Phytochemistry Reviews

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 143–178 | Cite as

Pine monoterpenes and pine bark beetles: a marriage of convenience for defense and chemical communication

  • Steven J. Seybold
  • Dezene P. W. Huber
  • Jana C. Lee
  • Andrew D. Graves
  • Jörg Bohlmann
Article

Abstract

Pine-feeding bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) interact chemically with their host pines (Coniferales: Pinaceae) via the behavioral, physiological, and biochemical effects of one class of isoprenoids, the monoterpenes and their derivatives. Pine monoterpenes occur in the oleoresin and function as behaviorally active kairomones for pine bark beetles and their predators, presenting a classic example of tri-trophic chemical communication. The monoterpenes are also essential co-attractants for pine bark beetle aggregation pheromones. Ironically, pine monoterpenes are also toxic physiologically to bark beetles at high vapor concentrations and are considered an important component of the defense of pines. Research over the last 30 years has demonstrated that some bark beetle aggregation pheromones arise through oxygenation of monoterpenes, linking pheromone biosynthesis to the host pines. Over the last 10 years, however, several frequently occurring oxygenated monoterpene pheromone components (e.g., ipsenol, ipsdienol and frontalin) have also been shown to arise through highly regulated de novo pathways in the beetles (reviewed in Seybold and Tittiger, 2003). The most interesting nexus between these insects and their plant hosts involves the late-stage reactions in the monoterpenoid biosynthetic pathway, during which isomeric dimethylallyl diphosphate and isopentenyl diphosphate are ultimately elaborated to stereospecific monoterpenes in the trees and to hydroxylated monoterpenes or bicyclic acetals in the insects. There is signal stereospecificity in both production of and response to the monoterpenoid aggregation pheromones of bark beetles and in response to␣the monoterpenes of the pines. In the California fivespined ips, Ips paraconfusus, we have discovered a number of cytochome P450 genes that have expression patterns indicating that they may be involved in detoxifying monoterpene secondary metabolites and/or biosynthesizing pheromone components. Both processes result in the production of oxygenated monoterpenes, likely with varying degrees of stereospecificity. A behavioral analysis of the stereospecific response of I. paraconfusus to its pheromone is providing new insights into the development of an efficacious bait for the detection of this polyphagous insect in areas outside the western United States. In contrast, a Eurasian species that has arrived in California, the Mediterranean pine engraver, Orthotomicus (Ips) erosus, utilizes both a monoterpenoid (ipsdienol) and a hemiterpenoid (2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol) in its pheromone blend. The stereospecificity of the response of O. erosus to the monoterpenoid appears to be the key factor to the improved potency of the attractant bait for this invasive species.

Keywords

Aggregation pheromone Behavior Biosynthesis Coleoptera Host colonization Ipsdienol Ips paraconfusus Kairomone 2-Methyl-3-buten-2-ol Monoterpene Myrcene Orthotomicus erosus Pinus P450 Scolytidae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams MD, cooperators (2000) The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287:2185–2195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoyama T, Hardwick JP, Imaoka S, Funae Y, Gelboin HV, Gonzalez FJ (1990) Clofibrate-inducible rat hepatic P450s IVA1 and IVA3 catalyze the omega- and (omega-1)-hydroxylation of fatty acids and the omega-hydroxylation of prostaglandins E1 and F2 alpha. J␣Lipid Res 31:1477–1482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ascoli-Christensen A, Salom SM, Payne TL (1993) Olfactory receptor cell responses of Ips grandicollis (Eichhoff) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to intra- and interspecific behavioral chemicals. J Chem Ecol 19:699–712Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson R, Arey J (2003) Gas-phase tropospheric chemistry of biogenic volatile organic compounds: a review. Atmos Environ 37:S197–S219Google Scholar
  5. Bakke A (1983) Dosage response of the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to semiochemicals. Z angew Entomol 95:158–161Google Scholar
  6. Barkawi LS (2002) Biochemical and molecular studies of aggregation pheromones of bark beetles in the genus Dendroctonus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), with special reference to the Jeffrey pine beetle, Dendroctonus jeffreyi Hopkins. PhD Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, 220 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Barkawi LS, Francke W, Blomquist GJ, Seybold SJ (2003) Frontalin: De novo biosynthesis of an aggregation pheromone component by Dendroctonus spp. bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 33:773–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beal JA (1939) The Black Hills beetle, a serious enemy of Rocky Mountain pines. USDA Farmers’ Bull. No. 1824, 22 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Bedard WD, Silverstein RM, Wood DL (1970) Bark beetle pheromones. Science 167:1638–1639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bedard WD, Tilden PE, Wood DL, Silverstein RM, Brownlee RG, Rodin JO (1969) Western pine beetle: field response to its sex pheromone and a synergistic host terpene, myrcene. Science 164:1284–1285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bedard WD, Wood DL, Tilden PE, Lindahl KQ Jr, Silverstein RM, Rodin JO (1980) Field responses of the western pine beetle and one of its predators to host- and beetle-produced compounds. J Chem Ecol 6:625–641Google Scholar
  12. Bhakthan NM, Borden JH, Nair KK (1970) Fine structure of degenerating and regenerating flight muscles in a bark beetle, Ips confusus. I. Degeneration. J Cell Sci 6:807–819PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Billings RF (1985) Southern pine bark beetles and associated insects: effects of rapidly-released host volatiles on response to aggregation pheromones. Z angew Ent 99:483–491Google Scholar
  14. Billings RF, Gara RI, Hrutfiord BF (1976) Influence of ponderosa pine resin volatiles on the response of Dendroctonus ponderosae to synthetic trans-verbenol. Environ Entomol 5:171–179Google Scholar
  15. Birch MC, Light DM, Wood DL, Browne LE, Silverstein RM, Bergot BJ, Ohloff G, West JR, Young JC (1980) Pheromonal attraction and allomonal interruption of Ips pini in California by the two enantiomers of ipsdienol. J Chem Ecol 6:703–717Google Scholar
  16. Birgersson G, DeBarr GL, De Groot P, Dalusky MJ, Pierce HD Jr, Borden JH, Meyer H, Francke W, Espelie KE, Berisford CW (1995) Pheromones in white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz)(Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Chem Ecol 21:143–167Google Scholar
  17. Blackman MW (1931) The Black Hills Beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk.). Bull. New York State College of Forestry, Tech. Pub no 36, vol 4, 97 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Blomquist GJ, Guo L, Gu P, Blomquist C, Reitz RC, Reed JR (1994) Methyl-branched fatty acids and their biosynthesis in the housefly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 24:803–810Google Scholar
  19. Borden JH (1985) Aggregation pheromones. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology biochemistry & pharmacology, vol 9. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 257–285Google Scholar
  20. Borden JH, Slater CE (1968) Induction of flight muscle degeneration by synthetic juvenile hormone in Ips confusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Zeitschrift für Verlgleichende Physiologie 63:366–368Google Scholar
  21. Borden JH, Slater CE (1969) Flight muscle volume change in Ips confusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can J Zool 47:29–31Google Scholar
  22. Borden JH, Chong L, Lindgren BS (1990) Redundancy in the semiochemical message required to induce attack on lodgepole pine trees by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Entomol 122:769–777Google Scholar
  23. Borden JH, Chong L, Slessor KN, Oehlschlager AC, Pierce HD Jr, Lindgren BS (1981) Allelochemic activity of aggregation pheromones between 3 sympatric species of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Entomol 113:557–564Google Scholar
  24. Borden JH, Conn JE, Friskie LM, Scott BE, Chong LJ, Pierce HD Jr, Oehlschlager AC (1983) Semiochemicals for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in British Columbia: baited tree studies. Can J For Res 13:325–333Google Scholar
  25. Borden JH, Lindgren BS, Chong L (1980) Ethanol and α-pinene as synergists for the aggregation pheromones of two Gnathotrichus species. Can J For Res 10:290–292Google Scholar
  26. Borden JH, Ryker LC, Chong LJ, Pierce HD Jr, Johnston BD, Oehlschlager AC (1987) Response of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to five semiochemicals in British Columbia lodgepole pine forests. Can J For Res 17:118–128Google Scholar
  27. Brand JM, Bracke JW, Britton LN, Markovetz AJ, Barras SJ (1976) Bark beetle pheromones: production of verbenone by a mycangial fungus of Dendroctonus frontalis. J Chem Ecol 2:195–199Google Scholar
  28. Brand JM, Bracke JW, Markovetz AJ, Wood DL, Browne LE (1975) Production of verbenol pheromone by a bacterium isolated from bark beetles. Nature 254:136–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bridges JR (1982) Effects of juvenile hormone on pheromone synthesis in Dendroctonus frontalis. Environ Entomol 11:417–420Google Scholar
  30. Bright DE Jr, Skidmore RE (2002) A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), supplement 2 (1995–1999). NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada, 523 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Bright DE Jr, Stark RW (1973) The bark and ambrosia beetles of California, Coleoptera: Scolytidae and Platypodidae, vol 16. Bulletin of the California Insect Survey, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 169 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Browne LE, Wood DL, Bedard WD, Silverstein RM, West JR (1979) Quantitative estimates of the western pine beetle attractive pheromone components, exo-brevicomin, frontalin, and myrcene in nature. J Chem Ecol 5:397–414Google Scholar
  33. Byers JA (1981) Pheromone biosynthesis in the bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus, during feeding or exposure to vapours of host plant precursors. Insect Biochem 11:563–569Google Scholar
  34. Byers JA (1982) Male-specific conversion of the host plant compound, myrcene, to the pheromone, (+)-ipsdienol, in the bark beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis. J Chem Ecol 8:363–371Google Scholar
  35. Byers JA (1983a) Bark beetle conversion of a plant compound to a sex-specific inhibitor of pheromone attraction. Science 220:624–626Google Scholar
  36. Byers JA (1983b) Influence of sex, maturity and host substances on pheromones in the guts of the bark beetles, Ips paraconfusus and Dendroctonus brevicomis. J Insect Physiol 29:5–13Google Scholar
  37. Byers JA (1992) Attraction of bark beetles, Tomicus piniperda, Hylurgops palliatus, and Trypodendron domesticum and other insects to short-chain alcohols and monoterpenes. J Chem Ecol 18:2385–2402Google Scholar
  38. Byers JA (2000) Wind-aided dispersal of simulated bark beetles flying through forests. Ecol Model 125:231–243Google Scholar
  39. Byers JA (2004) Chemical ecology of bark beetles in a complex olfactory landscape. In: Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Gregoire J-C, Evans HF (eds) Bark and wood boring insects living in trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 89–134Google Scholar
  40. Byers JA, Birgersson G (1990) Pheromone production in a bark beetle independent of myrcene precursor in host pine species. Naturwissenschaften 77:385–387Google Scholar
  41. Byers JA, Wood DL (1981) Antibiotic-induced inhibition of pheromone synthesis in a bark beetle. Science 213:763–764PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Byers JA, Lanne BS, Löfqvist J, Schlyter F, Bergström G (1985) Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles. Naturwissenschaften 72:324–326Google Scholar
  43. Byers JA, Wood DL, Browne LE, Fish RH, Piatek B, Hendry LB (1979) Relationship between a host plant compound, myrcene and pheromone production in the bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus. J Insect Physiol 25:477–482Google Scholar
  44. Byers JA, Zhang Q-H, Birgersson G (2000) Strategies of a bark beetle, Pityogenes bidentatus, in an olfactory landscape. Naturwissenschaften 87:503–507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Charron CS, Cantliffe DJ, Heath RR (1995) Volatile emissions from plants. In: Janick J (ed) Horticultural reviews, vol. 17. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, pp 43–72Google Scholar
  46. Chénier JVR, Philogène BJR (1989) Field responses of certain forest Coleoptera to conifer monoterpenes and ethanol. J Chem Ecol 15:1729–1745Google Scholar
  47. Conn JE, Borden JH, Scott BE, Friskie LM, Pierce HD Jr, Oehlschlager AC (1983) Semiochemicals for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in British Columbia: field trapping studies. Can J For Res 13:320–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Conn JE, Borden JH, Hunt DWA, Holman J, Whitney HS, Spanier OJ, Pierce HD Jr, Oehlschlager AC (1984) Pheromone production by axenically reared Dendroctonus ponderosae and Ips paraconfusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Chem Ecol 10:281–290Google Scholar
  49. Cook SP, Hain FP (1988) Toxicity of host monoterpenes to Dendroctonus frontalis and Ips calligraphus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Entomol Sci 23:287–292Google Scholar
  50. Critchfield WB, Little EL Jr (1966) Geographic distribution of the pines of the world. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication No. 991, 97 ppGoogle Scholar
  51. Czokajlo D, Teale SA (1999) Synergistic effect of ethanol to α-pinene in primary attraction of the larger pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda. J Chem Ecol 25:1121–1130Google Scholar
  52. Dallara PL, Seybold SJ, Meyer H, Tolasch T, Francke W, Wood DL (2000) Semiochemicals from three species of Pityophthorus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): identification and field response. Can Entomol 132:889–906Google Scholar
  53. De Groot P, Debarr GL, Birgersson G (1998) Field bioassays of synthetic pheromones and host monoterpenes for Conophthorus coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ Entomol 27:382–387Google Scholar
  54. De Groot P, Poland TM (2003) Attraction of Hylastes opacus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to nonanal. Can Entomol 135:309–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. De Groot P, Zylstra BF (1995) Factors affecting capture of male red pine cone beetles, Conophthorus resinosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in pheromone traps. Can Entomol 127:851–858Google Scholar
  56. Delorme JD, Payne TL (1990) Antennal olfactory responses of black turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus terebrans (Olivier), to bark beetle pheromones and host terpenes. J Chem Ecol 16:1321–1329Google Scholar
  57. Dickens JC, Payne TL (1977) Bark beetle olfaction: Pheromone receptor system in Dendroctonus frontalis. J Insect Physiol 23:481–489Google Scholar
  58. Eglitis AE (2000) Mediterranean pine engraver beetle. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and Forest Service pest risk assessment for importation of solid wood packing materials into the United States, pp 190–193Google Scholar
  59. El-Sayed AM, Byers JA (2000) Inhibitory effect of monoterpenes on response of Pityogenes bidentatus to aggregation pheromone released by piezoelectric sprayer for precision release of semiochemicals. J␣Chem Ecol 26:1795–1809Google Scholar
  60. Erasmus MJ, Chown SL (1994) Host location and aggregation behaviour in Hylastes angustatus (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). African Entomol 2:7–11Google Scholar
  61. Erbilgin N, Raffa KF (2000) Opposing effects of host monoterpenes on responses by two sympatric species of bark beetles to their aggregation pheromones. J␣Chem Ecol 26:2527–2548Google Scholar
  62. Erbilgin N, Raffa KF (2001) Modulation of predator attraction to pheromones of two prey species by stereochemistry of host plant volatiles. Oecologia 127:444–453Google Scholar
  63. Erbilgin N, Powell JS, Raffa KF (2003) Effect of varying monoterpene concentrations on the response of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to its aggregation pheromone: implications for pest management and ecology of bark beetles. Agric For Entomol 5:269–274Google Scholar
  64. Eriksson K, Levin J-O (1990) Identification of cis- and trans-verbenol in human urine after occupational exposure to terpenes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 62:379–383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Fettig CJ, Borys RR, Cluck DR, Smith SL (2004) Field response of Dendroctonus valens (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and a major predator, Temnochila chlorodia (Coleoptera: Trogositidae), to host kairomones and a Dendroctonus spp. pheromone component. J Entomol Sci 39:490–499Google Scholar
  66. Fettig CJ, McMillin JD, Anhold JA, Hamud SM , Borys RB, Dabney CP, Seybold SJ (2006) The effects of mechanical fuel reduction treatments on the activity of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infesting ponderosa pine. For Ecol Manage 230:55–68Google Scholar
  67. Feyereisen R (1999) Insect P450 enzymes. Ann Rev Entomol 44:507–533Google Scholar
  68. Feyereisen R, Pratt GE, Hamnett AF (1981) Enzymic synthesis of juvenile hormone in locust corpora allata: evidence for a microsomal cytochrome P-450 linked methyl farnesoate epoxidase. Eur J Biochem 118:231–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Fisher AJ, Baker BM, Greenberg JP, Fall R (2000) Enzymatic synthesis of methylbutenol from dimethylallyl diphosphate in needles of Pinus sabiniana. Arch Biochem Biophys 383:128–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T (2005) Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol 167:353–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Francke W, Kitching W (2001) Spiroacetals in insects. Curr Org Chem 5:233–251Google Scholar
  72. Francke W, Vité JP (1983) Oxygenated terpenes in pheromone systems of bark beetles. Z angew Entomol 96:146–156Google Scholar
  73. Francke W, Pan M-L, Bartels J, König WA, Vité JP, Krawielitzki S, Kohnle U (1986) The odour bouquet of three pine engraver beetles (Ips spp.). Z angew Entomol 101:453–461Google Scholar
  74. Furniss MM, Furniss RL (1972) Scolytids (Coleoptera) on snowfields above timberline in Oregon and Washington. Can Ent 104:1471–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Gara RI, Vité JP (1962) Studies on the flight patterns of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in second growth ponderosa pine forests. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 21:275–289Google Scholar
  76. Giesen H, Kohnle U, Vité JP, Pan ML, Francke W (1984) Das aggregationspheromon des mediterranen Kiefernborkenkäfers Ips (Orthotomicus) erosus. Z angew Entomol 98:95–97Google Scholar
  77. Gilg AB, Bearfield JC, Tittiger C, Welch WH, Blomquist GJ (2005) Isolation and functional expression of an animal geranyl diphosphate synthase and its role in bark beetle pheromone biosynthesis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:9760–9765PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Gomez SM, Eiglmeier K, Segurens B, Dehoux P, Couloux A, Scarpelli C, Wincker P, Weissenbach J, Brey PT, Roth CW (2005) Pilot Anopheles gambiae full-length cDNA study: Sequencing and initial characterization of 35, 735 clones. Genome Biol 6:R39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Gray DW (2002) Field response of Ips paraconfusus, Dendroctonus brevicomis, and their predators to 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol, a novel alcohol emitted by ponderosa pine. J Chem Ecol 28:1583–1597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Gries G, Leufvén A, LaFontaine JP, Pierce HD Jr, Borden JH, Vanderwel D, Oehlschlager AC (1990) New metabolites of α-pinene produced by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Insect Biochem 20:365–371Google Scholar
  81. Grosman DM (1996) Southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): quantitative analysis of chiral semiochemicals. PhD Thesis, Viginia Polytechnical Institute, 171 ppGoogle Scholar
  82. Guenther A, Zimmerman P, Wildermuth M (1994) Natural volatile organic compound emission rate estimates for U.S. woodland landscapes. Atmos Environ 28:1197–1210Google Scholar
  83. Haack RA (2001) Intercepted Scolytidae (Coleoptera) at U.S. ports of entry: 1985–2000. Int Pest Manag Rev 6:253–282Google Scholar
  84. Haack RA (2006) Exotic bark- and woodboring Coleoptera in the United States: recent establishments and interceptions. Can J For Res 36:269–288Google Scholar
  85. Harley P, Fridd-Stroud V, Greenberg J, Guenther A, Vasconcellos P (1998) Emission of 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol by pines: a potentially large natural source of reactive carbon to the atmosphere. J Geophys Res 103:25479–25486Google Scholar
  86. Hendry LB, Piatek B, Browne LE, Wood DL, Byers JA, Fish RH, Hicks RA (1980) In vivo conversion of a labelled host plant chemical to pheromones of the bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus. Nature 284:485Google Scholar
  87. Hobson KR, Wood DL, Cool LG, White PM, Ohtsuka T, Kubo I, Zavarin E (1993) Chiral specificity in responses by the bark beetle Dendroctonus valens to host kairomones. J Chem Ecol 19:1837–1846Google Scholar
  88. Hodges JD, Elam WW, Watson WF (1977) Physical properties of the oleoresin system of the four major southern pines. Can J For Res 7:520–525Google Scholar
  89. Hodges JD, Elam WW, Watson WF, Nebeker TE (1979) Oleoresin characteristics and susceptibility of four southern pines to southern pine beetle. Can Entomol 111:889–896Google Scholar
  90. Holzinger R, Lee A, McKay M, Goldstein AH (2005a) Seasonal variability of monoterpene emission factors for a ponderosa pine plantation in California. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 5:8791–8810Google Scholar
  91. Holzinger R, Lee A, Paw UKT, Goldstein AH (2005b) Observations of oxidation products above a forest imply biogenic emissions of very reactive compounds. Atmos Chem Phys 5:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Hopkins AD (1909) Contributions toward a monograph of the scolytid beetles. I. The genus Dendroctonus, USDA Bur. of Ent. Tech Ser No 17, Part I, Washington DC, 164 ppGoogle Scholar
  93. Huber DPW, Borden JH, Stastny M (2001) Response of the pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coeloptera: Scolytidae), to conophthorin and other angiosperm bark volatiles in the avoidance of non-hosts. Agric For Entomol 3:225–232Google Scholar
  94. Huber DPW, Gries R, Borden JH, Pierce HD Jr (1999) Two pheromones of coniferophagous bark beetles found in the bark of nonhost angiosperms. J Chem Ecol 25:805–816Google Scholar
  95. Huber DPW, Gries R, Borden JH, Pierce HD Jr (2000) A survey of antennal responses by five species of coniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees. Chemoecology 10:103–113Google Scholar
  96. Hughes PR (1973a) Dendroctonus, Production of pheromones and related compounds in response to host monoterpenes. Z angew Entomol 73:294–312Google Scholar
  97. Hughes PR (1973b) Effect of α-pinene exposure on trans-verbenol synthesis in Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk. Naturwissenschaften 60:261–262Google Scholar
  98. Hughes PR (1974) Myrcene: a precursor of pheromones in Ips beetles. J Insect Physiol 20:1271–1275Google Scholar
  99. Hughes PR (1975) Pheromones of Dendroctonus: Origin of α-pinene oxidation products present in emergent adults. J Insect Physiol 21:687–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Hunt DWA, Borden JH (1989a) Conversion of verbenols to verbenone by yeasts isolated from Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Chem Ecol 16:1385–1397Google Scholar
  101. Hunt DWA, Borden JH (1989b) Terpene alcohol pheromone production by Dendroctonus ponderosae and Ips paraconfusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the absence of readily culturable microorganisms. J Chem Ecol 15:1433–1463Google Scholar
  102. Hunt DWA, Smirle MJ (1988) Partial inhibition of pheromone production in Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) by polysubstrate monooxygenase inhibitors. J Chem Ecol 14:529–536Google Scholar
  103. Hunt DWA, Borden JH, Lindgren BS, Gries G (1989) The role of autoxidation of α- pinene in the production of pheromones of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can J For Res 19:1275–1282Google Scholar
  104. Hunt DWA, Borden JH, Pierce HD Jr, Slessor KN, King GGS, Czyzewska EK (1986) Sex-specific production of ipsdienol and myrcenol by Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) exposed to myrcene vapors. J Chem Ecol 12:1579–1586Google Scholar
  105. Ivarsson P, Blomquist GJ, Seybold SJ (1997) In vitro production of the pheromone intermediates ipsdienone and ipsenone by the bark beetles Ips pini (Say) and I. paraconfusus Lanier (Coleoptera:Scolytidae). Naturwissenschaften 84:454–457Google Scholar
  106. Joseph G, Kelsey RG, Peck RW, Niwa CG (2001) Response of some scolytids and their predators to ethanol and 4-allylanisole in pine forests of central Oregon. J Chem Ecol 27:697–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Juuti S, Arey J, Atkinson R (1990) Monoterpene emission rate measurements from a Monterey pine. J Geophys Res 95 (D6):7515–7519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Keeling CI, Blomquist GJ, Tittiger CR (2004) Coordinated gene expression for pheromone biosynthesis in the pine engraver beetle, Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Naturwissenschaften 91:324–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Kesselmeier J, Staudt M (1999) Biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC): An overview on emission, physiology and ecology. J Atmos Chem 33:23–88Google Scholar
  110. Kinn DN (1971) The life cycle and behavior of Cercoleipus coelonotus (Acarina: Mesostigmata) including a survey of phoretic mite associates of California Scolytidae, University of California Publications in Entomology, vol 65, University of California Press, Berkeley, 66 ppGoogle Scholar
  111. Kirkendall LR (1983) The evolution of mating systems in bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Zool J Linn Soc 77:293–352Google Scholar
  112. Kirkendall LR, Kent DS, Raffa KF (1997) Interactions among males, females and offspring in bark and ambrosia beetles: The significance of living in tunnels for the evolution of social behavior. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 181–215Google Scholar
  113. Klimetzek D, Francke W (1980) Relationship between enantiomeric composition of α- pinene in host trees and the production of verbenols in Ips species. Experientia 36:1343–1344Google Scholar
  114. Klimetzek D, Vité JP (1986) Die Wirkung insektenbürtiger Duftstoffe auf das Aggregationsverhalten des mediterranen Kiefernborkenkäfers Orthotomicus erosus. J␣Appl Ent 101:239–243Google Scholar
  115. Klimetzek D, Kohler J, Vité JP, Kohnle U (1986) Dosage response to ethanol mediates host selection by “secondary” bark beetles. Naturwissenschaften 73:270–272Google Scholar
  116. Kohnle U (1991) Verhaltensmodifizierende Duftstoffe in der Aggregation von Borkenkäfern der Gattung Ips DeGeer (Col., Scolytidae). Freiburger Waldschutz-Abhandlungen, Forstzoologischen Institut der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Br, pp 142–145Google Scholar
  117. Kohnle U, Schmutzenhofer H, Bartels J, Francke W (1988) Oxygenated terpenes in the chemical communication system of the bark beetle, Ips schmutzenhoferi (Col., Scolytidae), a species recently described for the Southeastern Himalaya. J Appl Ent 106:46–51Google Scholar
  118. Kohnle U, Vité JP, Meyer H, Francke W (1994) Response of four American engraver bark beetles, Ips spp. (Col., Scolytidae), to synthetic racemates of chiral pheromones. J Appl Ent 117:451–456Google Scholar
  119. Langenheim JH (2003) Plant resins—chemistry, evolution, ecology, and ethnobotany. The Timber Press, Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  120. Lanne BS, Ivarsson P, Johnson P, Bergström G, Wassgren AB (1989) Biosynthesis of 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol, a pheromone component of Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Insect Biochem 19:163–168Google Scholar
  121. Lanne BS, Schlyter F, Byers JA, Löfqvist J, Leufvén A, Bergström G, Van der Pers JNC, Unelius R, Baeckström P, Norin T (1987) Differences in attraction to semiochemicals present in sympatric pine shoot beetles, Tomicus minor and T. piniperda. J Chem Ecol 13:1045–1067Google Scholar
  122. Lavery PB, Mead DJ (1998) Pinus radiata: a narrow endemic from North America takes on the world. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 432–449Google Scholar
  123. Lee A, Goldstein AH, Kroll JH, Ng NL, Varutbangkul V, Flagan RC, Seinfeld JH (2006) Gas-phase products and secondary aerosol yields from photooxidation of sixteen different terpenes. J Geophysical Res-Atmospheres (in press)Google Scholar
  124. Lee A, Schade GW, Holzinger R, Goldstein AH (2005) A comparison of new measurements of total monoterpene flux with improved measurements of speciated monoterpene flux. Atmos Chem Phys 5:505–513Google Scholar
  125. Lee JC, Smith SL, Seybold SJ (2005) The Mediterranean pine engraver, Orthotomicus erosus. USDA Forest Service, Pest Alert, R5-PR-016, 4 ppGoogle Scholar
  126. Lewinsohn E, Gijzen M, Croteau R (1991) Defense mechanisms of conifers—Differences in constitutive and wound-induced monoterpene biosynthesis among species. Plant Physiol 96:44–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Light DM (1983) Sensitivity of antennae of male and female Ips paraconfusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to its pheromone and other behavior modifying chemicals. J Chem Ecol 9:585–606Google Scholar
  128. Light DM, Birch MC (1979) Inhibition of the attractive pheromone response in Ips paraconfusus by (R)-(−)-ipsdienol. Naturwissenschaften 66:159–160Google Scholar
  129. Lindström M, Norin T, Birgersson G, Schlyter F (1989) Variation of enantiomeric composition of α-pinene in Norway spruce, Picea abies, and its influence on production of verbenol isomers by Ips typographus in the field. J Chem Ecol 15:541–548Google Scholar
  130. Liu Y-B, McLean JA (1989) Field evaluation of responses of Gnathotrichus sulcatus and G. retusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to semiochemicals. J Econ Entomol 82:1687–1690Google Scholar
  131. Litvak ME, Monson RK (1998) Patterns of induced and constitutive monoterpene production in conifer needles in relation to insect herbivory. Oecologia 114:531–540Google Scholar
  132. Litvak ME, Madronich S, Monson RK (1999) Herbivore-induced monoterpene emissions from coniferous forests: potential impact on local tropospheric chemistry. Ecol Appl 9:1147–1159Google Scholar
  133. McCarty FA, Billings PM, Richerson JV, Payne TL, Edson LJ (1980) Response of the southern pine beetle to behavioral chemicals in the laboratory. J Georgia Entomol Soc 15:307–317Google Scholar
  134. McNee WR, Bonello P, Storer AJ, Wood DL, Gordon TR (2003) Feeding response of Ips paraconfusus to phloem and phloem metabolites of Heterobasidion annosum-inoculated ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa. J Chem Ecol 29:1183–1201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. McNee WR, Wood DL, Storer AJ (2000) Pre-emergence feeding in bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ Entomol 29:495–501Google Scholar
  136. Maïbèche-Coisne M, Nikonov AA, Ishida Y, Jacquin-Joly E, Leal WS (2004) Pheromone anosmia in a scarab beetle induced by in vivo inhibition of a pheromone-degrading enzyme. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101:11459–11464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Martin DM, Bohlmann J, Gershenzon J, Francke W, Seybold SJ (2003) A novel sex-specific and inducible monoterpene synthase activity associated with a pine bark beetle, the pine engraver, Ips pini. Naturwissenschaften 90:173–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Martin DM, Fäldt J, Bohlmann J (2004) Functional characterization of nine Norway spruce TPS genes and evolution of gymnosperm terpene synthases of the TPS-d subfamily. Plant Physiol 135:1908–1927PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Massey CL (1974) Biology and taxonomy of nematode parasites and associates of bark beetles in the United States. USDA Agric Handbook No 446, 233 ppGoogle Scholar
  140. Mendel Z (1988) Attraction of Orthotomicus erosus and Pityogenes calcaratus to a synthetic aggregation pheromone of Ips typographus. Phytoparasitica 16:109–117Google Scholar
  141. Miller B, Oschinski C, Zimmer W (2001) First isolation of an isoprene synthase gene from poplar and successful expression of the gene in Escherichia coli. Planta 213:483–487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Miller DR, Borden JH (1990a) β-Phellandrene: Kairomone for pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Chem Ecol 16:2519–2531Google Scholar
  143. Miller DR, Borden JH (1990b) The use of monoterpenes as kairomones by Ips latidens (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Entomol 122:301–307Google Scholar
  144. Miller DR, Borden JH (2000) Dose-dependent and species-specific responses of pine bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to monoterpenes in association with pheromones. Can Entomol 132:183–195Google Scholar
  145. Miller DR, Borden JH (2003) Responses of Ips pini (Say), Pityogenes knechteli Swaine and associated beetles (Coleoptera) to host monoterpenes in stands of lodgepole pine. J Entomol Sci 38:602–611Google Scholar
  146. Miller DR, Lindgren BS (2000) Comparison of α-pinene and myrcene on attraction of mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromones in stands of western white pine. J Entomol Soc British Columbia 97:41–46Google Scholar
  147. Miller DR, Crowe CM, Asaro C, Debarr GL (2003) Dose and enantiospecific responses of white pine cone beetles, Conophthorus coniperda, to α-pinene in an eastern white pine seed orchard. J Chem Ecol 29:437–463PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Miller DR, Madden JL, Borden JH (1986) Primary attraction of Ips latidens (LeConte) and Hylastes gracilis LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to high-girdled lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var.latifolia Engelmann. Can Entomol 122:301–307Google Scholar
  149. Miller DR, Pierce HD Jr, DeGroot P, Jeans-Williams N, Bennett R, Borden JH (2000) Sex pheromone of Conophthorus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in a coastal stand of western white pine (Pinaceae). Can Entomol 132:243–245Google Scholar
  150. Mirov NT (1967) The genus Pinus. The Ronald Press Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  151. Mizell RF, Frazier JL, Nebeker TE (1984) Response of the clerid predator Thanasimus dubius (F.) to bark beetle pheromones and tree volatiles in a wind tunnel. J␣Chem Ecol 10:177–187Google Scholar
  152. Mori K, Mizumachi N, Matsui M (1976) Synthesis of optically pure (1S, 4S, 5S)-2-pinen-4-ol (cis-Verbenol) and its antipode, the pheromone of Ips bark beetles. Agr Biol Chem 40:1611–1615Google Scholar
  153. Nation JL, Foltz JL, Phillip TW (1996) Chemical ecology of bark beetles in the Florida slash pine ecosystem. In: Rosen D, Bennett FD, Capinera JL (eds) Pest management in the subtropics—integrated pest management–a Florida perspective. Intercept Ltd., Andover Hants, UK, pp 209–222Google Scholar
  154. Nebeker TE, Hodges JD, Blanche CA (1993) Host response to bark beetle and pathogen colonization. In: Schowalter TD, Filip GM (eds) Beetle-pathogen interaction in conifer forests. Academic Press, London, pp 157–173Google Scholar
  155. Niinemets Ü, Reichstein M, Staudt M, Seufert G, Tenhunen JD (2002) Stomatal constraints may affect emission of oxygenated monoterpenoids from the foliage of Pinus pinea. Plant Physiol 130:1371–1385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Nordlund DA, Lewis WJ (1976) Terminology of chemical releasing stimuli in intraspecific and interspecific interactions. J Chem Ecol 2:211–220Google Scholar
  157. Omura T (1999) Forty years of cytochrome P450. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 266:690–698PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Paine TD, Hanlon CC (1991) Response of Dendroctonus brevicomis and Ips paraconfusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to combinations of synthetic pheromone attractants and inhibitors verbenone and ipsdienol. J␣Chem Ecol 17:2163–2176Google Scholar
  159. Paine TD, Blanche CA, Nebeker TE, Stephen FM (1987) Composition of loblolly pine resin defenses: comparison of monoterpenes from induced lesion and sapwood resin. Can J For Res 17:1202–1206Google Scholar
  160. Paiva MR, Kiesel K (1985) Field responses of Trypodendron spp. (Col., Scolytidae) to different concentrations of lineatin and α-pinene. Z angew Entomol 99:442–448Google Scholar
  161. Paiva MR, Fernanda Pessoa M, Vité JP (1988) Reduction in the pheromone attractant response of Orthotomicus erosus (Woll.) and Ips sexdentatus Boern. (Col., Scolytidae). J Appl Ent 106:198–200Google Scholar
  162. Payne TL, Coster JE, Richerson JV, Edson LJ, Hart ER (1978) Field response of the southern pine beetle to behavioral chemicals. Environ Entomol 7:578–582Google Scholar
  163. Petrice TR, Haack RA, Poland TM (2004) Evaluation of three trap types and five lures for monitoring Hylurgus ligniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and other local scolytids in New York. The Great Lakes Entomol 37:1–9Google Scholar
  164. Phillips TW (1990) Responses of Hylastes salebrosus to turpentine, ethanol, and pheromones of Dendroctonus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Flor Entomol 73:286–292Google Scholar
  165. Phillips TW, Wilkening AJ, Atkinson TH, Nation JL, Wilkinson RC, Foltz JL (1988) Synergism of turpentine and ethanol as attractants for certain pine-infesting beetles (Coleoptera). Environ Entomol 17:456–462Google Scholar
  166. Pierce HD Jr, Conn JE, Oehlschlager AC, Borden JH (1987) Monoterpene metabolism in female mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, attacking ponderosa pine. J Chem Ecol 13:1455–1480Google Scholar
  167. Pierce HD Jr, de Groot P, Borden JH, Ramaswamy S, Oehlschlager AC (1995) Pheromones in red pine cone beetle, Conophthorus resinosae Hopkins, and its synonym, C. banksianae McPherson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Chem Ecol 21:169–185Google Scholar
  168. Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience 50:53–65Google Scholar
  169. Pitman GB (1971) trans-Verbenol and alpha-pinene: their utility in manipulation of the mountain pine beetle. J␣Econ Entomol 64:426–430Google Scholar
  170. Poland TM, Borden JH (1994) Attack dynamics of Ips pini (Say) and Pityogenes knechteli (Swaine) (Col., Scolytidae) in windthrown lodgepole pine trees. J Appl Ent 117:434–443Google Scholar
  171. Poland TM, Haack RA (2000) Pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (Col., Scolytidae), responses to common green leaf volatiles. J Appl Ent 124:63–69Google Scholar
  172. Poland TM, de Groot P, Burke S, Wakarchuk D, Haack RA, Nott R, Scarr T (2003) Development of an improved attractive lure for the pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Agric For Entomol 5:293–300Google Scholar
  173. Poland TM, de Groot P, Haack RA, Czokajlo D (2004) Evaluation of semiochemicals potentially synergistic to a-pinene for trapping the larger European pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (Col., Scolytidae). J Appl Entomol 128:639–644Google Scholar
  174. Prema BR, Bhattacharyya PK (1962) Microbiological transformation of terpenes. II. Transformations of α-pinene. Appl Microbiol 10:524–528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. Price RA, Liston A, Strauss SH (1998) Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 49–68Google Scholar
  176. Pureswaran DS (2003) The role of kairomones and pheromones in host selection by tree-killing bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). PhD Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, 186 ppGoogle Scholar
  177. Pureswaran DS, Borden JH (2005) Primary attraction and kairomonal host discrimination in three species of Dendroctonus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Agric For Entomol 7:219–230Google Scholar
  178. Pureswaran DS, Gries R, Borden JH (2004a) Antennal responses of four species of tree-killing bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to volatiles collected from beetles, and their host and nonhost conifers. Chemoecology 14:59–66Google Scholar
  179. Pureswaran DS, Gries R, Borden JH (2004b) Quantitative in monoterpenes in four species of conifers. Biochem System Ecol 32:1109–1136Google Scholar
  180. Raffa KF, Berryman AA (1982) Physiological differences between lodgepole pines resistant and susceptible to the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Environ Entomol 11:486–492Google Scholar
  181. Raffa KF, Berryman AA (1983) Physiological aspects of lodgepole pine wound responses to a fungal symbiont of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Entomol 115:723–734Google Scholar
  182. Reay SD, Walsh PJ (2002) Relative attractiveness of some volatiles to the introduced pine bark beetles, Hylastes ater and Hylurgus ligniperda (Curculionidae: Scolytinae). New Zealand Entomol 25:51–56Google Scholar
  183. Renwick JAA (1970) Chemical aspects of bark beetle aggregation. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 24:337–341Google Scholar
  184. Renwick JAA, Vité JP (1969) Bark beetle attractants: mechanism of colonization by Dendroctonus frontalis. Nature 224:1222–1223Google Scholar
  185. Renwick JAA, Hughes PR, Tanletin DTY (1973) Oxidation products of pinene in the bark beetle Dendroctonus frontalis. J Insect Physiol 19:1735–1740Google Scholar
  186. Renwick JAA, Hughes PR, Krull IS (1976a) Selective production of cis- and trans-verbenol from (−)- and (+)-α- pinene by a bark beetle. Science 191:199–201Google Scholar
  187. Renwick JAA, Hughes PR, Pitman GB, Vité JP (1976b) Oxidation products of terpenes identified from Dendroctonus and Ips bark beetles. J Insect Physiol 22:725–727Google Scholar
  188. Rice RE (1969) Response of some predators and parasites of Ips confusus (Lec.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to olfactory attractants. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 24:189–194Google Scholar
  189. Robins GL, Reid ML (1997) Effects of density on the reproductive success of pine engravers: is aggregation in dead trees beneficial? Ecol Entomol 22:329–334Google Scholar
  190. Safranyik L, Carroll AL (2006) The biology and epidemiology of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. In: Safranyik L, Wilson B (eds) The mountain pine beetle. A synthesis of biology, management, and impacts on lodgepole pine. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC, pp 3–66, 314 ppGoogle Scholar
  191. Safranyik L, Linton DA, Shore TL (2000) Temporal and vertical distribution of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) captured in barrier traps at baited and unbaited lodgepole pines the year following attack by the mountain pine beetle. Can Entomol 132:799–810Google Scholar
  192. Safranyik L, Linton DA, Silversides R, McMullen LH (1992) Dispersal of released mountain pine beetles under the canopy of a mature lodgepole pine stand. J␣Appl Ent 113:441–450Google Scholar
  193. Safranyik L, Silversides R, McMullen LH, Linton DA (1989) An empirical approach to modeling the local dispersal of the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk.) (Col. Scolytidae) in relation to sources of attraction, wind direction and speed. J␣Appl Ent 108:498–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Schade GW, Goldstein AH (2001) Fluxes of oxygenated volatile organic compounds from a ponderosa pine plantation. J Geophysical Res 106:3111–3123Google Scholar
  195. Schade GW, Goldstein AH (2003) Increase of monoterpene emissions from a pine plantation as a result of mechanical disturbances. Geophysical Res Lett 30(7):1380, doi:10.1029/2002GL016138Google Scholar
  196. Schade GW, Goldstein AH, Lamanna MS (1999) Are monoterpene emissions influenced by humidity? Geophysical Res Lett 26:2187–2190Google Scholar
  197. Schmitz RF (1980) Dispersal of pine engraver beetles in second growth ponderosa pine forests. In: Berryman AA, Safranyik L (eds) Dispersal of forest insects: evaluation, theory and management implications, Proc 2nd IUFRO Conference, Sand Point, Idaho, 27–31 August, 1979, Cooperative Extension Service, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, pp 41–50Google Scholar
  198. Schmitz RF (1984) A passive aerial barrier trap suitable for sampling flying bark beetles. USDA Forest Service Intermountain For. & Range Exp. Stn. Res. Note, INT-348, 8 ppGoogle Scholar
  199. Schmitz RF, McGregor MD, Amman GD (1980) Mountain pine beetle response to lodgepole pine stands of different characteristics. In: Berryman AA, Safranyik L (eds) Dispersal of forest insects: evaluation, theory and management implications, Proc 2nd IUFRO Conference, Sand Point, Idaho, 27–31 August, 1979, Cooperative Extension Service, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, pp. 234–243Google Scholar
  200. Schmitz RF, McGregor MD, Amman GD, Oakes RD (1989) Effect of partial cutting treatments of lodgepole pine stands on the abundance and behavior of flying mountain pine beetle. Can J For Res 19:566–574Google Scholar
  201. Schroeder LM (1988) Attraction of the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda and some other bark- and wood-living beetles to the host volatiles α-pinene and ethanol. Entomol Exp Appl 46:203–210Google Scholar
  202. Schroeder LM (2003) Differences in responses to α-pinene and ethanol, and flight periods between the bark beetle predators Thanasimus femoralis and T. formicarius (Col.: Cleridae). For Ecol Manage 177:301–311Google Scholar
  203. Schroeder LM, Eidmann HH (1987) Gallery initiation by Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on Scots pine trees baited with host volatiles. J Chem Ecol 13:1591–1599Google Scholar
  204. Schroeder LM, Lindelöw A (1989) Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol. J Chem Ecol 15:807–817Google Scholar
  205. Schultz DE, Bedard WD (1987) California fivespined ips. USDA Forest Service, Insect & Disease Leaflet, No 102, 8 ppGoogle Scholar
  206. Serez M (1987) Verwendung des aggregationspheromon-präparats “Ips lure” gegen den mediterranen Kiefernborkenkäfer, Ips (Orthotomicus) erosus (Woll.) (Col., Scolytidae). Anz Schadl Pfanzenschutz Umweltschutz 60:94–95Google Scholar
  207. Seybold SJ (1993) Role of chirality in olfactory-directed behavior: aggregation of pine engraver beetles in the genus Ips (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Chem Ecol 19:1809–1831Google Scholar
  208. Seybold SJ, Tittiger C (2003) Biochemistry and molecular biology of de novo isoprenoid pheromone production in the Scolytidae. Ann Rev Entomol 48:425–453Google Scholar
  209. Seybold SJ, Vanderwel D (2003) Biosynthesis and endocrine regulation of pheromone production in the Coleoptera. In: Blomquist GJ, Vogt RG (eds) Insect pheromone biochemistry and molecular biology—the biosynthesis and detection of pheromones and plant volatiles. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 137–200Google Scholar
  210. Seybold SJ, Bohlmann J, Raffa KF (2000) Biosynthesis of coniferophagous bark beetle pheromones and conifer isoprenoids: evolutionary perspective and synthesis. Can Entomol 132:697–753Google Scholar
  211. Seybold SJ, Quilici DR, Tillman JA, Vanderwel D, Wood DL, Blomquist GJ (1995) De novo biosynthesis of the aggregation pheromone components ipsenol and ipsdienol by the pine bark beetles, Ips paraconfusus Lanier and Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 92:8393–8397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  212. Seybold SJ, Teale SA, Wood DL, Zhang A, Webster FX, Lindahl KQ Jr, Kubo I (1992) The role of lanierone in the chemical ecology of Ips pini (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) in California. J Chem Ecol 18:2305–2329Google Scholar
  213. Shao M, Czapiewski KV, Heiden AC, Kobel K, Komenda M, Koppmann R, Wildt J (2001) Volatile organic compound emissions from Scots pine: Mechanisms and description by algorithms. J Geophys Res 106(D17):20483–20491Google Scholar
  214. Shore TL, McLean JA (1983) A further evaluation of the interactions between the pheromones and 2 host kairomones of the ambrosia beetles Trypodendron lineatum and Gnathotrichus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Entomol 115:1–6Google Scholar
  215. Shrimpton DM (1973) Extractives associated with wound response of lodgepole pine attacked by the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Can J Bot 51:527–534Google Scholar
  216. Silverstein RM (1970a) Attractant pheromones of Coleoptera. In: Beroza M (ed) Chemicals controlling insect behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–40Google Scholar
  217. Silverstein RM (1970b) Methodology for isolation and identification of insect pheromones—examples from Coleoptera. In: Wood DL, Silverstein RM, Nakajima M (eds) Control of insect behavior by natural products. Academic Press, New York, pp 285–299Google Scholar
  218. Silverstein RM (1977) Complexity, diversity, and specificity of behavior-modifying chemicals: examples mainly from Coleoptera and Hymenoptera. In: Shorey HH, McKelvey JJ (eds) Chemical control of insect behavior: theory and application. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 231–251Google Scholar
  219. Silverstein RM, Brownlee RG, Bellas TE, Wood DL, Browne LE (1968) Brevicomin: principal sex attractant in the frass of the female western pine beetle. Science 159:889–891PubMedGoogle Scholar
  220. Silverstein RM, Rodin JO, Wood DL (1967) Methodology for isolation and identification of insect pheromones with reference to studies on California five-spined ips. J Econ Entomol 60:944–949Google Scholar
  221. Silverstein RM, Rodin JO, Wood DL (1966) Sex attractants in frass produced by male Ips confusus in ponderosa pine. Science 154:509–510Google Scholar
  222. Smith MT, Busch GR, Payne TL, Dickens JC (1988) Antennal olfactory responsiveness of three sympatric Ips species [Ips avulsus (Eichhoff), Ips calligraphus (Germar), Ips grandicollis (Eichhoff)], to intra- and interspecific behavioral chemicals. J Chem Ecol 14:1289–1304Google Scholar
  223. Smith RH (1961) The fumigant toxicity of three pine resins to Dendroctonus brevicomis and D. jeffreyi. J Econ Entomol 54:365–369Google Scholar
  224. Smith RH (1964) The monoterpenes of lodgepole pine oleoresin. Phytochem 3:259–262Google Scholar
  225. Smith RH (1965a) A physiological difference among beetles of Dendroctonus ponderosae (=D. monticolae) and D. ponderosae (=D. jeffreyi). Ann Entomol Soc Am 58:440–442Google Scholar
  226. Smith RH (1965b) Effect of monoterpene vapors on the western pine beetle. J Econ Entomol 58:509–510Google Scholar
  227. Smith RH (1966) Resin quality as a factor in the resistance of pines to bark beetles. In: Gerhold HD, McDermott RE, Schreiner EJ, Winieski JA (eds) Breeding pest-resistant trees. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 189–196Google Scholar
  228. Smith RH (1967) Variations in the monoterpene composition of the wood resin of Jeffrey, Washoe, Coulter and lodgepole pines. Forest Sci 13:246–252Google Scholar
  229. Smith RH (1977) Monoterpenes of ponderosa pine xylem resin in western United States. USDA Forest Service Tech. Bull. No. 1532, 48 ppGoogle Scholar
  230. Smith RH (1983) Monoterpenes of lodgepole pine xylem resin: a regional study in western United States. Forest Sci 29:333–340Google Scholar
  231. Smith RH (2000) Xylem monoterpenes of pines: Distribution, variation, genetics, function. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-177, 454 ppGoogle Scholar
  232. Stark RW (1965) Recent trends in forest entomology. Ann Rev Entomol 10:303–324Google Scholar
  233. Stephen FM, Berisford CW, Dahlsten DL, Fenn P, Moser JC (1993) Invertebrate and microbial associates. In: Schowalter TD, Filip GM (eds) Beetle–Pathogen iInteraction in Conifer forests. Academic Press, Harcourt Brace & Co., London, pp 129–153Google Scholar
  234. Strom BL, Goyer RA, Shea PJ (2001) Visual and olfactory disruption of orientation by the western pine beetle to attractant-baited traps. Entomol Exp Appl 100:63–67Google Scholar
  235. Strom BL, Roton LM, Goyer RA, Meeker JR (1999) Visual and semiochemical disruption of host finding in the southern pine beetle. Ecol Appl 9:1028–1038Google Scholar
  236. Strömvall A-M, Petersson G (1991) Conifer monoterpenes emitted to air by logging operations. Scan J For Res 6:253–258Google Scholar
  237. Struble GR, Hall RC (1955) The California five-spined engraver and its biology and control. United States Department of Agriculture Circular No. 964, 21 ppGoogle Scholar
  238. Sturgeon KB (1979) Monoterpene variation in ponderosa pine xylem resin related to western pine beetle predation. Evolution 33:803–814Google Scholar
  239. Sun J, Maio Z, Zhang Z, Zhang ZN, Gillette NE (2004) Red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), response to host semiochemicals in China. Environ Entomol 33:206–212Google Scholar
  240. Sutherland TD, Unnithan GC, Andersen JF, Evans PH, Murataliev MB, Szabo LZ, Mash EA, Bowers WS, Feyereisen R (1998) A cytochrome P450 terpenoid hydroxylase linked to the suppression of insect juvenile hormone synthesis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 95:12884–12889PubMedGoogle Scholar
  241. Tillman JA, Holbrook GL, Dallara PL, Schal C, Wood DL, Blomquist GJ, Seybold SJ (1998) Endocrine regulation of de novo aggregation pheromone biosynthesis in the pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 28:705–715Google Scholar
  242. Tillman JA, Lu F, Goddard LM, Donaldson ZR, Dwinell SC, Tittiger C, Hall GM, Storer AJ, Blomquist GJ, Seybold SJ (2004) Juvenile hormone regulates de novo isoprenoid aggregation pheromone biosynthesis in pine bark beetles, Ips spp. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), through transcriptional control of HMG-CoA reductase. J Chem Ecol 30:2459–2494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  243. Tillman-Wall JA, Vanderwel D, Kuenzli ME, Reitz RC, Blomquist GJ (1992) Regulation of sex pheromone biosynthesis in the housefly, Musca domestica: relative contribution of the elongation and reductive step. Arch Biochem Biophys 299:92–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  244. Tingey DT, Burns WF (1980) Hydrocarbon emissions from vegetation. In: Miller PR (ed) Effects of air pollutants on mediterranean and temperate forest ecosystems. Pacific Southwest Forest, pp 24–30, and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report 43, 228 pp, Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  245. Tingey DT, Manning M, Grothaus LC, Burns WF (1980) Influence of light and temperature on monoterpene emission rates from slash pine. Plant Physiol 65:797–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. Tingey DT, Turner DP, Weber JA (1991) Factors controlling the emissions of monoterpenes and other volatile organic compounds. In: Sharkey TD, Holland EA, Mooney HA (eds) Trace gas emissions by plants. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, pp 93–119Google Scholar
  247. Tittiger C, O’Keeffe C, Bengoa CS, Barkawi LS, Seybold SJ, Blomquist GJ (2000) Isolation and endocrine regulation of an HMG-CoA synthase cDNA from the male Jeffrey pine beetle, Dendroctonus jeffreyi (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Insect Biochem Molec Biol 30:1203–1211Google Scholar
  248. Unnithan GC, Nair KK (1977) Ultrastructure of juvenile hormone-induced degenerating flight muscles in a bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus. Cell Tissue Res 185:481–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  249. Vanderwel D (1991) Pheromone biosynthesis by selected species of grain and bark beetles. PhD Dissertation. Simon Fraser University, 172 ppGoogle Scholar
  250. Vanderwel D, Oehlschlager AC (1992) Mechanism of brevicomin biosynthesis from (Z)-6-nonen-2-one in a bark beetle. J Amer Chem Soc 114:5081–5086Google Scholar
  251. Vité JP (1970) Pest management systems using synthetic pheromones. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 24:343–350Google Scholar
  252. Vité JP, Bakke A (1979) Synergism between chemical and physical stimuli in host colonization by an ambrosia beetle. Naturwissenschaften 66:528–529Google Scholar
  253. Vité JP, Pitman GB (1969) Aggregation behavior of Dendroctonus brevicomis in response to synthetic pheromones. J Insect Physiol 15:1617–1622Google Scholar
  254. Vité JP, Volz HA, Paiva MR (1986) Semiochemicals in host selection and colonization of pine trees by the pine shoot beetle Tomicus piniperda. Naturwissenschaften 73:39–40Google Scholar
  255. Volz HA (1988) Monoterpenes governing host selection in the bark beetles Hylurgops palliatus and Tomicus piniperda. Entomol Exp Appl 47:31–36Google Scholar
  256. Wallin KF, Raffa KF (2000) Influences of host chemicals and internal physiology on the multiple steps of postlanding host acceptance behavior of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ Entomol 29:442–453Google Scholar
  257. Wallin KF, Rutledge J, Raffa KF (2002) Heritability of host acceptance and gallery construction behaviors of the bark beetle Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ Entomol 31:1276–1281Google Scholar
  258. Warren JT, Petryk A, Marqués G, Jarcho M, Parvy J-P, Dauphin-Villemant C, O’Connor MB, Gilbert LI (2002) Molecular and biochemical characterization of two P450 enzymes in the ecdysteroidogenic pathway of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99:11043–11048PubMedGoogle Scholar
  259. Werner RA (1972) Response of the beetle, Ips grandicollis, to combinations of host and insect produced attractants. J Insect Physiol 18:1403–1412Google Scholar
  260. White PR, Hobson KR (1993) Stereospecific antennal response by red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens to chiral monoterpenes from ponderosa pine resin. J␣Chem Ecol 19:2193–2202Google Scholar
  261. White RA Jr, Franklin RT, Agosin M (1979) Conversion of α-pinene oxide by rat liver and the bark beetle Dendroctonus terebrans microsomal fractions. Pest Biochem Physiol 10:233–242Google Scholar
  262. White RA Jr, Agosin M, Franklin RT, Webb JW (1980) Bark beetle pheromones: Evidence for physiological synthesis mechanisms and their ecological implications. Z angew Entomol 90:255–274Google Scholar
  263. Wingfield MJ, Marasas WFO (1980) Ceratocystis ips associated with Orthotomicus erosus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on Pinus spp. in the Cape Province of South Africa. Phytophylactica 12:65–69Google Scholar
  264. Witcosky JJ, Schowalter TD, Hansen EM (1987) Host-derived attractants for the beetles Hylastes nigrinus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and Steremnius carinatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environ Entomol 16:1310–1313Google Scholar
  265. Wojtasek H, Leal WS (1999) Degradation of an alkaloid pheromone from the pale-brown chafer. FEBS Letts 458:333–336Google Scholar
  266. Wood DL (1970) Pheromones of bark beetles. In: Wood DL, Silverstein RM, Nakajima M (eds) Control of insect behavior by natural products. Academic Press, New York, pp 301–316Google Scholar
  267. Wood DL (1972) Selection and colonization of ponderosa pine by bark beetles. In: Van Emden HF (ed) Insect/plant relationships, Symposia of the Royal entomological society of London, vol 6. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 101–117Google Scholar
  268. Wood DL (1982) The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Ann Rev Entomol 27:411–446Google Scholar
  269. Wood DL, Browne LE, Bedard WD, Tilden PE, Silverstein RM, Rodin JO (1968) Response of Ips confusus to synthetic sex pheromones in nature. Science 159:1373–1374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  270. Wood DL, Browne LE, Ewing B, Lindahl K, Bedard WD, Tilden PE, Mori K, Pitman GB, Hughes PR (1976) Western pine beetle: specificity among enantiomers of male and female components of an attractant pheromone. Science 192:896–898PubMedGoogle Scholar
  271. Wood DL, Browne LE, Silverstein RM, Rodin JO (1966) Sex pheromones of bark beetles—I. Mass production, bio-assay, source, and isolation of the sex pheromone of Ips confusus (LeC.). J Insect Physiol 12:523–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  272. Wood DL, Silverstein RM, Nakajima M (1969) Pest control. Science 164:203–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  273. Wood DL, Stark RW, Silverstein RM, Rodin JO (1967) Unique synergistic effects produced by the principal sex attractant compounds of Ips confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Nature 215:206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  274. Wood SL (1982) The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Nat Memoirs 6:1–1359Google Scholar
  275. Wood SL, Bright DE (1992) A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), Part 2, Taxonomic index, vol A. Great Basin Naturalist No. 13, 833 ppGoogle Scholar
  276. Zavarin E, Cool LG, Snajberk K (1993) Geographic variability of Pinus flexilis xylem monoterpenes. Biochem System Ecol 21:381–387Google Scholar
  277. Zeidler J, Lichtenthaler HK (2001) Biosynthesis of 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol emitted from needles of Pinus ponderosa via the non-mevalonate DOXP/MEP pathway of isoprenoid formation. Planta 213:323–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  278. Zhang Q (2003) Interruption of aggregation pheromone in Ips typographus (L.) (Col. Scolytidae) by non-host bark volatiles. Agric For Entomol 5:145–153Google Scholar
  279. Zhang Q, Schlyter F (2004) Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles. Agric For Entomol 6:1–19Google Scholar
  280. Zumr V (1989) Attractiveness of the terpene alpha-pinene to the large pine shoot beetle, Blastophagus piniperda (L.) (Col., Scolytidae). J Appl Entomol 107:141–144Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven J. Seybold
    • 1
  • Dezene P. W. Huber
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jana C. Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrew D. Graves
    • 4
  • Jörg Bohlmann
    • 5
  1. 1.Chemical Ecology of Forest InsectsUSDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research StationDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  3. 3.Ecosystem Science and Management ProgramUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada
  4. 4.Department of EntomologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  5. 5.Michael Smith LaboratoriesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations