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to manage and filter the microarray data. Differently expressed genes (DEGs) were functionally categorized based on the ontology annotation of the Arabidopsis genome from the Arabidopsis Information Resource (http://www.arabidopsis.org). Pollen expression type was determined based on the maximum expression value (MaxP) from the four pollen stages (uninucleate microspore, bicellular pollen, tricellular pollen, and mature pollen), the maximum expression value (MaxS) from seven sporophytic tissues (cotyledon, leaves, petiole, stems, roots, root hair zone, and suspension cell cultures), or the value of MaxP/MaxS according to the pollen transcriptome dataset (Honys and Twell 2004). Late pollen genes were defined as those expressed after microspore mitosis during male gametophyte development, which had continued transcript accumulation during pollen maturation (McCormick 1993).
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
The 104 non-pollen expressed genes (NPGs) from Brassica oleracea detected in this study
| Gene ID | Group name | Gene description | Down-regulated ratio of fertility to sterility F/S | Expression pattern groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NiCMS | RGMS | OguCMS | DGMS | ||||
| AT1G01280 | CYP703A2 | Cytochrome P450, family 703, subfamily A, polypeptide 2 | 59.137 | 0.499 | 0.687 | 1.923 | A |
| AT1G03390 | HXXXD-type acyl-transferase family protein | 3.376 | 0.819 | 0.309 | 0.931 | A | |
| AT1G27040 | Major facilitator superfamily protein | 3.664 | 2.117 | 2.985 | 1.008 | A | |
| AT1G36340 | UBC31 | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 31 | 3.503 | 1.161 | 1.566 | 0.906 | A |
| AT1G52560 | HSP20-like chaperones superfamily protein | 49.751 | 1.362 | 1.769 | 0.772 | A | |
| AT1G62940 | ACOS5 | Acyl-CoA synthetase 5 | 21.156 | 0.364 | 0.403 | 1.246 | A |
| AT1G74310 | HSP101 | Heat shock protein 101 | 9.024 | 0.971 | 0.957 | 2.327 | A |
| AT2G14540 | SRP2 | Serpin 2 | 8.913 | 0.378 | 0.857 | 2.331 | A |
| AT2G26150 | HSFA2 | Heat shock transcription factor A2 | 4.045 | 0.955 | 1.087 | 2.105 | A |
| AT2G31210 | Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) DNA-binding superfamily protein | 3.998 | 2.032 | 0.512 | 0.969 | A | |
| AT2G38240 | 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein | 3.035 | 1.621 | 1.630 | 0.377 | A | |
| AT2G42940 | Predicted AT-hook DNA-binding family protein | 36.341 | 0.336 | 0.086 | 2.476 | A | |
| AT2G45630 | d-isomer specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family protein | 3.502 | 1.118 | 1.133 | 1.450 | A | |
| AT3G05780 | LON3 | lon protease 3 | 3.075 | 0.311 | 0.330 | 0.898 | A |
| AT3G09640 | APX2 | Ascorbate peroxidase 2 | 7.165 | 1.048 | 2.410 | 0.905 | A |
| AT3G13220 | WBC27 | ABC-2 type transporter family protein | 15.681 | 0.560 | 0.704 | 1.188 | A |
| AT3G48540 | Cytidine/deoxycytidylate deaminase family protein | 3.199 | 1.013 | 0.845 | 0.817 | A | |
| AT3G52130 | Bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein/seed storage 2S albumin superfamily protein | 9.011 | 0.495 | 0.245 | 0.654 | A | |
| AT4G14080 | MEE48 | O-Glycosyl hydrolases family 17 protein | 85.174 | 0.322 | 0.406 | 1.871 | A |
