Auxin–cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branching
- 5.4k Downloads
In many plant species, the intact main shoot apex grows predominantly and axillary bud outgrowth is inhibited. This phenomenon is called apical dominance, and has been analyzed for over 70 years. Decapitation of the shoot apex releases the axillary buds from their dormancy and they begin to grow out. Auxin derived from an intact shoot apex suppresses axillary bud outgrowth, whereas cytokinin induced by decapitation of the shoot apex stimulates axillary bud outgrowth. Here we describe the molecular mechanisms of the interactions between auxin and cytokinin in the control of shoot branching.
KeywordsAdenosine phosphate-isopentenyltransferase Apical dominance Basipetal auxin flow Cytokinin oxidase Pea PIN1 Shoot branching
Shoot apical meristem
2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid
Apical dominance is a phenomenon in which a main shoot in an intact plant grows predominantly while suppressing the outgrowth of axillary buds. After loss of the main shoot, the dormant axillary buds immediately begin to grow out as a main shoot to replace the lost apex, thereby allowing the plant to survive (Cline 1991; Shimizu-Sato and Mori 2001). A main shoot derives from the activity of the primary shoot apical meristem (SAM), which arises during embryogenesis (Kerstetter and Hake 1997). Axillary buds also derive from the primary SAM in a developmental process that generally involves two phases. (1) The axillary meristem is formed from groups of meristematic cells, which originate directly from detached parts of the primary SAM of the main shoot. The axillary meristem produces axillary buds located on the axil of the leaf primordia. (2) After axillary buds are fully developed and have reached a certain size depending on the plant species, growth ceases and the axillary bud becomes dormant. In Arabidopsis, pea, petunia, and tomato, some mutants show a phenotype that is characteristic of a specific developmental phase of the axillary buds. For example, the lateral suppressor (ls) mutant in tomato shows decreased branching, because the ls mutation prevents the initiation of axillary meristems during the vegetative phase (Malayer and Guard 1964). The more axillary growth (max) mutant of Arabidopsis shows enhanced shoot branching (Stirnberg et al. 2002), caused by the release of dormant axillary buds.
Shoot branching has an important role in generating a large variety of diverse plant forms, because the degree of apical dominance varies depending on the plant species. Branching pattern complexity also depends on plant age. Generally, older plants show weaker apical dominance resulting in a bushier form in which the total number of leaves or flowers are increased to be more fruitful. Shoot branching is controlled by environmental cues (such as light strength and nutrition) as well as by temporal and spatial developmental programs (Cline 1996). In some species, axillary buds of plants damaged by excessive bending continue to grow in the intact shoot apex, suggesting that gravity is also one of the environmental cues that controls axillary bud outgrowth. Interestingly, gravity-regulated release from apical dominance seems to be distinct and unique from decapitation-regulated release from apical dominance (Kitazawa et al. 2008). When the upper part of the main shoot of the Japanese morning glory (Pharbitis nil) is bent down, the axillary buds located on the uppermost node of the bent region begin to grow. Despite this phenomenon, shoot bending does not induce significant changes in either the cytokinin (CK) level or the auxin response, which are typical responses to the release from apical dominance caused by decapitation. The response to gravity, therefore, might be a separate molecular mechanism for survival.
Apical dominance is regulated by two plant hormones, auxin and CK. In this review, we describe the molecular mechanisms underlying the interactions between auxin and CK in the control of shoot branching. Recently, studies of a series of recessive mutants with enhanced shoot branching revealed that a third novel hormone is also involved in inhibiting the outgrowth of axillary buds. These mutants include the pea ramosus (rms) mutant, the petunia decreased apical dominance (dad) mutant, the Arabidopsis more axillary growth (max) mutant, and the rice dwarf (d) and high-tillering dwarf (htd) mutants (Beveridge et al. 1994; Napoli 1996; Stirnberg et al. 2002; Ishikawa et al. 2005). Dun et al. and Ongaro and Leyser have provided excellent reviews of other important signals involved in shoot branching (Dun et al. 2006; Ongaro and Leyser 2008).
The basipetal auxin flow in the stem suppresses axillary bud outgrowth
More than 70 years ago, Thimann et al. reported that decapitation of Vicia spp. plants induces axillary bud outgrowth, whereas the application of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) to the stump prevents axillary bud outgrowth (Thimann and Skoog 1934). Axillary bud growth cannot be prevented by the direct application of auxin to the axillary buds after decapitation. Further, radiolabeled auxin applied to the stump is not transported into the axillary buds (Hall and Hillman 1975). These findings indicate that auxin does not directly prevent axillary bud outgrowth. Stump application of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, which cannot be transported basipetally in plants, also does not prevent the outgrowth of axillary buds (Brown et al. 1979). The auxin-transport inhibitor 2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) in lanolin applied to the stem of an intact plant can, however, reduce or abolish apical dominance (Snyder 1949). These observations indicate that basipetal auxin flow derived from a shoot apex inhibits axillary bud outgrowth.
Auxin, produced mainly in young leaves and in the shoot apex (Ljung et al. 2001), is transported basipetally down the stem in a polar manner by active transport in the vascular parenchyma (Lomax et al. 1995). Several proteins regulate auxin transport, such as the auxin efflux carriers PIN-FORMED (PIN) and p-glycoprotein, and the auxin influx facilitators AUXIN RESISTANT 1 (AUX1)/LIKE-AUX1 (LAX) (Okada et al. 1991; Marchant et al. 1999; Murphy et al. 2002). Although the molecular mechanisms of active auxin transport are becoming clear, it remains unknown how auxin flow derived from the shoot apex induces axillary buds to enter dormancy.
CK promotes axillary bud outgrowth
The effects of CK in apical dominance are antagonistic to those of auxin. Direct application of CK to axillary buds promotes axillary bud outgrowth, even in intact plants (Wickson and Thimann 1958). To date, CK is the only chemical known to release axillary buds from dormancy. After decapitation in chickpea, CK levels in the axillary buds increase 7-fold within 6 h and 25-fold within 24 h, and axillary bud outgrowth is well correlated with the CK level in the axillary buds (Turnbull et al. 1997). Roots are the main CK-producing organ in plants, and CK biosynthesized in the root system is transported into the shoot system via the xylem (Hopkins and Huner 2004). CK levels in bean xylem exudates increase within 16 h after decapitation and gradually return to basal levels (Bangerth 1994). Application of 1-naphthylacetic acid to the stump prevents the increase in CK in the bean xylem exudates (Li et al. 1995). These observations led to the suggestion that CK derived from roots promotes axillary bud outgrowth after decapitation, and auxin derived from a shoot apex regulates CK transport in plants (Letham 1994). It is now known, however, that the CK that promotes axillary bud outgrowth after decapitation is locally biosynthesized in the nodal stem rather than in the roots (Tanaka et al. 2006), as described below.
An adenosine phosphate-isopentenyltransferase (IPT) gene is expressed specifically in nodal stems after decapitation
Several molecular approaches have been used to characterize the biochemical events associated with axillary bud dormancy and outgrowth. In pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) axillary buds, the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle control during the dormancy-to-growth transition were characterized based on the expression patterns of cell cycle regulators such as histone H4 (S phase marker), cyclinB (G2/M phase marker), cyclinD (G1 phase marker), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (G1/S phase marker) (Shimizu and Mori 1998). These analyses demonstrated that for every 2-cm increase in the distance from the site of decapitation to the second node, there is a 2-h delay in the induction of proliferating cell nuclear antigen mRNA in the axillary buds (Shimizu-Sato et al. unpublished data). This finding suggests that sustained outgrowth of the axillary bud is regulated by a decrease in the auxin level in the stem around the second node, although the rapid but transient initial growth of the axillary bud is dependent on hydrostatic pressure (McIntyre and Damson 1988) and independent of auxin (Morris et al. 2005). The genes, including IPT, expressed in nodal stems after decapitation were identified by a subtraction method using mRNA prepared from nodal stems before or after decapitation (Tanaka et al. 2006). IPT encodes a key enzyme in CK biosynthesis (Kakimoto 2001; Takei et al. 2001). Transgenic Agrobacterium tumefaciens plants overexpressing IPT exhibit elevated levels of CK, and reduced apical dominance (Medford et al. 1989). The petunia mutant sho, which was identified by activation tagging, also has increased levels of CK, and reduced apical dominance (Zubko et al. 2002). sho encodes an IPT protein. These observations indicate that IPT has an important role in the control of CK levels in plants. IPT cDNA has been identified and characterized in various plants such as Arabidopsis, rice, and maize (Kakimoto 2001; Takei et al. 2001). In pea, two full-length IPT cDNAs (PsIPT1 and PsIPT2) were isolated from the stem. PsIPT2 in the stem seems to have a main role in controlling axillary bud outgrowth after decapitation, because PsIPT2 was the only isolated clone identified from a subtracted library prepared from nodal stems after decapitation.
Auxin derived from a shoot apex suppresses local biosynthesis of CK in the nodal stem through the regulation of PsIPT expression
Members of the IPT family regulate CK levels in Arabidopsis in response to plant developmental processes (Miyawaki et al. 2004; Takei et al. 2004). In pea plants, PsIPT2 mRNA expressed transiently in the nodal stems increases at 1 h, reaches a maximum level at 3 h, decreases by 9 h, and is undetectable 24 h after decapitation. This expression pattern suggests that the induction of PsIPT2 mRNA in the nodal stem correlates with the release of dormant axillary buds, and that PsIPT2 is involved in CK biosynthesis to stimulate axillary bud outgrowth. Together, these results and the report that basipetal auxin transport in the pea stem is 1 cm h−1 (Johnson and Morris 1989) suggest that auxin derived from the shoot apex represses PsIPT2 expression in the nodal stem in intact plants, and that the depletion of auxin in the nodal stem immediately induces the expression of PsIPT2 mRNA after decapitation (Tanaka et al. 2006).
Some members of the Arabidopsis IPT family are downregulated by CK, and others are upregulated by auxin (Miyawaki et al. 2004). PsIPT2, however, is downregulated by auxin, as demonstrated by the following two experiments. (1) Decrease of PsIPT2 expression by exogenous IAA in nodal excised stem segments, in which PsIPT2 mRNA had accumulated. Three hours after decapitation 1 cm above the second node, nodal stem segments in which PsIPT2 mRNA was increased were excised. The excised nodal segments were incubated in 2-(N-morpholine)-ethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffer with or without IAA. Northern blot analyses showed that PsIPT2 mRNA was maintained at the same level in the IAA-free buffer, whereas it decreased immediately after incubation with IAA buffer. (2) Increase of PsIPT2 expression by IAA-depletion in nodal excised stem segments, in which PsIPT2 mRNA had been undetectable. The excised nodal segments from intact seedlings were incubated in MES buffer with or without IAA. Northern blot analyses demonstrated that PsIPT2 mRNA was induced in the IAA-free buffer, whereas it was not detected in the IAA buffer. In addition, PsIPT2 responds to the auxin level as well as the basipetal auxin flow in the stem, as indicated by the following two observations. (1) Induction of PsIPT2 mRNA is inhibited by the application of IAA in lanolin to the stump after decapitation. (2) PsIPT2 mRNA is induced by the application of TIBA in lanolin to the internode above the second node as well as by removal of the shoot apex. Auxin negatively regulates CK biosynthesis to control some plant developmental stages (Eklöf et al. 1997; Nordström et al. 2004), but there is little information on the molecular mechanisms occurring at the gene level. These above observations in pea plants indicate that auxin directly affects CK biosynthesis by regulating IPT expression, which is involved in the first step in CK biosynthesis.
CK is mainly synthesized in the root, which contains high levels of CK. In Arabidopsis, AtIPT1, AtIPT3, AtIPT5, and AtIPT7 transcripts are detected in the root (Miyawaki et al. 2004; Takei et al. 2004). In intact pea seedlings, the PsIPT2 expression level is very low in various organs, including root. Therefore, PsIPT2 may not contribute to CK biosynthesis in the root. PsIPT, however, may induce CK biosynthesis in the roots and other tissues to control various aspects of plant development. Members of the IPT family each have individual roles in controlling the complicated interactions between auxin and CK, depending on plant development.
Transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings containing the β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene under control of the PsIPT2 promoter region (2,025 bp) were generated to examine whether the depletion effect of auxin on PsIPT2 expression in pea is a common molecular mechanism in plants. The GUS gene was expressed before treatment with IAA, but GUS mRNA was completely depleted by IAA treatment for 5 h. This response of GUS expression to auxin in transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings is similar to that of PsIPT2 expression in the pea stem, suggesting that plants, at least, pea and Arabidopsis, have similar molecular mechanisms in which auxin suppresses PsIPT2 expression (Tanaka et al. 2006).
CK is locally biosynthesized in the nodal stem
CK is mainly biosynthesized in roots, and xylem exudates contain high levels of CK. Based on the changes in the levels of CK in xylem exudates, it was thought that CK is transported from the root to promote axillary bud outgrowth (Letham 1994). In pea, CK levels in the stem and axillary buds increase 3 h after decapitation despite the fact that PsIPT2 is not expressed in growing axillary buds; therefore, CK is biosynthesized in the stem and transported into axillary buds to promote their outgrowth after decapitation.
Axillary bud outgrowth occurs in excised nodal stem segments without the root (Tamas et al. 1989). In pea, the amount of CK synthesized in the excised stem segments is the same as that in the stem with an intact root. Application of IAA in lanolin to the stump inhibits the increase in CK in the excised nodal stem segments. Together, these observations indicate that the CK in the stem is biosynthesized in the nodal stem and not transported from the root. The amount of CK locally biosynthesized de novo in the nodal stems is sufficient for promoting axillary bud outgrowth.
PsPIN1 expression pattern follows the auxin flow in plants
PIN1 has a very important role in polar auxin transport, because the Arabidopsis loss of PIN1 mutant has a very severe phenotype. The distribution of PIN-family proteins in Arabidopsis root follows the auxin flow (Blilou et al. 2005). PsPIN1 was isolated as a gene expressed specifically in the nodal stem of intact pea seedlings in a subtraction experiment. Although Gocal et al. had previously reported IAA levels in axillary buds of Phaseolus vulgaris (Gocal et al. 1991), more detailed measurements of IAA levels in axillary buds and nodal stems were made before and after decapitation in pea plants (Tanaka et al. unpublished data). The decrease in the IAA level in the stem after decapitation corresponded to the decrease in PsPIN1 expression in the stem. When auxin flow is recovered by de novo biosynthesis in outgrowing axillary buds, PsPIN1 expression in the stem also recovers. In axillary buds, the IAA level is low during dormancy, and increases in outgrowing axillary buds. In a similar manner, the PsPIN1 expression level in dormant axillary buds is low, whereas it increases in outgrowing axillary buds. These findings suggest that the PsPIN1 expression pattern follows the auxin flow in the stem, both before and after decapitation.
The decrease in CK in the stem is also regulated by auxin through the regulation of cytokinin oxidase (CKX)
Endogenous plant hormone levels are controlled by biosynthesis and metabolism. CKX is the only enzyme that inactivates CK by irreversibly degrading active CK (Jones and Schreiber 1997), and is a key factor in controlling the endogenous levels of active CK (Werner et al. 2001). CKX cDNA has been identified and characterized in various plants, such as maize, Arabidopsis, rice, Hordeum vulgare, Dendrobium hybrid, and Dendrobium huoshanense (Houba-Hérin et al. 1999; Morris et al. 1999). Two CKX cDNAs (PsCKX1 and PsCKX2) from pea stem were isolated (Tanaka et al. unpublished data). PsCKX2 may contribute mainly to regulate CK levels in the stem, because PsCKX2 transcript levels are very high compared with those of PsCKX1 in the stem. PsCKX2 transcripts are expressed at a low level in the stem in intact plants. After decapitation, PsCKX2 mRNA is undetectable from 3 to 9 h after decapitation, and then rapidly increases after 9 h. The application of TIBA in lanolin to the stem causes a similar PsCKX2 expression pattern. These PsCKX2 expression patterns in the stem are opposite to the CK level patterns before and after decapitation, suggesting that PsCKX2 induces a decrease in CK levels in the stem.
In many cases, CKX activity and CKX mRNA are promoted by CK, indicating that CK levels are regulated by negative feedback through the regulation of CKX (Terrine and Laloue 1980; Brugière et al. 2003). On the other hand, auxin might induce some CKXs to regulate CK levels in various developmental processes in plants, because auxin induces the CKX activity during leaf development under canopy shade (Carabelli et al. 2007). In pea stem, PsCKX2 mRNA is strongly induced by auxin, indicating that auxin positively regulates PsCKX2 expression (Tanaka et al. unpublished data). The decrease in CK in the stem 12 h after decapitation might be caused by both the suppression of PsIPT2 expression and the induction of PsCKX2 in the stem. Auxin derived from the shoot apex might regulate CK levels in the stem by inducing CK degradation through the regulation of CKX expression, as well as by the suppression of CK biosynthesis through the regulation of IPT expression to control shoot branching. Plants seem to regulate plant hormone interactions to control developmental programs through complex crosstalk in which the hormones affect the expression of genes related to the biosynthesis as well as hormone metabolism.
A model of interactions between auxin and CK in shoot branching through functions of PsIPT, PsCKX, and PsPIN1
A third plant hormone involved in the control of shoot branching
Recently, strigolactone, a group of terpenoid lactones, was identified as a third plant hormone involved in the control of shoot branching (Gomez-Roldan et al. 2008; Umehara et al. 2008). Gomez-Roldan et al. and Umehara et al. demonstrated that the levels of strigolactones are significantly reduced in the roots of enhanced shoot branching mutants (max/rms/dwarf). Moreover, the bushy phenotype of these mutants can be restored toward wild type when exogenous strigolactones are supplied. Strigolactones were previously reported to be communication chemicals in symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that facilitate soil nutrient uptake. Parasitic weeds, Striga and Orobanche, utilize strigolactone as a plant-derived signal to promote seed germination. To survive under nutrient-deficient conditions, plants might use strigolactones as signal molecules to suppress shoot branching and to communicate with symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. At present, the strigolactone biosynthesis and signal transduction pathways are not clear, and there is still much to be learned about the relationships between strigolactones, auxin, and CK with regard to the control of shoot branching. More information about the interactions between these three plant hormones will provide further insight into the molecular mechanisms of shoot branching.
This work was supported in part by Grants-in Aid to H. M. from the Japan Ministry of Education, Sciences, Sports, and Culture (No. 19039015 and, 20061017). S. S.-S. has received Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists (No. 19045188).
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Brugière N, Jiao S, Hantke S, Zinselmeier C, Roessler JA, Niu X, Jones RJ, Habben JE (2003) Cytokinin oxidase gene expression in maize is localized to the vasculature, and is induced by cytokinins, abscisic acid, and abiotic stress. Plant Physiol 132:1228–1240. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.017707 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eklöf S, Åstot C, Blackwell J, Moritz T, Olsson O, Sandberg G (1997) Auxin–cytokinin interactions in wild-type and transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol 38:225–235Google Scholar
- Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, Puech-Pagès V, Dun EA, Pillot J-P, Letisse F, Matusova R, Danoun S, Portais J-C, Bouwmeester H, Bécard G, Beveridge CA, Rameau C, Rochange SF (2008) Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 455:189–194. doi: 10.1038/nature07271 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hopkins WG, Huner NPA (2004) Cytokinins are synthesized primarily in the root. In: Hopkins WG, Huner NP (eds) Introduction to plant physiology. Wiley, New York, pp 325–326Google Scholar
- Letham DS (1994) Cytokinin as phytohormones-sites of biosynthesis, translocation, and function of translocated cytokinin. In: Mok DWS, Mok MC (eds) Cytokinin: chemistry, activity, and function. CRC Press, Florida, pp 57–80Google Scholar
- Lomax TL, Muday GK, Rubery PH (1995) Auxin transport. In: Davies PJ (ed) Plant hormones: physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, pp 509–530Google Scholar
- Nordström A, Tarkowski P, Tarkowska D, Norbaek R, Åstot C, Dolezal K, Sandberg G (2004) Auxin regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a factor of potential importance for auxin–cytokinin-regulated development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8039–8044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402504101 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wickson M, Thimann KV (1958) The antagonism of auxin and kinetin in apical dominance. Physiol Plant 49:304–314Google Scholar