Advertisement

Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 73, Issue 1–2, pp 27–36 | Cite as

Axillary bud outgrowth in herbaceous shoots: how do strigolactones fit into the picture?

  • Tanya Waldie
  • Alice Hayward
  • Christine Anne Beveridge
Article

Abstract

Strigolactones have recently been identified as the long sought-after signal required to inhibit shoot branching (Gomez-Roldan et al. 2008; Umehara et al. 2008; reviewed in Dun et al. 2009). Here we briefly describe the evidence for strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching and, more extensively, the broader context of this action. We address the central question of why strigolactone mutants exhibit a varied branching phenotype across a wide range of experimental conditions. Where knowledge is available, we highlight the role of other hormones in dictating these phenotypes and describe those instances where our knowledge of known plant hormones and their interactions falls considerably short of explaining the phenotypes. This review will focus on bud outgrowth in herbaceous species because knowledge on the role of strigolactones in shoot branching to date barely extends beyond this group of plants.

Keywords

Shoot branching Apical dominance Strigolactone Auxin Decapitation Light Nutrient Flowering 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Australian Research Council for grant funding and the Australian Postgraduate Award scheme for funding to AH and TW.

References

  1. Adam H, Ouellet F, Kane NA, Agharbaoui Z, Major G, Tominaga Y et al (2007) Overexpression of TaVRN1 in Arabidopsis promotes early flowering and alters development. Plant Cell Physiol 48:1192–1206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilar-Martínez JA, Poza-Carrión C, Cubas P (2007) Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. Plant Cell 19:458–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Akiyama K, Matsuzaki K, Hayashi H (2005) Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 435:824–827PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arite T, Iwata H, Ohshima K, Maekawa M, Nakajima M, Kojima M et al (2007) DWARF10, an RMS1/MAX4/DAD1 ortholog, controls lateral bud outgrowth in rice. Plant J 51:1019–1029PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bainbridge K, Sorefan K, Ward S, Leyser O (2005) Hormonally controlled expression of the Arabidopsis MAX4 shoot branching regulatory gene. Plant J 44:569–580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bangerth F (1994) Response of cytokinin concentration in the xylem exudate of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants to decapitation and auxin treatment and relationship to apical dominance. Planta 194:439–442Google Scholar
  7. Bennett T, Sieberer T, Willett B, Booker J, Luschnig C, Leyser O (2006) The Arabidopsis MAX pathway controls shoot branching by regulating auxin transport. Curr Biol 16:553–563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beveridge CA (2000) Long-distance signalling and a mutational analysis of branching in pea. Plant Growth Regul 32:193–203Google Scholar
  9. Beveridge CA, Murfet IC (1996) The gigas mutant in pea is deficient in the floral stimulus. Physiol Plant 96:637–645Google Scholar
  10. Beveridge CA, Ross JJ, Murfet IC (1992) Mutant dn influences dry matter distribution, assimilate partitioning and flowering in Lathyrus odoratus L. J Exp Bot 43:55–62Google Scholar
  11. Beveridge CA, Symons GM, Murfet IC, Ross JJ, Rameau C (1997) The rms1 mutant of pea has elevated indole-3-acetic acid levels and reduced root-sap zeatin riboside content but increased branching controlled by graft-transmissible signal(s). Plant Physiol 115:1251–1258Google Scholar
  12. Beveridge CA, Batge SL, Ross JJ, Murfet IC (2001) Hormone physiology of pea mutants prevented from flowering by mutations gi or veg1. Physiol Plant 113:285–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Beveridge CA, Weller JL, Singer SR, Hofer JM (2003) Axillary meristem development. Budding relationships between networks controlling flowering, branching and photoperiod responsiveness. Plant Physiol 131:927–934PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brewer PB, Dun EA, Fergusion BJ, Rameau CA, Beveridge CA (2009) Strigolactone acts downstream of auxin to regulate bud outgrowth in pea and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 150:482–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carabelli M, Possenti M, Sessa G, Ciolfi A, Sassi M, Morelli G, Ruberti I (2007) Canopy shade causes a rapid and transient arrest in leaf development through auxin-induced cytokinin oxidase activity. Genes Dev 21:1863–1868PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Casal JJ, Fankhauser C, Coupland G, Blázquez MA (2004) Signalling for developmental plasticity. Trends Plant Sci 9:309–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cerdán PD, Chory J (2003) Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature 423:881–885PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chatfield SP, Stirnberg P, Forde BG, Leyser O (2000) The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J 24:159–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cline M (1996) Exogenous auxin effects on lateral bud outgrowth in decapitated shoots. Ann Bot 78:255–266Google Scholar