| AT4G20800 | FAD-binding Berberine family protein | 3.556 | 0.216 | 0.478 | 0.496 | A | |
| AT4G34850 | LAP5 | Chalcone and stilbene synthase family protein | 33.679 | 0.347 | 0.524 | 2.273 | A |
| AT5G02490 | Hsp70-2 | Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp 70) family protein | 3.638 | 0.991 | 0.994 | 1.583 | A |
| AT5G03800 | EMB1899 | Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily protein | 3.957 | 0.603 | 0.398 | 1.511 | A |
| AT5G07230 | Bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein/seed storage 2S albumin superfamily protein | 38.418 | 1.387 | 1.473 | 1.206 | A | |
| AT5G15250 | FTSH6 | FTSH protease 6 | 6.159 | 0.940 | 1.604 | 0.937 | A |
| AT5G56110 | MYB80 | myb domain protein 103 | 11.942 | 0.297 | 0.310 | 1.641 | A |
| AT5G59330 | Bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein/seed storage 2S albumin superfamily protein | 3.228 | 0.863 | 1.869 | 0.416 | A | |
| AT5G66110 | HIPP27 | Heavy metal transport/detoxification superfamily protein | 4.063 | 0.950 | 1.877 | 1.133 | A |
| AT1G06170 | Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) DNA-binding superfamily protein | 21.653 | 3.183 | 0.946 | 1.042 | B | |
| AT1G26780 | MYB117 | myb domain protein 117 | 5.846 | 3.004 | 2.601 | 1.306 | B |
| AT1G61070 | PDF2.4 | low-molecular-weight cysteine-rich 66 | 19.633 | 6.853 | 1.030 | 0.804 | B |
| AT2G16910 | AMS | Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) DNA-binding superfamily protein | 66.945 | 4.721 | 0.651 | 1.476 | B |
| AT3G13890 | MYB26 | myb domain protein 26 | 4.193 | 5.225 | 2.197 | 0.996 | B |
| AT5G09970 | CYP78A7 | Cytochrome P450, family 78, subfamily A, polypeptide 7 | 27.337 | 10.050 | 0.731 | 0.837 | B |
| AT5G59720 | HSP18.2 | Heat shock protein 18 | 61.107 | 3.567 | 2.700 | 1.710 | B |
| AT1G06260 | Cysteine proteinases superfamily protein | 73.654 | 73.422 | 81.181 | 1.410 | C | |
| AT1G06990 | GDSL-like Lipase/Acylhydrolase superfamily protein | 35.896 | 27.959 | 28.634 | 1.008 | C | |
| AT1G09550 | Pectinacetylesterase family protein | 10.316 | 7.484 | 7.553 | 2.254 | C | |
| AT1G61110 | NAC025 | NAC domain containing protein 25 | 100.000 | 42.366 | 100.000 | 1.177 | C |
| AT1G66570 | SUC7 | Sucrose-proton symporter 7 | 12.623 | 5.220 | 8.168 | 2.813 | C |
| AT1G68190 | B-box zinc finger family protein | 9.385 | 3.859 | 4.895 | 1.220 | C | |
| AT1G71160 | KCS7 | 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase 7 | 40.698 | 7.545 | 4.751 | 1.043 | C |
| AT1G74540 | CYP98A8 | Cytochrome P450, family 98, subfamily A, polypeptide 8 | 66.968 | 10.829 | 45.078 | 1.006 | C |
| AT1G75930 | EXL6 | Extracellular lipase 6 | 41.703 | 29.272 | 31.621 | 1.245 | C |
| AT2G03850 | Late embryogenesis abundant protein (LEA) family protein | 95.261 | 66.233 | 85.170 | 1.376 | C | |
| AT2G23800 | GGPS5 | Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase 2 | 6.929 | 5.344 | 4.895 | 1.002 | C |
| AT3G51590 | LTP12 | Lipid transfer protein 12 | 73.651 | 29.780 | 100.000 | 1.015 | C |
| AT3G56380 | RR17 | Response regulator 17 | 3.141 | 3.041 | 3.287 | 0.988 | C |
| AT5G14980 | Alpha/beta-Hydrolases superfamily protein | 11.521 | 5.466 | 5.219 | 1.233 | C | |
| AT5G38160 | Bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein/seed storage 2S albumin superfamily protein | 85.213 | 3.937 | 4.407 | 0.819 | C | |
| AT5G57670 | Protein kinase superfamily protein | 5.306 | 7.763 | 6.793 | 2.440 | C | |
| AT1G30860 | RING/U-box superfamily protein | 11.670 | 7.714 | 15.767 | 12.143 | D | |
| AT1G60210 | Unknown | 10.368 | 4.913 | 10.225 | 5.278 | D | |
| AT2G47040 | VGD1 | Plant invertase/pectin methylesterase inhibitor superfamily | 85.995 | 94.127 | 100.000 | 13.393 | D |
| AT4G37960 | Unknown | 91.658 | 100.000 | 100.000 | 8.117 | D | |
| AT1G27720 | TAF4B | TBP-associated factor 4B | 0.600 | 1.203 | 0.317 | 1.100 | OguCMS_UP |
| AT1G60500 | DRP4C | Dynamin related protein 4C | 0.460 | 0.735 | 0.236 | 0.942 | OguCMS_UP |
| AT1G68640 | PAN | bZIP transcription factor family protein | 0.961 | 0.742 | 0.258 | 0.738 | OguCMS_UP |
| AT2G23050 | NPY4 | Phototropic-responsive NPH3 family protein | 0.760 | 0.777 | 0.216 | 0.888 | OguCMS_UP |
| AT3G13960 | GRF5 | Growth-regulating factor 5 | 0.714 | 1.087 | 0.327 | 0.957 | OguCMS_UP |
| AT3G19300 | Protein kinase superfamily protein | 0.692 | 0.820 | 0.252 | 0.949 | OguCMS_UP | |
| AT4G10640 | IQD16 | IQ-domain 16 | 0.411 | 0.736 | 0.280 | 0.835 | OguCMS_UP |
| AT4G29980 | 2.059 | 0.561 | 0.221 | 0.826 | OguCMS_UP | ||
| AT5G13170 | SWEET15 | Senescence-associated gene 29 | 1.399 | 0.943 | 0.297 | 0.678 | OguCMS_UP |
| AT5G26140 | LOG9 | Putative lysine decarboxylase family protein | 1.131 | 1.406 | 0.333 | 0.743 | OguCMS_UP |
| AT5G41890 | GDSL-like Lipase/Acylhydrolase superfamily protein | 1.215 | 1.296 | 0.303 | 0.813 | OguCMS_UP | |
| AT5G42120 | Concanavalin A-like lectin protein kinase family protein | 0.763 | 0.724 | 0.168 | 0.837 | OguCMS_UP | |
| AT5G63390 | O-fucosyltransferase family protein | 0.548 | 0.840 | 0.334 | 1.347 | OguCMS_UP | |
| AT1G26400 | FAD-binding Berberine family protein | 0.977 | 0.093 | 0.206 | 0.381 | RGMS & OguCMS_UP | |
| AT1G53990 | GLIP3 | GDSL-motif lipase 3 | 0.849 | 0.166 | 0.217 | 0.612 | RGMS & OguCMS_UP |
| AT1G73050 | Glucose-methanol-choline (GMC) oxidoreductase family protein | 0.807 | 0.264 | 0.075 | 0.482 | RGMS & OguCMS_UP | |
| AT3G21660 | UBX domain-containing protein | 1.380 | 0.249 | 0.100 | 0.865 | RGMS & OguCMS_UP | |
| AT5G54060 | UF3GT | UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-o-glucosyltransferase | 1.248 | 0.331 | 0.324 | 1.486 | RGMS & OguCMS_UP |
| AT5G10880 | tRNA synthetase-related/tRNA ligase-related | 1.794 | 0.517 | 0.190 | 0.287 | OguCMS & DGMS_UP | |
| AT1G69500 | CYP704B1 | Cytochrome P450, family 704, subfamily B, polypeptide 1 | 80.639 | 5.991 | 0.789 | 1.331 | |
| AT1G75890 | GDSL-like Lipase/Acylhydrolase superfamily protein | 11.565 | 3.048 | 8.453 | 1.224 | ||
| AT3G10600 | CAT7 | Cationic amino acid transporter 7 | 2.700 | 4.204 | 1.349 | 1.514 | |
| AT3G15870 | Fatty acid desaturase family protein | 0.347 | 3.419 | 0.741 | 1.786 | ||
| AT1G64010 | Serine protease inhibitor (SERPIN) family protein | 20.572 | 0.279 | 1.114 | 3.002 | ||
| AT3G11980 | MS2 | Jojoba acyl CoA reductase-related male sterility protein | 88.115 | 0.664 | 0.728 | 5.882 | |
| AT2G13900 | Cysteine/Histidine-rich C1 domain family protein | 10.295 | 14.914 | 16.371 | 6.944 | ||
| AT1G28430 | CYP705A24 | Cytochrome P450, family 705, subfamily A, polypeptide 24 | 5.695 | 2.973 | 5.814 | 1.383 | |
| AT2G14960 | GH3.1 | Auxin-responsive GH3 family protein | 3.708 | 0.732 | 3.282 | 1.158 | |
| AT3G27812 | Unknown | 18.284 | 0.542 | 43.198 | 1.023 | ||
| AT3G53290 | CYP71B30P | Cytochrome P450, family 71, subfamily B, polypeptide 30 pseudogene | 9.250 | 0.375 | 16.667 | 1.371 | |
| AT3G55970 | JRG21 | Jasmonate-regulated gene 21 | 5.141 | 0.497 | 4.167 | 0.781 | |
| AT3G56700 | FAR6 | Fatty acid reductase 6 | 16.177 | 0.353 | 100.000 | 1.551 | |
| AT1G03170 | FAF2 | Protein of unknown function (DUF3049) | 0.681 | 0.673 | 3.176 | 1.515 | |
| AT1G15360 | WIN1 | Integrase-type DNA-binding superfamily protein | 1.929 | 1.215 | 4.281 | 1.031 | |
| AT1G19640 | JMT | Jasmonic acid carboxyl methyltransferase | 1.141 | 0.772 | 5.879 | 1.379 | |
| AT1G30740 | FAD-binding Berberine family protein | 2.387 | 2.498 | 4.238 | 2.632 | ||
| AT2G19990 | PR-1-LIKE | Pathogenesis-related protein-1-like | 1.504 | 2.561 | 6.212 | 5.556 | |
| AT2G21220 | SAUR-like auxin-responsive protein family | 1.133 | 1.327 | 4.282 | 1.002 | ||
| AT2G23570 | MES19 | Methyl esterase 19 | 1.984 | 0.226 | 4.238 | 0.509 | |
| AT2G30310 | GDSL-like Lipase/Acylhydrolase family protein | 2.397 | 1.417 | 3.256 | 1.043 | ||
| AT3G10570 | CYP77A6 | Cytochrome P450, family 77, subfamily A, polypeptide 6 | 1.852 | 1.168 | 3.098 | 0.842 | |
| AT3G57510 | ADPG1 | Pectin lyase-like superfamily protein | 1.774 | 1.043 | 5.391 | 1.049 | |
| AT4G16000 | 0.601 | 0.850 | 4.465 | 0.886 | |||
| AT4G37950 | Rhamnogalacturonate lyase family protein | 2.729 | 1.904 | 3.469 | 2.782 | ||
| AT5G62320 | MYB99 | myb domain protein 99 | 30.564 | 0.958 | 4.055 | 1.460 | |
| AT1G13150 | CYP86C4 | Cytochrome P450, family 86, subfamily C, polypeptide 4 | 77.360 | 21.613 | 43.020 | 1.065 | |
| AT3G59440 | Calcium-binding EF-hand family protein | 1.879 | 4.605 | 3.068 | 1.951 | ||
| AT4G12410 | SAUR-like auxin-responsive protein family | 1.413 | 3.016 | 8.257 | 0.898 | ||
| AT4G23230 | CRK15 | Cysteine-rich RLK (RECEPTOR-like protein kinase) 15 | 13.486 | 7.928 | 8.071 | 1.337 | |
In situ hybridization
Arabidopsis Col-0 inflorescences were embedded in Paraplast (Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China), sectioned at 8-μm thickness and mounted onto precharged slides. For sense and antisense probe synthesis, five coding regions of the NPGs, MEE48, A9, CYP98A8, EXL6, and GGPS5, resulting in 990-, 895-, 749-, 552-, and 656-bp DNA templates, were PCR amplified from flower cDNA using gene-specific forward and reverse primers. A T7 polymerase binding site was incorporated into the forward primer for sense probe amplification and in the reverse primer for antisense probe amplification. Digoxigenin-labeled probes were transcribed off the template using T7 polymerase (Roche, Shanghai, China). Probes were shortened to 200-bp fragments by limited carbonate hydrolysis, and then quantified and hybridized to slides. Tissue fixation, embedding, hybridization, and signal detection were performed as described by (Hooker et al. 2002).
Results and discussion
Cytological defects in the four B. oleracea MS lines
Light and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs of tapetums in wild-type and the four male sterile (MS) lines of Brassica oleracea at different developmental stages. I Comparisons of anther development between the wild-type (1–6) and four MS lines, NiCMS (7–12), RGMS (13–18), OguCMS (19–24), and DGMS (25–30), at different developmental stages, revealing that the principal cause of abnormal anther development in the four MS lines are defects in tapetum development, followed by abnormalities in microspore development. Bar = 20 μm. II Comparisons of tapetum development between the wild-type (1–4) and the four MS lines at different developmental stages (5–8), revealing that the sequence appearance and characteristics of tapetum cytological defects at the sporogenesis cell stage, microspore mother cell stage, pre-tetrad stage and post-tetrad stage. Bar = 2 μm. A the sporogenesis cell stage; B the microspore mother cell stage; C the early tetrad stage; D the uninucleate microspore stage; E the mature pollen stage; and F the dehiscence stage. Sc sporogenesis cell, Ta tapetum, Ml middle layer, Mmc microspore mother cell, En endothecium cell, Ep epidermis cell, Te tetrad, Ms microspore
Sequential developmental interruption model for the four types of male sterile (MS) lines of B. oleracea. Gray bar represents the normal developmental stage. Black bar represents the male sterility stage. NI represents the stage in which the genes were not interrupted in all four MS lines. A, B, C, and D represent the expressed genes in different anther developmental stages, which were classified by the developmental interruptions of NiCMS, RGMS, OguCMS and DGMS, respectively. Plus represent up-regulated and minus represent down-regulated
Signal extraction of the microarrays
The correlation analysis between two swap replicates of the four male sterile (MS) lines of Brassica oleracea and corresponding control line (MF) buds. a NiCMS control; b NiCMS; c RGMS control; d RGMS; e OguCMS control; f OguCMS; g DGMS control; and h DGMS
Microarray analysis
RT-PCR expression patterns of nine randomly selected genes. N, R, O, D represents the four male sterile (MS) lines of Brassica oleracea, NiCMS, RGMS, OguCMS, and DGMS. F–N, F–R, F–O, F–D represents the four MS lines’ corresponding control lines (MFs)
There were 544, 338, 526, and 209 down-regulated genes, and 5, 45, 151, and 15 up-regulated genes detected in the NiCMS, RGMS, OguCMS, and DGMS lines, respectively (Supplementary Table S2 and S3). After redundant genes were merged, 838 DEGs were down-regulated (group 1) and 188 up-regulated (group 2) in at least one of the four MS lines. The overlap of group 1 and group 2 contained 21 DEGs, including the two tapetum-related genes TDF1 and MYB 103. These genes play vital roles in tapetum synthesis and degeneration, and the sporopollenin monomer biosynthesis process (Higginson et al. 2003). These genes were down-regulated in the NiCMS line but up-regulated in RGMS and OguCMS lines. Following the removal of these 21 DEGs, 1,005 non-redundant DEGs were identified in this research.
Identification of tapetum-specific genes
The tapetum has been studied in many kinds of plants using MS defects, and, due to the difficulty of tapetum isolation, only four genes have been reported to be tapetum specific by MS mutant gene cloning (Suwabe et al. 2008). Therefore, we developed an approach to identify tapetum-specific genes on a large-scale, and at the developmental stages in which they are expressed. Fortunately, the separation of male gametophytes is easy, and numerous male gametophyte-specific genes have been identified from multiple MS mutants and global transcriptome analyses.
Comparison between differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and genes expressed in sporophytic and gametophytic tissues to identify non-pollen expressed genes (NPGs) of B. oleracea. A total of 17,677 sporophytic-expressed genes and 13,977 male gametophyte-expressed genes were detected in Honys’ research (Honys and Twell 2004). Of the DEGs, 725 genes were also sporophytic-expressed genes and 613 were also male gametophyte-expressed genes
Male sterility genes block the developmental pathways of anthers at a certain stage, and lead to abnormal anther development. Because each of the four MS lines showed distinct tapetum abortive phenotypes, and their abnormal characteristics appeared successively during anther development, we could deduce the expression sequence of the NPGs by their expression patterns. The expression sequence of the 55 NPGs could be determined according to the sequential appearance of the tapetum abortive phenotypes (Table 2). First, 28 NPGs that were only down-regulated in the NiCMS line were expressed, followed by seven NPGs down-regulated in both the NiCMS and RGMS lines, then 16 NPGs down-regulated in the NiCMS, RGMS, and OguCMS lines, and finally four NPGs down-regulated in the four MS lines were expressed. It is thought these 55 NPGs constitute the main stream of tapetum development, while the remaining 49 NPGs belonged to bypass ways which also play roles in tapetum development. These results showed that the tapetum development is strongly correlated with gene expression patterns and anther developmental timing. In the eight previously reported tapetum-specific genes, five (ACOS5, A6, LTP12, LAP5, and A9) were detected in our filtered microarray results, although the other three tapetum-specific genes (TSM1, TAP35, and TAP44) were detected in our microarray analysis at variable expression levels in the four MS lines. Because of the strict filter these three tapetum-specific genes were not included in our set of 104 NPGs. There were many noticeable features in the up-regulated genes, with 13 NPGs up-regulated in the OguCMS line, five NPGs up-regulated in both the RGMS and OguCMS lines, and one NPG up-regulated in both the RGMS and DGMS lines (Table 2). This is consistent with the cytological observations of different abnormal tapetum development in the four MS lines.
The tapetum developmental network is regulated by many genetic pathways (Wilson and Zhang 2009). MS mutants occurring at different developmental stages lead to abnormal downstream reactions, including altered tapetum structure and gene expression patterns. These changes are evoked by the presence of MS-associated proteins (Fujii et al. 2010). Only a few previous studies have analyzed gene expression patterns in B. oleracea MS lines (Kang et al. 2008). These studies compared anther gene expression profiles in MS lines with their corresponding fertile lines, allowing for the preferentially expressed anther genes to be identified. Despite their clear contribution to anther developmental pathways, downstream expressed anther wall-specific genes have been overlooked because of the removal of male gametophyte-specific expressed genes.
Function of genes arrested by the four types of B. oleracea MS lines
Gene ontology categorization of non-pollen expressed genes (NPGs) of B. oleracea. The NPGs were placed in 15 functional categories based on the MAS database
Five Brassica oleracea NPG mRNAs were localized by in situ hybridization to sections taken from developing anther locules of wild type (Col-0) Arabidopsis flowers. Top line using each of the five non-pollen expressed genes (NPGs) control sense probes. Bottom line using each of the five NPGs anti-sense probe. Dark precipitate indicates hybridization of the probe. T tapetum, PG pollen grain, PMC pollen mother cell. Bar = 70 µm
Conclusions
In this study, four different types of B. oleracea MS lines, covering the whole of anther development, were sampled for microscopy and microarray analysis. A systematic study of the tapetum developmental and molecular phenotypes of the four B. oleracea MS lines was performed using the Agilent Arabidopsis 2 Oligo array, which contains 25,000 probes to known or predicted genes. This is the first large-scale trial to explore the spatial and temporal expression patterns of tapetum-specific gene in B. oleracea MS lines. The results revealed that most tapetum-specific genes were expressed in a stage-specific manner.
The most significant phenotype of the four B. oleracea MS lines is that the anther walls are normally developed, with the exception of the distinct tapetum abortive phenotypes. These abnormal characteristics appeared successively during anther development (Fig. 1). The abortive phenotypes first appears in NiCMS, then in RGMS, followed by OguCMS, and finally in DGMS. A sequential developmental interruption model was proposed to clarify the expression order of the DEGs in plants. MS-associated proteins might directly or indirectly regulate some of the genes involved in tapetum synthesis and degeneration, and then block the expression of a large number of genes involved in normal microspore development. Eliminating sporophytic-and male gametophyte-specific expressed genes identified in the NPGs as anther wall-specific genes, resulted in the majority of remaining genes being tapetum specific. We defined the expression sequence of 55 NPGs based on the sequential developmental interruption model and determined that they are involved in structural molecules, transporters, and physiological processes related to cell wall modification and catalytic activities. The categories suggested the metabolic role of the tapetum in the regulation of anther development. These results outline a methodology to retrieve information on hard to isolate tissues through the comparison of global expression with gene expression in easily obtained mutants. The relationship of anther-expressed genes can be clarified by comparing the sequential cytological appearance of defects in multiple independent MS lines with the same tissues in the wild-type.
Notes
Acknowledgments
The work was funded by the National High Technology R&D Program of China (2012AA100101), International Joint Research Grant of Ministry of Science and Technology, P. R. China (2010DFA31730), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant:30972010). The work was conducted in Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China and the Sino-Dutch Joint Lab of Horticultural Genomics Technology in Beijing.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
References
- Amagai M, Ariizumi T, Endo M, Hatakeyama K, Kuwata C, Shibata D, Toriyama K, Watanabe M (2003) Identification of anther-specific genes in a cruciferous model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana, by using a combination of Arabidopsis macroarray and mRNA derived from Brassica oleracea. Sex Plant Reprod 15:213–220Google Scholar
- Ariizumi T, Amagai M, Shibata D, Hatakeyama K, Watanabe M, Toriyama K (2002) Comparative study of promoter activity of three anther-specific genes encoding lipid transfer protein, xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase and polygalacturonase in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep 21:90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Becker JD, Boavida LC, Carneiro J, Haury M, Feijo JA (2003) Transcriptional profiling of Arabidopsis tissues reveals the unique characteristics of the pollen transcriptome. Plant Physiol 133:713–725CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang F, Wang Y, Wang S, Ma H (2011) Molecular control of microsporogenesis in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14:66–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Azevedo Souza C, Kim SS, Koch S, Kienow L, Schneider K, McKim SM, Haughn GW, Kombrink E, Douglas CJ (2009) A novel fatty acyl-CoA synthetase is required for pollen development and sporopollenin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21:507–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Engelke T, Hülsmann S, Tatlioglu T (2002) A comparative study of microsporogenesis and anther wall development in different types of genic and cytoplasmic male sterilities in chives. Plant Breed 121:254–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fang ZY, Sun PT, Liu YM (1984) Brief report: breeding of cytoplasmic male sterile line in cabbage. China Veg 4:42–43Google Scholar
- Fang ZY, Sun PT, Liu YM, Yang LM, Hou AF, Wang XW, Bian CS (1995) Preliminary study on the inheritance of male sterility in cabbage line 79-399-438. Acta Hortic (ISHS) 402:414–417Google Scholar
- Fang ZY, Sun PT, Liu YM, Yang LM, Wang XW, Zhuang M (2001) Investigation of different types of male sterility and application of dominant male sterility in cabbage [J]. China Veg 1:6–10Google Scholar
- Fellenberg C, Milkowski C, Hause B, Lange P-R, Böttcher C, Schmidt J, Vogt T (2008) Tapetum-specific location of a cation-dependent O-methyltransferase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 56:132–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujii S, Yamada M, Fujita M, Itabashi E, Hamada K, Yano K, Kurata N, Toriyama K (2010) Cytoplasmic-nuclear genomic barriers in rice pollen development revealed by comparison of global gene expression profiles among five independent cytoplasmic male sterile lines. Plant Cell Physiol 51:610–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ge X, Chang F, Ma H (2010) Signaling and transcriptional control of reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 20:R988–R997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg RB, Beals TP, Sanders PM (1993) Anther development: basic principles and practical applications. Plant Cell 5:1217–1229CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Higginson T, Li SF, Parish RW (2003) AtMYB103 regulates tapetum and trichome development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 35:177–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hird DL, Worrall D, Hodge R, Smartt S, Paul W, Scott R (1993) The anther-specific protein encoded by the Brassica napus and Arabidopsis thaliana A6 gene displays similarity to beta-1,3-glucanases. Plant J 4:1023–1033CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Honys D, Twell D (2003) Comparative analysis of the Arabidopsis pollen transcriptome. Plant Physiol 132:640–652CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Honys D, Twell D (2004) Transcriptome analysis of haploid male gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol 5:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hooker TS, Millar AA, Kunst L (2002) Significance of the expression of the CER6 condensing enzyme for cuticular wax production in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 129:1568–1580CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang J, Zhang G, Bonnema G, Fang Z, Wang X (2008) Global analysis of gene expression in flower buds of Ms-cd1 Brassica oleracea conferring male sterility by using an Arabidopsis microarray. Plant Mol Biol 66:177–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kao H, Keller W, Gleddie S, Brown G (1992) Synthesis of Brassica oleracea/Brassica napus somatic hybrid plants with novel organeile DNA compositions. Theor Appl Genet 83:313–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SS, Grienenberger E, Lallemand B, Colpitts CC, Kim SY, CdA Souza, Geoffroy P, Heintz D, Krahn D, Kaiser M, Kombrink E, Heitz T, Suh D-Y, Legrand M, Douglas CJ (2010) LAP6/POLYKETIDE SYNTHASE A and LAP5/POLYKETIDE SYNTHASE B encode hydroxyalkyl α-pyrone synthases required for pollen development and sporopollenin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 22:4045–4066CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lou P, Kang J, Zhang G, Bonnema G, Fang Z, Wang X (2007) Transcript profiling of a dominant male sterile mutant (Ms-cd1) in cabbage during flower bud development. Plant Sci 172:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ma H (2005) Molecular genetic analyses of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in flowering plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:393–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma H, Sundaresan V (2010) Chapter thirteen—development of flowering plant gametophytes. In: Marja CPT (ed) Current topics in developmental biology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Ma X, Feng B, Ma H (2012) AMS-dependent and independent regulation of anther transcriptome and comparison with those affected by other Arabidopsis anther genes. BMC Plant Biol 12:23CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mariani CDBM, Truettner J, Leemans J, Goldberg RB (1990) Induction of male sterility in plants by a chimeric ribonuclease gene. Nature 347:737–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCormick S (1993) Male gametophyte development. Plant Cell 5:1265–1275CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Owen H, Makaroff CA (1995) Ultrastructure of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. ecotype Wassilewskija (Brassicaceae). Protoplasma 185:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Papini A, Mosti S, Brighigna L (1999) Programmed-cell-death events during tapetum development of angiosperms. Protoplasma 207:213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Paul W, Hodge R, Smartt S, Draper J, Scott R (1992) The isolation and characterisation of the tapetum-specific Arabidopsis thaliana A9 gene. Plant Mol Biol 19:611–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pearson O (1972) Cytoplasmically inherited male sterility characters and flavor components from the species cross Brassica nigra (L) Koch X Brassica oleracea L. Amer Soc Hort Sci JGoogle Scholar
- Piffanelli P, Ross JHE, Murphy DJ (1998) Biogenesis and function of the lipidic structures of pollen grains. Sex Plant Reprod 11:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pina C, Pinto F, Feijo JA, Becker JD (2005) Gene family analysis of the Arabidopsis pollen transcriptome reveals biological implications for cell growth, division control, and gene expression regulation. Plant Physiol 138:744–756CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanders PM, Bui AQ, Weterings K, McIntire KN, Hsu YC, Lee PY, Truong MT, Beals TP, Goldberg RB (1999) Anther developmental defects in Arabidopsis thaliana male-sterile mutants. Sex Plant Reprod 11:297–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scott R, Hodge R, Paul W, Draper J (1991) The molecular biology of anther differentiation. Plant Sci 80:167–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scott RJ, Spielman M, Dickinson HG (2004) Stamen structure and function. Plant Cell 16(Suppl 1):S46–S60CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smyth DR, Bowman JL, Meyerowitz EM (1990) Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2:755–767CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spurr AR (1969) A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 26:31–43Google Scholar
- Stevens VA, Murray BG (1981) Studies on heteromorphic self-incompatibility systems: the cytochemistry and ultrastructure of the tapetum of Primula obconica. J Cell Sci 50:419–431PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suwabe K, Suzuki G, Takahashi H, Shiono K, Endo M, Yano K, Fujita M, Masuko H, Saito H, Fujioka T, Kaneko F, Kazama T, Mizuta Y, Kawagishi-Kobayashi M, Tsutsumi N, Kurata N, Nakazono M, Watanabe M (2008) Separated transcriptomes of male gametophyte and tapetum in rice: validity of a laser microdissection (LM) microarray. Plant Cell Physiol 49:1407–1416CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varnier A-L, Mazeyrat-Gourbeyre F, Sangwan RS, Clément C (2005) Programmed cell death progressively models the development of anther sporophytic tissues from the tapetum and is triggered in pollen grains during maturation. J Struct Biol 152:118–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wellmer F, Riechmann JL, Alves-Ferreira M, Meyerowitz EM (2004) Genome-wide analysis of spatial gene expression in Arabidopsis flowers. Plant Cell 16:1314–1326CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson ZA, Zhang DB (2009) From Arabidopsis to rice: pathways in pollen development. J Exp Bot 60:1479–1492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu J, Ding Z, Vizcay-Barrena G, Shi J, Liang W, Yuan Z, Werck-Reichhart D, Schreiber L, Wilson ZA, Zhang D (2014) ABORTED MICROSPORES Acts as a master regulator of pollen wall formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Online 26:1544–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin DM, Peng V, Ngai J, Speed TP (2002) Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res 30:e15CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang X, Feng B, Zhang Q, Zhang D, Altman N, Ma H (2005) Genome-wide expression profiling and identification of gene activities during early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 58:401–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.






