Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 62, Issue 1–2, pp 15–28

Nature of stress and transgene locus influences transgene expression stability in barley

Orignal paper

Abstract

Stress and the nature of the transgene locus can affect transgene expression stability. These effects were studied in two, stably expressing, T6 populations of barley (Hordeum vulgare): bombardment-mediated, multi-copy lines with ubiquitin-driven bar and uidA or single-copy lines from Ds-mediated gene delivery with ubiquitin-driven bar alone. Imposing the environmental stresses, water and nutrient deprivation and heat shock, did not reproducibly affect transgene expression stability; however, high frequencies of heritable transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) occurred following in vitro culture after six generations of stable expression in the multi-copy subline, T3#30, but not in the other lines studied. T3#30 plants with complete TGS had epigenetic modification patterns exactly like those in an identical sibling subline, T3#31, which had significant reduction in transgene expression in the T3 generation and was completely transcriptionally silenced in the absence of imposed stresses in the T6 generation. Complete TGS in T3#30 plants correlated with methylation in the 5′UTR and intron of the ubi1 promoter complex and condensation of chromatin around the transgenes; DNA methylation likely occurred prior to chromatin condensation. Partial TGS in T3#30 also correlated with methylation of the ubi1 promoter complex, as occurred with complete TGS. T3#30 has a complex transgene structure with inverted repeat transgene fragments and a 3′-LTR from a barley retrotransposon, and therefore the transgene locus itself may affect its tendency to silence after in vitro culture and transgene silencing might result from host defense mechanisms activated by changes in plant developmental programming and/or stresses imposed during in vitro growth.

Keywords

Barley Chromatin condensation Environmental stress In vitro culture DNA methylation Transgene silencing 

Abbreviations

2,4-D

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

BAP

6-benzylaminopurine

IBA

indole butyric acid

MS

Murishige and Skoog

RWC

relative water content

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnaud P, Goubely C, Pélissier T, Deragon J-M (2000) SINE retrotransposons can be used in vivo as nucleation centers for de novo methylation. Mol Cell Biol 20:3434–3441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bregitzer P, Tonks D (2003) Inheritance and expression of transgenes in barley, Hordeum vulgare. L Crop Sci 43:4–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bregitzer P, Zhang S, Cho M-J, Lemaux PG (2002) Reduced somaclonal variation in barley is associated with culturing highly differentiated, meristematic tissues. Crop Sci 42:1303–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassells AC, Curry RF (2001) Oxidative stress and physiological, epigenetic and genetic variability in plant tissue culture: implications for micropropagators and genetic engineers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 64:145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen W, Provart NJ, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F, Chang HS, Eulgem T, Mauch F, Luan S, Zou G, Whitham SA, Budworth PR, Tao Y, Xie Z, Chen X, Lam S, Kreps JA, Harper JF, Si-Ammour A, Mauch-Mani B, Heinlein M, Kobayashi K, Hohn T, Dangl JL, Wang X, Zhu T (2002) Expression profile matrix of Arabidopsis transcription factor genes suggests their putative functions in response to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 14:559–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen AH, Quail PH (1996) Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high-level expression of selectable and or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants. Transgenic Res 5:213–218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conner AJ, Mlynárová L, Stiekema WJ, Nap JP (1998) Meiotic stability of transgene expression is unaffected by flanking matrix-associated region. Mol Breeding 4:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper B, Clarke JD, Budworth P, Kreps J, Hutchison D, Park S, Guimil S, Dunn M, Luginbühl P, Ellero C, Goff SA, Glazebrook J (2003) A network of rice genes associated with stress response and seed development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:4945–4950PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. De Wilde C, Van Houdt H, De Buck S, Angenon G, De Jaeger G, Depicker A (2000) Plants as bioreactors for protein production: avoiding the problem of transgene silencing. Plant Mol Biol 43:347–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finnegan EJ, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (1996) Reduced DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana results in abnormal plant development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:8449–8454PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Finnegan EJ, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (2000) DNA methylation, a key regulator of plant development and other processes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10:217–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grandbastien MA (1998) Activation of plant retrotransposons under stress conditions. Trends Plant Sci 3:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halpin C (2005) Gene stacking in transgenic plants—The challenge for 21st century plant biotechnology. Plant Biotech J 3:141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunter CP (1988) Plant regeneration from microspores of barley, Hordeum vulgare. Wye College, University of London, Ashford, KentGoogle Scholar
  15. Iglesias VA, Moscone EA, Papp I, Neuhuber F, Michalowski S, Phelan T, Spiker S, Matzke M, Matzke AJM (1997) Molecular and cytogenetic analyses of stably and unstably expressed transgene loci in tobacco. Plant Cell 9:1251–1264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobsen SE, Sakai H, Finnegan EJ, Cao X, Meyerowitz EM (2000) Ectopic hypermethylation of flower-specific genes in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 10:179–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaenisch R, Bird A (2003) Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet 33:245–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. James VA, Avart C, Worland B, Snape JW, Vain P (2002) The relationship between homozygous and hemizygous transgene expression levels over generations in populations of transgenic rice plants. Theor Appl Genet 104:553–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kakutani T, Jeddeloh JA, Flowers SK, Munakata K, Richards EJ (1996) Developmental abnormalities and epimutations associated with DNA hypomethylation mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:12406–12411PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Kashkush K, Feldman M, Levy AA (2002) Transcriptional activation of retrotransposons alters the expression of adjacent genes in wheat. Nat Genet 33:102–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Köhne S, Neumann K, Pühler A, Broer I (1998) The heat-treatment induced reduction of the pat gene encoded herbicide resistance in Nicotiana tabacum is influenced by the transgene sequence. J Plant Physiol 153:631–642Google Scholar
  22. Koprek T, McElroy D, Louwerse J, Williams-Carrier R, Lemaux PG (2000) An efficient method for dispersing Ds elements in the barley genome as a tool for determining gene function. Plant J 24:253–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koprek T, Rangel S, McElroy D, Louwerse JD, Williams-Carrier RE, Lemaux PG (2001) Transposon-mediated single-copy gene delivery leads to increased transgene expression stability in barley. Plant Physiol 125:1354–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kranthi Kumar P, Subrahmanyam NC (1999) Molecular changes at Rrn loci in barley (Hordeum vulgare L) hybrids with H bulbosum L). Genome 42:1127–1133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krishna JP (2001) Environmental influences on gene silencing. ISB News, August 2001Google Scholar
  26. Kumpatla SP, Chandrasekharan MB, Iyer LM, Li G, Hall TC (1998) Genome intruder scanning and modulation systems and transgene silencing. Trends Plant Sci 3:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li E (2002) Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet 3:622–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li G, Hall TC, Holmes-Davis R (2002) Plant chromatin: development and gene control. Bioessays 24:234–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martienssen R, Barkan A, Taylor WC, Freeling M (1990) Somatically heritable switches in the DNA modification of Mu transposable elements monitored with a suppressible mutant in maize. Genes Dev 4:331–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Matzke AJM, Neuhuber F, Park YD, Ambros PF, Matzke MA (1994) Homology-dependent gene silencing in transgenic plants: Epistatic silencing loci contain multiple copies of methylated transgenes. Mol Gen Genet 244:219–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matzke MA, Matzke AJM, Eggleston WB (1996) Paramutation and transgene silencing: a common response to invasive DNA? Trends Plant Sci 11:382–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matzke MA, Mette MF, Matzke AJM (2000) Transgene silencing by the host genome defense: implications for the evolution of epigenetic control mechanisms in plants and vertebrates. Plant Mol Biol 43:401–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matzke MA, Aufsatz W, Kanno T, Mette MF, Matzke AJ (2002) Homology-dependent gene silencing and host defense in plants. Adv Genet 46:235–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meng L, Bregitzer P, Zhang S, Lemaux PG (2003) Exon/intron region in Ubi1 promoter complex involved in transgene silencing in barley. Plant Mol Biol 53:327–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meng L, Lemaux PG (2003) A simple and rapid method for nuclear run-on transcription assays in plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 21:65–71Google Scholar
  36. Meyer P, Linn F, Heidmann I, Meyer H, Niedenhof I, Saedler H (1992) Endogenous and environmental factors influence 35S promoter methylation of a maize A1 gene construct in transgenic petunia and its colour phenotype. Mol Gen Genet 231:345–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meza TJ, Kamfjord D, Hakelien AM, Evans I, Godager LH, Mandal A, Jakobsen KS, Aalen RB (2001) The frequency of silencing in Arabidopsis thaliana varies highly between progeny of siblings and can be influenced by environmental factors. Transgenic Res 10:53–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morino K, Olsen O-A, Shimamoto K (1999) Silencing of an aleurone-specific gene in transgenic rice is caused by a rearranged transgene. Plant J 17:275–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neumann K, Dröge-Laser W, Köhne S, Broer I (1997) Heat treatment results in a loss of transgene-encoded activities in several tobacco lines. Plant Physiol 115:939–947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orlando V (2003) Polycomb, epigenomes, and control of cell identity. Cell 112:599–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Palauqui JC, Vaucheret H (1995) Field trial analysis of nitrate reductase co-suppression: a comparative study of 38 combinations of transgene loci. Plant Mol Biol 29:149–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reik W, Dean W, Walter J (2001) Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 293:1089–1093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ronemus MJ, Galbiati M, Ticknor C, Chen J, Dellaporta SL (1996) Demethylation-induced developmental pleiotropy in Arabidopsis. Science 273:654–657PubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  44. Sheldon CC, Burn JE, Perez PP, Metzger J, Edwards JA, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (1999) The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation. Plant Cell 11:445–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vain P, James V, Worland B, Snape J (2002) Transgene behaviour across two generations in a large random population of transgenic rice plants produced by particle bombardment. Theor Appl Genet 105:878–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walter C, Broer I, Hillemann D, Pühler A (1992) High frequency, heat treatment-induced inactivation of the phosphinothricin resistance gene in transgenic single cell suspension cultures of Medicago sativa. Mol Gen Genet 235:189–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wan Y, Lemaux PG (1994) Generation of large numbers of independently transformed fertile barley plants. Plant Physiol 104:37–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Waterhouse PM, Wang M-B, Lough T (2001) Gene silencing as an adaptive defence against viruses. Nature 411:834–842PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant and Microbial BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley USA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural BotanyHebrew University of JerusalemRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations