Advertisement

Photosynthetica

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 288–294 | Cite as

The effect of methanol on photosynthetic parameters of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under water deficit

  • N. Armand
  • H. Amiri
  • A. Ismaili
Original papers
  • 215 Downloads

Abstract

Water availability is the main factor limiting crop growth and productivity in dry regions. This study was carried out in order to determine the effect of spraying methanol solution on the photosynthetic characteristics of bean plants. The main aim of our experiment was to improve plant performance under stress caused by water shortage. Two factors were involved: water-deficit stress, such as severe stress (25% of field capacity), mild stress (75% of field capacity), and no stress (100% of field capacity), and application of methanol solution spray at four concentrations: control (without spraying), 10, 20, and 30%. Methanol was applied three times at different growth stages (seedling, flowering, and podding stage) in 10-d intervals. The treatment with 20% methanol at the seedling stage resulted in increased net photosynthesis (P N), intercellular CO2 concentration (C i), and decreased transpiration rate (E) under no stress and mild stress conditions. Under severe stress, 10 and 20%-methanol treatments resulted in increased C i, maximal quantum yield of PSII photochemistry, and decreased E. At the flowering stage, methanol treatments resulted in decreased E and increased C i under mild and severe stress. At the podding stage, 10 and 20%-methanol treatments resulted in increased P N, C i, and total chlorophyll content under mild stress. In conclusion, we suggested that foliar application of methanol had a positive role in enhancing photosynthetic performance.

Additional key words

chlorophyll fluorescence gas exchange maximal quantum yield of PSII physiological characteristics 

Abbreviations

Chl

chlorophyll

Ci

intercellular CO2 concentration

CK

control without methanol

E

transpiration rate

Fv/Fm

maximal quantum yield of PSII photochemistry

M10

10% methanol treatment

M20

20% methanol treatment

M30

30% methanol treatment

MS

mild water stress

NS

no water stress

PN

net photosynthetic rate

ROS

reactive oxygen species

RuBP

ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate

S1

seedling stage

S2

early flowering stage

S3

early podding stage

SS

severe water stress

TChl

total chlorophyll content

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anyia A.O., Herzog H.: Water use efficiency, leaf area and leafgas exchange of cowpeas under mid-season drought. — Eur. J. Agron. 20: 327–339, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadpour R., Hosseinzadeh S.R., Armand N., Fani E.: [Effect of methanol on germination characteristics of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) under drought stress.] — Iranian J. Seed Res. 2: 83–96. [In Persian]Google Scholar
  3. Cakmak I.: The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. — J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sc. 168: 521–530, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman H.D., Pratt P.F.: Methods of Analysis for Soil, Plants and Water. Pp. 409–428. University of California, Berkeley 1961.Google Scholar
  5. Dorri H.R.: [Bean agronomy.] — In: Ahmadi A. (ed.): [Publication Series of Research Center of Bean.] Pp. 46. Khomein 2008. [In Persian]Google Scholar
  6. Downie A., Miyazaki S., Bohnert H. et al.: Expression profiling of the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to methanol stimulation. — Phytochemistry 65: 2305–2316, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Farzad P., Mohammad N., Moghadam H.R.T. et al.: Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, chlorophyll content and grain yield of wheat cultivars. — J. Biol. Sci. 7: 841–847, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flexas J., Medrano H.: Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3-plants: Stomatal and non-stomatal limitation revisited. — Ann. Bot.-London 183: 183–189, 2008.Google Scholar
  9. Ganjeali A., Porsa H., Bagheri A.: Assessment of Iranian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasms for drought tolerance. — Agr. Water Manage. 98: 1477–1484, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gates D.M.: Transpiration and leaf temperature. — Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 19: 211–238, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giorio P.: Black leaf-clips increased minimum fluorescence emission in clipped leaves exposed to high solar radiation during dark adaptation. — Photosynthetica 49: 371–379, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gout E., Aubert S., Bligny R. et al.: Metabolism of methanol in plant cells. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance studies. — Plant. Physiol. 123: 287–296, 2000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Hosseinzadeh S.R., Salimi A., Ganjeali A. et al.: [Effects of foliar application of methanol on photosynthetic characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress.] — Iran J. Plant Biol. 5: 115–132, 2014. [In Persian]Google Scholar
  14. Hosseinzadeh S.R., Salimi A., Ganjeali A. et al.: Effects of foliar application of methanol on growth and root characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress. — Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 2: 1697–1702, 2012.Google Scholar
  15. Hosseinzadeh S.R., Amiri H., Ismaili A.: Effect of vermicompost fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress. — Photosynthetica 54: 87–92, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu Y.C., Schmidhalter U.: Drought and salinity: a comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. — J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sc. 168: 541–549, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ismaili A., Salavati A., Mohammadi P.P.: A comparative proteomic analysis of responses to high temperature stress in hypocotyl of canola (Brassica napus L.). — Protein Peptide Lett. 22: 285–299, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson J.D., Tognetti T., Paris P.: Water relations and gas exchange in poplar and willow under water stress and elevated atmospheric CO2. — Physiol. Plantarum 115: 93–100, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karimi S., Yadollahi A., Arzani K. et al.: Gas-exchange response of almond genotypes to water stress. — Photosynthetica 53: 29–34, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khoshbakht D., Ghorbani A., Baninasab B. et al.: Effects of supplementary potassium nitrate on growth and gas-exchange characteristics of salt-stressed citrus seedlings. — Photosynthetica 52: 589–596, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu M.H., Yi L.T., Yu S.Q. et al.: Chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and the growth response of Elaeocarpus glabripetalus to simulated acid rain. — Photosynthetica 53: 23–28, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu Q., Lu C., Zhang J. et al.: Photosynthesis and chlorophyll a fluorescence during flag leaf senescence of field-grown wheat plants. — J. Plant. Physiol. 159: 1173–1178, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Makhdum I.M., Malik M.N.A., Din S. et al.: Physiological response of cotton to methanol foliar application. — J. Res. Pak. 13: 37–43, 2002.Google Scholar
  24. Maxwell K., Johnson G.N.: Chlorophyll fluorescence — a practical guide. — J. Exp. Bot. 51: 659–668, 2000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nemecek-Marshall M., MacDonald R.C., Franzen J.J. et al.: Methanol emission from leaves: enzymatic detection of gas-phase methanol and relation of methanol fluxes to stomatal conductance and leaf development. — Plant. Physiol. 108: 1359–1368, 1995.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Osuagwu G.G.E., Edeoga H.O., Osuagwu A.N.: The influence of water stress on the mineral and vitamin potential of the leaves of Ocimum gratissimum (L). — Rec. Res. Sci. Technol. 2: 27–33, 2010.Google Scholar
  27. Pagter M., Bragato C., Brix H.: Tolerance and physiological responses of Phragmites australis to water deficit. — Aquat. Bot. 81: 285–299, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rahbarian R., Khavari-nejad R., Ganjeali A. et al.: Drought stress effects on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and water relations in tolerant and susceptible chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. — Acta. Biol. Cracov. Bot. 53: 47–56, 2011.Google Scholar
  29. Ramadan T., Omran Y.A.M.M.: The effects of foliar application of methanol on productivity and fruit quality of grapevine cv. Flame Seedles. — Vitis 44: 11–16, 2005.Google Scholar
  30. Ramírez I., Dorta F., Espinoza V. et al.: Effects of foliar and root applications of methanol on the growth of Arabidopsis, tobacco and tomato plants. — Plant Growth Regul. 25: 30–44, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SafarzadeVishgahi M., Noormohammadi G.H., Majidi A. et al.: Effect of methanol on the growth function peanuts. — Special Issue. J. Agri. Sci. 1: 102–187, 2008.Google Scholar
  32. Sicher R., Bunce J., Barnaby J. et al.: Water-deficiency effects on single leaf gas exchange and on C4 pathway enzymes of maize genotypes with differing abiotic stress tolerance. — Photosynthetica 53: 3–10, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sikder S., Foulkes J., West H. et al.: Evaluation of photosynthetic potential of wheat genotypes under drought condition. — Photosynthetica 53: 47–54, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zlatev Z.S., Yordanov I.T.: Effects of soil drought on photo-synthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in bean plants. — Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 30: 3–18, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institute of Experimental Botany 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, College of SciencesLorestan UniversityKhorramabadIran
  2. 2.Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of AgricultureLorestan UniversityKhorramabadIran

Personalised recommendations