Advertisement

Defending truth values for indicative conditionals

  • Kelly Weirich
Article
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

There is strong disagreement about whether indicative conditionals have truth values. In this paper, I present a new argument for the conclusion that indicative conditionals have truth values based on the claim that some true statements entail indicative conditionals. I then address four arguments that conclude that indicative conditionals lack truth values, showing them to be inadequate. Finally, I present further benefits to having a worldly view of conditionals, which supports the assignment of truth values to indicative conditionals. I conclude that certain types of account of indicative conditionals, which have been ignored in the literature partly on the basis of assigning truth values to indicative conditionals, deserve consideration.

Keywords

Indicative conditionals Truth values Language Probability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to anonymous reviewers at Philosophical Studies for helpful and formative comments. Thanks to David Barnett and Graeme Forbes for extensive comments on previous versions of Sects. 2 and 3 and to Scott Weirich for helpful feedback.

References

  1. Adams, E. (1965). A logic of conditionals. Inquiry, 8, 166–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, E. (1975). The logic of conditionals. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, D. (2006). Zif is if. Mind, 115, 519–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, D. (2012). Future conditionals and DeRose’s thesis. Mind, 121, 407–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, J. (1988). Farewell to the phlogiston theory of conditionals. Mind, 97, 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, J. (1995). Classifying conditionals: The traditional way is right. Mind, 104, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackburn, S. (1986). How can we tell whether a commitment has a truth condition? In C. Travis (Ed.), Meaning and interpretation (pp. 201–232). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Burgess, J. P. (2004). Review of J. Bennett, A philosophical guide to conditionals. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 10, 565–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douven, I. (2008). The evidential support theory of conditionals. Synthese, 164(1), 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dudman, V. H. (1983). Tense and time in English verb-clusters of the primary pattern. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 3, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudman, V. H. (1984). Parsing ‘If’-sentences. Analysis, 4(4), 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edgington, D. (1986). Do conditionals have truth-conditions? In Jackson (Ed.), Conditionals (pp. 176–201). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Edgington, D. (1995). On conditionals. Mind, 104, 235–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis, B. (1969). An epistemological concept of truth. In R. Brown & C. D. Rollins (Eds.), Contemporary philosophy in Australia (pp. 52–72). London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. Gibbard, A. (1981). Two recent theories of conditionals. In Harper, Stalnaker, & Pearce (Eds.), Ifs (pp. 211–247). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  16. Hajek, A., & Hall, N. (1994). The hypothesis of the conditional construal of conditional probability. In E. Eells & B. Skyrms (Eds.), Probability and conditionals (pp. 75–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, F. (1990). Classifying conditionals. Analysis, 50, 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson, F. (1998). Mind, method and conditionals. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeffrey, R. (1964). “If” (abstract). Journal of Philosophy, 61, 702–703.Google Scholar
  20. Krzyżanowska, K., Wenmackers, S., & Douven, I. (2014). Rethinking Gibbard’s riverboat argument. Studia Logica, 102, 771–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis, D. (1976). Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities. Philosophical Review, 85, 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lycan, W. (2001). Real conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mackie, J. L. (1973). Truth, probability and paradox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  24. McDermott, M. (1996). On the truth conditions of certain ‘if’-sentences. Philosophical Review, 105, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nolan, D. (2003). Defending a possible-worlds account of indicative conditionals. Philosophical Studies, 116(3), 215–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pendlebury, M. (1989). The projection strategy and the truth conditions of conditional statements. Mind, New Series, 98(390), 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stalnaker, R. (1970). Probability and conditionals. Philosophy of Science, 37, 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Stalnaker, R. (2005). Conditional propositions and conditional assertions. In New work on modality. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 51.Google Scholar
  30. Weatherson, B. (2001). Indicatives and subjunctives. Philosophical Quarterly, 51, 200–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TacomaUSA

Personalised recommendations