, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 542–550 | Cite as

Improving photosynthetic performance and some fruit quality traits in mango trees by shading

  • K. Jutamanee
  • S. Onnom
Original papers


Excess solar radiation under hot climate can lead to decline in photosynthetic activity with detrimental effects on growth and yield. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a transparent plastic roof as shading for diurnal changes in photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, fruit set and quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. ‘Nam Dok Mai’ growth in the field conditions. Fully expanded leaves were examined either shaded by the plastic roof or sunlit under natural conditions. Leaf temperature and leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit of the shaded leaves measured on the clear day were lowered compared to those of the sunlit leaves. It resulted in increased stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rates of the shaded leaves compared to those of the sunlit leaves, especially from the morning to midday. Furthermore, the reversible decrease of the maximal quantum yield of PSII was more pronounced in the sunlit leaves than that in the shaded ones. Shading increased the total fruit number; the shaded fruits developed better external color than that of the sun-exposed fruits. Our results indicated that shading could maintain the high photosynthetic activity by reducing stomatal limitations for carbon supply and was effective in alleviating the photoinhibitory damage to PSII during bright and clear days with excessive radiation. Finally, shading could increase the number of fruits and improve mango peel color.

Additional key words

chlorophyll fluorescence excessive irradiation net photosynthetic rate photoinhibition 







electron transport rate


maximal quantum yield of PSII


stomatal conductance




nonphotochemical quenching


net photosynthetic rate


photochemical quenching coefficient


relative humidity


air temperature


leaf temperature


titratable acidity


total soluble solid


air vapour pressure deficit


leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit


intrinsic water-use efficiency


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alarcón J.J., Ortuño M.F., Nicolás E. et al.: Improving water-use efficiency of young lemon trees by shading with aluminisedplastic nets.–Agr. Water Manage. 82: 387–398, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aliakbarpour H., Rawi C.S.: Diurnal activity of four species of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and efficiencies of three nondestructive sampling techniques for thrips in mango inflorescences.–J. Econ. Entomol. 103: 631–640, 2010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker N.R., Rosenqvist E.: Application of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities.–J. Exp. Bot. 55: 1607–1621, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barron-Gafford G.A., Grieve K.A., Murthy R.: Leaf- and standlevel responses of a forested mesocosm to independent manipulations of temperature and vapour pressure deficit.–New Phytol. 174: 614–625, 2007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Björkman O., Demmig B.: Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 k among vascular plants of diverse origins.–Planta 170: 489–504, 1987.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamchaiyaporn T., Jutamanee K., Kasemsap P. et al.: Selection of the most appropriate coating particle film for improving photosynthesis in mango.–Kasetsart J. 47: 323–332, 2013.Google Scholar
  7. Einhorn K.S., Rosenqvist E., Leverenz J.W.: Photoinhibition in seedlings of fraxinus and fagus under natural light conditions: implications for forest regeneration?–Oecologia 140: 241–251, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Flexas J., Bota J., Cifre J. et al.: Understanding down-regulation of photosynthesis under water stress future prospects and searching for physiological tools for irrigation management.–Ann. Appl. Biol. 144: 273–283, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flowers M.D., Fiscus E.L., Burkey K.O. et al.: Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and yield of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes differing in sensitivity to ozone.–Environ. Exp. Bot. 61: 190–198, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Genty B., Briantais J.M., Baker N.R.: The relationship between quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence.–Biochim. Biophys. Acta 990: 87–92, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goh C.H., Ko S.M., Koh S. et al.: Photosynthesis and environments: photoinhibition and repair mechanisms in plants.–J. Plant Biol. 55: 93–101, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goudriaan J., van Laar H.H.: Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes. Pp. 238. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht–Boston–London 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ibrahim M.H., Jaafar H.Z.E.: Photosynthetic capacity, photochemical efficiency and chlorophyll content of three varieties of Labisia pumila Benth. exposed to open field and greenhouse growing conditions.–Acta Physiol. Plant. 33: 2179–2185, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jifon J.L., Syvertsen J.P.: Moderate shade can increase net gas exchange and reduce photoinhibition in citrus leaves.–Tree Physiol. 23: 119–127, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Juntamanee K., Onnom S., Yingjajaval S. et al.: Leave photosynthesis and fruit quality of mango growing under field or plastic roof condition.–Acta Hortic. 975: 415–420, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kamaluddin M., Grace J.: Photoinhibition and light acclimation in seedlings of Bischofia javanica, a tropical forest tree from Asia.–Ann. Bot.-London 69: 47–52, 1992.Google Scholar
  17. Kitao M., Lei T.T., Koike T. et al.: Susceptibility to photoinhibition of three deciduous broadleaf tree species with different successional traits raised under various light regimes.–Plant Cell Environ. 23: 81–89, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krall J.P., Edwards G.E.: Relationship between photosystem II activity and CO2 fixation in leaves.–Physiol. Plantarum 86: 180–187, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maxwell K., Johnson G.N.: Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide.–J. Exp. Bot. 51: 659–668, 2000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Medina C.L., Souza R.P., Machado E.C. et al.: Photosynthetic response of citrus grown under reflective aluminized polypropylene shading nets.–Sci. Hortic.-Amsterdam 96: 115–125, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Montanaro G., Dichio B., Lang A. et al.: Internal versus external control of calcium nutrition in kiwifruit.–J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 177: 819–830, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Montanaro G., Dichio B., Lang A. et al.: Fruit calcium accumulation coupled and uncoupled from its transpiration in kiwifruit.–J. Plant Physiol. 181: 67–74, 2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Montanaro G., Dichio B., Xiloyannis C.: Shade mitigates photoinhibition and enhances water use efficiency in kiwifruit under drought.–Photosynthetica 47: 363–371, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Montanaro G., Dichio B., Xiloyannis C., Celano G.: Light influences transpiration and calcium accumulation in fruit of kiwifruit plants (Actinidia deliciosa var. deliciosa).–Plant Sci. 170: 520–527, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Monteith J.L.: A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity.–Plant Cell Environ. 18: 357–364, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nicolás E., Torrecillas A., Dell Amico J., Alarcón J.J.: Sap flow, gas exchange, and hydraulic conductance of young apricot trees growing under a shading net and different water supplies.–J. Plant Physiol. 162: 439–447, 2005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pettigrew W.T., Hesketh J.D., Peters D.B. et al.: A vapour pressure deficit effect on crop canopy photosynthesis.–Photosynth. Res. 24: 27–34, 1990.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Phattarlerphong J.: [Photosynthetic Light Response at Various Leaf Ages in Two Mango Cultivars.]–MSc. Thesis, Kasetsart University, Thailand 1997. [In Thai]Google Scholar
  29. Shirke P.A., Pathre U.V.: Influence of leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit (VPD) on the biochemistry and physiology of photosynthesis in Prosopis juliflora.–J. Exp. Bot. 55: 2111–2120, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Snelgar W.P., Hopkirk G.: Effect of overhead shading on yield and fruit-quality of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa).–J. Hortic. Sci. 63: 731–742, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Syvertsen J.P., Goñi C., Otero A.: Fruit load and canopy shading affect leaf characteristics and net gas exchange of ‘spring’ navel orange trees.–Tree Physiol. 23: 899–906, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tezara W., Martínez D., Rengifo E. et al.: Photosynthetic responses of the tropical spiney shrub Lycium nodosum (Solanaceae) to drought, soil salinity and salt spray.–Ann. Bot.-London 92: 757–765, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tucci M.L.S, Erismann N.M., Machado E.C. et al.: Diurnal and seasonal variation in photosynthesis of peach palms grown under subtropical conditions.–Photosynthetica 48: 421–429, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vasilev S., Wiebe S., Bruce D.: Non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in photosynthesis. 5-hydroxy-1, 4- naphthoquinone in spinach thylakoids as a model for antenna based quenching mechanisms.–Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1363: 147–156, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Veres S., Tóth V.R. Láposi R. et al.: Carotenoid composition and photochemical activity of four sandy grassland species.–Photosynthetica 44: 255–261, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhou S.B., Liu K., Zhang D. et al.: Photosynthetic performance of Lycoris radiata var. radiate to shade treatments.–Photosynthetica 48: 241–248, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institute of Experimental Botany 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botany, Faculty of ScienceKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Better Pharma Co., Ltd.Vibhavadi Rangsit RdLaksi, BangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations