Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 76, Issue 3–5, pp 299–309 | Cite as

Introducing an RNA editing requirement into a plastid-localised transgene reduces but does not eliminate functional gene transfer to the nucleus

  • Anna E. Sheppard
  • Panagiotis Madesis
  • Andrew H. Lloyd
  • Anil Day
  • Michael A. Ayliffe
  • Jeremy N. Timmis
Article

Abstract

In higher plants, DNA transfer from the plastid (chloroplast) genome to the nucleus is a frequent, ongoing process. However, there has been uncertainty over whether this transfer occurs by a direct DNA mechanism or whether RNA intermediates are involved. Previous experiments utilising transplastomic Nicotiana tabacum (tp7 and tp17) enabled the detection of plastid-to-nucleus transfer in real time. To determine whether RNA intermediates are involved in this transfer, transplastomic lines (tpneoACG) were generated containing, in their plastid genomes, a nuclear promoter-driven kanamycin resistance gene (neo) with a start codon that required plastid RNA editing but otherwise identical to tp7 and tp17. Therefore it was expected that kanamycin resistance would only be acquired following RNA-mediated transfer of neo to the nucleus. Screening of tpneoACG progeny revealed several kanamycin-resistant plants, each of which contained the neo gene located in the nucleus. Surprisingly, neo was unedited in all these plants, indicating that neoACG was active in the absence of an edited start codon and suggesting that RNA intermediates were not involved in the transfers. However, analysis of tpneoACG revealed that only a low proportion of transcripts potentially able to mediate neo transfer were edited, thus precluding unequivocal conclusions regarding the role of RNA in plastid-to-nucleus transfer. The low proportion of edited transcripts was found to be due to predominant antisense neo transcripts, rather than to low editing efficiency of the sense transcripts. This study highlights a number of important considerations in the design of experiments utilising plastid RNA editing. The results also suggest that RNA editing sites reduce but do not eliminate functional plastid-to-nucleus gene transfer. This is relevant both in an evolutionary context and in placing RNA editing-dependent genes in the plastid genome as a means of transgene containment.

Keywords

Endosymbiotic evolution Gene transfer RNA editing Plastid Nicotiana tabacum 

Supplementary material

11103_2011_9764_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (257 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 256 kb)

References

  1. Adams KL, Palmer JD (2003) Evolution of mitochondrial gene content: gene loss and transfer to the nucleus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29:380–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams KL, Daley DO, Qiu YL, Whelan J, Palmer JD (2000) Repeated, recent and diverse transfers of a mitochondrial gene to the nucleus in flowering plants. Nature 408:354–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bock R (2000) Sense from nonsense: how the genetic information of chloroplasts is altered by RNA editing. Biochimie 82:549–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bock R, Hermann M, Kossel H (1996) In vivo dissection of cis-acting determinants for plastid RNA editing. EMBO J 15:5052–5059PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaudhuri S, Carrer H, Maliga P (1995) Site-specific factor involved in the editing of the psbL mRNA in tobacco plastids. EMBO J 14:2951–2957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornelissen M, Vandewiele M (1989) Nuclear transcriptional activity of the tobacco plastid psbA promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 17:19–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curtis IS, Power JB, Davey MR (1995) NPTII assays for measuring gene expression and enzyme activity in transgenic plants. In: Jones H (ed) Methods in molecular biology; plant gene transfer and expression protocols. Humana Press Inc, Clifton, pp 149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deigan KE, Li TW, Mathews DH, Weeks KM (2009) Accurate SHAPE-directed RNA structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:97–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Depeiges A, Degroote F, Espagnol MC, Picard G (2006) Translation initiation by non-AUG codons in Arabidopsis thaliana transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 25:55–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deusch O, Landan G, Roettger M, Gruenheit N, Kowallik KV, Allen JF, Martin W, Dagan T (2008) Genes of cyanobacterial origin in plant nuclear genomes point to a heterocyst-forming plastid ancestor. Mol Biol Evol 25:748–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grohmann L, Brennicke A, Schuster W (1992) The mitochondrial gene encoding ribosomal protein S12 has been translocated to the nuclear genome in Oenothera. Nucleic Acids Res 20:5641–5646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hazkani-Covo E, Zeller RM, Martin W (2010) Molecular poltergeists: mitochondrial DNA copies (numts) in sequenced nuclear genomes. PLoS Genet 6. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000834
  13. Huang CY, Ayliffe MA, Timmis JN (2003) Direct measurement of the transfer rate of chloroplast DNA into the nucleus. Nature 422:72–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang CY, Ayliffe MA, Timmis JN (2004) Simple and complex nuclear loci created by newly transferred chloroplast DNA in tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9710–9715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iamtham S, Day A (2000) Removal of antibiotic resistance genes from transgenic tobacco plastids. Nat Biotechnol 18:1172–1176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keeling PJ, Palmer JD (2008) Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution. Nat Rev Genet 9:605–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kobayashi Y, Dokiya Y, Kumazawa Y, Sugita M (2002) Non-AUG translation initiation of mRNA encoding plastid-targeted phage-type RNA polymerase in Nicotiana sylvestris. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 299:57–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lloyd AH, Timmis JN (2011) The origin and characterization of new nuclear genes originating from a cytoplasmic organellar genome. Mol Biol Evol. doi:10.1093/molbev/msr021
  19. Lutz KA, Bosacchi MH, Maliga P (2006) Plastid marker-gene excision by transiently expressed CRE recombinase. Plant J 45:447–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maliga P (2002) Engineering the plastid genome of higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:164–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin W, Rujan T, Richly E, Hansen A, Cornelsen S, Lins T, Leister D, Stoebe B, Hasegawa M, Penny D (2002) Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12246–12251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matsuo M, Ito Y, Yamauchi R, Obokata J (2005) The rice nuclear genome continuously integrates, shuffles, and eliminates the chloroplast genome to cause chloroplast-nuclear DNA flux. Plant Cell 17:665–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Noutsos C, Richly E, Leister D (2005) Generation and evolutionary fate of insertions of organelle DNA in the nuclear genomes of flowering plants. Genome Res 15:616–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Noutsos C, Kleine T, Armbruster U, DalCorso G, Leister D (2007) Nuclear insertions of organellar DNA can create novel patches of functional exon sequences. Trends Genet 23:597–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nugent JM, Palmer JD (1991) RNA-mediated transfer of the gene coxII from the mitochondrion to the nucleus during flowering plant evolution. Cell 66:473–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richly E, Leister D (2004a) NUMTs in sequenced eukaryotic genomes. Mol Biol Evol 21:1081–1084PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richly E, Leister D (2004b) NUPTs in sequenced eukaryotes and their genomic organization in relation to NUMTs. Mol Biol Evol 21:1972–1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruf S, Karcher D, Bock R (2007) Determining the transgene containment level provided by chloroplast transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:6998–7002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shafer KS, Hanekamp T, White KH, Thorsness PE (1999) Mechanisms of mitochondrial DNA escape to the nucleus in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 36:183–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sheppard AE, Ayliffe MA, Blatch L, Day A, Delaney SK, Khairul-Fahmy N, Li Y, Madesis P, Pryor AJ, Timmis JN (2008) Transfer of plastid DNA to the nucleus is elevated during male gametogenesis in tobacco. Plant Physiol 148:328–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stegemann S, Bock R (2006) Experimental reconstruction of functional gene transfer from the tobacco plastid genome to the nucleus. Plant Cell 18:2869–2878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stegemann S, Hartmann S, Ruf S, Bock R (2003) High-frequency gene transfer from the chloroplast genome to the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8828–8833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stupar RM, Lilly JW, Town CD, Cheng Z, Kaul S, Buell CR, Jiang J (2001) Complex mtDNA constitutes an approximate 620-kb insertion on Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 2: implication of potential sequencing errors caused by large-unit repeats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5099–5103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Svab Z, Maliga P (2007) Exceptional transmission of plastids and mitochondria from the transplastomic pollen parent and its impact on transgene containment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:7003–7008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Timmis JN, Ayliffe MA, Huang CY, Martin W (2004) Endosymbiotic gene transfer: organelle genomes forge eukaryotic chromosomes. Nat Rev Genet 5:123–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tsang HH, Wiese KC (2010) SARNA-predict: accuracy improvement of RNA secondary Structure prediction using permutation-based simulated annealing. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 7:727–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wamboldt Y, Mohammed S, Elowsky C, Wittgren C, de Paula WBM, Mackenzie SA (2009) Participation of leaky ribosome scanning in protein dual targeting by alternative translation initiation in higher plants. Plant Cell 21:157–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woischnik M, Moraes CT (2002) Pattern of organization of human mitochondrial pseudogenes in the nuclear genome. Genome Res 12:885–893PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yu YS, Rambo T, Currie J, Saski C, Kim HR, Collura K, Thompson S, Simmons J, Yang TJ, Nah G et al (2003) In-depth view of structure, activity, and evolution of rice chromosome 10. Science 300:1566–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zoubenko OV, Allison LA, Svab Z, Maliga P (1994) Efficient targeting of foreign genes into the tobacco plastid genome. Nucleic Acids Res 22:3819–3824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zuker M (2003) Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3406–3415Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna E. Sheppard
    • 1
    • 4
  • Panagiotis Madesis
    • 2
    • 5
  • Andrew H. Lloyd
    • 1
  • Anil Day
    • 2
  • Michael A. Ayliffe
    • 3
  • Jeremy N. Timmis
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Molecular and Biomedical ScienceThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Life SciencesThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.CSIRO Plant IndustryCanberra, ACTAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Evolutionary Ecology and GeneticsUniversity of KielKielGermany
  5. 5.Instutute of AgrobiotechnologyThermiGreece

Personalised recommendations