Advertisement

Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 78, Issue 4–5, pp 503–514 | Cite as

Towards a synthetic view of potato cold and salt stress response by transcriptomic and proteomic analyses

  • D. Evers
  • S. Legay
  • D. Lamoureux
  • J. F. Hausman
  • L. Hoffmann
  • J. Renaut
Article

Abstract

Potato can suffer from several abiotic stresses such as cold temperature, high soil salinity, lack of water or heavy metal exposure, to name a few. They are known to affect plant growth as well as productivity, with differential regulations at several levels. Potato response to cold and salt exposure was investigated at both transcriptomic and proteomic levels in a growth chamber experiment. Cold exposure in potato resulted in a higher number of significantly differentially regulated genes compared to salt exposure, whereas there were nearly three times more differentially regulated proteins after salt exposure when compared to cold exposure. The allocation of up and down-regulated genes at the functional category level also differed between salt and cold exposure although common trends, previously described in various abiotic stresses, were observed. In both stresses, the majority of photosynthesis-related genes were down-regulated whereas cell rescue and transcription factor-related genes were mostly up-regulated. In the other functional categories no common trend was observed; salt exposure results displayed a strong down-regulation of genes implicated in primary metabolism, detoxication apparatus and signal transduction, whereas upon cold exposure, up and down-regulated genes were similar in number. At the proteomic level, the abundance of the majority of identified proteins was increased except for the photosynthesis-related proteins, which were mostly less abundant after both salt and cold exposure. Common responses between salt and cold stress and specific responses inherent to these abiotic stresses are described.

Keywords

Transcriptomic Proteomic Salt stress Cold stress Solanum tuberosum 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge S. Planchon, E. Boland, B. De Vos, L. Solinhac for their technical assistance and the microarray center (CRP-Santé, Luxembourg) for its technical help.

Supplementary material

11103_2012_9879_MOESM1_ESM.xls (702 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLS 702 kb)

References

  1. Amme S, Matros A, Schlesier B, Mock HP (2006) Proteome analysis of cold stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana using DIGE-technology. J Exp Bot 57:1537–1546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An SH, Sohn KH, Choi HW, Hwang IS, Lee SC, Hwang BK (2008) Pepper pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein CaPMEI1 is required for antifungal activity, basal disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance. Planta 228:61–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andeme OC, Christopher DA, Cho EJ, Chang SC, Staehelin LA (2008) Arabidopsis protein disulfide isomerase-5 inhibits cysteine proteases during trafficking to vacuoles before programmed cell death of the endothelium in developing seeds. Plant Cell 20:2205–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C (2008) Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot 103:551–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen JB, Wang SM, Jing RL, Mao XG (2009) Cloning the PvP5CS gene from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and its expression patterns under abiotic stresses. J Plant Physiol 166:12–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng YX, Long M (2007) A cytosolic NADP-malic enzyme gene from rice (Oryza sativa L.) confers salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Biotechnol Lett 29:1129–1134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JK (2007) Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends Plant Sci 12:444–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke AK (1999) ATP-dependent Clp proteases in photosynthetic organisms—a cut above the rest! Ann Bot 83:593–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crespi MD, Zabaleta EJ, Pontis HG, Salerno GL (1991) Sucrose synthase expression during cold-acclimation in wheat. Plant Physiol 96:887–891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cui SX, Huang F, Wang J, Ma X, Cheng YS, Liu JY (2005) A proteomic analysis of cold stress responses in rice seedlings. Proteomics 5:3162–3172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. del Rio LA, Sandalio LM, Corpas FJ, Palma JM, Barroso JB (2006) Reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species in peroxisomes. Production, scavenging, and role in cell signaling. Plant Physiol 141:330–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delmotte N, Ahrens CH, Knief C, Qeli E, Koch M, Fischer HM, Vorholt JA, Hennecke H, Pessi G (2010) An integrated proteomics and transcriptomics reference data set provides new insights into the Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroid metabolism in soybean root nodules. Proteomics 10:1391–1400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deuschle K, Funck D, Forlani G, Stransky H, Biehl A, Leister D, van der Graaff E, Kunzee R, Frommer WB (2004) The role of Delta(1)-Pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase in proline degradation. Plant Cell 16:3413–3425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dormann P, Benning C (1998) The role of UDP-glucose epimerase in carbohydrate metabolism of Arabidopsis. Plant J 13:641–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evers D, Bonnechère S, Hoffmann L, Hausman JF (2007) Physiological aspects of abiotic stress of abiotic response in potato. Belg J Bot 140:236–245Google Scholar
  16. Evers D, Lefevre I, Legay S, Lamoureux D, Hausman JF, Rosales ROG, Marca LRT, Hoffmann L, Bonierbale M, Schafleitner R (2010) Identification of drought-responsive compounds in potato through a combined transcriptomic and targeted metabolite approach. J Exp Bot 61:2327–2343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandez C, Krogh M, Warell K, Alm K, Oredsson S, Persson L, James P, Holm C (2009) Omics analyses reveal a potential link between hormone-sensitive lipase and polyamine metabolism. J Proteome Res 8:5008–5019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Groppa MD, Benavides MP (2008) Polyamines and abiotic stress: recent advances. Amino Acids 34:35–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guy C, Kaplan F, Kopka J, Selbig J, Hincha DK (2008) Metabolomics of temperature stress. Physiol Plant 132:220–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Haußühl K, Andersson B, Adamska I (2001) A chloroplast DegP2 protease performs the primary cleavage of the photodamaged D1 protein in plant photosystem II. EMBO J 20:713–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holland N, Belkind A, Holland D, Pick U, Edelman M (1998) Stress-responsive accumulation of plastid chaperonin 60 during seedling development. Plant J 13:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hon WC, Griffith M, Mlynarz M, Kwok YC, Yang DSC (1995) Antifreeze proteins in winter rye are similar to pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Physiol 109:879–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Igarashi Y, Yoshiba Y, Sanada Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Wada K, Shinozaki K (1997) Characterization of the gene for Delta(1)-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase and correlation between the expression of the gene and salt tolerance in Oryza sativa L. Plant Mol Biol 33:857–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jamet E, Roujol D, San-Clemente H, Irshad M, Soubigou-Taconnat L, Renou JP, Pont-Lezica R (2009) Cell wall biogenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana elongating cells: transcriptomics complements proteomics. BMC Genom 10:OnlineGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiang HW, Dian WM, Liu FY, Wu P (2003) Isolation and characterization of two fructokinase cDNA clones from rice. Phytochemistry 62:47–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jouve L, Hoffmann L, Hausman JF (2004) Polyamine, carbohydrate, and proline content changes during salt stress exposure of aspen (Populus tremula L.): involvement of oxidation and osmoregulation metabolism. Plant Biol 6:74–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kieffer P, Schröder P, Dommes J, Hoffmann L, Renaut J, Hausman JF (2009) Proteomic and enzymatic response of poplar to cadmium stress. J Proteom 72:379–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kosová K, Vítámvás P, Prášil IP, Renaut J (2011) Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress—contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. J Proteom 74:1301–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lai LB, Tausta SL, Nelson TM (2002) Differential regulation of transcripts encoding cytosolic NADP-malic enzyme in C3 and C4 Flaveria species. Plant Physiol 128:140–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Legay S, Lamoureux D, Hausman JF, Hoffmann L, Evers D (2009) Monitoring gene expression of potato under salinity using cDNA microarrays. Plant Cell Rep 28:1799–1816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Legay S, Lefevre I, Lamoureux D, Barreda C, Luz RT, Gutierrez R, Quiroz R, Hoffmann L, Hausman JF, Bonierbale M, Evers D, Schafleitner R (2011) Carbohydrate metabolism and cell protection mechanisms differentiate drought tolerance and sensitivity in advanced potato clones (Solanum tuberosum L.). Funct Integr Genom 11:275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahajan S, Tuteja N (2005) Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophys 444:139–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marouga R, David S, Hawkins E (2005) The development of the DIGE system: 2D fluorescence difference gel analysis technology. Anal Bioanal Chem 382:669–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McLellan H, Gilroy EM, Yun BW, Birch PRJ, Loake GJ (2009) Functional redundancy in the Arabidopsis Cathepsin B gene family contributes to basal defence, the hypersensitive response and senescence. New Phytol 183:408–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mustard J, Renault S (2004) Effects of NaCl on water relations and cell wall elasticity and composition of red-osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) seedlings. Physiol Plant 121:265–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicot N, Hausman JF, Hoffmann L, Evers D (2005) Housekeeping gene selection for real-time RT-PCR normalization in potato during biotic and abiotic stress. J Exp Bot 56:2907–2914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oufir M, Legay S, Nicot N, Van Moer K, Hoffmann L, Renaut J, Hausman JF, Evers D (2008) Gene expression in potato during cold exposure: Changes in carbohydrate and polyamine metabolisms. Plant Sci 175:839–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peng ZY, Wang MC, Li F, Lv HJ, Li CL, Xia GM (2009) A proteomic study of the response to salinity and drought stress in an introgression strain of bread wheat. Mol Cell Proteom 8:2676–2686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rabbani MA, Maruyama K, Abe H, Khan MA, Katsura K, Ito Y, Yoshiwara K, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2003) Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA get-blot analyses. Plant Physiol 133:1755–1767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramamoorthy R, Jiang SY, Kumar N, Venkatesh PN, Ramachandran S (2008) A comprehensive transcriptional profiling of the WRKY gene family in rice under various abiotic and phytohormone treatments. Plant Cell Physiol 49:865–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Renaut J, Hausman JF, Bassett C, Artlip T, Cauchie HM, Witters E, Wisniewski M (2008) Quantitative proteomic analysis of short photoperiod and low-temperature responses in bark tissues of peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch). Tree Genet Genom 4:589–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Renaut J, Planchon S, Oufir M, Hausman JF, Hoffmann L, Evers D (2009) Identification of proteins from potato leaves submitted to chilling temperature. In: Gusta LV, Wisniewski M, Tanino KK (eds) Plant cold hardiness: from the laboratory to the field. CAB Internationnal, Wallingford, pp 279–292Google Scholar
  43. Rensink WA, Buell CR (2005) Microarray expression profiling resources for plant genomics. Trends Plant Sci 10:603–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seo PJ, Lee AK, Xiang F, Park CM (2008) Molecular and functional profiling of Arabidopsis pathogenesis-related genes: insights into their roles in salt response of seed germination. Plant Cell Physiol 49:334–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Solomon M, Belenghi B, Delledonne M, Menachem E, Levine A (1999) The involvement of cysteine proteases and protease inhibitor genes in the regulation of programmed cell death in plants. Plant Cell 11:431–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Takahashi S, Murata N (2008) How do environmental stresses accelerate photoinhibition? Trends Plant Sci 13:178–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor NL, Day DA, Millar AH (2002) Environmental stress causes oxidative damage to plant mitochondria leading to inhibition of glycine decarboxylase. J Biol Chem 277:42663–42668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3(7):0034.1–0034.11Google Scholar
  49. Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu JK (2006) Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J 45:523–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vierstra RD (1993) Protein degradation in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol 44:385–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang WX, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A (2004) Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci 9:244–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wi SJ, Kim WT, Park KY (2006) Overexpression of carnation S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase gene generates a broad-spectrum tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Cell Rep 25:1111–1121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wong CE, Li Y, Labbe A, Guevara D, Nuin P, Whitty B, Diaz C, Golding GB, Gray GR, Weretilnyk EA, Griffith M, Moffatt BA (2006) Transcriptional profiling implicates novel interactions between abiotic stress and hormonal responses in Thellungiella, a close relative of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 140:1437–1450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xue GP, McIntyre CL, Glassop D, Shorter R (2008) Use of expression analysis to dissect alterations in carbohydrate metabolism in wheat leaves during drought stress. Plant Mol Biol 67:197–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Evers
    • 1
  • S. Legay
    • 1
  • D. Lamoureux
    • 1
  • J. F. Hausman
    • 1
  • L. Hoffmann
    • 1
  • J. Renaut
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environment and Agrobiotechnologies (EVA)Centre de Recherche Public—Gabriel LippmannBelvauxLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations