Pasireotide treatment significantly reduces tumor volume in patients with Cushing’s disease: results from a Phase 3 study



In the multinational, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 B2305 study of patients with Cushing’s disease (CD; identifier NCT00434148), pasireotide substantially decreased urinary-free cortisol (UFC) levels, decreased mean corticotroph tumor volume, and improved clinical signs of disease. The current post hoc analysis further assesses the effects of pasireotide on corticotroph pituitary tumor volume.


Patients enrolled in the B2305 study had persistent or recurrent CD or newly diagnosed CD but were not surgical candidates. Enrollees were randomized to receive subcutaneous pasireotide, either 600-μg or 900-μg twice daily. Tumor volume was assessed independently at months 6 and 12 by 2 blinded radiologists and compared with baseline value and UFC response.


Of 162 patients enrolled in the trial, 53 had measurable tumor volume data and were included in the post hoc analysis. Reductions in tumor volume were both dose and time dependent. Tumor volume reduction was more frequently observed at month 6 in the 900-μg group (75%) than in the 600-μg group (44%). Similarly, at month 12 (n = 32), tumor volume reduction was observed more frequently in the 900-µg group (89%) than in the 600-µg group (50%). Control of UFC levels was not required for reduction of tumor volume. No relationship was noted between baseline tumor size and change in tumor size.


Measurable decreases in pituitary tumor volume were observed in a large proportion of patients with CD and measurable tumor volume who were enrolled in the trial and treated with subcutaneous pasireotide; this decrease was not correlated with UFC control. identifier



Cushing’s disease (CD), the most frequent cause of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome, is characterized by excess production of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) by a corticotroph pituitary tumor, leading to hypersecretion of cortisol by the adrenal glands [1,2,3,4,5,6]. CD is associated with a high burden of comorbidities, and uncontrolled CD is associated with increased morbidity and approximately a two to fivefold greater risk of death compared with controlled populations [1, 3, 5,6,7,8].

Selective transsphenoidal surgical removal of the corticotroph tumor is the recommended initial treatment for patients with CD [2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10]. Optimal surgical results depend on the expertise of the surgeon, with remission rates of 48.7% to 100% (mean 82.1%; median 85.7%) observed in patients with pituitary microadenomas and 30.8% to 100% (mean 62.3%; median 64.1%) in patients with macroadenomas [6]. Recurrence rates of 0% to 36.4% (mean 11.7%; median 10.9%) and 0% to 59% (mean 18.8%; median 13.9%) have been reported following initial remission in patients with microadenomas and macroadenomas, respectively. Long-term surgical failure, which includes disease persistence and recurrence after surgery, is reported to be greater in patients with macroadenomas (range 0–71.4%; mean 48.8%; median 52.2%) than in those with microadenomas (range 0–55.5%; mean 25%; median 21.2%). Repeat surgery is an option in the treatment of patients with persistent/recurrent disease, but it is associated with only 58% mean remission rates over an average of 5 years of follow-up and higher rates of complications, including pituitary insufficiency in an average of 38% of patients [2, 5, 6].

Because of their continued exposure to elevated cortisol levels, patients with persistent or recurrent CD pose a significant challenge for management. Optimal care depends on the effective use of other available therapeutic options, including repeat pituitary surgery, radiotherapy, or bilateral adrenalectomy, all of which should be adapted to each patient’s specific situation [2, 5, 6, 9,10,11,12].

Medical therapy is also an option for treatment of patients with CD; to date, the largest body of clinical experience has been obtained with the steroidogenesis inhibitors metyrapone and ketoconazole [2, 13,14,15]. In a limited number of retrospective studies in patients with CD, mean response rates were 71% for metyrapone and 64% for ketoconazole [6]. However, disadvantages of adrenal-directed medical therapy are that it does not treat the underlying tumor that causes CD and is associated with various adverse events including gastrointestinal-related events, hypokalemia, hypogonadism, hirsutism, and elevations in liver function test results [2, 10]. It has been proposed that pituitary-directed medical therapies may provide broader clinical benefit including tumor control as well as reversal of hypercortisolism [2, 13, 16].

Somatostatin receptors (SSRs) are highly expressed in corticotroph pituitary tumors—particularly SSR type 5 (SSR5)—and are therefore a logical target for pharmacologic inhibition [2, 4, 10, 16]. Pasireotide is a multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analog (SSA) that binds with high affinity to 4 of the 5 types of human SSR, but exhibits the greatest binding affinity for SSR5 [2, 10, 16, 17]. In corticotroph tumors, pasireotide binds to and activates the SSRs, resulting in inhibition of ACTH secretion, which in turn leads to decreased cortisol secretion [17]. In a Phase 3 trial in patients with CD (B2305; identifier NCT00434148), a 6-month treatment with subcutaneous (SC) pasireotide was associated with normalization of urinary-free cortisol (UFC) levels without the need for dose adjustment in 15% of patients treated with a 600-μg twice-daily (BID) dose and in 26% of patients treated with a 900-μg BID dose [18]. Marked improvements in signs and symptoms of CD as well as reductions in pituitary tumor volume were also observed in patients enrolled in the clinical trial. Further analysis of data from the trial demonstrated that significant improvements in signs and symptoms of CD were associated with progressive changes in UFC levels following pasireotide treatment [19]. The current report describes the results of a post hoc analysis that evaluated the effects of pasireotide on tumor volume by baseline tumor size in patients enrolled in the trial who had tumors at baseline that were measurable by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, the potential association between pasireotide-induced tumor volume control and UFC control was analyzed.


The B2305 study was a multinational, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating control of UFC by pasireotide in patients with confirmed persistent or recurrent CD or those with newly diagnosed CD who were not candidates for surgery (Fig. 1; full description of the trial design has been published previously) [18]. Patients were eligible for inclusion in the study if they were ≥ 18 years of age and had confirmed persistent or recurrent CD after surgery or newly diagnosed CD if they were not candidates for surgery. Inclusion criteria for active CD included a mean 24-h UFC level ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal (ULN) range, which was determined from four 24-h samples collected within 2 weeks; a morning plasma corticotropin level ≥ 5 ng/L (1.1 nmol/L); and a pituitary source of Cushing’s syndrome, which was confirmed through MRI identification of a pituitary macroadenoma, by bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling central-to-peripheral ACTH gradient > 2 basally or > 3 after corticotropin-releasing hormone or desmopressin stimulation in patients with microadenomas, or by histopathologic confirmation of an ACTH-staining tumor [18].

Fig. 1

Study design of the Phase 3 study. BID twice daily

Key exclusion criteria were pituitary irradiation within the previous 10 years, compression of the optic chiasm with secondary visual field defects, symptomatic cholelithiasis, and glycated hemoglobin level > 8% [18]. Patients who were receiving medical treatment for CD must have completed a washout period prior to baseline efficacy assessment [18]. The study was approved by independent review committees at the participating institutions and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice from the International Conference on Harmonization, and local laws. Each patient provided written informed consent.

Patients were randomly assigned to receive BID SC injections of pasireotide at doses of either 600 μg or 900 μg [18]. At month 6, patients with UFC levels above the ULN range could have had their doses increased by 300 μg BID (to a maximum of 1200 μg BID). Throughout the 12-month treatment period, the dose of pasireotide could be decreased in 300-μg increments BID, if required, because of adverse events such as uncontrolled hyperglycemia. Patients who had measurable pituitary tumors according to MRI assessments at baseline and at months 6 and/or 12 were evaluated in this analysis.

UFC levels

UFC levels were assessed monthly through month 6 and then every 3 months thereafter, and the assays were performed in a central laboratory as described previously [18]. Levels were calculated by obtaining the 24-h samples, which were collected within a 2-week period at all time points. The most recently available value (on the basis of ≥ 3 collections) between months 3 and 6 was carried forward if no UFC measurement was available for month 6. Patients who did not have valid UFC measurements available as well as those who discontinued the study medication before month 3 were considered to have uncontrolled hypercortisolism. Patients were considered to have normalized UFC (full UFC responders) if their UFC level was ≤ ULN at month 6 without a prior dose increase. Patients were considered to have partial UFC response if their level was > ULN but had a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline.

Pituitary tumor volume

Tumor volume assessments were determined with MRI scans performed at each site at baseline and at months 6 and 12 following treatment with pasireotide (or at the time of study drug discontinuation). In this subanalysis, patients who had tumor measurements within 40 days of the baseline evaluation were included. The MRI scans were sent to a central reader (Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc), and the reading of the images was performed by two independent radiologists who were blinded to the treatment dose as well as to the treatment time points. In case of disagreement between the 2 readers in their evaluation of the tumor volume, a third radiologist reviewed the data and selected the assessment of one of the readers. If the two readers agreed, the average tumor volume was used for the analysis. Tumor volume was assessed by extrapolation, after measuring the area of the serial MRI slices and then integrating them into a 3-dimensional structure using a computer model. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the reliability of tumor volume measurements from the two readers using a random-effects analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The ICC was 0.96, suggesting high agreement between the two readers’ assessments of tumor volume. Descriptive statistics (eg, mean) of actual tumor volumes and of changes in tumor volumes were used to represent results for each dose group. To assess frequency of tumor volume reduction after treatment, stratification of baseline tumor volume was performed based on median baseline tumor volume from patients with measurable tumors at both baseline and month 6. Number and percentages of patients with tumor volume decreases of 20%, 25%, and 50% from baseline are presented for the two treatment groups.


One hundred sixty-two patients (78% female, 22% male) were enrolled in the B2305 study (Table 1) [18]. Seventy-five patients had a measurable tumor at baseline on MRI. At baseline, median pituitary tumor volume was 0.24 cm3 (mean volume 1.10 cm3; range 0.04–12.42 cm3) in the 600-μg (n = 36) and 0.20 cm3 (mean volume 0.38 cm3; range 0.02–2.99 cm3) in the 900-μg groups (n = 39). Six patients (n = 3 in each of the treatment groups) had macroadenomas (tumor volume ≥ 1 cm3). Fifty-three patients had measurable tumor volume at both baseline and month 6 and were included in this analysis (600-μg group, n = 25; 900-μg group, n = 28; Table 1); only 11 of these patients had not undergone pituitary surgery. Thirty-two patients were included for whom tumor volume data were available at baseline and month 12 (600-μg, n = 14; 900-μg, n = 18; Table 1). The median baseline tumor was measured as 0.20 cm3.

Table 1 Patient characteristics

At month 6, there was a mean tumor volume decrease from baseline of 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] − 17.4% to 6.0%). In particular, there was a mean tumor volume increase of + 9.3% (95% CI − 8.9% to 27.5%) in the 600-μg group (n = 25) but a decrease of 19.0% (95% CI − 33.3% to − 4.7%; median − 28.9%) in the 900-μg group (n = 28). Tumor volume reduction was observed less frequently in the 600-μg group (44%) than in the 900-μg group (75%; Table 2). Tumor volume reductions of ≥ 25% were observed in 16% and 57% of patients in the 600- and 900-μg groups, respectively. Reductions of ≥ 50% of tumor volume were observed in 8% and 21% of patients in the 600- and 900-μg groups, respectively. At baseline, median pituitary tumor volumes were 0.24 and 0.20 cm3 in the 600- and 900-μg groups, respectively [18]. To assess frequency of tumor volume reduction from baseline at month 6 in the 53 patients with measurable tumors, patients were stratified into those with tumors > 0.2 cm3 and those ≤ 0.2 cm3 at baseline. In the 600-μg group, 5 of 16 tumors (31%) > 0.2 cm3 and 6 of 9 tumors (67%) ≤ 0.2 cm3 at baseline decreased in volume (Fig. 2). In the 900-μg group, 10 of 13 tumors (77%) > 0.2 cm3 at baseline and 11 of 15 tumors (73%) ≤ 0.2 cm3 in size at baseline decreased in volume.

Table 2 Changes in tumor volume at 6 and 12 months
Fig. 2

Percentage of tumor volume changes by baseline tumor volume at month 6 in a individual patients treated with pasireotide 900 μg and b individual patients treated with pasireotide 600 μg. UFC urinary-free cortisol. *Indicates full UFC responder. Indicates UFC partial responder

Differences were observed in the amount of tumor volume reduction in the 2 groups. In the 600-μg group, average changes from baseline in tumor volume (± standard error of mean) were 15.6% ± 10.0% and − 1.8% ± 17.0% in patients with tumors > 0.2 cm3 and ≤ 0.2 cm3, respectively. Conversely, in the 900-μg group, the average change from baseline in tumor volume (± standard error of mean) was –18.8% ± 8.2% and − 19.2% ± 11.2% in patients with tumors > 0.2 and ≤ 0.2 cm3, respectively. In patients with macroadenomas who were assigned to the 600-ug group, tumor volume increased in all 3 patients from baseline at month 6 (by 13%, 11%, and 36%). In patients assigned to the 900-ug group at month 6, a total of 2 out of 3 patients (67%) had a decrease in tumor volume from baseline by 25% and 1%, and 1 patient had a 43% increase in tumor volume.

At month 6, results of the descriptive analysis do not sufficiently establish a relationship between change in tumor volume and achievement of UFC control in either treatment group. In the 600-μg group, 1 of 25 (4%) patients with macroadenoma at baseline was a UFC full responder, and the patient had an 11% increase in tumor volume. Six (24%) patients were partial responders (ie, UFC > ULN but ≥ 50% reduction from baseline); 3 (12%) patients exhibited < 20% reductions in tumor volume, whereas tumor volume increased in 3 (12%) patients. Among 18 (72%) UFC nonresponders, 4 (22%) experienced < 20% reductions in tumor volume and 4 (22%) patients exhibited ≥ 20% decrease in tumor volume. Ten nonresponders of 18 (56%) experienced an increase in tumor volume. In the 900-μg group, 11 of 28 patients (39%) were full UFC responders, and tumor volume was reduced in 9 of 11 (82%) full UFC responders. Two full UFC responders (7%) exhibited increased tumor volume. Seven of 11 full responders (64%) exhibited ≥ 20% reduction in tumor volume, including 1 patient with macroadenoma at baseline, and 2 (18%) exhibited < 20% reduction. Two of 28 (7%) patients were partial responders, and ≥ 20% reductions in tumor volume were observed in both patients. Tumor volume was reduced in 10 of 15 (67%) patients who were not UFC responders, and the remaining 5 patients (33%) showed an increased tumor volume. Seven of 15 nonresponders (47%) experienced ≥ 20% reductions in tumor volume, and 3 patients (20%) experienced < 20% tumor volume reductions.

Although the number of evaluable patients was somewhat smaller at month 12 compared with month 6, a similar trend in tumor volume change was observed (Fig. 3). At month 12, there was a mean tumor volume decrease of 28.6% (95% CI − 49.6% to − 7.6%; median, 34.7%) from baseline. In the 600-μg group, there was a mean tumor volume decrease of 9.1% (95% CI 46.3% to 28.0%; median 4.2%; n = 14) and 7 of 14 (50%) patients experienced reductions in tumor volume (≥ 25% reduction in 5 patients and ≥ 50% in 4 patients). In this group, 2 of 3 patients (67%) with tumor volume reduction at month 6 experienced further reductions in tumor volume at month 12. The patient with macroadenomas and a 13% increase in tumor volume at month 6 experienced tumor volume decrease; the net increase from baseline at month 12 for this patient was 8%. One of 14 patients (7%) at month 12 achieved full control levels and 3 other patients achieved partial control of UFC levels. Seven patients (50%) with increased tumor volume at month 12 in the 600-μg group did not achieve full control of UFC levels; however, 1 of 7 patients (14%) achieved partial control of UFC levels. The remaining 6 patients (99%) continued to have uncontrolled UFC.

Fig. 3

Percentage of tumor volume changes by baseline tumor volume at month 6 (black bar) and at month 12 (white bar) in a individual patients treated with pasireotide 600 μg and b individual patients treated with pasireotide 900 μg. UFC urinary-free cortisol. *Indicates full UFC responder. Indicates UFC partial responder

At month 12, in the 900-μg group (n = 18), a decrease in mean tumor volume of 43.8% (95% CI 68.4% to 19.2%; median 42.0%) was observed. Sixteen of 18 (89%) patients experienced reductions in this group (≥ 20% reduction in 14 patients, ≥ 25% in 13 patients, and ≥ 50% in 7 patients). Thirteen of 16 (81%) patients with reductions in tumor volume at month 6 experienced further reductions in tumor volume at month 12. The patient with macroadenomas with 25% tumor volume reduction at month 6 from baseline experienced further reduction at month 12, with a total tumor reduction of 38% from baseline. Eight of 16 patients with tumor volume reduction (50%) at month 12 achieved full control, and none of the other patients in this 900-μg group achieved partial control of UFC levels at month 12. One of 2 patients (50%) who had increases in tumor volume at month 12 achieved full control of UFC levels; the remaining patient had uncontrolled UFC.

Of the 52 patients whose pituitary lesions were not detectable on MRI at baseline, only 1 of 15 (6.7%) patients receiving treatment at 6 months and 2 of 37 (5.4%) patients receiving treatment for 12 months developed a tumor visible on follow-up MRI.


The B2305 Phase 3 trial demonstrated substantial decreases in UFC levels, improvement in clinical signs of disease, and decreases in mean pituitary tumor volume in patients with CD who were treated with pasireotide [18, 19]. Our post hoc analysis was performed to further assess the effects of pasireotide on corticotroph tumor volume among patients enrolled in the trial. The results of the current study demonstrate a measurable decrease in MRI-detectable pituitary tumor volume in a majority of patients with CD who were treated with pasireotide 900 μg (75% at month 6; 89% at month 12), but in a smaller percentage of patients treated with pasireotide 600 μg (44% at month 6; 50% at month 12).

Interestingly, no relationship was established between tumor size at baseline (when considering whether tumors were > 0.2 cm3 or ≤ 0.2 cm3) and the frequency of change in tumor volume in response to pasireotide 900 μg at month 6. Although 2 of 3 patients with macroadenomas at baseline experienced tumor reductions at month 6 with the 900-μg dose of pasireotide, the small sample size precludes any meaningful conclusions for this subgroup. In contrast, patients treated with pasireotide 600 μg with tumors ≤ 0.2 cm3 were more likely to experience reductions in tumor volume than those with larger tumors. Interpretations of data regarding changes in tumor volume in tumors ≤ 0.2 cm3 are challenging because of the difficulties in accurately assessing the size of the tumor. Therefore, the frequency of tumor volume reduction in the smallest tumors in the study may be underrepresented, and it is possible that reductions in tumor volume may occur at either of the pasireotide 600 μg or 900 μg doses. Unfortunately, the number of patients with measurable tumor volume who had not undergone pituitary surgery was too few to allow for a meaningful separate analysis.

In 52 patients with residual corticotroph tumors not visible on MRI at baseline, only 3 patients developed tumors visible on MRI within 6 or 12 months of therapy with pasireotide. Tumor progression has been reported as 39% at 3 years, plateauing to 47% at 7 years following bilateral adrenalectomy in 46 patients with persistent or recurrent CD despite no visible residual tumor on imaging prior to adrenal surgery [20]. Comparative data are lacking on the progression of corticotroph tumors over time with or without other medical interventions and without bilateral adrenalectomy for the management of CD.

Somatic mutations in the ubiquitin-specific peptidase 8 gene (USP8), which prevents the degradation of epidermal growth factor receptors, were recently identified in 40% to 62% of corticotroph tumors from patients with CD [21,22,23]. The majority of tumors with USP8 mutations were smaller and produced relatively more ACTH than those without USP8 mutations. Levels of SSR5 receptors were significantly higher in the USP8-mutated tumors than in the wild-type tumors, suggesting that pasireotide may be more effective in the USP8-mutated tumors, which are mostly microadenomas, than in the macroadenomas, which less frequently carry USP8 mutations [21]. However, the status of USP8 and of SSR5 receptors in the smallest tumors (close to 50%, not detectable by MRI) is largely unknown because it is difficult to obtain sufficient tumor tissue to characterize their molecular status.

No correlation between tumor volume reduction and UFC control has been established, thereby suggesting that pasireotide may have independent actions on pathways that regulate hormone secretion and on those that regulate tumor growth. At month 6, in the 900-μg group, 43% (9 of 21) of patients with any tumor reduction from baseline were classified as full UFC responders, and 10% (2 of 21) of patients were partial UFC responders; in the 600-μg group, none of the patients with any tumor reduction from baseline were classified as full UFC responders, and 27% (3 of 11) of patients were partial UFC responders. At month 12, in the 600-μg group, 14% (1 of 7) of patients with any tumor reduction from baseline were classified as full UFC responders, 29% (2 of 7) of patients were partial UFC responders, and at month 12, in the 900-μg group, 50% (8 of 16) of patients with any tumor reduction from baseline were classified as full UFC responders, and of the remaining patients had uncontrolled UFC. In addition, of the 9 patients who experienced increases in tumor volume at month 12, 1 (11%) patient in the 900-μg group attained full UFC control, and 1 (4%) patient in the 600-μg group was considered a partial responder. These observations preclude any substantial correlation between UFC level normalization and tumor volume reduction. However, not all patients experience tumor volume reduction, and future studies may help identify factors that are important determinants of tumor volume response.

Limitations of the current analysis include the substantial number of patients enrolled in the study (69.5% of patients in the 600-μg group and 65% of those in the 900-μg group) who did not receive pasireotide for prolonged periods of time and thus lacked data for tumor volume measurements after baseline at months 6 and 12. Additionally, the apparent imbalance in baseline mean and median UFC levels between the 2 groups may have affected the overall efficacy observed in the study [18]. However, this analysis indicates a limited relationship between pasireotide-induced change in corticotroph tumor volume and UFC control, suggesting that UFC imbalances may not have affected tumor volume change in this study. Another potential limitation was the variability in assessing tumor volume changes, specifically, the accuracy of detecting small changes in volume in smaller tumors. For this reason, a threshold of ≥ 25% was considered to be a substantial change in tumor volume, which is consistent with other studies [24,25,26,27,28].

Taken together, the results of the current analysis demonstrate that treatment with pasireotide, a pituitary-directed medical therapy that targets SSRs, can frequently lead to radiologically measurable reductions in pituitary tumor volume in patients with CD. Tumor volume reduction is especially relevant in patients with larger microadenomas, suggesting that pasireotide is an attractive option for these patients, especially in cases in which patients cannot undergo transsphenoidal surgery or do not respond to surgical management of disease.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Arnaldi G, Angeli A, Atkinson AB et al (2003) Diagnosis and complications of Cushing's syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(12):5593–5602

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Biller BM, Grossman AB, Stewart PM et al (2008) Treatment of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing's syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(7):2454–2462

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Castinetti F, Morange I, Conte-Devolx B, Brue T (2012) Cushing's disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7:41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fleseriu M, Petersenn S (2013) New avenues in the medical treatment of Cushing's disease: corticotroph tumor targeted therapy. J Neurooncol 114(1):1–11

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lacroix A, Feelders RA, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK (2015) Cushing's syndrome. Lancet 386(9996):913–927

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pivonello R, De Leo M, Cozzolino A, Colao A (2015) The treatment of Cushing's disease. Endocr Rev 36(4):385–486

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Pivonello R, Isidori AM, De Martino MC, Newell-Price J, Biller BM, Colao A (2016) Complications of Cushing's syndrome: state of the art. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4(7):611–629

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    van Haalen FM, Broersen LH, Jorgensen JO, Pereira AM, Dekkers OM (2015) Management of endocrine disease: mortality remains increased in Cushing's disease despite biochemical remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 172(4):R143–R149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bertagna X, Guignat L (2013) Approach to the Cushing's disease patient with persistent/recurrent hypercortisolism after pituitary surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(4):1307–1318

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW et al (2015) Treatment of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100(8):2807–2831

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Blevins LS Jr, Sanai N, Kunwar S, Devin JK (2009) An approach to the management of patients with residual Cushing's disease. J Neurooncol 94(3):313–319

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nieman LK (2013) Update in the medical therapy of Cushing's disease. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 20(4):330–334

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Feelders RA, Hofland LJ (2013) Medical treatment of Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(2):425–438

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Castinetti F, Guignat L, Giraud P et al (2014) Ketoconazole in Cushing's disease: is it worth a try? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(5):1623–1630

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Daniel E, Aylwin S, Mustafa O et al (2015) Effectiveness of metyrapone in treating Cushing's syndrome: a retrospective multicenter study in 195 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100(11):4146–4154

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Moloney K, Mercado J, Ludlam W, Mayberg M (2012) Pasireotide (SOM230): a novel pituitary-targeted medical therapy for the treatment of patients with Cushing’s disease. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 7(5):491–502

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hofland LJ, van der Hoek J, Feelders R et al (2005) The multi-ligand somatostatin analogue SOM230 inhibits ACTH secretion by cultured human corticotroph adenomas via somatostatin receptor type 5. Eur J Endocrinol 152(4):645–654

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Colao A, Petersenn S, Newell-Price J et al, for the Pasireotide B2305 Study Group (2012) A 12-month phase 3 study of pasireotide in Cushing's disease. N Engl J Med 366:914–924

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pivonello R, Petersenn S, Newell-Price J et al (2014) Pasireotide treatment significantly improves clinical signs and symptoms in patients with Cushing's disease: results from a phase III study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 81(3):408–417

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Assié G, Bahurel H, Coste J et al (2007) Corticotroph tumor progression after adrenalectomy in Cushing's disease: a reappraisal of Nelson's Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(1):172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Reincke M, Sbiera S, Hayakawa A et al (2015) Mutations in the deubiquitinase gene USP8 cause Cushing's disease. Nat Genet 47(1):31–38

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ma ZY, Song ZJ, Chen JH et al (2015) Recurrent gain-of-function USP8 mutations in Cushing's disease. Cell Res. 25(3):306–317

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hayashi K, Inoshita N, Kawaguchi K et al (2016) The USP8 mutational status may predict drug susceptibility in corticotroph adenomas of Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol 174(2):213–226

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Simeoli C, Auriemma RS, Tortora F et al (2015) The treatment with pasireotide in Cushing's disease: effects of long-term treatment on tumor mass in the experience of a single center. Endocrine 50(3):725–740

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bevan JS, Atkin SL, Atkinson AB et al (2002) Primary medical therapy for acromegaly: an open, prospective, multicenter study of the effects of subcutaneous and intramuscular slow-release octreotide on growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-I, and tumor size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(10):4554–4563

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Edling KL, Heaney AP (2013) An update on the treatment of acromegaly. Res Rep Endocr Disord 3:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Giustina A, Mazziotti G, Torri V, Spinello M, Floriani I, Melmed S (2012) Meta-analysis on the effects of octreotide on tumor mass in acromegaly. PLoS ONE 7(5):e36411

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jimenez C, Burman P, Abs R et al (2008) Follow-up of pituitary tumor volume in patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant in clinical trials. Eur J Endocrinol 159(5):517–523

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Writing support was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. We thank all the investigators, study nurses, coordinators, and patients who contributed to or participated in the study. This study was supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Rajni Parthasarathy, PhD, Jeffrey Stumpf, PhD, and Sherri Damlo, ELS, of MedThink SciCom under the direction of the authors.


This study was supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Writing support was also funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Lacroix.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AL has received funding from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation to conduct clinical studies with pasireotide SC and osilodrostat (LCI699) in Cushing’s disease and served occasionally as a consultant, an advisory group member, or a speaker for Novartis, EMD Serono, and Ipsen. FG has served as a consultant, an advisory group member, an investigator, and a speaker for Novartis and Ipsen. JS has served as a lecturer, a researcher, and an advisory group member for Novartis, Ipsen and Pfizer. AK and AMP are employees of Novartis Pharma AG and hold stock options. LJ was employed by Novartis at the time of writing this manuscript but is currently employed by Bristol-Myers Squibb. RP has served as an investigator, a researcher, a consultant, and a speaker for Novartis, Viropharma, Shire, HRA Pharma, and Ipsen.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the protocol, the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, applicable local regulations (including European Directive 2001/20/EC and US Code of Federal Regulations Title 21), and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lacroix, A., Gu, F., Schopohl, J. et al. Pasireotide treatment significantly reduces tumor volume in patients with Cushing’s disease: results from a Phase 3 study. Pituitary 23, 203–211 (2020).

Download citation


  • Cushing’s disease
  • Pasireotide
  • Corticotroph tumor volume
  • Urinary-free cortisol