, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 595–601 | Cite as

Leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and growth responses of Melaleuca alternifolia seedlings to flooding and subsequent recovery

  • Y. X. JingEmail author
  • G. L. Li
  • B. H. Gu
  • D. J. Yang
  • L. Xiao
  • R. X. Liu
  • C. L. Peng


Periodic flooding of trees in tropical floodplains and reservoirs where water levels fluctuate is a common phenomenon. The effects of flooding and subsequent recovery on gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and growth responses of Melaleuca alternifolia seedlings, a tall shrub species used in floodplain and reservoir forest restoration in southern China, were studied during a grow season (from March to December in 2007). M. alternifolia seedlings were flooded for 180 days, drained and left to recover for another 60 days. Survival rates of the seedlings were 100% during the 180-day flooding period. Chlorophyll (Chl) content, net photosynthetic rate (P N), stomatal conductance (g s), and transpiration rate (E) of the flooded seedlings were all significantly lower than those of the control. Significant reductions of photochemical quenching coefficient (qp) and increases of nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) in the flooded seedlings were observed. However, there were no significant differences in the maximal quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) between treatments. All seedlings survived during the two-month recovery period after the flooded treatment was drained, and the biomass and height of the recovered seedlings approached those of the control at the end of the experiment. During the first-month recovery period, Chl content, P N, g s and E in the recovered seedlings were all obviously low, then increased gradually and rose to the levels similar to the control by the end of the experiment. Quenching analysis revealed significant reductions of qp and increments of NPQ in the recovered seedlings at the beginning of draining, and a nearly complete recovery for both parameters by the end of the experiment. However, Fv/Fm of the recovered seedlings did not differ significantly from the control during the recovery period. Our study demonstrated that M. alternifolia seedlings can survive and grow through 180 days of flooding with a subsequent 60-day recovery period in drained conditions, indicating that seedlings of this species would be suitable for afforestation in areas exposed to intermittent flooding.

Additional key words

chlorophyll fluorescence flooding leaf gas exchange Melaleuca alternifolia recovery 





transpiration rate


maximal quantum yield of PSII photochemistry


stomatal conductance


nonphotochemical quenching


net photosynthetic rate


photochemical quenching coefficient


photosynthetic photon flux density


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was financed by Guangdong key problems project (No. 2005B33302014).


  1. Armstrong, J., Armstrong, W.: Rice and Phragmites: effects of organic acids on growth, root permeability, and radial oxygen loss to the rhizosphere. — Am. J. Bot. 88: 1359–1370, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, M.C., Butterworth, J.A., Roden, J.S., Christian, R., Egerton, J.J.G.: Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence to forest ecology. — Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22: 311–319, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolton, K.G.E., Greenway, M.: A feasibility study of Melaleuca trees for use in constructed wetlands in subtropical Australia. — Water Sci. Technol. 35: 247–254, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. Bolton, K.G.E., Greenway, M.: Pollutant removal capability of a constructed Melaleuca wetland receiving primary settled sewage. — Water Sci. Technol. 39: 199–206, 1999a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolton, K.G.E., Greenway, M.: Nutrient sinks in a constructed Melaleuca wetland receiving secondary treated effluent. — Water Sci. Technol. 40: 341–347, 1999b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gravatt, D. A., Kirby, C. J.: Patterns of photosynthesis and starch allocation in seedlings of four bottomland hardwood tree species subjected to flooding. — Tree Physiol. 18: 411–417, 1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall, T.F., Smith, G.E.: Effects of flooding on woody plants, West Sandy dewatering project, Kentucky reservoir. — J. Forest 53: 281–285, 1955.Google Scholar
  8. Iwanaga, F., Yamamoto, F.: Effects of flooding depth on growth, morphology and photosynthesis in Alnus japonica species. — New Forests 35: 1–14, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Islam, M.A., Macdonald, S.E.: Ecophysiological adaptations of black spruce (Picea mariana) and tamarack (Larix laricina) seedlings to flooding. — Trees. 18: 35–42, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. James, R.A., Rivelli, A.R., Munns, R., von Caemmerer, S.: Factors affecting CO2 assimilation, leaf injury and growth in salt-stressed durum wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 29: 1393–1403, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, D.T., Sah, J.P., Ross, M.S., Oberbauer, S.F., Hwang, B., Jayachandran, K.: Responses of twelve tree species common in Everglades tree islands to simulated hydrologic regimes. — Wetlands. 26: 830–844, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kozlowski, T.T.: Physiological-ecological impacts of flooding on riparian forest ecosystems. — Wetlands. 22: 550–561, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kozlowski, T. T., Pallardy, S. G.: Acclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stresses. — Bot. Rev. 68: 270–334, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kozlowski, T.T.: Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. — Tree Physiol. Monogr. 1: 1–29, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. Kramer, K., Vreugdenhil, S.J., van der Werf, D.C.: Effects of flooding on the recruitment, damage and mortality of riparian tree species: A field and simulation study on the Rhine floodplain. — Wetlands Ecol. Manage 255: 3893–3903, 2008.Google Scholar
  16. Lavinsky, A.O., De Souza Sant’Ana, C., Mielke, M.S., De Almeida, A.F., Gomes, F.P., França, S., Da Costa Silva, D.: Effects of light availability and soil flooding on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Genipa americana L. seedlings. — New Forests 34: 41–50, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lichtenthaler, H.K., Wellburn, A.R.: Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. — Biochem. Soc. Trans. 11: 591–592, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. Loucks, W.L., Keen, R.A.: Submersion tolerance of selected seedling trees. — J. Forest. 71: 496–497, 1973.Google Scholar
  19. Mielke, M.S., De Almeida, A.-A.F., Gomes, F.P., Aguilar, M.A.G., Mangabeira, P.A.O.: Leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and growth responses of Genipa americana seedlings to soil flooding. — Environ. Exp. Bot. 50: 221–231, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maxwell, K., Johnson, G.N.: Chlorophyll fluorescence — a practical guide. — J. Exp. Bot. 51: 659–668, 2000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Naumann, J. C., Young, D. R., Anderson, J. E.: Leaf chlorophyll fluorescence, reflectance, and physiological response to freshwater and saltwater flooding in the evergreen shrub, Myrica cerifera. — Environ. Exp. Bot.63:402–409, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pang, J.Y., Cuin, T., Shabala, L., Zhou, M.X., Mendham, N., Shabala, S.: Effect of secondary metabolites associated with anaerobic soil conditions on ion fluxes and electrophysiology in barley roots. — Plant Physiol. 145: 266–276, 2007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Parolin, P.: Morphological and physiological adjustments to waterlogging and drought in seedlings of Amazonian floodplain trees. — Oecologia. 128:326–335, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parolin, P., Armbruester, N., Junk, W.J.: Two Amazonian floodplain trees react differently to periodical flooding. — Trop. Ecol. 47: 243–250, 2006.Google Scholar
  25. Pezeshki, S.R.: Plant response to flooding. — In: Wilkinson, R. E. (ed.): Plant-Environment Interactions. Pp. 289–321. Marcel Dekker, New York — Basel — Hong Kong 1994.Google Scholar
  26. Pezeshki, S.R., Pardue, J.H., DeLaune, R.D.: Leaf gas exchange and growth of flood-tolerant and flood-sensitive tree species under low soil redox conditions. — Tree Physiol. 16: 453–458, 1996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pezeshki, S.R., DeLaune, R.D.: Responses of seedlings of selected woody species to soil oxidation-reduction conditions. — Environ. Exp. Bot. 40:123–133, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Senagomes, A.R., Kozlowski, T.T.: Responses of Melaleuca quinquenervia seedlings to flooding. — Physiol. Plant. 49:373–377, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Senagomes, A.R., Kozlowski, T. T.: Physiological and growth responses to flooding of seedlings of Hevea brasiliensis. — Biotropica 20: 286–293, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stewart, J. R., Landes, R. D., Koeser, A. K., Pettay, A. L.: Net photosynthesis and growth of three novel woody species under water stress: Calycanthus occidentalis, Fraxinus anomala, and Pinckneya pubens. — Hortscience 42: 1341–1345, 2007.Google Scholar
  31. Tsukahara, H., Kozlowski, T.T.: Importance of adventitious roots to growth of flooded Platanus occidentalis seedlings. — Plant and Soil. 88: 123–132, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yamamoto, F., Sakata, T., Terazawa, K.: Physiological, morphological and anatomical responses of Fraxinus mandshurica seedlings to flooding. — Tree Physiol. 15: 713–719, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. X. Jing
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. L. Li
    • 1
  • B. H. Gu
    • 2
  • D. J. Yang
    • 3
  • L. Xiao
    • 1
  • R. X. Liu
    • 1
  • C. L. Peng
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Science in Guangdong Higher Education, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, College of Life ScienceSouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouP. R. China
  2. 2.Southwest Florida Research & Education CenterUniversity of FloridaFloridaUSA
  3. 3.Guangzhou Research Academy of Environmental ProtectionGuangzhouP. R. China

Personalised recommendations