, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 430–435 | Cite as

Cerebrovascular complications and utilization of endovascular techniques following transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas: a study of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2001–2010

  • Waleed Brinjikji
  • Giuseppe Lanzino
  • Harry J. Cloft



Cerebrovascular complications following transsphenoidal resection of pituitary tumors are rare and often evaluated and treated with endovascular techniques. We determined the utilization rate and outcomes of endovascular procedures in transsphenoidal pituitary resection patients using an administrative database.


Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2001–2010, patients receiving transsphenoidal resection of benign pituitary tumors were identified. The rate of cerebrovascular complications and utilization of endovascular repair procedures and cerebral angiography were compared between high (≥75 procedures/year) and low volume (<75 procedures/year) centers. Chi squared tests were used to compare categorical variables.


70,878 were patients included in this study. ICH/SAH occurred in 0.9 % of patients (652/70,878) and stroke occurred in 0.5 % of patients (327/70,878). Patients treated at high volume centers had significantly lower rates of stroke (0.5 % vs. 1.0 %, P = 0.04), and ICH/SAH (0.5 vs. 1.0 %, P = 0.05) when compared to patients treated at low-volume centers. Overall, 531 patients (0.7 %) received post-operative angiography and 83 patients (0.1 %) received endovascular repair procedures. High volume center patients underwent angiography in 0.4 % of cases compared to 0.9 % for low volume center patients (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in endovascular repair procedure rates at high and low volume centers (0.1 vs. 0.2 %, P = 0.37).


Cerebrovascular surgical complications requiring cerebral angiography and endovascular repair are rare among transsphenoidal pituitary resection patients. These occur with higher frequency at low volume centers and are associated with high mortality rates.


Pituitary adenoma Transsphenoidal resection Endovascular Hospital outcomes Hemorrhage 


  1. 1.
    Berker M, Aghayev K, Saatci I, Palaoglu S, Onerci M (2010) Overview of vascular complications of pituitary surgery with special emphasis on unexpected abnormality. Pituitary 13(2):160–167. doi:10.1007/s11102-009-0198-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park YS, Jung JY, Ahn JY, Kim DJ, Kim SH (2009) Emergency endovascular stent graft and coil placement for internal carotid artery injury during transsphenoidal surgery. Surg Neurol 72(6):741–746. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.05.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kocer N, Kizilkilic O, Albayram S, Adaletli I, Kantarci F, Islak C (2002) Treatment of iatrogenic internal carotid artery laceration and carotid cavernous fistula with endovascular stent-graft placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23(3):442–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leung GK, Auyeung KM, Lui WM, Fan YW (2006) Emergency placement of a self-expandable covered stent for carotid artery injury during trans-sphenoidal surgery. Br J Neurosurg 20(1):55–57. doi:10.1080/02688690600601382 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cinar C, Bozkaya H, Parildar M, Oran I (2013) Endovascular management of vascular injury during transsphenoidal surgery. Interv Neuroradiol 19(1):102–109PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalia JS, Niu T, Zaidat OO (2009) The use of a covered stent graft for obliteration of high-flow carotid cavernous fistula presenting with life-threatening epistaxis. J Neurointerv Surg 1(2):142–145. doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.001040 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laws ER Jr, Lanzino G (2010) Transsphenoidal surgery, vol 1. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berman MF, Solomon RA, Mayer SA, Johnston SC, Yung PP (2003) Impact of hospital-related factors on outcome after treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 34(9):2200–2207. doi:10.1161/01.str.0000086528.32334.06 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ (2011) Patient outcomes are better for unruptured cerebral aneurysms treated at centers that preferentially treat with endovascular coiling: a study of the national inpatient sample 2001–2007. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(6):1065–1070. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2446 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Solomon RA, Mayer SA, Tarmey JJ (1996) Relationship between the volume of craniotomies for cerebral aneurysm performed at New York state hospitals and in-hospital mortality. Stroke 27(1):13–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ciric I, Ragin A, Baumgartner C, Pierce D (1997) Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience. Neurosurgery 40(2):225–236 Discussion 236–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fatemi N, Dusick JR, de Paiva Neto MA, Kelly DF (2008) The endonasal microscopic approach for pituitary adenomas and other parasellar tumors: a 10-year experience. Neurosurgery 63(4 Suppl 2):244–256. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000327025.03975.ba Discussion 256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Pant H, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Horowitz MB (2013) Carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: incidence and outcomes. Neurosurgery. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000430821.71267.f2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mamelak AN, Carmichael J, Bonert VH, Cooper O, Melmed S (2012) Single-surgeon fully endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: outcomes in three-hundred consecutive cases. Pituitary. doi:10.1007/s11102-012-0437-1 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dusick JR, Esposito F, Malkasian D, Kelly DF (2007) Avoidance of carotid artery injuries in transsphenoidal surgery with the Doppler probe and micro-hook blades. Neurosurgery 60(4 Suppl 2):322–328. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000255408.84269.a8 Discussion 328–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raymond J, Hardy J, Czepko R, Roy D (1997) Arterial injuries in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma; the role of angiography and endovascular treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18(4):655–665PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng Y, Zhang H, Su L, Tian Y, Zhang S, Zheng Y, Cui D, Li Y, Wang Y (2013) Anatomical study of cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery and its relationship to the structures in sella region. J Craniofac Surg 24(2):622–625. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182801f30 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang Y, Tian Y, Song J, Li Y, Li W (2012) Internal carotid artery in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. J Craniofac Surg 23(6):1866–1869. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826bf22a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Razak AA, Horridge M, Connolly DJ, Warren DJ, Mirza S, Muraleedharan V, Sinha S (2013) Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: early results in a single centre. Br J Neurosurg 27(1):40–43. doi:10.3109/02688697.2012.703353 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rhoton AL Jr (2002) The sellar region. Neurosurgery 51(4 Suppl):S335–S374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laws ER Jr, Kern EB (1976) Complications of trans-sphenoidal surgery. Clin Neurosurg 23:401–416PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Waleed Brinjikji
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Lanzino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Harry J. Cloft
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations