A combined strategy of “in silico” transcriptome analysis and web search engine optimization allows an agile identification of reference genes suitable for normalization in gene expression studies
- 644 Downloads
Traditionally housekeeping genes have been employed as endogenous reference (internal control) genes for normalization in gene expression studies. Since the utilization of single housekeepers cannot assure an unbiased result, new normalization methods involving multiple housekeeping genes and normalizing using their mean expression have been recently proposed. Moreover, since a gold standard gene suitable for every experimental condition does not exist, it is also necessary to validate the expression stability of every putative control gene on the specific requirements of the planned experiment. As a consequence, finding a good set of reference genes is for sure a non-trivial problem requiring quite a lot of lab-based experimental testing. In this work we identified novel candidate barley reference genes suitable for normalization in gene expression studies. An advanced web search approach aimed to collect, from publicly available web resources, the most interesting information regarding the expression profiling of candidate housekeepers on a specific experimental basis has been set up and applied, as an example, on stress conditions. A complementary lab-based analysis has been carried out to verify the expression profile of the selected genes in different tissues and during heat shock response. This combined dry/wet approach can be applied to any species and physiological condition of interest and can be considered very helpful to identify putative reference genes to be shortlisted every time a new experimental design has to be set up.
Keywords“In silico” analysis Literature search Reference genes RNA quantification
This work was supported by “AGRONANOTECH” (MiPAAF) project and by “VIGNA” project.
- Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput Netw 30:107–117Google Scholar
- Calishain T, Dornfest R (2004) Google Hacks, 2nd edn. O’Reilly, SebastopolGoogle Scholar
- Druka A, Muehlbauer G, Druka I, Caldo R, Baumann U, Rostoks N, Schreiber A, Wise R, Close T, Kleinhofs A, Graner A, Schulman A, Langridge P, Sato K, Hayes P, McNicol J, Marshall D, Waugh R (2006) An atlas of gene expression from seed to seed through barley development. Funct Integr Genomics 6:202–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Iskandar HM, Simpson RS, Casu RE, Bonnett GD, MacLean DJ, Manners JM (2004) Comparison of reference genes for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of gene expression in sugarcane. Plant Mol Biol Rep 22:325–337Google Scholar
- Sætre R, Tveit A, Steigedal TS, Lægreid A (2005a) Semantic annotation of biomedical literature using Google. In: Gervasi O et al (eds) Computational science and its applications—ICCSA 2005, LNCS 3482. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 327–337Google Scholar
- Sætre R, Tveit A, Ranang MT, Steigedal TS, Thommensen L, Stunes K, Lægreid A (2005b) gProt: annotating protein interactions using Google and gene ontology. 9th International conference on knowledge-based & intelligent information & engineering systems (Lecture notes in artificial intelligence). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3(7):research0034.1–0034.11Google Scholar