Advertisement

Photosynthetica

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 227–234 | Cite as

Shade effect alters leaf pigments and photosynthetic responses in Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) grown under field conditions

  • M. Bertamini
  • K. Muthuchelian
  • N. NedunchezhianEmail author
Article

Abstract

The contents of chlorophyll (Chl) and carotenoids (Car) per fresh mass were lower in shade needles than in sun needles. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPC) activity and contents of soluble proteins were also significantly lower in shade needles. In isolated thylakoids, a marked lower rate of whole chain and photosystem (PS) 2 activities were observed in shade needles. Smaller lower rate of PS1 activity was also observed in shade needles. The artificial exogenous electron donors, diphenyl carbazide (DPC) and NH2OH, significantly restored the loss of PS2 activity in shade needles. Similar results were obtained when Fv/Fm was evaluated by Chl fluorescence measurements. The marked lower rate of PS2 activity in shade needles was due to the lower contents of 47, 33, 28–25, 23, and 17 kDa polypeptides. This conclusion was confirmed by immunological studies showing that the content of the 33 kDa protein of the watersplitting complex was diminished significantly in shade needles.

Additional key words

chlorophyll fluorescence diphenyl carbazide donor side electron transport NH2OH photosystems 1 and 2 polypeptides ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase 

Abbreviations

Car

carotenoid

Chl

chlorophyll

DCBQ

2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone

DCPIP

2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol

DPC

diphenyl carbazide

F0

minimal fluorescence

Fv

variable fluorescence

MV

methyl viologen

PAR

photosynthetic active radiation

PFD

photon flux density

PS

photosystem

RuBPC

ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase

SDS-PAGE

sodium dodecylsulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

SiMo

silicomolybdate

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allakhverdiev, S.I., Šetlíková, E., Klimov, V.V., Šetlík, I.: In phototoinhibited photosystem II particles pheophytin photoreduction remains unimpaired.-FEBS Lett. 226: 186–190, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J.M.: Photoregulation of the composition, function, and structure of thylakoid membranes.-Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 37: 93–136, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baig, M.J., Anand, A., Mandal, P.K., Bhatt, R.K.: Irradiance influences contents of photosynthetic pigments and proteins in tropical grasses and legumes.-Photosynthetica 43: 47–53, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berthhold, D.A., Babcock, G.T., Yocum, C.F.: A highly resolved, oxygen-evolving photosystem II preparation from spinach thylakoid membranes. EPR and electron-transport properties.-FEBS Lett. 134: 231–234, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. Björkman, O.: Responses to different quantum flux densities.-In: Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C.B., Ziegler, H. (ed.): Physiological Plant Ecology I. Pp. 57–107. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1981.Google Scholar
  6. Björkman, O., Ludlow, M.M., Morrow, P.A.: Photosynthetic performance of two rainforest species in their native habitat and analysis of their gas exchange.-Carnegie Inst. Washington Year Book 77: 94–102, 1972.Google Scholar
  7. Bjőrkman, O., Troughton, J., Nobs, M.: Photosynthesis in relation to leaf structure.-Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 25: 206–226, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. Boardman, N.K.: Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants.-Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28: 355–377, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boardman, N.K., Björkman, O., Anderson, J.M., Goodchild, D.J., Thorne, S.W.: Photosynthetic adaptation of higher plants to light intensity: Relationship between chloroplast structure, composition of the photosystems and photosynthetic rates.-In: Avron, M. (ed.): Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Photosynthesis. Vol. III. Pp. 1809–1827. Elsevier, Amsterdam-Oxford-New York 1975.Google Scholar
  10. Bradford, M.M.: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.-Anal. Biochem. 72: 248–254, 1976.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Burkey, K.O., Wilson, R.F., Wells, R.: Effects of canopy on the lipid composition of soybean leaves.-Physiol. Plant. 101: 591–598, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cao, J., Govindjee: Chlorophyll a fluorescence transient as an indicator of active and inactive Photosystem II in thylakoid membranes.-Biochim. biophys. Acta 1015: 180–188, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Charles-Edwards, D.A., Ludwig, L.J.: The basis of expression of leaf photosynthetic activities.-In: Marcelle, R. (ed.): Environmental and Biological Control of Photosynthesis. Pp. 37–44. Dr W. Junk Publ., The Hague 1975.Google Scholar
  14. Dzhibladze, T.G, Polesskaya, O.G, Alekhina, N.D, Egorova, E.A., Bukhov, N.G.: Redox states of photosystems I and II in irradiated leaves of wheat seedlings grown under different conditions of nitrogen nutrition.-Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 52: 141–146, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Enami, I., Kitamura, M., Tomo, T., Isokawa, Y., Ohta, H., Katoh, S.: Is the primary cause of thermal inactivation of oxygen evolution in spinach PS II membranes release of the extrinsic 33 kDa protein or of Mn?-Biochim. biophys. Acta 1186: 52–58, 1994.Google Scholar
  16. Evans, J.R.: The relationship between electron transport components and photosynthetic capacity in pea leaves grown at different irradiances.-Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 14: 157–170, 1987.Google Scholar
  17. Feng, Y.-L., Cao, K.-F., Zhang, J.-L.: Photosynthetic characteristics, dark respiration, and leaf mass per unit area in seedlings of four tropical tree species grown under three irradiances.-Photosynthetica 42: 431–437, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Golovko, T.K., Dymova, O.V., Tabalenkova, G.N.: The effect of light regime on source-sink relations in the shade-enduring Ajuga reptans plant.-Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 51: 604–608, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Govindjee, Papageorgiou, G.: Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: Fluorescence transients.-In: Giese, A.C. (ed.): Photophysiology. Vol. VI. Pp. 1–46. Academic Press, New York-London 1971.Google Scholar
  20. Green, B.R.: The chlorophyll-protein complexes of higher plant photosynthetic membranes or Just what green band is that?-Photosynth. Res. 15: 3–32, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffin, J.J., Ranney, T.G., Pharr, D.M.: Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and carbohydrate content of Illicium taxa grown under varied irradiance.-J. amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 129: 46–53, 2004.Google Scholar
  22. Krause, G.H., Weis, E.: Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics.-Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant mol. Biol. 42: 313–349, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laemmli, U.K.: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.-Nature 227: 680–685, 1970.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Laisk, A., Eichelmann, H., Oja, V., Rasulov, B., Padu, E., Bichele, I., Pettai, H., Kull, O.: Adjustment of leaf photosynthesis to shade in a natural canopy: rate parameters.-Plant Cell Environ. 28: 375–388, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leverenz, J.W.: Shade-shoot structure, photosynthetic performance in the field and photosynthetic capacity of evergreen conifers.-Tree Physiol. 19: 109–114, 1996.Google Scholar
  26. Lewandowska, M., Jarvis, P.G.: Changes in chlorophyll and carotenoid content, specific leaf area and dry weight fraction in Sitka spruce, in response to shading and season.-New Phytol. 79: 247–256, 1977.Google Scholar
  27. Lichtenthaler, H.K.: Adaptation of leaves and chloroplasts to high quanta fluence rates.-In: Akoyunoglou, G. (ed.): Photosynthesis. Vol. VI. Pp. 273–287. Balaban Int. Sci. Service, Philadelphia 1981.Google Scholar
  28. Lichtenthaler, H.K.: Chlorophylls and carotenoids-pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes.-In: Colowick, S.P., Kaplan, N.O. (ed.): Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 148. Pp. 350–382. Academic Press, San Diego-New York-Berkeley-Boston-London-Sydney-Tokyo-Toronto 1987.Google Scholar
  29. Lichtenthaler, H.K., Babani, F., Langsdorf, G., Buschmann, C.: Measurement of differences in red chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic activity between sun and shade leaves by fluorescence imaging.-Photosynthetica 38: 521–529, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lichtenthaler, H.K., Burkart, S.: Photosynthesis and high light stress.-Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 25: 3–16, 1999.Google Scholar
  31. Lichtenthaler, H.K., Kuhn, G., Prenzel, U., Meier, D.: Chlorophyll-protein levels and degree of thylakoid stacking in radish chloroplasts from high-light, low-light and bentazon-treated plants.-Physiol. Plant. 56: 183–188, 1982.Google Scholar
  32. Lichtenthaler, H.K., Meier, D., Buschmann, C.: Development of chloroplasts at high and low light quanta fluence rates.-Isr. J. Bot. 33: 185–194, 1984.Google Scholar
  33. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J.: Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.-J. biol. Chem. 193: 265–275, 1951.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Marek, M.V., Markova, I., Kalina, J., Janous, D.: An effect of thinning on photosynthetic characteristic of a Norway spruce canopy. II. Seasonal changes of photosynthetic pigment content.-Lesnictví-Forestry 43: 141–153, 1997.Google Scholar
  35. Marini, R.P., Marini, M.C.: Seasonal changes in specific leaf weight, net photosynthesis, and chlorophyll content of peach leaves as affected by light penetration and canopy position.-J. amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 108: 600–605, 1983.Google Scholar
  36. McClenden, J.H., McMillen, G.G.: The control of leaf morphology and the tolerance to shade by woody plants.-Bot. Gaz. 143: 79–83, 1982.Google Scholar
  37. Millner, P.A., Gogel, G., Barber, J.: Investigation of the spatial relationships between photosystem 2 polypeptides by reversible crosslinking and diagonal electrophoresis.-Photosynth. Res. 13: 185–198, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Misra, A.N., Biswal, U.C.: Changes in the content of plastid macromolecules during aging of attached and detached leaves, and of isolated chloroplasts of wheat seedlings.-Photosynthetica 16: 22–26, 1982.Google Scholar
  39. Muthuchelian, K., Paliwal, K., Gnanam, A.: Influence of shading on net photosynthesis, and transpiration rates, stomatal diffusive resistance, nitrate reductase and biomass productivity of a woody legume tree species (Erythrina variegata Lam).-Proc. indian Acad. Sci. 99: 539–546, 1989.Google Scholar
  40. Nedunchezhian, N., Kulandaivelu, G.: Effect of UV-B enhanced radiation on ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in leaves of Vigna sinensis L.-Photosynthetica 25: 431–435, 1991.Google Scholar
  41. Nedunchezhian, N., Morales, F., Abadia, A., Abadia, J.: Decline in photosynthetic electron transport activity and changes in thylakoid protein pattern in field grown iron deficient peach (Prunus persica L.).-Plant Sci. 129: 29–38, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nedunchezhian, N., Ravindran, K.C., Kulandaivelu, G.: Changes in photosynthetic apparatus during dark incubation of detached leaves from control and ultraviolet-B treated Vigna seedlings.-Biol. Plant. 37: 341–348, 1995.Google Scholar
  43. Nedunchezhian, N., Ravindran, K.C., Kulandaivelu, G.: Ultraviolet-B (280–320 nm) radiation induced changes in photosynthetic electron transport during aging of isolated Vigna chloroplasts.-Photosynthetica 32: 381–391, 1996.Google Scholar
  44. Priwitzer, T., Urban, O., Šprtová, M., Marek, M.V.: Chloroplastic carbon dioxide concentration in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) needles relates to the position within the crown.-Photosynthetica 35: 561–571, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seidler, A.: Expression of the 23 kDa protein from the oxygen-evolving complex of higher plants in Escherichia coli.-Biochim. biophys. Acta 1187: 73–79, 1994.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Senevirathna, A.M.W.K., Stirling, C.M., Rodrigo, V.H.L.: Growth, photosynthetic performance and shade adaptation of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) grown in natural shade.-Tree Physiol. 23: 705–712, 2003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Senger, H., Bauer, B.: The influence of light quality on adaptation and function of the photosynthetic apparatus.-Photochem. Photobiol. 45: 939–946, 1987.Google Scholar
  48. Šetlík, I., Allakhverdiev, S.I., Nedbal, L., Šetlíková, E., Klimov, V.V.: Three types of photosystem II photoinactivation. 1. Damaging processes on the acceptor side.-Photosynth. Res. 23: 39–48, 1990.Google Scholar
  49. Usuda, H., Ku, M.S.B., Edwards, G.E.: Influence of light intensity during growth on photosynthesis and activity of several key photosynthetic enzymes in a C4 plant (Zea mays).-Physiol. Plant. 63: 65–67, 1985.Google Scholar
  50. Woodman, J.N.: Variation of net photosynthesis within the crown of a large forest grown conifer.-Photosynthetica 5: 50–54, 1971.Google Scholar
  51. Woolhouse, H.W.: Regulation of senescence in the chloroplast.-In: Thomson, W.W., Nothnagel, E.A., Huffaker, R.C. (ed.): Plant Senescence: Its Biochemistry and Physiology. Pp. 132–145. Amer. Soc. Plant Physiologists, Rockville 1987.Google Scholar
  52. Wydrzynski, T., Govindjee: A new site of bicarbonate effect in photosystem II of photosynthesis: Evidence from chlorophyll fluorescence transients in spinach chloroplasts.-Biochim. biophys. Acta 387: 403–408, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Experimental Botany, ASCR 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Bertamini
    • 1
  • K. Muthuchelian
    • 2
  • N. Nedunchezhian
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Istituto Agrario di San Michele all’ AdigeSan Michele all’ AdigeItaly
  2. 2.Center for Biodiversity and Forest Studies, School of Energy SciencesMadurai Kamaraj UniversityMaduraiIndia

Personalised recommendations