  20. Cline M (2000) Execution of the auxin replacement apical dominance experiment in temperate woody species. Am J Bot 87:182–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cline MG, Riley L (1984) The presentation time for shoot inversion release of apical dominance in Pharbitis nil. Ann Bot 53:897–900Google Scholar
  22. Cline MG, Chatfield SP, Leyser O (2001) NAA restores apical dominance in the axr3-1 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ann Bot 87:61–65Google Scholar
  23. Cook CE, Whichard LP, Wall ME, Egley GH, Coggon P, Luhan PA et al (1972) Germination stimulants. II. The structure of strigol—a potent seed germination stimulant for witchweed (Striga lutea Lour.). J Am Chem Soc 94:6198–6199Google Scholar
  24. Davies CR, Wareing PF (1965) Auxin-directed transport of radiophosphorus in stems. Planta 65:139–156Google Scholar
  25. Devitt ML, Stafstrom JP (1995) Cell cycle regulation during growth-dormancy cycles in pea axillary buds. Plant Mol Biol 29:255–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Doebley J, Stec A, Hubbard L (1997) The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386:485–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Doust AN (2007) Grass architecture: genetic and environmental control of branching. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:21–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Doust AN, Devos KM, Gadberry MD, Gale MD, Kellogg EA (2004) Genetic control of branching in foxtail millet. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9045–9050PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dun EA, Ferguson BJ, Beveridge CA (2006) Apical dominance and shoot branching. Divergent opinions or divergent mechanisms? Plant Physiol 142:812–819PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dun EA, Brewer PB, Beveridge CA (2009) Strigolactones: discovery of the elusive shoot branching hormone. Trends Plant Sci 14:364–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferguson BJ, Beveridge CA (2009) Roles for auxin, cytokinin and strigolactone in regulating shoot branching. Plant Physiol 149:1929–1944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Finlayson S (2007) Arabidopsis TEOSINTE BRANCHED1-LIKE1 regulates axillary bud outgrowth and is homologous to monocot TEOSINTE BRANCHED1. Plant Cell Physiol 48:667–677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Foo E, Bullier E, Goussot M, Foucher F, Rameau C, Beveridge CA (2005) The branching gene RAMOSUS1 mediates interactions among two novel signals and auxin in pea. Plant Cell 17:464–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Foo E, Morris SE, Parmenter K, Young N, Wang H, Jones A et al (2007) Feedback regulation of xylem cytokinin content is conserved in pea and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 143:1418–1428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Foucher F, Morin J, Courtiade J, Cadioux S, Ellis N, Banfield MJ, Rameau C (2003) DETERMINATE and LATE FLOWERING are two TERMINAL FLOWER1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. Plant Cell 15:2742–2754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, Peuch-Pagès V, Dun EA, Pillot J-P et al (2008) Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 455:189–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Grbić B, Bleecker AB (2000) Axillary meristem development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 21:215–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hayward A, Stirnberg P, Beveridge CA, Leyser O (2009) Interactions between auxin and strigolactone in shoot branching control. Plant Physiol 151:400–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hecht V, Foucher F, Ferrándiz C, Macknight R, Navarro C, Morin J et al (2005) Conservation of Arabidopsis flowering genes in model legumes. Plant Physiol 137:1420–1434PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Horvath D (2009) Common mechanisms regulate flowering and dormancy. Plant Sci 177:523–531Google Scholar
  41. Hu W, Zhang S, Zhao Z, Sun C, Zhao Y, Luo D (2003) The analysis of the structure and expression of OsTB1 gene in rice. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol 29:507–514Google Scholar
  42. Humphrey AJ, Beale MH (2006) Strigol: biogenesis and physiological activity. Phytochemistry 67:636–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Husain SM, Linck AJ (1966) Relationship of apical dominance to the nutrient accumulation in Pisum sativum var. Alaska. Physiol Plant 19:992–1010Google Scholar
  44. Ishikawa S, Maekawa M, Arite T, Onishi K, Takamure I, Kyozuka J (2005) Suppression of tiller bud activity in tillering dwarf mutants of rice. Plant Cell Physiol 46:79–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jensen CS, Salchert K, Nielsen KK (2001) A TERMINAL FLOWER1-like gene from perennial ryegrass involved in floral transition and axillary meristem identity. Plant Physiol 125:1517–1528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jiang F, Li C, Jeschke WD, Zhang F (2001) Effect of top excision and replacement by 1-naphthylacetic acid on partition and flow of potassium in tobacco plants. J Exp Bot 52:2143–2150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnson X, Brcich T, Dun EA, Goussot M, Haurogné K, Beveridge CA et al (2006) Branching genes are conserved across species. Genes controlling a novel signal in pea are co-regulated by other long-distance signals. Plant Physiol 142:1014–1026PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kebrom TH, Brutnell TP (2007) The molecular analysis of the shade avoidance syndrome in the grasses has begun. J Exp Bot 58:3079–3089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kebrom TH, Burson BL, Finlayson SA (2006) Phytochrome B represses Teosinte Branched1 expression and induces sorghum axillary bud outgrowth in response to light signals. Plant Physiol 140:1109–1117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. King RA, Van Staden J (1988) Differential responses of buds along the shoot of Pisum sativum to isopentyladenine and zeatin application. Plant Physiol Biochem 26:253–259Google Scholar
  51. Kitazawa D, Miyazawa Y, Fujii N, Hoshino A, Iida S, Nitasaka E et al (2008) The gravity-regulated growth of axillary buds is mediated by a mechanism different from decapitation-induced release. Plant Cell Physiol 49:891–900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Klee H (2008) Plant biology: hormones branch out. Nature 455:176–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kyozuka J (2007) Control of shoot and root meristem function by cytokinin. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:442–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lang GA, Early JD, Martin GC, Darnell RL (1987) Endo-, para-, and eco-dormancy: physiological terminology and classification for dormancy research. Hortic Sci 22:371–377Google Scholar
  55. Leyser O (2008) Strigolactones and shoot branching: a new trick for a young dog. Dev Cell 15:337–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Leyser O (2009) The control of shoot branching: an example of plant information processing. Plant Cell Environ 32:694–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Li CJ, Bangerth F (1999) Autoinhibition of indoleacetic acid transport in the shoots of two-branched pea (Pisum sativum) plants and its relationship to correlative dominance. Physiol Plant 106:415–420Google Scholar
  58. Liew LC, Hecht V, Laurie RE, Knowles CL, Vander Schoor JK, Macknight RC, Weller JL (2009) DIE NEUTRALIS and LATE BLOOMER 1 contribute to regulation of the pea circadian clock. Plant Cell 21:3198–3211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lin H, Wang R, Qian Q, Yan M, Meng X, Fu Z et al (2009) DWARF27, an iron-containing protein required for the biosynthesis of strigolactones, regulates rice tiller bud outgrowth. Plant Cell 21:1512–1525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. López-Ráez JA, Charnikhova T, Gómez-Roldán V, Matusova R, Kohlen W, De Vos R, Verstappen F, Puech-Pages V, Bécard G, Mulder P, Bouwmeester H (2008) Tomato strigolactones are derived from carotenoids and their biosynthesis is promoted by phosphate starvation. New Phytol 178:863–874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. López-Ráez JA, Matusova R, Cardoso C, Jamil M, Charnikhova T, Kohlen W et al (2009) Strigolactones: ecological significance and use as a target for parasitic plant control. Pest Manag Sci 65:471–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Mader JC, Turnbull CGN, Emery RJN (2003) Transport and metabolism of xylem cytokinins during lateral bud release in decapitated chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seedlings. Physiol Plant 117:118–129Google Scholar
  63. Madoka Y, Mori H (2000) Acropetal disappearance of PsAD1 Protein in pea axillary buds after the release of apical dominance. Plant Cell Physiol 41:556–564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Matusova R, Rani K, Verstappen FWA, Franssen MCR, Beale MH, Bouwmeester HJ (2005) The strigolactone germination stimulants of the plant-parasitic Striga and Orobanche spp. are derived from the carotenoid pathway. Plant Physiol 139:920–934PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. McSteen P (2009) Hormonal regulation of branching in grasses. Plant Physiol 149:46–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. McSteen P, Leyser O (2005) Shoot branching. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:353–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Miyawaki K, Matsumoto-Kitano M, Kakimoto T (2004) Expression of cytokinin biosynthetic isopentenyltransferase genes in Arabidopsis: tissue specificity and regulation by auxin, cytokinin, and nitrate. Plant J 37:128–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Mockaitis K, Estelle M (2008) Auxin receptors and plant development: a new signaling paradigm. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24:55–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Morris DA (1977) Transport of exogenous auxin in two-branched dwarf pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.): some implication for polarity and apical dominance. Planta 136:91–96Google Scholar
  70. Morris DA, Johnson CF (1990) The role of auxin efflux carriers in the reversible loss of polar auxin transport in the pea (Pisum sativum L.) stem. Planta 181:117–124Google Scholar
  71. Morris SE, Cox MCH, Ross JJ, Krisantini S, Beveridge CA (2005) Auxin dynamics after decapitation are not correlated with the initial growth of axillary buds. Plant Physiol 138:1665–1672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Murfet IC, Symons GC (2000a) Double mutant rms2 rms5 expresses a transgressive, profuse branching phenotype. Pisum Genet 32:33–38Google Scholar
  73. Murfet IC, Symons GC (2000b) The pea rms2-1 rms4-1 double-mutant phenotype is transgressive. Pisum Genet 32:59–60Google Scholar
  74. Nakagawa M, Shimamoto K, Kyozuka J (2002) Overexpression of RCN1 and RCN2, rice TERMINAL FLOWER 1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs, confers delay of phase transition and altered panicle morphology in rice. Plant J 29:743–750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Napoli C (1996) Highly branched phenotype of the petunia dad1-1 mutant is reversed by grafting. Plant Physiol 111:27–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Napoli CA, Beveridge CA, Snowden KC (1999) Re-evaluating concepts of apical dominance and the control of axillary bud outgrowth. Curr Top Dev Biol 44:127–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Nordström A, Tarkowski P, Tarkowska D, Norbaek R, Åstot C, Dolezal K, Sandberg G (2004) Auxin regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a factor of potential importance for auxin-cytokinin-regulated development. Proc Nat Acad Sci 101(21):8039–8044PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Ongaro V, Leyser O (2008) Hormonal control of shoot branching. J Exp Bot 59:67–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Ongaro V, Bainbridge K, Williamson L, Leyser O (2008) Interactions between axillary branches of Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 1:388–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Ouellet F, Overoorde PJ, Theologis A (2001) IAA17/AXR3: biochemical insight into an auxin mutant phenotype. Plant Cell 13:829–841PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Phillips IDJ (1968) Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium distribution in relation to apical dominance in dwarf bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, c.v. Canadian Wonder). J Exp Bot 19:617–627Google Scholar
  82. Pnueli L, Gutfinger T, Hareven D, Ben-Nairn O, Ron N, Adir N et al (2001) Tomato SP-interacting proteins define a conserved signalling system that regulates shoot architecture and flowering. Plant Cell 13:2687–2702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Prasad TK, Cline MG (1985) Shoot inversion-induced ethylene in Pharbitis nil induces the release of apical dominance by restricting shoot elongation. Plant Sci 38:163–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Ratcliffe OJ, Amaya I, Vincent CA, Rothstein S, Carpenter R et al (1998) A common mechanism controls the life cycle and architecture of plants. Development 125:1609–1615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Reed JW, Nagpal P, Poole DS, Furuya M, Chory J (1993) Mutations in the gene for the red/far-red light receptor phytochrome B alter cell elongation and physiological responses throughout Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell 5:147–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Robson PRH, Whitelam GC, Smith H (1993) Selected components of the shade-avoidance syndrome are displayed in a normal manner in mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica rapa deficient in phytochrome B. Plant Physiol 102:1179–1184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Rubio V, Bustos R, Irigoyen ML, Cardona-López X, Rojas-Triana M, Paz-Ares J (2009) Plant hormones and nutrient signaling. Plant Mol Biol 69:361–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Sachs T, Thimann K (1964) Release of lateral buds from apical dominance. Nature 201:939–940Google Scholar
  89. Sachs T, Thimann KV (1967) The role of auxins and cytokinins in the release of buds from dominance. Am J Bot 54:136–144Google Scholar
  90. Shalit A, Rozman A, Goldshmidt A, Alvarez JP, Bowman JL, Eshed Y et al (2009) The flowering hormone florigen functions as a general systemic regulator of growth and termination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:8392–8397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Shen H, Luong P, Huq E (2007) The F-box protein MAX2 functions as a positive regulator of photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 145:1471–1483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Shimizu S, Mori H (1998) Analysis of cycles of dormancy and growth in pea axillary buds based on mRNA accumulation patterns of cell cycle-related genes. Plant Cell Physiol 39:255–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Shimizu-Sato S, Mori H (2001) Control of outgrowth and dormancy in axillary buds. Plant Physiol 127:1405–1413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Shimizu-Sato S, Ike Y, Mori H (2008) PsRBR1 encodes a pea retinoblastoma-related protein that is phosphorylated in axillary buds during dormancy-to-growth transition. Plant Mol Biol 66:125–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Shimizu-Sato S, Tanaka M, Mori H (2009) Auxin-cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branching. Plant Mol Biol 69:429–435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Snowden KC, Napoli CA (2003) A quantitative study of lateral branching in petunia. Funct Plant Biol 30:987–994Google Scholar
  97. Stafstrom JP (1993) Axillary bud development in pea: apical dominance, growth cycles, hormonal regulation and plant architecture. In: Amasino RM (ed) Cellular communication in plants. Plenum Press, New York, pp 75–86Google Scholar
  98. Stafstrom JP, Sussex IM (1988) Patterns of protein synthesis in dormant and growing vegetative buds of pea. Planta 176:497–505Google Scholar
  99. Stafstrom JP, Sussex IM (1992) Expression of a ribosomal protein gene in axillary buds of pea seedlings. Plant Physiol 100:1494–1502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ (1992) Rapid alteration in growth rate and electric potentials upon stem excision in pea seedlings. Planta 187:523–531PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Stirnberg P, van de Sande K, Leyser HMO (2002) MAX1 and MAX2 control shoot lateral branching in Arabidopsis. Development 129:1131–1141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Stirnberg P, Furner IJ, Leyser HMO (2007) MAX2 participates in an SCF complex which acts locally at the node to suppress shoot branching. Plant J 50:80–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Takeda T, Suwa Y, Suzuki M, Kitano H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M et al (2003) The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. Plant J 33:513–520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Takei K, Ueda N, Aoki K, Kuromori T, Hirayama T, Shinozaki K et al (2004) AtIPT3 is a key determinant of nitrate-dependent cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 45:1053–1062PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Tanaka M, Takei K, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Mori H (2006) Auxin controls local cytokinin biosynthesis in the nodal stem in apical dominance. Plant J 45:1028–1036PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Taylor SA, Murfet IC (1994) A short day mutant in pea is deficient in the floral stimulus. Flower Newsl 18:39–43Google Scholar
  107. Thimann KV, Skoog F (1933) Studies on the growth hormone of plants III. The inhibiting action of the growth substance on bud development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 19:714–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Thimann KV, Skoog F (1934) On the inhibition of bud development and other functions of growth substances in Vicia faba. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 114:317–339Google Scholar
  109. Turnbull CGN, Raymond MAA, Dodd IC, Morris SE (1997) Rapid increases in cytokinin concentration in lateral buds of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) during the release of apical dominance. Planta 202:271–276Google Scholar
  110. Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S, Akiyama K, Arite T, Takeda-Kamiya N et al (2008) Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 455:195–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Wang G, Römheld V, Li C, Bangerth F (2006) Involvement of auxin and CKs in boron deficiency induced changes in apical dominance of pea plants (Pisum sativum L.). J Plant Physiol 163:591–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Weberling F (1989) Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  113. Weller JL, Hecht V, Liew LC, Sussmilch FC, Wenden B, Knowles CL et al (2009) Update on the genetic control of flowering in garden pea. J Exp Bot 60:2493–2499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Woo HE, Chung KM, Park JH, Oh SA, Ahn T, Hong SH et al (2001) ORE9, an F-box protein that regulates leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13:1779–1790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Yan H, Saika H, Maekawa M, Takamure I, Tsutsumi N, Kyozuka J, Nakazono M (2007) Rice tillering dwarf mutant dwarf3 has increased leaf longevity during darkness-induced senescence or hydrogen peroxide-induced cell death. Genes Genet Syst 82:361–366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Yang HY, Li CJ, Zhang FS (2007) Shoot apex demand determines assimilate and nutrients partitioning and nutrient-uptake rate in tobacco plants. J Integr Plant Biol 49:1654–1661Google Scholar
  117. Yoneyama K, Yoneyama K, Takeuchi Y, Sekimoto H (2007) Phosphorus deficiency in red clover promotes exudation of orobanchol, the signal for mycorrhizal symbionts and germination stimulant for root parasites. Planta 225(4):1031–1038PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Zou J, Zhang S, Zhang W, Li G, Chen Z, Zhai W et al (2006) The rice HIGH-TILLERING DWARF1 encoding an orthologue of Arabidopsis MAX3 is required for negative regulation of the outgrowth of axillary buds. Plant J 48:687–696PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanya Waldie
    • 1
  • Alice Hayward
    • 1
  • Christine Anne Beveridge
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences and Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Integrative Legume ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations