, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 291–293 | Cite as

Leaf area prediction model for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars

Brief Communication


In two successive years (2003 and 2004), a set of 16 commercial sugar beet cultivars was established in Randomized Complete Block experiments at two sites in central Greece. Cultivar combination was different between years, but not between sites. Leaf sampling took place once during the growing season and leaf area, LA [cm2], leaf midvein length, L [cm] and maximum leaf width, W [cm] were determined using an image analysis system. Leaf parameters were mainly affected by cultivars. Leaf dimensions and their squares (L2, W2) did not provide an accurate model for LA predictions. Using L×W as an independent variable, a quadratic model (y = 0.003 x2 − 1.3027 x + 296.84, r 2 = 0.970, p<0.001, n = 32) provided the most accurate estimation of LA. With compromises in accuracy, the linear relationship between L×W and LA (y = 0.5083 x + 31.928, r 2 = 0.948, p<0.001, n = 32) could be used as a prediction model thanks to its simplicity.

Additional key words

leaf length leaf width morphology non-destructive methods 



analysis of variance


leaf midvein length


leaf area


leaf area index


maximum leaf width


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bhatt, M., Chanda, S.V.: Prediction of leaf area in Phaseolus vulgaris by non-destructive method.-Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 29: 96–100, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. Bosemark, N.O.: Genetics and breeding.-In: Cooke, D.A., Scott, R.K. (ed.): The Sugar Beet Crop: Science into Practice. Pp. 67–119. Chapman & Hall, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993.Google Scholar
  3. Camargo Neto, J., Meyer, G.E., Jones, D.D., Samal, A.K.: Plant species identification using Elliptic Fourier leaf shape analysis.-Comp. electron. Agr. 50: 121–134, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cristofori, V., Rouphael, Y., Mendoza-de Gyves, E., Bignami, C.: A simple model for estimating leaf area of hazelnut from linear measurements.-Sci. Hort. 113: 221–225, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du, J.X., Wang, X.F., Zhang, G.J.: Leaf shape based plant species recognition.-Appl. Math. Comput. 185: 883–893, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gamper, H.: Nondestructive estimates of leaf area in white clover using predictive formulae: The contribution of genotype identity to trifoliate leaf area.-Crop Sci. 45: 2552–2556, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goudriaan, J., van Laar, H.H.: Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes.-Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht 1994.Google Scholar
  8. Iwata, H., Nesumi, H., Ninomiya, S., Takano, Y., Ukai, Y.: Diallel analysis of leaf shape variations of citrus varieties based on Elliptic Fourier descriptors.-Breed. Sci. 52: 89–94, 2002a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Iwata, H., Nesumi, H., Ninomiya, S., Takano, Y., Ukai, Y.: The evaluation of genotype × environment interactions of citrus leaf morphology using image analysis and Elliptic Fourier descriptors.-Breed. Sci. 52: 243–251, 2002b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Iwata, H., Ukai, Y.: SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on Elliptic Fourier descriptors.-J. Heredity 93: 384–385, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kessler, S., Sinha, N.: Shaping up: the genetic control of leaf shape.-Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7: 65–72, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Květ, J., Marshall, J.K.: Assessment of leaf area and other assimilating plant surfaces.-In: Šesták, Z., Čatský, J., Jarvis, P.G. (ed.): Plant Photosynthetic Production. Manual of Methods. Pp. 517–555. Dr W. Junk Publ., The Hague 1971.Google Scholar
  13. Lu, H.-Y., Lu, C.-T., Wei, M.-L., Chan, L.-F.: Comparison of different models for nondestructive leaf area estimation in taro.-Agron. J. 96: 448–453, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. Mendoza-de Gyves, E., Rouphael, Y., Cristofori, V., Mira, F.R.: A non-destructive, simple and accurate model for estimation of the individual leaf area of kiwi (Actinidia deliciosa).-Fruits 62: 1–7, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ober, E.S., Le Bloa, M., Clark, C.J.A., Royal, A., Jaggard, K.W., Pidgeon, J.D.: Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet.-Field Crops Res. 91: 231–249, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ober, E.S., Luterbacher, M.C.: Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Beta vulgaris.-Ann. Bot. 89: 917–924, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Fanasca, S., Karam, F.: Leaf area estimation of sunflower leaves from simple linear measurements.-Photosynthetica 45: 306–308, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rouphael, Y., Rivera, C.M., Cardarelli, M., Fanasca, S., Colla, G.: Leaf area estimation from linear measurements in zucchini plants of different ages.-J. hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 81: 238–241, 2006.Google Scholar
  19. Salerno, A., Rivera, C.M., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Cardarelli, M., Pierandrei, F., Rea, E., Saccardo, F.: Leaf area estimation of radish from simple linear measurements.-Adv. hortic. Sci. 19: 213–215, 2005.Google Scholar
  20. Scott, R.K., Jaggard, K.W.: Crop physiology and agronomy.-In: Cooke, D.A., Scott, R.K. (ed.): The Sugar Beet Crop: Science into Practice. Pp. 179–237. Chapman & Hall, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993.Google Scholar
  21. Serdar, Ü., Demirsoy, H.: Non-destructive leaf area estimation in chestnut.-Sci. Hort. 108: 227–230, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stewart, D.W., Dwyer, L.M.: Mathematical characterization of leaf shape and area of maize hybrids.-Crop Sci. 39: 422–427, 1999.Google Scholar
  23. Tsialtas, J.T., Maslaris, N.: Leaf area estimation in a sugar beet cultivar by linear models.-Photosynthetica 43: 477–479, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hellenic Sugar Industry SAGreece
  2. 2.Department of ExperimentationLarissa factoryLarissa, Hellas
  3. 3.Agronomic Research ServiceSindos, Hellas

Personalised recommendations