Advertisement

A new argument for the phenomenal approach to personal persistence

  • Matt DuncanEmail author
Article

Abstract

When it comes to personal identity, two approaches have long ruled the roost. The first is the psychological approach, which has it that our persistence through time consists in the continuance of certain of our psychological traits, such as our memories, beliefs, desires, or personality. The second is the biological approach, according to which personal persistence consists in continuity in our physical or biological makeup. Amid the bipartite reign of these approaches, a third contender has emerged: the phenomenal approach. On this approach, personal persistence consists in continuity in phenomenal consciousness or the capacity for phenomenal consciousness. In this paper I will introduce and defend a new argument for the phenomenal approach. In the process, I will argue against the psychological and biological approaches. I will also address some lingering questions and outline further ways to develop the phenomenal approach.

Keywords

Personal identity Personal persistence Persons Identity Experience Phenomenal consciousness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Ross Cameron, Nina Emery, Mark Fiocco, Brie Gertler, Harold Langsam, Trenton Merricks, Paul Nedelisky, Adam Pautz, Nick Rimmel, Tomoji Shogenji, Jack Spencer, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and/or conversations on various versions of this paper.

References

  1. Bayne, T. (2010). The unity of consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayne, T., & Chalmers, D. (2003). What is the unity of consciousness? In A. Cleeremans (Ed.), The unity of consciousness: Binding, integration, and dissociation (pp. 23–58). Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carruthers, P. (2011). The opacity of mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dainton, B. (2008). The phenomenal self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dainton, B., & Bayne, T. (2005). Consciousness as a guide to personal persistence. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89(4), 549–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duncan, M. (2014). A challenge to anti-criterialism. Erkenntnis, 79(2), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duncan, M. (forthcoming). A renewed challenge to anti-criterialism. Erkenntnis.Google Scholar
  8. Duncan, M. (2015a). I think, therefore I persist. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(4), 740–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan, M. (2015b). We are acquainted with ourselves. Philosophical Studies, 172(9), 2531–2549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duncan, M. (2018). Subjectivity as self-acquaintance. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(3–4), 88–111.Google Scholar
  11. Duncan, M. (forthcoming). The self shows up in experience. Review of Philosophy and Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0355-2
  12. Evans, G. (2001). Self-identification. In A. Brook & R. DeVidi (Eds.), Self-reference and self-awareness (pp. 95–142). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster, J. (1991). The immaterial self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Gertler, B. (2011). Self-knowledge. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Howell, R. (2006). Self-knowledge and self-reference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72(1), 44–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James, W. (1952). The principles of psychology. Chicago: William Benton.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, D. (1976). Survival and identity. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), The identities of persons (pp. 17–40). Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Locke, J. (1689/1975). An essay concerning human understanding. In P. H. Nidditch (Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/NIDJLA-2.
  19. MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue (2nd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  20. Noonan, H. (1989). Personal identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. O’Brien, L. (2007). Self-knowing agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olson, E. (2007). What are we?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prinz, J. (2011). The sensory basis of cognitive phenomenology. In T. Bayne & M. Montague (Eds.), Cognitive phenomenology (pp. 174–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schechtman, M. (2011). The narrative self. In S. Gallagher (Ed.), The oxford handbook of the self (pp. 394–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Shoemaker, S. (1968). Self-reference and self-awareness. Journal of Philosophy, 65(19), 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shoemaker, S. (1985). Personal identity: A materialist account. In S. Shoemaker & R. Swinburne (Eds.), Personal identity (pp. 67–133). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, C. (1976). Responsibility for Self. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), The identities of persons (pp. 281–300). Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Thompson, J. J. (1987). Ruminations on an account of personal identity. In J. J. Thompson (Ed.), On being and saying: Essays for Richard Cartwright (pp. 215–240). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Unger, P. (1990). Identity, consciousness and value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Van Inwagen, P. (1990). Material beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Velleman, J. D. (2006). The self as narrator. In Self to self: Selected essays. Cambridge University Press, pp. 203–223. https://philpapers.org/rec/VELSTS-6.
  32. Williams, B. (1973). Problems of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rhode Island CollegeProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations